On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Quazie wrote:
> The original contract stated 3 objections. The question is whether or not
> objections and OBJECTIONS are the same thing.
CFJ 1520 (particularly last paragraph): just because you give one thing the
name of some other thing, doesn't mean the thing gains the p
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, ihope wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is especially an issue since R1728 itself claims that it only
>> applies to rules, even though we've been ignoring that in practice and
>> applying it to contracts anyway.
>
> Hmm. I su
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Jonathan Fry wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Jonathan Fry wrote:
If I WAS still a player in Agora I WOULD vote AGAINST any rule with THIS
form
>>> of capitalization.
>>>
>>> I hated it too when it was introduced. But I learned to l
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Ed Murphy wrote:
> As G. pointed out, that style was more common once; Wes was generally
> given primary credit for establishing it.
Fortunately, We didn't adopt all of Wes's conventions, did We?
___
Agora mailing list
Agora@l
backup list.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:05:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Kerim Aydin
To: Agora Official
Subject: [Herald] The Scroll of Agora
=
THE SCROLL OF AGORA
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:56 PM, omd wrote:
> > This message initiates a bogus Agoran Decision to determine the new
> > Distributor. For this decision, the eligible voters are anyone who
> > cares, the voting period lasts five days, and the valid opti
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Fool wrote:
> Note that if Alex's attempt failed, then I CANNOT judge this case as
> it does not exist. So in assigning a judgement I could simply take
> it for granted that Alex's attempt succeeded, and reason from there.
> But that would be a cop-out wouldn't it.
This has
ping.
I intend to do everything that's late.
-G.
___
Agora mailing list
Agora@listserver.tue.nl
http://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora
Hmm... I still haven't had it bounce back to me.
Wonder what I've been missing...
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I got your first message.
>
> On Jun 6, 2014 1:52 PM, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
>
>
> ping.
>
> I intend
H. Distributor omd,
I have not received any emails from the agora mailing list since
your note that the list was "back up" on May 30.
I can't find anything changed on my end. Anything on yours that
might explain?
-G.
___
Agora mailing list
Agora@
Well my goodness, hi.CFJ: Quazie is a player.
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, Quazie wrote:
> I attempt to join agora nomic. I attempt to leave agora nomic. I wonder if
> either of those are effective in this bak
> channel. I assume yes. I wonder if this message will just be seen as an
> annoyan
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018, Quazie wrote:
> I object, unless doing so makes me active.
Since the conditional can't stop this from being a public message
from you, the unless clause fails... (assuming by 'active' you
mean 'hasn't posted publicly for N days', if you mean 'active' =
'not a zombie' you ha
On Mon, 7 May 2018, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-05-07 at 19:52 +0200, Corona wrote:
> > I intend to declare victory by apathy.
>
> Something makes me think that the backup lists have been pretty much
> nothing but attempts to win by apathy since it was invented.
A tribute to omd's uptime t
[note: an earlier version of this email to agora-business bounced].
FACT: Seven Days have passed since Proposal 8052 was distributed.
FACT: Exactly three players (Murphy, Aris, and twg) have voted on it.
FACT: Quorum for the decision to adopt Proposal 8052 is 6.
THEREFORE, as per Rule 2168:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> Did this copy bounce? That would be concerning. I appreciate the severe
> humiliation that you have brought upon me.
So the second copy (sent to both BAK and BUS) came to both BAK and BUS,
I got both copies. Then your reply to DIS c
If I have not previous resolved decisions to adopt Proposals 8050-8052,
I resolve them as indicated in the original message below.
[Please confirm receipt, someone!]
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kerim Aydin
To: Agora Official
(also publishing the below report to BAK, just in case).
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 13:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kerim Aydin
To: Agora Business
Subject: [Referee] Weekly Report
On 1/1/2020 12:54 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
I intend to register and prefer this case as soon as I have time to figure
out how to do that.
Parenthesis problems - I'm not sure if the "I intend to register" is part of
the conditional on "as soon as I have time"?
Based on the grammar, my cold first
[I'm voting AGAINST proposals authored by zombies, as I've done in past -
Lime shouldn't be that cheap].
I act on behalf of D. Margaux to vote endorse G. on all the below proposals.
I vote as follows:
On 10/21/2020 12:06 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> 8507p^ ATMunn, G., Falsifian 1.0 Happy
On 10/21/2020 12:59 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 8:40 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
>> wrote:
>>
>> AGAINST: This proposal is malformed and unclear on what is being replaced.
I change my vote on proposal 8512 to AGAINST.
From R105:
Any ambiguity in the spec
On 10/21/2020 6:16 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> On 10/21/2020 9:05 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
>> On 10/21/20 8:57 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>>> On 10/21/2020 8:51 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
On 10/21/20 8:49 PM, ATMunn wrote:
> On 10/21/2020 7:24 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
>> On 10/21/20 6:30 PM, Reuben Staley wrote:
On 10/9/2020 10:47 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> The below CFJ is 3885. I assign it to G..
>
> status:
> https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffaculty.washington.edu%2Fkerim%2Fnomic%2Fcases%2F%233885&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5ac50867715f4fe0
ence by G.:
https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.agoranomic.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Fprivate%2Fagora-business%2F2020-October%2F044977.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C0acf0928730140c7c9ca08d877645add%7Ccc7df24760ce4a0f9d75704cf60efc64%7C1%7C0%7C6373906202122
On 10/24/2020 6:17 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> On 10/24/20 9:16 AM, ais523 wrote:
>> On Sat, 2020-10-24 at 10:24 +0100, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>>> I'm not sure this works. 478 requires, when making a forum public,
>>> "the announcement by which the Registrar makes that forum public
On 10/25/2020 12:38 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> OK I just checked Promises and they seem like just mini-contracts. I'm not
> sure why we even have a rule for them specifically if I can do the same
> thing with something like:
>
> ---*---
> I make the following:
> "Promise Contract
> Only Falsifan ca
I object. -G.
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 9:21 AM Janet Cobb wrote:
>
> !---|
> This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
> You have not previously corresponded with this sender.
> See
> https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.
26 matches
Mail list logo
