DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: The gig economy

I like this a lot in theory. Bard would need careful definition to not be abused/impossible to satisfy Tour Guide reminds me that I need to fix the agora wiki... On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > (Some jobs don't need regular Offices, but should

DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: The gig economy

I rather like this proposal, and I’m looking forward to the second draft. I do have one (sincere, not critical) question: On Apr 19, 2017, at 9:33 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > If a performer does so, clearly specifying that eir action is > intended to fulfill a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: The gig economy

On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > I disagree. It hasn't seen its second drafting yet, and I think we should > discuss it somewhat more. However, I do believe it is traditionally the > author's privilege to decide when a proposal is ready for a vote. I was waiting to see if there was

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: The gig economy

I disagree. It hasn't seen its second drafting yet, and I think we should discuss it somewhat more. However, I do believe it is traditionally the author's privilege to decide when a proposal is ready for a vote. -Aris On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:48 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: The gig economy

I recommend we try to move this along to a vote. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > It could be scaling where a person purports to have completed a gig and > are awarded five

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: The gig economy

It could be scaling where a person purports to have completed a gig and are awarded five shinies without 2 objections, but with two support it may be increased. This scaling could be proportional to length. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Aris Merchant <

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: The gig economy

Minor grammar tweak: in the sentence "the goal of such reports is to create a more informed population," there is an apparent plurality mismatch between "reports" and "is". I know that the subject is actually "the goal", but it feels a bit awkward. Suggested substance changes: I'd support

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: The gig economy

I would like a new ribbon. Also, I would support this more if there were not a limit on the number of people who could perform it and only a limit on certain things which should only occur once per week. On Wednesday, April 19, 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Wed,

DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: The gig economy

On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 06:33 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Proto:  The Gig Economy Haven't checked the details, but I really like this idea. We could definitely do with fewer mandatory-duty offices. I can see an argument for converting the Referee into one of these too (when the game's going

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: The gig economy

On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Quazie wrote: > should one get a cyan ribbon for doing enough gigs? Good idea. Or an entirely new Ribbon.

DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: The gig economy

should one get a cyan ribbon for doing enough gigs? On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 06:33 Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > (Some jobs don't need regular Offices, but should be rewarded with payoffs > as they are valuable to Agora). > > Proto: The Gig Economy > > Create the following

DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: The gig economy

On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > The following Gigs are defined: Additional (brings in the other discussion thread going on): Narc: Point the Finger at 1 or more Officers for failing to perform official duties, with an emphasis on penalizing excessively