Hello.
I have just discovered Nomic, and I am currently considering joining Agora
in order to get accustomed to the game and see how it's played. Should I?
How much will be expected of me? Is it better to be Watcher for a few weeks
and try to keep up anyway, or just dive in head first?
If I join,
Whatever happened to the Anarchist? As I understood it Bayes held it,
but was declared inactive and lost it, the Goethe nominated himself
for it. Has voting begun yet?
This could just be me not being a native English speaker, but I think
the form If xxx, than yyy is incorrect. It is found in two places in
the rules, R106 and R2198, and should probably read then instead of
than. Since the Rulekeepor can change these typos, it's not
necessary to submit proposals
Murphy wrote:
Tiger wrote:
I also vote FOR x2 the proposal in question.
(If this message causes the proposal to become democrating, and so
decreasing my voting limit to 1, the above papragraph is void and I
instead vote FOR x1)
You're not an eligible voter for proposal 6072, as you weren't
Geoffrey Spear wrote
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
The following proposals are made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly
duties. Said duties have not been performed within the tme limit, so I
hereby deputise for the office regarding this duty.
Proposal: Repeal R2147
Repeal Rule 2147
From the thread going on in Business right now:
---
On 2/9/09, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I contest the last 5 of these. Punishing em 6 times for what is
essentially the same inaction is manifestly unjust, and may break R101.
Alright, then I submit the following NoVs:
(snip)
---
The
2009/2/9 comex com...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
No it has to do with showing names/aliases. That's the name that shows up
in the archives themselves when no name outside of the actual address is
supplied.
Look at the archive list's
I read through the AAA contract, and as I understand it it's just for
me to join and request subsidization, and I will have a couple of
lands to start with? Anything tricky I should think about?
2009/3/2 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
I nominate Taral and comex for Accountor (low priority).
I nominate ais523 and Murphy for Tailor (low priority).
I nominate Taral, comex, ais523, Murphy, OscarMeyr, Tiger,
and ehird for Conductor (high priority).
-Goethe
I decline the nomination
2009/3/2 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote:
I nominate myself for Anarchist (now *that* I can handle)
I nominate tiger for Anarchist (not wholly fair to make a new player/
officer who's doing a good job have to keep track of re-running).
(tiger, you
2009/2/26 agora-official-requ...@agoranomic.org:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6120 D 1 2.0 Murphy Increase the ticket ration
I vote FOR this proposal.
2009/3/3 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Tiger wrote:
6120 D 1 2.0 Murphy Increase the ticket ration
I vote FOR this proposal.
NttPF
I'm sorry, until now I thought I could just watch that being aid
everywhere and figure out what it meant on my own, but now that it's
said to
Oh, just realized I'm in the wrong forum. I guess it's something about
Public Forum, but I'd still like to know the exact acronym. Iäll
repost in business.
2009/3/3 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 14:53 +, Elliott Hird wrote:
2009/3/3 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
Any activity.
einos is run by our player Craig/Teucer, and since we can make it a
Protectorate we might as well.
The Ambassador handles
2009/3/3 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
2009/3/3 Benjamin Caplan celestialcognit...@gmail.com:
This seems like an excellent reason /for/ Agora to interfere.
R2147: ...Agora, being the superpower of nomics, has an inherent
responsibility to lead the nomic world; and ... Agora
2009/3/3 Taral tar...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
Voting for this one could be useful insurance against whatever Goethe is
trying. We already have H. Cassandra Goethe, don't make me a Cassandra
too...
Change amend to repeal, and I'll vote
6137 O 0 1.0 Tiger Ambassador Anarchy
AGAINST (probably invalid)
Why? Did I fail to use correct adoption index again?
Is Billy Pilgrim still around? As far as I can see e hasn't said
anything for over 2 weeks.
2009/3/8 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com:
Is Billy Pilgrim still around? As far as I can see e hasn't said
anything for over 2 weeks.
Er, no e isn't. Sorry for not reading through things before posting.
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend, without 3 objections, to flip the contestmaster of Brainfuck
Joust to None.
I intend, without 3 objections, to flip the contestmaster of Enigma to None.
I object to both of these.
2009/3/11 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 19:49 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
I agree to this contract.
(or is that how you say when you want to join the contest?)
Yep, that's correct. It isn't a contest yet, just an ordinary contract
atm; however, it's clearly intended
2009/3/12 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 15:12 +, Elliott Hird wrote:
2009/3/12 Alexander Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
ehird wrote (with top-posting corrected):
Blame the iPhone's lack of adequate text box movement.
On 2009-03-11, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
I vote the following way, on each proposal a number of times equal to
my voting limit on that proposal
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6140 D 1 2.0 Goethe reward contest activity
FOR
6141 D 1 3.0 coppro Fix 754
FOR
6143 D 0 2.0 Tiger Subsidy
Also, to reduce the risk of
transcription errors, please say no vote instead of snipping
proposals from the quoted material (as you did with 6142).
Will do.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 6164 (Ordinary, AI=1.0, Interest=1) by Yally
Low-priority Anarchism
Amend the first paragraph of rule 2216 (The Repeal-o-Matic) to read:
{
The Anarchist is a low-priority office; its holder is responsible for
2009/3/18 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
6164 O 1 1.0 Yally Low-priority Anarchism
8xAGAINST. I like my anarchy weekly.
-Goethe
As I understand it, it still will be. The paragraph The Anarchist's
weekly duties include the performance of the
following tasks(...) will
2009/3/18 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
I see no reason to leave an office, especially one with a weekly duty,
vacant for any longer than necessary. In fact, I'm not sure there's a
good reason not to require the IADoP to nominate as soon as possible
for all vacant offices rather than
2009/3/19 Warrigal ihope12...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
We should so join this, right?
I imagine it would be similar if Agora and B simply joined each other,
or at least if B joined Agora. I believe that BlogNomic
2009/3/22 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
The following proposal is made as a part of the Anarchist's weekly
duties.
Date of this message: Sun 22 Mar 09
Date of last fulfilment of these duties: Sat 14 Mar 09
Proposal: Speaker Anarchy
So, if I want to make a proposal about us joining IN2, how should I
word it? Is referring to another nomic in the rules a good idea, or
should they be kept general?
2009/3/23 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 19:35 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/22 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 23:06 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote
Yes, but do they play? I can't find any message by anyone other than
kennercat...
2009/3/23 Charles Walker charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com:
Hey, I've just researched this again and not including me, there are 3
members: http://groups.google.com/group/fresh-nomic?pli=1
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at
2009/3/24 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
A humble request: can players (esp. newish players without email addresses
matching their nicknames) get in the habit of including their nick as a
signature? Used to be pretty much the done thing (for everyone, even the
old-timers) though might
2009/3/24 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com:
2009/3/24 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
A humble request: can players (esp. newish players without email addresses
matching their nicknames) get in the habit of including their nick as a
signature? Used to be pretty much the done
2009/3/24 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
[Looks like the proposal system is up for grabs]
I initiate two Agoran Decisions to choose the holder for each of the following
two offices. Each decision is identified by its office. The eligible voters
for each decision are the active players
2009/3/24 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
2009/3/24 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
A humble request: can players (esp. newish players without email addresses
matching their nicknames) get in the habit of including their nick as a
signature? Used to be pretty much the done
2009/3/24 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 22:26 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/3/24 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
2009/3/24 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
A humble request: can players (esp. newish players without email
addresses
matching
2009/3/24 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
Darth Cliche idles. Quorum becomes 1.
Okay, what is up with mixing up Agora and Blognomic?
--
-Tiger
2009/3/25 comex com...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
Add the following after the third section of rule 2148 (the ambassador):
If a foreign nomic allows for one player to join on behalf of Agora,
only the ambassador may do so
2009/3/25 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 19:12 +0100, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Okay, I guess I didn't really know exactly what was allowed since I
just read outline changes to the gamestate. The only thing I can see
that would stop it is that it requires higher power than
11. (Rating=4, Owner=null) Creating a new section is a Battle Action
with a cost of 2.
Exactly what is a section? I don't really get it, the rest of the
rules imply that players create rules against each other, but what you
can create is sections. How do you get war-rules into your sections?
--
2009/3/26 The PerlNomic Partnership perlno...@nomictools.com:
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6167 D 1 3.0 comex Foo
I vote AGAINST this proposal.
--
-Tiger
I wish to purchase a Digit Ranch. (Can I do that with those y-points I
got from Enigma?)
--
-Tiger
2009/3/31 comex com...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is something wrong that's easy to fix, please let me know so
that I can retract and edit.
It's not wrapped properly. :p
Yeah, those things are hard. Where should
2009/4/1 Ian Kelly ian.g.ke...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/31 comex com...@gmail.com:
It's not wrapped properly. :p
Yeah, those things are hard. Where should I put them, what is it
I'm actually delimiting
Is the idea even feasible? I am thinking somewhere along the lines of
the original Mornington Crescent, with all its nuances and strategies,
being played as a contest monitored by a few meta-rules. So a move
consists of a description of the move with things like Nice move,
I'll have to rethink
2009/4/6 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 22:33 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
Is the idea even feasible? I am thinking somewhere along the lines of
the original Mornington Crescent, with all its nuances and strategies,
being played as a contest monitored by a few meta-rules
2009/4/6 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 22:50 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
2009/4/6 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
Rather different from what you thought up, though; the old ruleset
looks like quite an interesting and fun ruleset for Mornington Crescent.
I can't
2009/4/6 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
2009/4/6 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com:
I can't be bothered to read all that, I'm sorry, but it's not at all
what I meant. From what I can see Mornington Nomic is more of a nomic
meant to look like a game of MC than a game
I vote:
6191 Joining other nomics, take 2 O 1.0 1 Tiger
FOR
6192 Loosen contest axes D 2.0 1 Murphy
FOR
6193 Grandfather Anarchy D 2.0 0 tiger
FOR
6194 Pragmatic Contestmaster Award Eligibility D 2.0 1 root
FOR
2009/4/8 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 14:38 -0400, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
To Tiger and ais523: Is there any particular logic to the way you came
up with these, or was it just a matter of trying until something
worked? The first two times this puzzle was submitted I tried
I vote:
6187 D1 3.0 coppro Instant Adoption
AGAINST
6188 D0 2.0 ais523 Fix the revocation bug
FOR
--
-Tiger
2009/4/16 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 19:18 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
There was one Enigma puzzle this week, Scales by Tiger:
A puzzle named Scales.
You have a balance scale and want to be able to measure any integer
number of ounces. Which is the biggest weight that
Well, I still want us to join. I won't submit the same proposal again,
but I don't think there was a good explanation from the ones voting
against. Are you just against the concept of Internomic, or is it
something in the proposal that I can change?
--
-Tiger
2009/4/17 comex com...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have been the contestmaster for at least 16 days, you MAY once,
otherwise you MAY not, so all the statements are illegal. I'm not
really sure about what the rest of 2234
2009/4/17 Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com:
2009/4/17 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com:
Well, I still want us to join. I won't submit the same proposal again,
but I don't think there was a good explanation from the ones voting
against. Are you just against the concept
2009/4/17 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
As if the ruleset has ever prevented a nomic...
A bad ruleset keeps certain people, who care about such things, from
joining. In this case, it's keeping Agora
2009/4/18 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
This post serves the purpose of resolving the Agoran Decision to choose the
holder of the Registrar office. The options were coppro, root, and Tiger.
The subject line says Herald.
--
-Tiger
I support all of these.
2009/4/20 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
Bring back the history, dammit.
I publish an NoV accusing Yally of violating
R1789, a Power-2 rule, by publishing a Registrar's Report
that failed to ensure that all know that Andre deregistered
in a Writ of FAGE.
I
2009/4/20 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Tiger wrote:
I request subsidization.
(I'm not sure about when points were last awarded, but from a quick
search in the scoreboards it seems the subsidy should have went up to
4 this week.)
Same here, though I suspect this fails because I
2009/4/20 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
I award 8+2i points to Murphy for harvesting 2 democratic proposals
and an ordinary proposal.
Tiger's request for subsidization in denied; e has 5 lands (3 ranches,
2 mills) and the subsidy is 4.
--SoA Wooble
Oh. That's right, it's lands, not
2009/4/20 comex com...@gmail.com:
[Completely off-topic: It's a week since vacation but I'm still trying
to find the time to publish a Lead Sheet. (hours, most likely...)
But if someone else wants to do it, I'll accept the rests for the last
few weeks.]
I'm trying to sort it out now. If you
2009/4/20 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Tiger wrote:
6211 Refactor appeals opinions O 1.7 1 comex
FORx2
Your caste is only 1.
I know.
--
-Tiger
2009/4/22 David Picón Álvarez da...@miradoiro.com:
I wish to be registered.
--David.
By whom?
--
-Tiger
http://einos-nomic.blogspot.com/
Einos has had a move activition, and now has a restriction on when
protective decrees take effect. It's pretty clear it's just to get
some kind of reaction, but the only thing coherent with our rules is
to disqualify it from being a protectorate, right?
--
-Tiger
2009/4/22 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:36 PM, 869850178 209745189 pr769...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Hi, I’m a gamer friend of Kerim (you call him Goethe) and he’s sometimes
talked about Agora. I played original Nomic in person with him a couple
times a few
2009/4/23 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 03:23 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
== CFJ 2461 ==
Caller: Nameless
Isn't it customary to refer to unknown CFJ applicants as Hillary Rodham
2009/4/23 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
coppro wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
I depitise for the conductor to publish the following report:
I transfer a prop from myself to Tiger for em sorting through nearly a
month's messages
2009/4/23 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
Admitted.
(is that all I have to do, or do I actually have to post an updated version?)
R2201 says you have to publish a revision (and in fact gives no legal
2009/4/24 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
C# D# F# G# A#
Player C D E F G A B Total
Db Eb Gb Ab Bb
2009/4/25 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:03, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
A public message is a message sent via a public forum, or sent
to a reserve forum if all public fora are not functional, or
sent to all players and
2009/4/26 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com
== CFJ 2464 ==
The PNP has more than one G# Note.
I accept H. Conductor Tiger's interpretation of the PNP's message
as until either half of a repetition fails rather than until a
2009/4/26 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
Registrar's Census
Date of last report: Sun, 19 Apr 09
Date of this report: Sun, 26 Apr 09
Date of last ratification: Fri, 04 Jul 08
Date of report last ratified: Sun, 29 Jun 08
(All times are UTC)
Recent events
-
Mon, 13
2009/4/27 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you please try to get this to make sense when read in the archives?
It's easy for the ones reading their mail in variable width to change to
set
width
2009/4/27 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
That report
has since ratified, and I can't find the message were you supposedly
changed it to A.
I changed my Key on April 20, in the same message I published the NoVs
against comex for failing to report on Notes.
Ah
2009/4/28 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
I agree to the following text:
{{
1. The Contract
The name of this public contract is 3-Scroll Rodney. Any player CAN join
or leave this contract by announcement. Any party CAN amend this
contract without member objection.
When this contract directs
2009/4/28 comex com...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk wrote:
ais235 3 3 3 5 8 5 19 0 3 2 2 2 55
I'm actually called ais523...
Can I be ais238?
I
2009/4/28 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 11:17 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
Per CFJ 2450, I award 96+96i points to comex.
Disclaimer: This message is an attempt to construct a paradox. Nothing
here is definitely false; but it may be confusing.
The following sentence is a Win
2009/4/28 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
Proposal: Reworking the Anarchist (AI = 1, II = 3)
The Anarchist's proposals are rarely accepted. This proposal proposes two
changes, both of which serve the purpose of having the Anarchist's proposals
actually be accepted. First, the
2009/4/28 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Yally wrote:
First, the Anarchist is given the power
to select the rules e wishes to repeal rather than having to randomly
select some (which will often net em with having rules that nobody wants
to repeal).
The whole point of the Anarchist is to
2009/4/28 Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
The Anarchist's proposals are rarely accepted. This proposal proposes two
changes, both of which serve the purpose of
I'm wondering about what constitutes gaining points for the purposes
of gaining notes - when someone wins by high score all points are
lowered, so that week almost noone has a net gain, but if it's
instantaneous gains that are counted then two players who are not
gaining points otherwise could
2009/5/2 Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com:
Sent from my iPhone
On May 1, 2009, at 6:32 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I nominate Tiger as Anarchist.
I nominate myself.
NttPF
--
-Tiger
2009/5/2 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/2 Quazie quazieno...@gmail.com:
Sent from my iPhone
On May 1, 2009, at 6:32 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I nominate Tiger
2009/5/2 comex com...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Benjamin Caplan
celestialcognit...@gmail.com wrote:
comex wrote:
Repeats: (a nonnegative integer, or infinity; default 1)
[...]
An Offer with zero Repeats is automatically destroyed.
As was pointed out on IRC, this won't
2009/5/2 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
[Summary: Each active non-scamster gets a bogus Rest, then the
scamsters take turns being the sole active Rest-free player for
Win by Solitude, then the bogus Rests are destroyed.]
ais523, comex, and coppro have agreed to a private contract allowing
2009/5/2 Taral tar...@gmail.com:
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 10:52 AM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
I CFJ on the statement:
* It is ILLEGAL to grant certain powers (in the ordinary-language
sense) and privileges to Agora's ambassador if one is not a nomic.
Clever. MAY vs may?
I'd say it's not
2009/5/2 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I destroy all of the Ribbons in the possession of Murphy, ais523,
coppro, and comex.
IMPOSSIBLE.
How?
--
-Tiger
2009/5/4 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 16:54, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I join the cookie jar and guess 15 proposals at 10 CFJs.
I join cookie jar. I guess 18 proposals and 14 CFJs.
BobTHJ
I guess 10 proposals and 11 CFJs.
--
-Tiger
2009/5/4 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 19:23, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
This report is governed by 3-Scroll Rodney, ac ontest. Full text is in
the Notary's monthly report, though it may be slightly out of date. If
you need to see the current text, contact me.
2009/5/5 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
I recuse myself.
== CFJ 2477
2009/5/5 Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn
jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote:
I harvest 2477 for Water Rights Vouchers.
Fails, CFJ2477 was assigned its ID over a week ago (you're about 12 hours
late)
Oops.
--
-Tiger
2009/5/5 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 00:52 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
I spend A C D to decrease Dvorak Herring's caste.
Fails, those don't form a triad. (A minor triad, which you would need,
is an interval of 3 semitones followed by an interval of 4 semitones.
What you
2009/5/5 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Tiger wrote:
I judge TRUE, publishing is clearly done by submitting them to a public
forum.
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this. On-time is arguably
meaningless outside the context of the player required to publish
the judgement. (The
2009/5/5 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Tiger wrote:
I judge TRUE, publishing is clearly done by submitting them to a public
forum.
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this. On-time is arguably
meaningless outside the context of the player required to publish
the judgement. (The
2009/5/5 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:13, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree to Nomic Wars III.
I flip the contestmaster of Nomic Wars III to BobTHJ.
BobTHJ
First you intend to do so, without 3 objections. Easier is perhaps to
amend
2009/5/5 Alex Smith ais...@bham.ac.uk:
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 21:43 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
A bug in rule 2136:
{{{
A contract's contestmaster CAN be flipped by any player without 3
objections, or as specified by the contract.
}}}
[That read contest's a while back, it must have
2009/5/5 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:39, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/5/5 Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:13, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree to Nomic Wars III.
I flip
2009/5/5 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:25 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com
wrote:
IADoP's Office Report
Does not include reports or duties. I nominate myself, Wooble, and
Goethe
2009/5/5 Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com:
Proposal: Close the contest loophole
(II = 0, please)
Amend Rule 2136 (Contests) by replacing this text:
A contract's contestmaster CAN be flipped by any player without 3
objections, or as specified by the contract.
with this text:
1 - 100 of 440 matches
Mail list logo
