On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 9:44 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On 1/16/2019 12:48 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> > No, there's no need. I initiate an election for Assessor, beginning the
> > nomination period. This is a bad enough mistake (considering it's
> actually > the second time I've made it rec
On 1/16/2019 5:37 AM, D. Margaux wrote:>
>> On Jan 16, 2019, at 4:10 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>> If the original attempt failed at all, I would have expected it to be
>> because of R2466's prohibition of sending-messages-on-behalf. I realise
>> that contradicts CFJ 3649 but to be honest I'm
On 1/15/2019 4:05 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
>>> I CFJ, barring D. Margaux: "D. Margaux has fulfilled eir obligation,
>>> detailed in the rule entitled 'Space Battles', to 'once communicate to
>>> the resolver the amount of Energy [e wishes] to spend" in Space Battle
>>> 0001."
I think this is a ver
In space battles:
> 4) the non-combatant who has least recently registered.
I don't see anything restricting this pool to "players".
So it could be:
1. If current players only, it's omd. This is an issue in its own right
because I don't expect response from omd; moreover we don't generally
> On Jan 17, 2019, at 3:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> That's worth thinking about, but first I was curious at other people's
> thoughts between #1 and #2.
I prefer interpretation #2. The person being communicated to is the resolver;
what is necessary is that e has knowledge sufficient to det
On 1/17/2019 1:10 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
> I prefer interpretation #2. The person being communicated to is the
> resolver; what is necessary is that e has knowledge sufficient to
> determine the number being communicated.
If we go with #2, here's something I just thought of. Yesterday you
stat
Those were literally the words out of my mouth when I checked the Agora
folder.
Judging from the message subjects, it appears that we now have space and
politics. There's a lot of messages, which will take a while to go
through. Things have been a bit busy for me irl recently, which is why I
have
On Friday, January 18, 2019 1:06 AM, ATMunn wrote:
> Things have been a bit busy for me irl recently, which is why I
> haven't been Agora-ing as much recently.
(Hijacking thread to mention that this is the case for me as well - I know
there are multiple threads I haven't replied to yet,
8 matches
Mail list logo
