On 6 April 2011 21:24, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Geoffrey Spear geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to choose the
holder of the Registrar office. The eligible voters are the active
first-class players,
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
Inaction is not action. And if this was triggered by an Agoran
Consent success, then I'd argue that only the player completing
the process would be on the hook.
Here's the
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
Wooble wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the President to intend to
deputize to publish the Registrar's report.
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to cause the President to deputize for
the Registrar to publish the Registrar's report.
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
scshunt wrote:
On 11-03-19 02:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
The Speaker CAN, by announcement, cause the President to take
an action that is not otherwise IMPOSSIBLE. If there is no
Speaker, then the player who was most recently
G. wrote:
Causing the President to perform an ILLEGAL action is the
Class-6 crime of Misleading the Leader.
Personally, I was waiting for an Agoran Consent failure to publish a report
so that we could see if all Agorans who didn't support could be found
guilty of this. -G.
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Ed Murphy wrote:
G. wrote:
Causing the President to perform an ILLEGAL action is the
Class-6 crime of Misleading the Leader.
Personally, I was waiting for an Agoran Consent failure to publish a report
so that we could see if all Agorans who didn't
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.edu wrote:
On 11-03-19 02:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
The Speaker CAN, by announcement, cause the President to take
an action that is not otherwise IMPOSSIBLE. If there is no
Speaker, then the player who was
The probability of the job almost certainly not getting done if the
President holds it aside, will publishing a report this week change your
mind?
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 09:31, Jonathan Rouillard
jonathan.rouill...@gmail.com wrote:
I also vote for The President. Sorry Yally. =P
~ Roujo
On
On 11-03-19 02:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
The Speaker CAN, by announcement, cause the President to take
an action that is not otherwise IMPOSSIBLE. If there is no
Speaker, then the player who was most recently Speaker (if
any) CAN, by announcement, cause the President
scshunt wrote:
On 11-03-19 02:57 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
The Speaker CAN, by announcement, cause the President to take
an action that is not otherwise IMPOSSIBLE. If there is no
Speaker, then the player who was most recently Speaker (if
any) CAN, by announcement,
On 11-03-19 03:30 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
The President being required to do impossible actions seems rare enough
not to worry about it until a specific example comes up. (The any
first-class player clause doesn't include the IMPOSSIBLE bit either.)
What about the Agoran Consent or without
On 06/13/2010 05:07 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
I hereby resolve the election for Registrar; votes were as follows:
Murphy E Wooble = Wooble
Wooble = Wooble
Wooble wins with 2 votes to whatever and remains Registrar.
CoE: Either it failed quorum or the voting period was doubled.
coppro wrote:
On 06/13/2010 05:07 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
I hereby resolve the election for Registrar; votes were as follows:
Murphy E Wooble = Wooble
Wooble = Wooble
Wooble wins with 2 votes to whatever and remains Registrar.
CoE: Either it failed quorum or the voting
On 06/13/2010 05:07 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
I hereby resolve the election for Registrar; votes were as follows:
Murphy E Wooble = Wooble
Wooble = Wooble
Wooble wins with 2 votes to whatever and remains Registrar.
CoE: Either it failed quorum or the voting period was doubled.
On 06/06/2010 01:55 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
coppro wrote:
This message serves to initiate the Agoran Decision to decide the
holder of the office of Registrar. For this Decision, the
eligible voters are all the active first-class players, each with a
voting limit of one. The Intergalactic
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Charles Walker
charles.w.wal...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 5/21/09 9:03 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Registrar
office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector
is the IADoP, and
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Kerim Aydin ke...@u.washington.eduwrote:
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I initiate an Agoran decision to decide the holder of the Registrar
office. The eligible voters are the active players, the vote collector
is the IADoP,
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 09:32 -0400, Quazie wrote:
Wooble is how i vote.
Lowercase i? Are you gwen in disguise?
--
ais523
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:43 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
ais523 wrote:
I took on Registrar because nobody else seemed to want it, but I'm not
too attached to it really. It's not even as if I get anything for doing
it (as both Notary and Mad Scientist earn me the same pitch of note).
Apart
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 17:06 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
I actually considered nominating myself when I saw the options, but
I'd have to wait for the current election to end. Besides, the
Monster might actually make an interesting Registrar.
Would the
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:52 AM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the Mad Scientist would be required to act on behalf of the
Monster to publish on time (publishing a report is something the Monster
SHALL do if it's an officeholdor). There isn't an obvious Monsterkeepor,
although we
comex wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:52 AM, ais523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the Mad Scientist would be required to act on behalf of the
Monster to publish on time (publishing a report is something the Monster
SHALL do if it's an officeholdor). There isn't an obvious Monsterkeepor,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
I shudder at the thought of what Bayes might do with the Registrar's report...
-root
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 04:07:28 pm Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Kerim Aydin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote
Bayes.
I shudder at the thought of what Bayes might do with the
Registrar's report...
Nothing we
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 17:24 -0400, comex wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ais523
the Monster
ehird
Bayes
A choice between ehird and ais523?
I vote for Goethe.
You'd better vote for the Monster if you don't want Bayes to end up
having to
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ais523
the Monster
ehird
Bayes
A choice between ehird and ais523?
I vote for Goethe.
I actually considered nominating myself when I saw the options, but
On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:05, Kerim Aydin wrote:
If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
Say that to $EVERY_PARTNERSHIP_HERE.
Btw, if Bayes gets elected e will deregister and Seyab will pop up.
--
ehird
On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 15:28 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, comex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Geoffrey Spear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ais523
the Monster
ehird
Bayes
A choice between ehird and ais523?
I vote for Goethe.
I
On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:41, Charles Reiss wrote:
Bayes could just resign. Wouldn't that be easier?
-woggle
Oh.
... Yea.
--
ehird
ais523 wrote:
I took on Registrar because nobody else seemed to want it, but I'm not
too attached to it really. It's not even as if I get anything for doing
it (as both Notary and Mad Scientist earn me the same pitch of note).
Apart from forum scams, of course, but I doubt there will be many
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ais523 wrote:
I took on Registrar because nobody else seemed to want it, but I'm not
too attached to it really. It's not even as if I get anything for doing
it (as both Notary and Mad Scientist earn me the same pitch of
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
I actually considered nominating myself when I saw the options, but
I'd have to wait for the current election to end. Besides, the
Monster might actually make an interesting Registrar.
Would the Monsterkeepor be required to publish report on time on
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:05, Kerim Aydin wrote:
If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
Say that to $EVERY_PARTNERSHIP_HERE.
Sure. No worries. I agree. If any partnership is nominated when e doesn't
want to be e should
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
I actually considered nominating myself when I saw the options, but
I'd have to wait for the current election to end. Besides, the
Monster might actually make an interesting Registrar.
On 15/10/2008, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 14 Oct 2008, at 22:05, Kerim Aydin wrote:
If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
Say that to $EVERY_PARTNERSHIP_HERE.
Sure. No worries. I agree. If any
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
On 15/10/2008, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a Player registers, e should take responsibilities. I vote Bayes.
Say that to $EVERY_PARTNERSHIP_HERE.
Sure. No worries. I agree. If any partnership is nominated when e doesn't
want to be e
36 matches
Mail list logo
