On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 3:51 PM Aris Merchant
wrote:
> In either case, I'm officializing them in my proposal. Still, you're
> right that this is interesting, and I could see the precedent being
> potentially relevant in the future. I don't want to add to your
> overload right after you've taken
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 3:43 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 3:17 PM Aris Merchant
> wrote:
> > Note that (probably) only the Referee can assign an ID number to this
> > case. Under Rule 2246, "Submitting a CFJ to the Referee", "the Referee
> > receives all obligations and
You... may actually be right about that. I would have sworn that it
was somewhere that the Arbitor assigned numbers, but I can't seem to
find that provision. That's odd, since that's not the case for
proposals or rules.
-Aris
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 3:32 PM Rebecca wrote:
>
> ID numbers are
ID numbers are entirely informal so anyone can assign them if they like.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:31 AM Rebecca wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:16 AM Aris Merchant <
> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:53 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> >
>> > Please
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:16 AM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:53 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > Please review if you have an interest in a pending case - did I miss
> anything?
> >
> > Cases listed open in the Court Gazette May 27
> >
5 matches
Mail list logo
