On 9 Jul 2013 10:44, "Ørjan Johansen" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
>
>> I meant "buggy requirement" as a hypothetical in my quote (as in,
>> "satisfies the requirement if it's bugged").
>>
>> FWIW, I meant omd's interpretation when I wrote the rule originally. Not
>> that that
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote:
I meant "buggy requirement" as a hypothetical in my quote (as in,
"satisfies the requirement if it's bugged").
FWIW, I meant omd's interpretation when I wrote the rule originally. Not
that that really counts for anything. (And not that either
interpretation
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:32 PM, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Matt Berlin wrote:
>>> An Elder is a first-class player who has been registered continuously for
>>> at least 32 days
>>
>> Future Perfect Progressive Tense ( ie, happened in the past, is still going
>> on, and may conti
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Matt Berlin wrote:
>> An Elder is a first-class player who has been registered continuously for
>> at least 32 days
>
> Future Perfect Progressive Tense ( ie, happened in the past, is still going
> on, and may continue in the future) requires the present participle
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 17:01 -0400, Matt Berlin wrote:
> > An Elder is a first-class player who has been registered continuously for
> at least 32 days
>
> Future Perfect Progressive Tense ( ie, happened in the past, is still going
> on, and may continue in the future) requires the present particip
> An Elder is a first-class player who has been registered continuously for
at least 32 days
Future Perfect Progressive Tense ( ie, happened in the past, is still going
on, and may continue in the future) requires the present participle of the
verb. I don't think "registered" would work for this
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 13:41 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, omd wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > > Apparently, you were registered contiguously from 2 Mar 06 to 31 May 07,
> > > easily long enough to satisfy the buggy requirement.
> >
> > Gratuitous
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > Apparently, you were registered contiguously from 2 Mar 06 to 31 May 07,
> > easily long enough to satisfy the buggy requirement.
>
> Gratuitous: I have been interpreting it as non-buggy. If I say "I've
> be
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Apparently, you were registered contiguously from 2 Mar 06 to 31 May 07,
> easily long enough to satisfy the buggy requirement.
Gratuitous: I have been interpreting it as non-buggy. If I say "I've
been here for two hours", it means the last two
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 16:27 -0400, Matt Berlin wrote:
> Yes, I believe that was the original intent of the rule, though not how it
> is written. Would support amendment.
>
> Also, this may apply to me. Is there a chronological record of
> registrations/deregistrations/holds?
It's in the Registr
Yes, I believe that was the original intent of the rule, though not how it
is written. Would support amendment.
Also, this may apply to me. Is there a chronological record of
registrations/deregistrations/holds?
- arkestra
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Mon, 8
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Steven Gardner wrote:
R2357:
An Elder is a first-class player who has been registered
continuously for at least 32 days, and also registered for at
least 128 days total (not necessarily contiguously).
I was registered continuously from 1 July 1994 until 19
12 matches
Mail list logo
