Re: DIS: Test 2

On 4/11/23 15:44, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: I scheduled them to send at the exact same time (Test 1 before Test 2) Ah interesting. My guess is that when you schedule the client sets the Date to the scheduled time, even if it doesn't actually *send* at the scheduled time.

Re: DIS: Test 2

I scheduled them to send at the exact same time (Test 1 before Test 2) On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:40 PM nix via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 4/11/23 15:00, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: > > I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience > The

Re: DIS: Test 2

On 4/11/23 15:00, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience The time between your DATE and the first received on these messages seems longer than your previous messages (or other players'). Did you schedule these, or do something to the

Re: DIS: Test

Jason wrote: I intend, without objection, to intend, without objection, to declare Apathy. [G. suggested the archives went down on Discord.] https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/2015/08/no-1973-1975.html

Re: DIS: Test

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:44 AM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I intend, without objection, to intend, without objection, to declare > Apathy. > > [G. suggested the archives went down on Discord.] > > -- > Jason Cobb > > Assessor, Rulekeepor,

Re: DIS: Test

On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 18:41 +, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote: > I intend, without objection, to figure out if the lists are quiet or > down. I support. -- ais523

Re: DIS: test

On 2/14/20 2:26 PM, Jason Cobb wrote: > On 2/14/20 2:25 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: >> Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if >> it's only for that message. >> >> -- Jason Cobb > > Looks like it is, since I got this back (w/o failure notice). > Oh,

Re: DIS: test

On 2/14/20 2:25 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if > it's only for that message. > > -- Jason Cobb Looks like it is, since I got this back (w/o failure notice). -- Jason Cobb

Re: DIS: test

On 2/2/20 9:15 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote: > On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:01 PM comex wrote: >> Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone. > ...except that didn't actually use Haraka because I sent from the > wrong address. This time for real. Received, if it helps. -- Jason Cobb

Re: DIS: test

On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:01 PM comex wrote: > Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone. ...except that didn't actually use Haraka because I sent from the wrong address. This time for real.

Re: DIS: test

On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 5:11 PM comexk--- via agora-discussion wrote: > Nothing to see here, move along. Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone.

Re: DIS: test

On Sun, 22 Dec 2019, omd wrote: Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? Maybe this is a good time to remind you (you never responded to my original message) that back in June/July (I think) I had trouble receiving list email because the list IP got on a global

Re: DIS: test should fail

Never mind; I eventually got "Yeah ... I was trying" at 03:59 UTC. On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:52, James Cook wrote: > > I got "Testing my new address filter." but not "Yeah... I was trying > to send from an unsubscribed address, ...". > > > On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:49, Jason Cobb wrote: > > >

Re: DIS: test should fail

I got "Testing my new address filter." but not "Yeah... I was trying to send from an unsubscribed address, ...". On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:49, Jason Cobb wrote: > > On 12/22/19 10:35 PM, Nicholas Allegra wrote: > > I received this, but not Falsifian's reply nor the one that says > "Testing my

Re: DIS: test

On 12/22/19 10:34 PM, omd wrote: Testing my new address filter. On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 3:25 PM omd wrote: Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? Sorry, just received this; disregard my previous message. -- Jason Cobb

Re: DIS: test should fail

On 12/22/19 10:35 PM, Nicholas Allegra wrote: I received this, but not Falsifian's reply nor the one that says "Testing my new address filter." -- Jason Cobb

Re: DIS: test should fail

On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 7:37 PM James Cook wrote: > I got this one. Yeah... I was trying to send from an unsubscribed address, but I didn't realize that when sending from an alias, Gmail would keep my normal address in the envelope. Whoops.

Re: DIS: test should fail

I got this one. On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:36, Nicholas Allegra wrote: > > -- - Falsifian

Re: DIS: test

Testing my new address filter. On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 3:25 PM omd wrote: > > Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP?

Re: DIS: test

On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 at 23:25, Jason Cobb wrote: > On 12/22/19 6:24 PM, omd wrote: > > Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? > > Received. > > -- > Jason Cobb I got both these messages, but GMail attached the note "This message was not sent to Spam because of a

Re: DIS: test

On 12/22/19 6:24 PM, omd wrote: Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? Received. -- Jason Cobb

Re: DIS: Test of a-d

On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 10:58 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote: > This is a test of what happens if I don't add "DIS:" to the subject > line ahead of time. I received this (and the a-b and a-o versions too). The mailing list rewrote the "From:" line in order to prevent a DMARC

Re: DIS: test post

Actually I was testing if my new email was subscribed correctly (yes, obviously), and if my filters put the returning message in the right place (no they didn't, but I'll try to minimize tests to fix that). On 12/28/2018 8:42 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: I received this, if that's what you

Re: DIS: test post

I received this, if that's what you were trying to test. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, December 28, 2018 4:24 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > testing new email filters

Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

I messed around with some settings and now it is working properly. On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:56 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing > characters actually have wide support these days. How does it look to the > rest of you? > >

Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

needs an explicit declaration of monospace typestyle: [image: needs monospace.PNG] ​Here it is in monospace, gmail's "fixed width" option: > ┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ >

Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

Looks sharp/nice/correct to me. With the usual exception of that Japanese line (but it's less out-of-line then other reports have been). On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing > characters > actually have wide

Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

Hmm. Perhaps an experiment to shelve for the time being. 樂 -twg ​​ ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On July 16, 2018 3:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > ​​ > > =E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= > >

Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

=E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=

Re: DIS: Test

*HTML preformatted style, perhaps?* *+---++++---+++++++ * *|Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs| * *+---++++---+++++++ * *|ATMunn

Re: DIS: Test

Why... How do you all make the tables??? (Let me try reposting Gaelan's previous report) +---++++---++++++ |*Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|

Re: DIS: test message please ignore

My nickname: dragging Agora to like 1992 in terms of internationalization of its encoding. 天火狐 On 22 November 2017 at 19:59, ATMunn wrote: > Yeah, I've noticed this as well, it happens in my text editor as well. I > tend to go with the approach of having the | be in

Re: DIS: test message please ignore

Yeah, I've noticed this as well, it happens in my text editor as well. I tend to go with the approach of having the | be in the same column. On 11/22/2017 7:56 PM, Alex Smith wrote: On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote: Telnaior| 天火狐 | Trigon | Telnaior|

Re: DIS: test message please ignore

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 19:57 Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote: > > > Telnaior| > > > 天火狐 | > > > Trigon | > > > > > Telnaior| > > > 天火狐 | > > > Trigon | > > > > > Telnaior| > > > 天火狐 | > > >

Re: DIS: test message please ignore

On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote: > > Telnaior| > > 天火狐 | > > Trigon | > > > Telnaior| > > 天火狐 | > > Trigon | > > > Telnaior| > > 天火狐 | > > Trigon | According to the Unicode standards, the vast majority of Japanese characters

Re: DIS: Test

> On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > > Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam? > > It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at least with > respect to sending. If this message gets through, presumably others > will too. I

Re: DIS: Test

me too. On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > I received this. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > >> On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smith

Re: DIS: Test

I received this. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > > Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam? > > It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at

Re: DIS: test

Yeah, that was the thing I wanted to try to exploit. Unfortunately SLR and other stuff are not self-ratifying like other reports. On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 at 09:39, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > On Sep 18, 2017, at 9:13 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > > > This

Re: DIS: test

> On Sep 18, 2017, at 9:13 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that > your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. > > Gaelan The “Estate Auctions” rule is missing a paragraph, I believe. -o

Re: DIS: test

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > test > > This concludes our test of the emergency scam response system. > > Had this been an actual working scam, it probably wouldn't have > involved CuddleBeam I

Re: DIS: test

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > test This concludes our test of the emergency scam response system. Had this been an actual working scam, it probably wouldn't have involved CuddleBeam.

Re: DIS: test

Auctions became unregulated. It was just "an auction" and such. Presumably I could just make my own. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given

Re: DIS: test

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. The last paragraph of rule 2491 is duplicated. I don't see how that allows any scam though... Greetings, Ørjan.

Re: DIS: test

This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. Gaelan > On Sep 18, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > I don't have any email problems fortunately. I was trying to pull a scam

Re: DIS: test

I don't have any email problems fortunately. I was trying to pull a scam which relied on timing and I wanted to see what time appeared on the archives for my message to compare with a-o. Sorry for any concerns. Also, my scam didn't work because the SLR isn't self-ratifying and now I cry in a

Re: DIS: test

The implication that Cuddlebeam sending this email suggested e might be having email problems. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:52 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > > I received it too (but already deleted it,

Re: DIS: test

I received it too (but already deleted it, after briefly seeing if I could spot anything funny in the headers but I didn't), what's wrong with it? Greetings, Ørjan. On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I

Re: DIS: test

I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I am slightly concerned that gmail users may be forming a cult of their own. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > >

Re: DIS: test

Uh oh. -Aris On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:22 PM Cuddle Beam wrote: > test >

Re: DIS: Test

Would it be better if I write the subject tags myself? Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: > > Is this working? > > It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's

Re: DIS: Test

On 05/20/2017 08:50 PM, Alex Smith wrote: On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: Is this working? It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's posts are, and no matter how many I mark as "not spam" it keeps happening. I distinctly remember having this problem a while back with

Re: DIS: Test

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > I use it too, but nearly exclusively through a desktop client. Maybe it's a > problem with the web client? > > Nope. I mostly use the web client. -Aris

Re: DIS: Test

On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: > Is this working? It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's posts are, and no matter how many I mark as "not spam" it keeps happening. I can unstick them manually, but finding a long-term solution to this might well be helpful. (The DKIM

Re: DIS: Test

I use it too, but nearly exclusively through a desktop client. Maybe it's a problem with the web client? On 05/20/2017 08:27 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:09 PM, CuddleBeam wrote: I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it

Re: DIS: Test

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:09 PM, CuddleBeam wrote: > I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it finally works > lol, holy fuck. > > Kudos to PSS btw, he helped me out. Straight up gmail doesn't work > apparently but they taught me the googlemail.com

Re: DIS: Test

I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it finally works lol, holy fuck. Kudos to PSS btw, he helped me out. Straight up gmail doesn't work apparently but they taught me the googlemail.com trick and it works and I'm super grateful.

Re: DIS: Test

Yeah, I noticed, but I didn't want to point it out. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, it should probably be ita vero. It's kind of scary how long I've > been doing that wrong. > > -Aris >

Re: DIS: Test

Actually, it should probably be ita vero. It's kind of scary how long I've been doing that wrong. -Aris On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:15 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > ​Yes. I appreciate the Latin.​ > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus

Re: DIS: Test

​Yes. I appreciate the Latin.​ Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:11 PM CuddleBeam > wrote: > >> Is this working? >> >> Ita vera. > > -Aris >

Re: DIS: Test

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:11 PM CuddleBeam wrote: > Is this working? > > Ita vera. -Aris

Re: DIS: test

One more test - this time I'm trying to fix the DIS: Re: problem.

Re: DIS: Test

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: ☃ BRR ITS COLD

Re: DIS: Test

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:33 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: ☃ I create a promise with text ☃ and transfer it to ehird. ...and, in a separate message to avoid any question of whether this affects the

Re: DIS: Test

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: On 27 August 2012 09:32, Sean Christopher Sherwood Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: This is a test email; please ignore. Don't tell me what to do. CFJ: That was a test email; please ignore.

Re: DIS: Test

On 27 August 2012 09:32, Sean Christopher Sherwood Hunt scsh...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: This is a test email; please ignore. Don't tell me what to do. CFJ: That was a test email; please ignore.

Re: DIS: test

On 14 March 2012 11:49, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: test

Re: DIS: test

On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 02:41 -0700, Sean Hunt wrote: I support and -- ais523

Re: DIS: test

On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 10:06 +, ais523 wrote: This is a test. Whoops, wrong year... (I was checking to see if there was some sort of firewall preventing me just sending email by hand from this connection. It seems there isn't.) -- ais523

Re: DIS: test

I support and do so. ~ Roujo On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:08 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 10:06 +, ais523 wrote: This is a test. Whoops, wrong year... (I was checking to see if there was some sort of firewall preventing me just sending email by hand

Re: DIS: test

On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:52 -0500, Sean Hunt wrote: this am a test I object. -- ais523

Re: DIS: test

I support. On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:57 AM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:52 -0500, Sean Hunt wrote: this am a test I object. -- ais523

Re: DIS: test

On 05/02/2010 11:30 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: testing... Sorry for the spam; I was testing my automated mail delivery which had broken. Looks like I finally found the problem. -coppro

Re: DIS: test

Pavitra wrote: Testing PGP/MIME for readability. It looks the same as woggle's messages to me. I seem to remember that I stopped using GPG with Agora because someone complained that their MUA didn't strip out the machine-readable parts of the message properly. How does this look to everyone

Re: DIS: test

On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 17:03 -0500, Pavitra wrote: Testing PGP/MIME for readability. What's your public key? -- ais523

Re: DIS: test

ais523 wrote: On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 17:03 -0500, Pavitra wrote: Testing PGP/MIME for readability. What's your public key? Obviously there's basically no security against a MITM attack here (the Distributor is in a particularly good position to execute it, and is known to be generally

Re: DIS: test

Pavitra wrote: Testing PGP/MIME for readability. Looks fine here (Thunderbird 2.0.0.23)

Re: DIS: test

I wrote: Pavitra wrote: Testing PGP/MIME for readability. Looks fine here (Thunderbird 2.0.0.23) Clarification: the PGP stuff is not shown unless I select View Source; I have not attempted to do anything else with it.

Re: DIS: test

2009/8/23 Pavitra celestialcognit...@gmail.com: Testing PGP/MIME for readability. In Gmail, below the message there is a horizontal rule (not full-width) and a text attachment available called signature.asc. It's quite small and ignorable. I can view it with one click. (I'm probably the one

Re: DIS: test

Sean Hunt wrote: Sorry guys, just doing a test that needs to go through the lists. Apologies for spam. This is another test; sorry again for spam.

Re: DIS: test

2009/6/2 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com: Sean Hunt wrote: Sorry guys, just doing a test that needs to go through the lists. Apologies for spam. This is another test; sorry again for spam. i uh object

Re: DIS: Test

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Sgeo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #P agora-discussion@agoranomic.org #S 6 #D 3 #R 1 #L 1 #C This is a test, I promise. #T This is a test, I promise. Well, that failed pretty hard.

Re: DIS: Test

On 9 Dec 2008, at 23:35, Sgeo wrote: #P agora-discussion@agoranomic.org #S 6 #D 3 #R 1 #L 1 #C This is a test, I promise. #T This is a test, I promise. Next time to the proper dice forum.

Re: DIS: Test

#P [EMAIL PROTECTED] #S 6 #D 3 #R 1 #L 1 #C This is a test, I promise. #T This is a test, I promise.

Re: DIS: test

Pavitra wrote: This is a test message. That looked like a real message to me. -- -- 0x44;

Re: DIS: Test...

On Jun 12, 2007, at 1:22 AM, Zefram wrote: Benjamin Schultz wrote: The last message went out twice, does this one double up? I have received at most one copy of each of your messages. -zefram I think I figured out my problem -- I was still double-subscribed. - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM

Re: DIS: Test...

Benjamin Schultz wrote: The last message went out twice, does this one double up? I have received at most one copy of each of your messages. -zefram