On 7/24/22 18:49, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> Pseudo-coe: I think this is missing the Cfj called by snail with the
> subject line [Proposal?]. If so and it’s not taken I favor that one. -G.
>
Acknowledged and assigned, thank you.
--
Jason Cobb
Arbitor, Assessor, Rulekeepor, Ston
On 2/21/2021 2:45 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>> DEADLINES (details below)
>> ---
>> [CFJ 3899 is being handled by the referee, but will be added to the CotC
>> database once closed. Falsifian's judgment is due 11 Feb 2021 07:15:03]
>
> I think it's due 24
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 6:16 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
>
> On 6/19/2020 6:06 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I always seem to get the least CFJs :(
>
> Hmmm... I think I've rotated pretty equally but maybe I'm wrong. I
> noticed a couple weeks ago I had to skip you
yeah im probably just mad because the number of CFJs called worked out to
give CFJs throughout the rotation except to myself, just luck on that one
(and i do call plenty of CFJs)
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 11:16 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/1
On 6/19/2020 6:06 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> I always seem to get the least CFJs :(
Hmmm... I think I've rotated pretty equally but maybe I'm wrong. I
noticed a couple weeks ago I had to skip you when you were on top (just
for one set of cfjs) because most of the cases were calle
Oh, my bad—your reply put the thread on top of my inbox and I assumed both
messages were recent.
Gaelan
> On Feb 14, 2020, at 12:10 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:02 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>>
>> CoE: I judged this one at
>
I'm sorry, but this week has been the busiest and most tiring I've had in
quite a while. I will deliver judgements for all the cases I'm currently
assigned to in a few hours.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019, 12:48 Kerim Aydin
> Trigon,
>
> Are you actually judging stuff? I know you stepped away from a coup
And I would have reconsidered if the motion had gone through.
--
Trigon
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, 10:47 D. Margaux
>
> > On Jan 29, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Reuben Staley
> wrote:
> >
> > Interesting that I judged 3592 more recently than 83 or 84 but it's not
> > recorded anywhere.
>
> Oops. The decision
> On Jan 29, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
>
> Interesting that I judged 3592 more recently than 83 or 84 but it's not
> recorded anywhere.
Oops. The decision in 3692 was recorded in the Court Gazette of 20 January, but
I forgot to add it to the list of recently judged CFJs. Will d
V.J. Rada wrote:
Also, please take Gaelan off the list
Done, looks like e hasn't posted to a-b at all since late April.
Note to Murphy on the Courts: Alexis is deregistered, o is a zombie, and
Publius is zombifiable.
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, ATMunn wrote:
> I am interested in judging CFJs again. I would like to be placed on the
> Weekend court.
>
> On 3/26/2018 9:02 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
> > COURT GAZETTE (Arbi
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
> G. wrote:
>
> > CoE: I think during my brief Reign of Terror, I recused all the late
> > judges and reassigned all these CFJs to myself? Or do you think that
> > didn't work for some reason...
>
> I interpreted the recusals as "assigned continuously
G. wrote:
CoE: I think during my brief Reign of Terror, I recused all the late
judges and reassigned all these CFJs to myself? Or do you think that
didn't work for some reason...
I interpreted the recusals as "assigned continuously since Nov 1",
though if judgements aren't forthcoming then I
NttPF
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
CoE: I think during my brief Reign of Terror, I recused all the late
judges and reassigned all these CFJs to myself? Or do you think that
didn't work for some reason...
On Sun, 28 Jan 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
==
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> That's fine by me, yes. Everyone has periods of high activity and
> inactivity (well, I'm very active haha) and night court as a concept just
> encourages giving more cases to yourself.
I mainly invented it because, when I took over as Arbitor, there were se
That's fine by me, yes. Everyone has periods of high activity and
inactivity (well, I'm very active haha) and night court as a concept just
encourages giving more cases to yourself.
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Judge C
That's fine by me.
On 11/19/17, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> Judge Court[***] Recent
>> - ---
>> G. Night3556, 3567, 3563, 3579, 3580, 3582, 3595, 3596
>> PubliusNight3558, 3561, 3574, 3576, 3591
>>
Of course! Also done.
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Madeline wrote:
> I also wouldn't mind going onto the Day Court if you consider me suitable.
>
>
> On 2017-11-13 10:03, VJ Rada wrote:
> > Given that there are now 2 day-court people and 5 weekenders, a
> > seemingly bad ratio, whack me on the day co
I also wouldn't mind going onto the Day Court if you consider me suitable.
On 2017-11-13 10:03, VJ Rada wrote:
Given that there are now 2 day-court people and 5 weekenders, a
seemingly bad ratio, whack me on the day court, please (it's not as if
I don't call half of CFJs anyway rip).
On Mon, N
Will do and appreciated. (Night gets pretty much the same load as Day
except when there's urgent cases, so it's not as uneven as it looks).
And yeah - I've noted that your tendency to call a lot means there
are fewer that I can assign you to! About half your light load to
date is because week
Yay, thanks.
On 11/4/2017 10:44 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sat, 4 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote:
I'd like to maybe get into judging CFJs.
Can I request to be placed in the Weekend court?
Yep! You're now on the list.
On Sat, 4 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote:
> I'd like to maybe get into judging CFJs.
>
> Can I request to be placed in the Weekend court?
Yep! You're now on the list.
No worries! You should always feel free to send a draft judgement to
Discussion first, to get feedback.
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Madeline wrote:
> Thanks! The main things I'm worried about are not really knowing much about
> the precedent of the game, and possibly missing a relevant rule. Hopefully
Thanks! The main things I'm worried about are not really knowing much
about the precedent of the game, and possibly missing a relevant rule.
Hopefully Ctrl-F on the ruleset and CFJ archive should help there, at
least! (Along with experience, of course)
On 2017-10-22 11:40, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Absolutely! You're on the list. I'll try to look out for ones that aren't
"super-complicated" to start.
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Madeline wrote:
> Would I be able to give the Weekend Court a try, perhaps? I might need some
> assistance at first with learning the ropes of what to consider when maki
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> 3575 should be listed as "recent" for me.
>
> Apart from that, thanks for this report as always.
I should have explained: when everyone has at least one case under "recent",
I drop everyone's oldest one (it's for making sure people have relatively
simila
26 matches
Mail list logo
