Wait, did I not send it to a-b again? Crap.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> > On Sep 27, 2017, at 9:20 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> >
> > [Okay. I think I've got it as I want. I'm going to pend it now, and this
> time for real.]
> > I retract the proposal "Cheer Up v6?" and
Oh, you mean for when I post a new reply. Okay.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Wait, did I not send it to a-b again? Crap.
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Sep 27, 2017, at 9:20 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
>> >
>> > [Okay. I think I've got it
> On Sep 27, 2017, at 9:20 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
> [Okay. I think I've got it as I want. I'm going to pend it now, and this time
> for real.]
> I retract the proposal "Cheer Up v6?" and create and pend the following
> proposal in its place:
With AP or with shinies? (Remember to send your repl
> On Sep 27, 2017, at 9:45 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
> I did end up changing the "may" to "MAY.”
MAY means “you won’t get a card for doing this.” You wanted CAN by announcement
(“attempts to do this this way will work”).
This is a recurrent bug. I can think of at least three players, including
m
You're right. I'll change that.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:56 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> any value it is currently not.
> < It is IMPOSSIBLE to change another player's Emotion.
> < When doing this, e MUST provide a reason as to why e changed eir
> Emotion as such.
>
> This could be read as mandating p
wrote:
> [Yay more spam! This time, fixed a typo and the weird text bug.]
> Retract the proposal "Cheer Up vIDEK" and create the following proposal in
> its place:
>
> Title: "Cheer Up v6?"
> Author: ATMunn
> AI: 1
>
> Create a power-1 rule titled "Emotions"
> {
> Emotion is a player switch, t
I did end up changing the "may" to "MAY."
I would add the "by announcement," however I'm not sure I can at this
point. Can you make changes to a pended proposal? If you do, do you get
back the AP/shinies you used to pend it?
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scri
See my comment below. Also, I greatly appreciate the current usage of Spivak
pronouns/
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:43 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
> I retract the proposal "Cheer Up" and create the following proposal in its
> plac
We could also overtime add nice emotions.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:39 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:34 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
>>
>> I create the following proposal:
>
> Some initial feedback: this
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 21:58 -0400, ATMunn . wrote:
> Actually, can't you just state that you change things in a proposal
> instead of retracting it and creating it again?
You can't. This is at least partly a consequence of a scam several
years ago in which someone got a dictatorship via editing a
(Oops, forgot about the sending-to-discussion-by-default thing. It seems to
have still been sent to business though.)
Thanks for the feedback, by the way.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:43 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> I retract the proposal "Cheer Up" and create the following proposal in its
> place:
>
> Ti
I retract the proposal "Cheer Up" and create the following proposal in its
place:
Title: "Cheer Up"
Author: ATMunn
Co-Authors: none
AI: 1
Create a power-1 rule titled "Emotions"
{
Emotion is a player switch, tracked by the registrar, with possible
values Joyous, Melancholy, and Indifferent, t
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:34 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
> I create the following proposal:
Some initial feedback: this is fantastic as a first proposal goes. You’ve
nailed the mechanical elements, it looks like, and taken advantage of existing
systems where appropriate. Furthermore, it’s a neat piec
You're probably right. I'll remove that.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:36 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> "
> Failing to do so can result in a Green Card being issued to the player.
> If a player thinks that another player's reason for changing eir
> Emotion is invalid, e SHOULD point eir finger at em.
I don't mind this, except for the card SHOULD, which doesn't go with any
potential rules violation.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:34 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
>
> I create the following proposal:
>
> Title: "Cheer Up"
> Author: ATM
"
Failing to do so can result in a Green Card being issued to the player.
If a player thinks that another player's reason for changing eir
Emotion is invalid, e SHOULD point eir finger at em."
Remove this, it's implied.
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:34 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> I create the fol
16 matches
Mail list logo