Seconded.
On Saturday, April 14, 2018, ATMunn wrote:
> For the record, though, I think I do actually prefer the 5 auctions thing.
> It seems like it's a lot more interesting.
>
> On 4/13/2018 2:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I don't consider 1 auctions/5 auctions to be a patch. It works a
For the record, though, I think I do actually prefer the 5 auctions
thing. It seems like it's a lot more interesting.
On 4/13/2018 2:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I don't consider 1 auctions/5 auctions to be a patch. It works as is,
but some people want it a different way (never mind that includ
I know, but I disapprove of the idea on general principle [1].
Additionally, your contract doesn't write up the proposal text for
people who don't have the time to do it themselves.
-Aris
[1] vide
https://wiki.blognomic.com/index.php?title=FAQ#Do_conditional_clauses_work.3F
On Fri, Apr 13, 201
I mean it's a problem with the ruleset in general that leads to more
mistakes of this nature. Of course each one cam be patched up as
it's found.
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I don't think it should be too hard. All we have to do is specify that
> "If the auctioneer CAN transfer
I don't think it should be too hard. All we have to do is specify that
"If the auctioneer CAN transfer the items in the lot to the winner at
will, e immediately does so; otherwise, e SHALL do so in a timely
fashion." Presuming that Agora can do whatever it wants to do, that
works fine because Rule
The real difficulty is many of the rules that have "or contract"
generalizations when describing how things work. It would be so much easier
if we could just assume all of auctions were transfers-from-agora and write
some auto transfer-from-agora language, but we have to (all over the place)
de
Sigh. I really don't like it when other people are right. I guess that
should be in the patches somewhere.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 14:42 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But where does it actually say that Agora actually ever makes such a
> transfer?
>
> -Aris
>
> On Fri
But where does it actually say that Agora actually ever makes such a transfer?
-Aris
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> The Cartographor doesn't make the transfer as the Cartographor is only the
> Announcer. Agora, the auctioneer, is authorized the make the transfer.
>
> On
The Cartographor doesn't make the transfer as the Cartographor is only the
Announcer. Agora, the auctioneer, is authorized the make the transfer.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 14:00 Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> However, (and this is the third time I've asked) can anyone point me to
> where it says in the ru
AFAICT it doesn't, so e can't. I presume we're letting last week's
auctions self-ratify, so that shouldn't be a problem for those. I
think the best fix is to specify that if Agora is the auctioneer and
the Auction is rule specified, the transfer is automatic unless
specified otherwise.
-Aris
On F
Yeah, sure.
-Aris
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> However, (and this is the third time I've asked) can anyone point me to
> where it says in the rules that the cartographer actually CAN make a
> transfer of land from Agora to a land auction winner?
>
>
> On Fri, 13 Apr
Sure, I'll leave it out.
-Aris
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I don't consider 1 auctions/5 auctions to be a patch. It works as is,
> but some people want it a different way (never mind that includes the
> original author). As it's controversial, please leave it on
However, (and this is the third time I've asked) can anyone point me to
where it says in the rules that the cartographer actually CAN make a
transfer of land from Agora to a land auction winner?
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I don't consider 1 auctions/5 auctions to be a patch. It
One thing I just realized might be useful: while you're fixing that, can
you also make it so that one corn can replace 3 or fewer apples instead of
only 3?
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 01:51 Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, one that I'd forgotten about: the place in Rule
I don't consider 1 auctions/5 auctions to be a patch. It works as is,
but some people want it a different way (never mind that includes the
original author). As it's controversial, please leave it on its own.
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Okay, I'm going to write up a patch propo
Thank you!
-Aris
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:04 AM Reuben Staley
wrote:
> As all of these are my fault, directly or indirectly, I transfer one
> paper to Aris for the purpose of pending the patch proposal outlined below.
>
> This is a notice of honour {
>
> +1 Aris for eir patching work
> -1 Teln
I'd take "substitute 3 apples for 1 corn" to mean that a one-way conversion
only is possible (in the useless direction). Sure, we all know the rule
wasn't meant that way, but Agora tends to follow the letter of law, not its
spirit.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Ned Strange
wrote:
> Doesn't it
I have a contract in place for exactly this purpose.
Gaelan
> On Apr 13, 2018, at 12:48 AM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> Okay, I'm going to write up a patch proposal. I'll take any reasonably
> uncontroversial patches, whether in typed up form or just with a
> description of the problem and a l
Doesn't it still work? I think any reasonable person would understand
that 1 corn= 3 apples with that text.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Oh, one that I'd forgotten about: the place in Rule 2003 where it says
> "Players CAN, while performing the above actions, substitute
Oh, one that I'd forgotten about: the place in Rule 2003 where it says
"Players CAN, while performing the above actions, substitute 3 apples
for 1 corn" should actually be the other way around.
-Aris
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:48 AM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Okay, I'm going to write up a patch pro
20 matches
Mail list logo
