Re: DIS: Looking to pick up an office, maybe

I would be happy to let you take over Registrar. On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 21:27 VJ Rada wrote: > If you want Registrar, you can initiate an election for the position > right now and stand for it. I don't know wheter PSS approves, e > certainly wants to retain that position. But if you want to try

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] ADoP and Prime Minister Elections

I got ENDORSE G. for Tailor. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 13, 2017, at 11:19 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > > I change my vote for ADoP to {ATMunn, V.J. Rada} > > My PM vote remains for myself. > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 2

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] ADoP and Prime Minister Elections

I'm not sure what happened. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 14, 2017, at 6:42 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > > Replied to the wrong email? > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: >>

Re: DIS: Semi-final draft: Contracts v3

I'd be happy to review the latest version, but I don't want to use the last version because I won't know what has changed. Could you share your current copy? Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 14, 2017, at 5:46 PM, Aris

DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

Typo, see below. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 14, 2017, at 6:55 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > This is just a miscellaneous fix proposal: > > Proposal: High Power Cleanup (AI=3) > {{{ > Text in square brackets is not a sub

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A few cleanups

After rereading it, I don't understand the need for both a "to" and a "for". I think either would work on its own. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 14, 2017, at 7:16 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > On

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Deregulation

Why not keep the birthday tournament. It existed before regulations. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 14, 2017, at 8:08 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Decided to put my money where my mouth is. > > Proposal: Deregulation (AI=3) >

Re: DIS: Semi-final draft: Contracts v3

See inline notes, below: On 10/15/2017 04:18 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: A new contracts version is affixed. -Aris --- Title: Contracts v5 Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Aris Co-author(s): o, G., ais523, Gaelan, 天火狐, CuddleBeam, V.J Rada, Trigon, Alexis, P.S.S. Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#"

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7908-7921

#x27;re ok with that added duty PSS) On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: On Sun, 15 Oct 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: 7912* Alexis3.0 Election Campaigns Alexis 1 AP [2] So, um ... anyone want to opine on the status of the PM or ADoP elections?

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7908-7921

You can't because you pended it with AP. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 15, 2017, at 8:27 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > > TTttPF > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 8:26 PM, ATMunn . wrote: > Is this new or am I not aware of somet

Re: DIS: eval()

I disagree with this. I think the distinction is that you want Agora to work like USB, whereas now Agora works like PS/2. On 10/15/2017 08:45 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: There are many places where Agora essentially calls eval(T), where T is some text from a player. This includes: The rules, of

Re: DIS: PROTO: [Proposal] A Reward for Obedience

I know that I for one read over it and liked the idea and wasn't sure whether it was would work as is, but didn't have thoughts on how to improve it, therefore I didn't comment. I'm sorry that I wasn't very helpful, but I don't have ideas on how I could be. On 10/15/2017 08:35 PM, ATMunn . wr

Re: DIS: eval()

5:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: I disagree with this. I think the distinction is that you want Agora to work like USB, whereas now Agora works like PS/2. On 10/15/2017 08:45 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: There are many places where Agora essentially calls eval(T), where T is some

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

Yes, he had, but it seems I missed that when preparing a report, probably when I was transitioning computers. In my next report, I will ratify him away if he doesn't mind. On 10/19/2017 11:10 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 at 15:06 Publius Scribonius Scho

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

Could you explain this objection? On 10/20/2017 07:07 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > No please no ratifying people out of existence thanks very much. > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: >> Yes, he had, but it seems I missed that when

DIS: Re: BUS: Registration and Apology

The shiny balance can not be negative because it is an asset, not a switch. On 10/20/2017 04:42 PM, Telnaior wrote: > I flip my Citizenship to Registered. > > For recordkeeping purposes, my username is Telnaior and I was > previously deregistered in 2014. > > Anyways, I'm going to apologise, I fe

Re: DIS: Idea: Taxes

I too like this idea. At this point, I think we need to do a lot more experimental stuff and add a lot of mechanics and just see what sticks. On 10/20/2017 07:52 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 19:48 Kerim Aydin > wrote: > > I'm personally worki

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Registration and Apology

If supporting this message is allowable, I do so. On 10/20/2017 08:24 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > I intend to destroy the universe with notice. > > -Aris > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: >> I intend t win the game with two da

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Notice of Honour

Mine is sort of up to date. The Registrar's report should be there, but I need to find my SSH key password to push again. On 10/22/2017 12:10 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > The FLR hasn't had them in a long time: certainly not since I've been > a player. I think Gaelan took them out. > > JDGA: I'm ironical

DIS: Re: BUS: Intent

I would be willing to do secretary. On 10/22/2017 12:46 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > I intend, in between 2 and 14 days, to deputize for the positions of > Referee and Surveyor, for the purposes of publishing the weekly > reports of each of those positions. > > I encourage someone with a stronger heart t

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7923-7929

his second one supposed to resolve the decision correctly, or > merely to correct the previously published document? I argue that this > is sufficiently unclear as to fail the test required for "by > announcement", meaning that e does not actually resolve the decision > in

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Notice of Honour

ork into it or think e could just grab it, because of exactly > what you said, I assumed you were putting work in already. > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> I'd appreciate if you would at least waiit because I have already >> embarked on cle

DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

We already have taxes. On 10/22/2017 07:39 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > I submit the following proposal, and pend it for 1 AP. > > -Aris > --- > Title: It's death _and_ taxes > Adoption index: 1.0 > Author: Aris > Co-author(s): > > > Lines beginning with hashmarks ("#") and comments in square brack

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (no subject)

Then, we need to rename the Tax Rate. On 10/22/2017 07:43 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > Not apart from deregistration and administrative fees, neither of > which would normally be considered taxes. > > -Aris > > > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Publius Scribonius Scho

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Agoran Newspaper Repeal

I agree with this and have written o, asking em, if e needed interim help. On 10/22/2017 07:49 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >> By the by, I forgot o. is also the agronomist. I intend to deputize >> for the position to publish its weekly report. > I have to say, o

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7923-7929

Not until after 7930. On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 22:57 Alexis Hunt wrote: > Will you be resolving 7922 soon? > > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 08:31 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I resolve the decision(s) to ado

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Deputisation] Short Logical Ruleset

>> >>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 21:00 Alexis Hunt wrote: >>>> I believe this is INEFFECTIVE as you did not intend to do so? >>>> >>>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 20:57 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >>>> wrote: >>>>>

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Revised FLR

would replace Obligations with a specific thing for Contracts. On 10/23/2017 10:58 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> THE FULL LOGICAL RULESET > Comments: > > 1. A bunch of these still have wrapping problems. If it d

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Deputisation] Short Logical Ruleset

dge? > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 16:43 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I announce my candidacy for Rulekeepor and pledge to fix the > margins, if > the issue is explained to me. > >

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Revised FLR

Please describe the issue, it looks identical to what appears in the proposal to me. On 10/23/2017 06:19 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > A number of my previously issues, such as the text of rule 2309, > remain unfixed. > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 16:46 Publius Scribonius

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: [Herald] We'll win so much you'll be tired of winning

But once the action has been taken once, the decision has been resolved. On 10/23/2017 06:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > I CFJ by spending a Shiny: G. won the game on 23 Oct 17. > > Arguments: > > Rule 208 reads: >The vote collector for an unresolved Agoran decision CAN resolve >i

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Revised FLR

;ve raised, along with some formatting issues in the YAML > files themselves, in my local copy of AgoraNomic/ruleset which I'll > push shortly. > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 20:34 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Deputisation] Short Logical Ruleset

g that this works without notice. >> >> I intend, with 2 support, to initiate an election for Rulekeepor. >> >> -Alexis >> >> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 21:00 Alexis Hunt wrote: >>> I believe this is INEFFECTIVE as you did not intend to do so? >&

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Weekly Report

------ > [1] Associate Director of Personnel > [2] Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > [3] Anyone may inititate elections for these positions without being > the ADoP or 4 support. > [4] Interim offices a

Re: DIS: Questions for Trigon

Most of my errors can be attributed to either not yet understanding the system for generating the ruleset or Gaelan's errors. Now, that I understand how the raw files are processed better, I do not believe any new errors will be introduced. Additionally, to you and everyone, what concerns do you h

Re: DIS: HLR inquiry

Yes, that is correct due to an error in the proposal. On 10/24/2017 10:36 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > Is it true that we have a rule whose title is “Campain Proposals, with power > 3” with power 1? Or is that a scrivener’s error? > > -o > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution

I am not trying to hoard shinies, but I also do not want to just collapse the economy, but if anyone has any interesting contract ideas or things the require shinies, email me and I will probably help out. On 10/25/2017 02:25 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> On Oct 25, 2017, at 1:51 AM, Madeline > <

DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution revision 2 (attn ais523)

Actually, when this came up, e made a statement that could have been consent and I believe G. may have mentioned that he thought it could count. On 10/25/2017 03:18 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > By the way, I'm pretty sure that ais523 isn't a player? E was only > made a player by ratification, and CFJ 345

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Weekly Report

Thank you, I missed that. On 10/25/2017 06:03 AM, VJ Rada wrote: > That's...what that document says. > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > CoE: The election for ruleke

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution revision 2 (attn ais523)

17, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> Actually, when this came up, e made a statement that could have been >> consent and I believe G. may have mentioned that he thought it could count. > No - not after the fact. > > The situation that CFJ 3456 allows this to work is is if a

Re: DIS: Let's talk Economic Realities

One thing that would be interesting to try, but for a fixed period of time would be getting rid of officers and implementing IP restrictions to force people to specialize as officers. Then anyone who payed a certain fee for a license could act as an officer. Additionally, privatizing proposals and

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution revision 2 (attn ais523)

However, this action should still be taken into account. On 10/25/2017 04:22 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > This doesn't affect the actual CFJ I called (because, as we all know, > CFJs are judged on the facts of their calling) but THIS might be the > player-like action we need to ratify ais523 in. > > On We

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution revision 2 (attn ais523)

e with accepting evidence of > consent? (obviously this works for any future ratification). > > What if OscarMeyr came back and said - you know back in May and that > other CFJ - well actually I consent. > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> Howeve

Re: DIS: Proto: Complete Economic Overhaul

While you're at it, could you rename Economics as Shinies? On 10/25/2017 09:29 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > In the interest of collaborating with everyone else that is working on > econ-related proposals, I'm posting the drafts of my Econ Overhaul as > they get written. Here's the first one. Would love

Re: DIS: thesis thoughts

I would rather err on the side of being overly wanting and give an A.N., rather than a M.N. On 10/26/2017 12:55 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I'm still struggling a bit "leveling" Alexis's thesis. By sheer length, > it is clearly more than a B.N. and would fit for Masters. However >

Re: DIS: thesis thoughts

That should be a challenge. On 10/26/2017 04:43 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: >>>    Levels were:  AN 150, BN 250, Masters 750, Doctorate 1000 >> lol, our CFJs routinely go above those, we are smurt af. > Actually, it would be a real challenge to write a thesi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] More Actions Should Use Agoran Consent

But retraction is itself informal. On 10/26/2017 08:49 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > NttPF. > > -Aris > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 6:53 PM, ATMunn wrote: >> Ah. I retract the below proposal. I didn't pend it anyway, and obviously >> nobody will vote for it. >> >> >> On 10/25/2017 9:51 PM, Kerim Ay

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] More Actions Should Use Agoran Consent

Thank you, I have checked the ruleset and you are correct. I thought that it was not required to be by announcement, but I was incorrect. On 10/26/2017 09:06 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > Retraction of Proposals is not informal! > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Publius Scribonius Sch

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Secretary] Basic income distribution revision 2 (attn ais523)

Thank you for the reminder, I missed that. On 10/26/2017 11:49 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> On Oct 25, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> wrote: >> >> The other thing to note is that he was previously a player and continued >> to take player-

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Second Revised S:R

You cna change it by just lying and letting it ratify. On 10/27/2017 01:58 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > On Oct 23, 2017, at 6:43 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > >> -- >> >> Rule 2497/3

Re: DIS: good FLR?

I believe the FLR that is currently online is accurate and it definitely includes all of the rules. On 10/27/2017 01:47 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > I didn't follow all the corrections - is there a consensus as to what > recently-posted FLR draft is "most accurate" (needed for random picks > for

Re: DIS: Officer report scraping

Or someone who hosted a script that pushed reports to git on their computer. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 27, 2017, at 8:54 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > Elsewhere-hosted bot? > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, Reuben Staley

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Tailor] Ribbon Award

Interestingly for me, it works on a-b, but not a-o. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Oct 27, 2017, at 9:59 PM, ATMunn wrote: > > Oops, Ntt...DF? > > For some reason, when replying to a-b or a-o threads, Thunderbird does not >

DIS: Re: OFF: [Herald] The Honour Role

SHOGUN >+3 ATMunn >+2 Telnaior >+1 Trigon >+1 Nichdel >+1 Japan >+1 G. > 0 Alexis >-1 V.J. Rada >-1 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >-1 ProofTechnique >

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3576 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus (Gaelan recused)

Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't fully understand the issue. I support. On 10/29/2017 05:07 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 at 16:51 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I judge CFJ 3576 TRUE becau

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3576 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus (Gaelan recused)

: >> I file a motion to reconsider. Supporters are PSS & Alexis. >> >> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:34 AM, VJ Rada wrote: >>> I support >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: >>>> On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 at 16:51 Publius Scri

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Surveyor Election Campaign Proposal Distribution

I vote in favour of proposal 7954. On 10/30/2017 09:38 AM, ATMunn wrote: > Doing it correctly this time! > Note: If you've already voted, you'll have to vote again. > > As the nomination period of the Surveyor election is over, and there > was only one candidate, o, the election is uncontested. >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: JA;tC

NttPF. On 10/30/2017 08:01 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > I support. > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Aris Merchant > wrote: >> I intend to destroy JA:tC with 2 Agora Consent, on the basis that it has >> been judged INEFFECTIVE. >> >> -Aris >> >> On

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Make Deregistration Less Stupid

You should make it without objection or with 2 Agoran Consent. On 10/30/2017 10:29 PM, Telnaior wrote: > I won't be looking to use this immediately since it looks like zombies > are becoming a thing, but if you want proper procedure for > deregistering in future let's try this? > > I create the fo

Re: DIS: Re: Wards

What do you have against the Reportor? On 10/30/2017 10:53 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > How does Agora have no money? There were 32 proposals last week > > We really need to decrease reward amounts. Have hard jobs: Rulekeepor, > Treasuror be 5, all the way down to like reportor as 1. > > On Tue, Oct 3

Re: DIS: Re: Wards

It looks now like getting rid of a monetary cap and stabilizing prices would be the best course of action. On 10/31/2017 01:21 AM, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 10:11 PM Owen Jacobson > wrote: > > > > On Oct 31, 2017, at 12:42 AM, Kerim Aydin > ma

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Make Deregistration Less Stupid

uly a dealbreaking concern? > > > On 2017-10-31 21:37, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> You should make it without objection or with 2 Agoran Consent. >> >> On 10/30/2017 10:29 PM, Telnaior wrote: >>> I won't be looking to use this immediately since it

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Referee Election Agoran Decision Initiation [and making stuff easier for the Assessor]

n} >>>>> ATMunn: {Alexis, PSS} >>>>> Alexis: Conditional ({Alexis, Trigon} if Alexis publishes a FLR draft >>>>> to a forum before the end of the voting period; {Trigon, >>>>> Alexis} >>>>> otherwise.) >>>>&g

Re: DIS: Judicial Reform

org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2010-December/008377.html > (sorry, I couldn't find it on mail archive) > > -Aris -- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Tailor] Ribbon Bar

No, so you are correct this fails. On 11/04/2017 02:31 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 at 06:19 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I award myself a green ribbon for Registrar. > > > Did you att

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

.com>> wrote: > > I AP CFJ the following: The below document claiming to be the > Registrar's Weekly Report was not a report. > > Arguments: The Registrar is required to track Emotion switches > (2514).. E didn't. > > > On Mon, O

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

o was not, but VJ Rada was. I will hold off on a correction, while waiting for comments. On 11/05/2017 01:55 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 13:41 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I CoE that

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Registrar] Weekly Report

So, I have checked the archives on my computer and I believe that is accurate. On 11/05/2017 02:03 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 14:01 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > ATMunn and nichdel were

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

7;ll happily step aside for a player who > wants it. At first I thought it was good for a long-time player > (who might have some memory of good stuff to re-enact) but it's > even better for a motivated new player, as encouragement to explore > Agoran history. > > > --

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

not related to truth or falsity, e.g. >> availability of information, from affecting outcomes.] >> >> and by replacing: >> >>    * DISMISS, appropriate if the statement is malformed, undecidable, >>    if insufficient information exists to make a judgement with >>    reasonable effort, or the statement is otherwise not able to be >>    answered with another valid judgement. >> >> with: >> >>    * DISMISS, appropriate if the statement is malformed, undecidable, >>    if insufficient information exists to make a judgement with >>    reasonable effort, or the statement is otherwise not able to be >>    answered with another valid judgement. DISMISS is not >>    appropriate if PARADOXICAL is appropriate. >> >> and by appending to the end: >> >>    * PARADOXICAL, appropriate if the statement is logically >> undecidable as a result of a paradox or or other irresovable >> logical situation. PARADOXICAL is not appropriate if IRRELEVANT >> is appropriate, nor is it appropriate if the undecidability >> arises from the case itself. >> >> [The reference to IRRELEVANT is to prevent multiple wins from the same >> paradox.] >> >> // >> -- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 7957-7961

or the statement is otherwise not able to be > answered with another valid judgement. > > with: > > * DISMISS, appropriate if the statement is malformed, undecidable, > if insufficient information exists to make a judgement with > reasonable effort, or the stateme

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

at 11:35 AM, ATMunn wrote: >>> Ah, thanks for letting me know. >>> >>> >>> On 10/31/2017 8:32 PM, VJ Rada wrote: >>>> >>>> (by the way ATMunn, I am uncommitted). >>>> >>>> I vote for myself, and FOR my campaign p

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

I think quorum is an essential parameter, given the SHALL requirement associated with it. On 11/05/2017 08:52 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 at 20:50 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Sorry about this

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Agronomist Election Agoran Decision Initiation and Campaign Proposal Distribution

To the same list or multiple lists? On 11/05/2017 08:54 PM, Madeline wrote: > PSS, you're sending all your messages twice for some reason. > > > On 2017-11-06 12:53, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> CoE: The quorum is not specified for the first decision. >&

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Agronomist Election Agoran Decision Initiation and Campaign Proposal Distribution

> On 2017-11-06 12:58, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> To the same list or multiple lists? >> >> On 11/05/2017 08:54 PM, Madeline wrote: >>> PSS, you're sending all your messages twice for some reason. >>> >>> >>> On 2017-11-06

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of 7931-7953

You did not. On 11/05/2017 09:48 PM, ATMunn wrote: > I have no idea if I voted on these or not. > > On 11/5/2017 9:45 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> I issue a humiliating public reminder on proposals 7948 through 7953. >> >> On 10/30/2017 01:48 AM, Aris M

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

at decision. However, incorrectly stating the quorum of a decision >> does not invalidate the initiation, nor does it actually change the >> quorum of the decision." >> >> Nowhere does it say that failing to announce quorum invalidates the >> decision. >> >&

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7931-7947

Sorry about that. On 11/05/2017 09:54 PM, ATMunn wrote: > The wrapping is a little messed up. > > On 11/5/2017 9:51 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> >> I resolve the decision(s) to adopt propos

DIS: Protosal: Poetry Challenge Fix

ays to determine the winner of the writ. The loser of the writ SHALL pay to the winner 12 shinies. -- ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Initiating Decisions Correctly

How could I make it more humiliating without being rude? On 11/06/2017 05:53 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 05:51 -0500, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: >> I issue a humiliating public reminder for this proposal and extend >> the voting period by 7 day

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Elections and Proposal 7954-7956

12:59 PM, ATMunn <mailto:iamingodsa...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Yay, I can publish my ADoP report now! > > On 11/6/2017 4:48 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > I resolve the deci

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Elections and Proposal 7954-7956

gt; On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 12:59 PM, ATMunn >> <mailto:iamingodsa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>>     Yay, I can publish my ADoP report now! >>> >>>     On 11/6/2017 4:48 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >>> >>>     I resolve the

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Elections and Proposal 7954-7956

Okay, then let me resolve it now. On 11/06/2017 09:34 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 at 21:31 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <mailto:p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I extended the period and I don't believe that I can close the &g

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Notes on Proposals 7931-7947, 7954-7956

gnatures? > > Thanks on both notes - you remain a wonderful Distributor and host. > > -o > -- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Weekly Report

2017-11-06 > Tailor Alexis   2017-10-01   2017-10-12    Y > Treasuror  o    2016-10-22   2017-09-21 > --------- > > [1] Associate Director of Personnel > [2] Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Surveyor] Weekly Report

== >> Owner: G. >> Market Value: 41 Shinies >> >>Dawsbergen is a stink, a grating noise, a pit, a habit, a >>nightmare. Dawsbergen is the shattered remains of logic and >>grammar, repealed rules, broken proposals, overturned judgements, >>and mistaken reports. Its inhabitants are, as the man once said, >>"logicians, rules lawyers, game munchkins, and sons of bitches," >>by which he meant Everybody. Had the man looked through another >>peep-hole he might have said: "Philosophers and judges and truth- >>seekers and the wise," and he would have meant the same thing. >> >>Also, it smells of fish. >> -- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: BUS: [Registrar] Monthly Deportations (Was: Re: DIS: Shiny Supply Level Fact (attn Treasuror!))

7:27 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: >>> On Nov 6, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >>> wrote: >>> >>> I intend to deregister without objection, each of Murphy, Quazie, Ienpw >>> III, omd, Bayushi, and ProofTechnique. >> I object t

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [ADoP] Weekly Report

The number of filled offices divided by the number of officers. On 11/07/2017 08:59 AM, ATMunn wrote: > Consolidation? > > On 11/7/2017 5:42 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> Could you continue to include Consolidation in your reports? >> >> On 11/06/

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3591 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

Documents do self-ratify on a date, but decisions specify that only the outcome, existence of the decision, and if it was a proposal, adoption ratify. Decisions are different in the way that they ratify. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Nov 7, 2

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3591 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

self-ratify. On 11/08/2017 06:29 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote: > Why doesn't ratifying the outcome ratify consequences of it? I'm struggling > with that. > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017, 05:48 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3591 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

s that a decision was "resolved as indicated" and >>> this includes the "indication" that it was resolved by the document >>> purporting to be a r208 resolution announcement that was published on >>> a particular date. It doesn't say that it ra

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3591 assigned to Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

I'm fine with either interpretation yours or mine, in my head mine made more sense, but yours makes more sense hearing it, so if people would prefer, I would have no problem with a reconsideration. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Nov 8, 20

Re: DIS: Will it ever end?

Once this economics phase winds down, I would be interested into going into a phase focused on legalistic stuff with contracts and a reformed judicial system, but without a currency. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Nov 8, 2017, at 2:02 PM, ATM

Re: DIS: Will it ever end?

I have no problem with the current phase and am enjoying it, I just also have thoughts for the future. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Nov 8, 2017, at 4:35 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > > I mean, I've been operating within the system for a

DIS: Re: OFF: [Referee] Weekly Report

ort > Tue 7 Nov 2017: V.J. Rada made a pledge > Tue 7 Nov 2017: V.J. Rada made a pledge > Wed, 8 Nov 2017: Aris made 18 pledges (thanks a bunch, Aris) > Thu, 9 Nov 2017: Cuddlebeam pointed a finger at o. for abuse of power > Sat, 11 Nov 2017: Alexis made a pledge > Mon, 13

Re: DIS: The land reforms I kept on talking up

s by variety, where if you > have a lot of different types of structures you win. There are lots of wins > that could be implemented. > > As a detail note, we should really unify on AP *or* shinies. Having > both around is a bit of a kludge and it would be good to pick just > one for basic action apportionment. > > > Good point. The two overlapping systems are quite inelegant. -- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

DIS: Re: BUS: Stamps, Rewards

icial waiting > period, I pledged to do same). > > > > > -- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Notes for proposals 7948-7953, 7957-7962

ral days later. -- ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

DIS: Re: BUS: Joining the fun

ir report. We should bring that >> back. (when I held a job like this that didn't have an official waiting >> period, I pledged to do same). > On Nov 16, 2017, at 3:32 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > >> As do I, if possible. > None of these succee

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Joining the fun

gt; >> This economy has been a hot mess for far too long. I don't do offices >> for a reward in general, but it's extremely dispiriting to be on this >> ride at this point and expect to get ahead. Donations don't particularly >> help that feeling, though thanks for the offer. >> > Hear, hear. > > I won't be resigning, though; we need a rulekeepor and it's fun, and tailor > is pretty trivial. -- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >