On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
I submit a proposal, titled Seventy-Three Ninety-Five: In Rule 2367
Messy Statements, replace inaccurate and incorrect with
nonsensical and meaningless.
Arguments: considering both a statement and its negation to be
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
TL;DR: the office of ATC is vacant and the Registrar is behind in eir
duties.
I initiate an election for Registrar. omd is considered to have
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
7386 2.0 Ordinary scshunt Eraser
FOR. Sorry Bayes, the small positive you contribute isn't worth the
large negatives brought by the rest of the golems.
For the record, just the other day I was planning to make
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
The most someone can get is just under 3xbase, I'm not sure this really
that unfair compared to a lot of past systems? Or am I missing
something. -G.
Oops, I forgot that the default limit is now 4...
In general I
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:54 PM, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
7382 1.0 Plutocra omd Плутократия!
With 3 Agoran consent, I hereby make the decision to adopt Proposal 7382
Democratic.
Murphy and Roujo supported and there were no objectors.
Oops, I forgot to object...
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
The new rule has power as specified by the enacting
instrument, defaulting to one if not specified, but if
that power is less than a minimum or more than a maximum
specified
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
If it is ambiguous whether or not the proposal contained the
text in brackets, then it could be argued that I chose to interpret
the text in brackets as not being part of the text of the proposal,
and thus the
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3306
== CFJ 3306 ==
scshunt satisfies the Victory Condition of Junta due to Rule
2380
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:32 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I hereby deregister all Golems and Agora Nomic.
correction: the Golems were already destroyed, so this only deregistered Agora.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
I don't think this solves the problem. I think the problem is people
putting in switches without thinking about tracking, the requirement
to add untracked doesn't help. Also, I'm nervous about having
untracked
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:36 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend, without objection, to change the Publicity of the fora
currently located at agora-busin...@agoranomic.org,
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org, and agora-discussion@agoranomic.org to
Foreign.
I am now sending the above
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:04 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Apr 16 0:13 Report published
Machiavelli -6
While this seems (more or less) accurate, I notice that you didn't put
down the reason
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
(But I assume that the Promotor can do that practically effortlessly,
and it wouldn't actually help the Rulekeepor at all.)
As Promotor, it's my policy not to reformat proposals because (a) it
historically hasn't
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I submit the following proposal:
{ Enforcement
Enact a Rule entitled The Prosecutor with the following text:
The Prosecutor is an office. As soon as possible after a player
breaks the Rules, the
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:20 PM, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
THE SHORT LOGICAL RULESET
Are you going to keep the web ruleset at
https://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~charles/agora/current_flr.txt updated?
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Yaks, with currency symbol '#' are a class of assets and a
currency; their ownership is restricted to players. The Yak
missing comma, and class of assets and a currency is redundant
The Yak
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Any player CAN, by announcement, set the Chamber of an entity to
Democratic for a cost of 1000 Yaks.
Democracy is easy enough already :(
Would you rather I:
a) Increase the cost
b) Remove the
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
The final version will go through and replace a bunch of crimes with
infractions and maybe add a few. This is just to proto the mechanism.
You should also replace some serious but unmarked SHALL NOTs with
Crimes, such
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
To which I'll expand: the prime example of permissiveness in CFJ 1719 was
partnerships (now gone)
Arguments: Partnerships, including the implicit ability to act on
behalf of them, were originally recognized by CFJ (by
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:19 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Even though the effect of such a misinterpretation is
lessened in this case because the general effects of the action
scshunt meant to take and the one e wrote are the same, it's still a
misinterpretation, and the potential
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:44 PM, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
See CFJ 1856 (finding that there was insufficient evidence, in a similar
situation, that the act-on-behalf agreement met the historical versions of
R101(iii) and R101(iv) and therefore judged such an attempt unsuccessful).
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Defining a bank for a Rules-backed currency is
Secured.
As written, only the rule defining a currency can define a Bank for
it, so securing this is unnecessary.
The creation or
awarding of instances
Did everyone not realize this was coming up, or just me? :)
I invite any sort of publicity that might encourage Agora's current
just-getting-out-of-a-slump.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:50 AM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
There is an experimental feature which I went ahead and implemented,
but I'd appreciate feedback and will turn it off if desired: all list
messages are piped through a script which rewrites the Date header to
be the same
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2 May 2013 18:18, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
Not everyone has Gmail's spam filtering!
Surely even mailman can weakly obfuscate addresses in the archives.
The archives include the raw mbox, and I don't
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2 May 2013 17:58, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
The archives include the raw mbox, and I don't really want to
obfuscate that, because then the obfuscated version will end up
getting backed up and published
Testing. Just set OLD_STYLE_PREFIXING = No, so the subject of this
message should be DIS: Re: OFF:, as before, instead of Re: DIS:
OFF:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
...and unfortunately, it seems that this is enough to make Gmail treat
the message as distinct from the original, so if you send a reply, you
now get a duplicate, rather than that only happening when you switch
fora.
- Date hack disabled until I can figure out what to do about the
duplicate messages.
- Slightly updated http://www.agoranomic.org and now on GitHub at
https://github.com/comex/agoranomic. (I updated the FLR links,
removed the text about me being the Rulekeepor, changed the link to
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Proposal: Numericity (AI=2)
{{{
Enact a new power-3 rule entitled Integral Switches as follows:
An integral switch is a switch defined as such by the rules. An
integral switch may be defined to have any
testing digest.
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 3:50 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
testing digest.
oops, derp.
I fixed something, but I also didn't receive any digest when I ran
senddigests. Testing again. Sorry for the spam.
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:19 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
I fixed something, but I also didn't receive any digest when I ran
senddigests. Testing again. Sorry for the spam.
Never mind. It should be fixed now. Also, the archives are now being
properly updated.
One more test - this time I'm trying to fix the DIS: Re: problem.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On May 5, 2013 1:03 AM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote:
Who is the current Rulekeepor?
It hasn't changed since I published my report...
He just subscribed.
It's woggle, ruleset is at
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote:
What is an entity?
Is it the same thing as a player?
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/entity
Everything is an entity.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 11:12 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
djanatyn [1] c/o Machiavelli 2013-04-29
djanatyn can be reached at djana...@gmail.com.
Noted.
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I initiate a criminal CFJ alleging that omd violated Rule 2143 by failing to
report on Adoption Index and Chamber last week.
Defendant's arguments: I considered publishing such a report, but
Adoption Index of Agoran
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
Sounds fun. I join the Bucky Proposal Proxy Party. Even though I don't
think co-authors are going to get VCs once a certain proposal passes.
It already passed, sorry :p
[13:42:48] taral I can't believe I was distributor for 10 years.
[13:42:59] taral Someone award me 10 Years Long Service please.
I thank you for your long service. :)
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Like I've said, I support the return of contract law. In fact I'm working on
a proto at the minute.
The point is, we don't need complex charters for the basic let's
run a sub-game based around an event and have it go
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, 6 May 2013, omd wrote:
7421 3 G.What you WILL
AGAINST
Is there a bug here I should know about, or you just don't
like the shorthand?
I'm somewhat against it because will and shall mean about
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Yeah, I had problem coming up with an easy short phrase. WILL isn't
used so I picked that. (I thought about REQUESTED AND REQUIRED, while
nice and colorful, it isn't that much shorter, and raises the question
about
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Benjamin Schultz
ben.dov.schu...@gmail.com wrote:
Why me? ::checks drop-box::
I was proposing rules copied verbatim from past proposals - somewhat
pointlessly. By my count, two or three of my proposals would actually
be interesting to adopt; I was hoping for
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Henri Bouchard henrib...@gmail.com wrote:
I intend to become a player at this time.
Welcome back!
Incidentally, G., would you like me to restore the note about Gravity
Circumference Line Deja Vu Cardboard Duck e^(-kt), or is your
nickname now officially G.? (It
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Elliott Hird
penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote:
7419 3 omd Clear the books
AGAINST
Why?
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
I vote:
NttPF
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
As long as you're rewriting headers, can you rewrite them to move Date:
to the bottom? Makes it easier to find.
Okay. I currently have the header rewriting disabled because of the
Gmail issue, but I'll address that and
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:49 PM, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
I hereby appeal this judgment.
Arguments:
The message was eventually delivered. Per CFJ 1646 and CFJ 2058, it was sent
when it left my technical domain of control, which was before the deadline.
Even if this precedent does not
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:57 PM, James Beirne james.m.bei...@gmail.com wrote:
...by the way, and I'd like be referred to by that name (if it's not too
much trouble).
Noted. Welcome back.
- The Registrar
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
I don't think it necessarily makes sense to say that the severity of a crime
is linearly proportional to its Class. I don't feel like seven class-2 crimes
ought to equate to one class-14 crime. Quadratic makes more
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Wes Contreras w...@antitribu.com wrote:
Proposal 7434 (AI=3, Ordinary) by omd
Fifty-Nine Thirty-Seven
We vote AGAINST. We find victory by paradox to still be quite possible.
How so?
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Wes Contreras w...@antitribu.com wrote:
Do you contend that an infinite recursion is the only means by which
the truth value of an inquiry CFJ cannot be determined? If so, we
contend that you lack imagination, but would prefer not to demonstrate
such a thing
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
I submit a promise, titled Gold Z, with empty text, and with condition for
cashing The sum of all numbers 2^n such that I have a promise titled 'Gold
2^n' is an even number greater than 2 that is not the sum of two
For the record, prompted by someone asking to be a Watcher, I just
sent this out.
-- Forwarded message --
From: omd c.ome...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:27 PM
Subject: Pinging Watchers of Agora Nomic
To: b...@fushizen.net, cmil...@brainsprain.net, davidni...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Thinking of defaults, I was also wondering about default
expirations, (as these promises tend to lose relevance over time).
I think Horton's destruction without objection is sufficient for those.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:
If I haven't already voted on these, I vote PRESENT on all of them.
(I sent a message to the list, but it was down so it told me that it
would retry automatically. I have no idea if it actually did, so eh.
This one's not even my fault :)
After the actual domain transfer for agoranomic.org completed
yesterday, I attempted to transfer DNS from the servers Taral was
using to namecheap's servers, first by choosing namecheap's transfer
DNS feature and then by directly changing the list of DNS servers.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
A party is a type of second-class person and a player.
What happens if one is deregistered?
A player CAN flip eir party membership by
announcement, provided that e satisfies any conditions for
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com wrote:
I was the Registrar who sent out that 2011 email, and everyone flipped a
shit that I removed people without their explicit instruction to do so. IIRC
I ended up removing the non-responders anyway (which was nearly
Proto: Spelling abuse capitalisation VLOP 2.0 (co-author=ais523, Bayes)
Amend Rule 2389 (Ordinary Chamber) to read:
Ordinary is a Voting Chamber.
Lexicographor is an office. Keyword is a player switch, tracked
by the Lexicographor, whose value is a string of case-sensitive
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Does not work, see Rule 1030.
Hmm - it probably ought to be be possible to defer to a lower-powered
rule, though.
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
Hmm - it probably ought to be be possible to defer to a lower-powered
rule, though.
You could still make this work; you'd just need different wording. In
Rule 955, between items (a) and (b) (or before item (a)), say,
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you clarify when spivak is and is not appropriate?
As Machiavelli said, Spivak pronouns are singular. (And in singular,
we use e rather than ey.)
This should only apply to decisions to adopt proposals.
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 11:25 AM, agora-official-ow...@agoranomic.org wrote:
As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:
List:agora-offic...@agoranomic.org
From:woggl...@gmail.com
Subject: [Rulekeepor] Full Logical
Updated version that allows for multiple words, but at a high (and
quadratic) cost, introduces a hand limit of 10, and tweaks the
numbers:
Proto: Spelling abuse capitalisation VLOP 2.0 (co-author=ais523, Bayes)
Amend Rule 2389 (Ordinary Chamber) to read:
Ordinary is a Voting Chamber.
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Campaign Speech:
I gently chastise scshunt for sending an 837kb message to the lists.
- The Distributor
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, am I mistaken that the initiator is also a participant? If so it seems
you've effectively made em a biased manager. Nothing prevents em and eir
allies from watching the turn while it's in progress, and it would not be
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Fines can be avoided by disposing of the assets, for instance.
No, they can't. Fines are a SHALL destroy; if the ninny disposes of
eir assets, e can be found guilty of violating that and sentenced to a
different
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
No, they can't. Fines are a SHALL destroy; if the ninny disposes of
eir assets, e can be found guilty of violating that and sentenced to a
different punishment.
But if e disposes of eir assets while the judgement
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Machiavelli voted AGAINST 7431:
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2013-May/031143.html
Admitted.
omd only re-voted on 7426-34, and only after eir VVLOP was increased
to 5 (not after
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
I do so.
Since my original message was accidentally NTTPF, I think this is a
reasonably clear and unambiguous synonym for submitting the quoted proposal.
As Promotor, so do I.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Admitted in part and denied in part. When I re-voted, I cast either 4
or 5 additional votes per proposal (depending on how you interpret
it), so the total number of votes was greater than my final voting
limit of 7.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I initiate an election for Yak Herdor, nominating myself.
I initiate an election for IADoP and nominate myself. I publish the
following Proposed Budget:
Office Salary
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Rulekeepor 0
Yak Herdor 0
INEFFECTIVE as you do not have the power to initiate an IADoP election by
announcement.
And because it was nttPF.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
The Registrar's report never recorded scshunt registering on Apr 1:
http://www.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2013-April/009991.html
It also inconsistently recorded Machiavelli becoming inactive on
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
If you're looking for a not guilty now to immunize yourself from a guilty
later, that
doesn't work. R101 forbids multiple penalties, but not multiple trials.
There is a
specific precedent to this (I think I argued
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that the use of 'pending', which was defined by the Yaks
proposal, means that the Promotor is never required to distribute a
proposal in the same week in which it was submitted.
Oops, sorry! I guess the
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
I initiate a CFJ on the statement If the time period for judging CFJ 3318a
ends with no majority opinion among members of the panel assigned to it, then
the Ambassador-At-Large will be REQUIRED to cause the panel to
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
In a given Agoran week, the Promotor SHALL, as part of eir
weekly duties:
a) distribute the MI pending proposals with the highest
Distributability, breaking ties in favour of proposals
Gratuitous evidence:
comex tswett: does Entreco have any players other than yourself?
tswett No.
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you intend to distribute all proposals as usual, or will you distribute
only those with positive distributability as if P2425 hadn't failed to amend
R1607?
I am required to distribute them all, at least this
I offer to vote for any candidate with salary 1 for a price of 2x
salary, to be paid only if that candidate wins.
(I'd submit a promise, but I'm still unsure whether the Tree is
actually functional; Ienpw III hasn't judged the relevant case within
the time limit and the Assessor hasn't yet
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 8:55 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote:
For my own record, I'll note that the first error was not mine (it was
in woggle's deputy Registrar report), but the second was. My
apologies, Machiavelli.
Actually, the first error was also mine because the deputy Registrar
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:07 PM, comex com...@gmail.com wrote:
7453 2 0 O scshunt Criminal Accountability
7466 1.7 40 O scshunt Victim's Rights
7467 370 O scshunt New Precedents
7468 240 O scshunt Fix Bug
7469 3 0 O scshunt Proposal editing
Minor
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
Not-really-a-CoE: I don't recall whether or not I was an active player at the
time that I purported to nominate myself. If I was not, then I am not a
candidate.
You were not.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I believe that at least one IADoP report will have ratified my playerhood
since.
Meh, you're right. In that case, your playerhood has been flipping
between dates one week after publications of Registrar's reports and
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
Since I just realized that AssessorDB got quorum wrong on the Agoran
Decision to adopt proposal 7435, since it's based on the players at
initiation, I submit a proposal identical to 7435 and then I initiate
an
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:43 PM, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote:
CoE: I submitted a proposal in my Rulekeepor's notes on proposals
7418-7425.
Indeed. I need to write a script to double-check messages to detect
proposals hidden in the middle of messages which already spuriously
match my search
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
- Promotor distributes in the first 4 days of each week (currently a proposal
submitted on a Monday could wait just under two weeks before distribution
without the Promotor breaking a rule)
I always considered
In the interests of speeding up the game, I'm providing a gratuitous
early warning for Proposals 7453-7470, which are in danger of failing
quorum and having their voting periods doubled in two days. The
following active players have not yet voted on all of them despite
being eligible:
ehird
of the PVN and Virtue.)
Inconstant indeed. I once again intend, without objection, to ratify
the above-quoted claim.
Now that this is ratified, I note that CFJ 3211, omd violated Rule
2356 by taunting the police., was called several months after the
last modification to that rule. ;p
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
CoE: At the very least, Machiavelli was inactive at the time of
distribution. Quorum was 5.
Denied. Machiavelli was inactive, but Ienpw III registered at
about the same time.
Ah. In that case, quorum was still 5
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Sean Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
I intend, without objection, to award Murphy the Patent Title of
Indispensable Do-Nothing
PRESENT
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote:
it regulates the game
by instructing the players to interpret the rules as if the statement
it is LEGAL to shout 'CREAMPUFF' if and only if it is ILLEGAL to
shout 'CREAMPUFF' were true. If the statement were true, then
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
'CREAMPUFF'
I disfavor everything contained in the above-cited message.
Because of the word CREAMPUFF? It's an interesting and fundamental
CFJ, in my opinion, despite its
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
by human decisions which face the need to escape absurd
literalism
I'm not quite sure this entirely applies to Agora. :)
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Fool fool1...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this (and a bunch of other CFJs on the topic of paradoxes) all about rule
2358? Why not just change that?
Although Rule 2358 mostly depends on the traditional interpretation of
paradoxes as causing fundamental logical
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I play stones at (lat, lon): (3, -3), (2, -3), (1, -3).
Where are you all getting stones from? Igora was adopted after the
start of the week.
601 - 700 of 1373 matches
Mail list logo
