Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-21 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > My Copy of RONR11 would also suggest that it is a point of order, given > that it is a custom of the Assembly. > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > RONR is up to edition

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-20 Thread Quazie
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:53 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > While I love the idea and I applaud you for taking the time to do that, it > seems a tad impractical. > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:29

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-20 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
While I love the idea and I applaud you for taking the time to do that, it seems a tad impractical. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > >On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > My Copy of RONR11 would also suggest that it is a point of order, given that it is a custom > of the Assembly. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-20 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
My Copy of RONR11 would also suggest that it is a point of order, given that it is a custom of the Assembly. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:16 AM Benjamin Schultz < >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-20 Thread Aris Merchant
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:16 AM Benjamin Schultz wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Kerim Aydin > wrote: > >> >> >> Minor point of order for new folks: >> >> We've historically promoted bottom-posting for replies (with editing of >> past

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-20 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Minor point of order for new folks: > > We've historically promoted bottom-posting for replies (with editing of > past > thread pieces allowed). Unfortunately not well-supported by current email > clients. I

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-19 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I like the idea of bringing back the fearmonger and making the waived fee a gig. On Wednesday, April 19, 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > Minor point of order for new folks: > > We've historically promoted bottom-posting for replies (with editing of > past > thread pieces

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-19 Thread Kerim Aydin
Minor point of order for new folks: We've historically promoted bottom-posting for replies (with editing of past thread pieces allowed). Unfortunately not well-supported by current email clients. I mildly prefer bottom-posting for things like judicial threads with counter arguments.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-19 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > Agreed, and that should apply to everyone, not just the Speaker. Want to make > the whole thing a gig? While we've been falling short of the ideal in the last few months, I think there's some things we want to encourage (1) regular weekly reports

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-19 Thread Quazie
I quite like making this idea a gig as well. On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:54 Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed, and that should apply to everyone, not just the Speaker. Want to > make the whole thing a gig? > > -Aris > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:55 AM Publius

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-19 Thread Aris Merchant
Agreed, and that should apply to everyone, not just the Speaker. Want to make the whole thing a gig? -Aris On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:55 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > ​Also, maybe a rule that waives the shiny fee on pending a proposal, if

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-19 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
​Also, maybe a rule that waives the shiny fee on pending a proposal, if the pool has been empty for a certain length of time.​ Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > A solid +1. Theme proposals encouraged? > > -o > > On

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-18 Thread Owen Jacobson
A solid +1. Theme proposals encouraged? -o > On Apr 13, 2017, at 4:11 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > You'd need to create a new rule. I'd also suggest paying them something. > Maybe add "If this proposal passes, the Secretary CAN and SHALL once pay the >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-13 Thread Aris Merchant
You'd need to create a new rule. I'd also suggest paying them something. Maybe add "If this proposal passes, the Secretary CAN and SHALL once pay the Speaker 10 shinies, plus 5 extra shinies for each additional week the Proposal Pool has been empty." Overall, a really good idea, which will

DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Weekly Report

2017-04-13 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > The proposal pool is currently empty. > Draft proposal: Encourage activity When the proposal pool has been empty for two consecutive Agoran weeks, the Speaker SHOULD submit a proposal. OscarMeyr