On 1/22/2019 10:24 AM, D. Margaux wrote:>> On Jan 20, 2019, at 7:25 PM, Aris
Merchant wrote:
>>
>> It’s definitely 1,000,000,000 actions, according to CFJ 3597, but
>> I think that CFJ may also suggest that we can only levy one fine (I’m not
>> sure about that though).
>
> I admit that I don’t
> On Jan 20, 2019, at 7:25 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> It’s definitely 1,000,000,000 actions, according to CFJ 3597, but
> I think that CFJ may also suggest that we can only levy one fine (I’m not
> sure about that though).
I admit that I don’t fully understand this CFJ decision. However, ar
I don't even know where to start figuring this out, so it would be good to CFJ
"D. Margaux has committed at least 1,000,000,000 rule violations", but we need
some way to get it assigned without D. Margaux interfering via eir position as
Arbitor (the earliest e can be impeached is Friday).
Any i
In any case, I think it's clear that e must be given the maximum
possible sentence. After all "The fine SHOULD be increased to the
degree that the violation is willful, profitable, egregious, or an
abuse of an official position.", and this is all of the above.
-Aris
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 4:25 P
Unfortunately, I think the common definition makes it rather clear what’s
going on. It’s definitely 1,000,000,000 actions, according to CFJ 3597, but
I think that CFJ may also suggest that we can only levy one fine (I’m not
sure about that though).
-Aris
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 4:17 PM Timon Wals
Oh, please say I can levy 1,000,000,000 fines. That would be awesome.
...Maybe not for D. Margaux. :/
Incidentally, I just did a brief ruleset skim for something that might indicate
whether this was 1 action or 1,000,000,000, and uncovered a different issue: I
can't find any definition of "awar
6 matches
Mail list logo
