Re: AI-GEOSTATS: (1) Geostatistics in pain

2010-01-07 Thread seba

Hi

In general I agree with the comments reported in the preceding replies.
Then I would add that the problem, if any one exists, doesn't relies 
on the lack of a good gui but maybe on the lack
of a kind of standard and internationally accepted set of programming 
routines directed to geostatistical analysis.
As a final consideration I think that the world of spatial analysis 
is more complex than in the past and
a kind of holistic view and is needed. For example I'm thinking to 
other techniques based on statistical learning theory,

data mining, etc...
Have a good new year!

Sebastiano


At 18.08 06/01/2010, Younes Fadakar wrote:

Hi there,

This is my first message as a test message checking the usage of the 
service, working with ai-geostats mailing list. I have many 
questions to ask you too.

To start:
The world of Geostatistics seriously needs a tool to present well to 
novices and professionals. Current availabilities have many of 
disadvantages. Some are too old, others not user-friendly and the 
rest more expensive.

1- GsLib seems powerful but too old (DOS-command line in 2010!)
2- WinGsLib is completely confusing despite of logging and 
automating! no direct input and output!!

3- Variowin is too weak in terms of GUI!
4- mGstat as a Matlab toolbox written too complex not handy program!
5- GeoR as an extention for R makes you to work with R such a 
command-line environment! what a development rather than GsLib!!

6- Isatis is more expensive; for what?!
7- Gs+ is in pain with weak performance of GUI!
8- Geoeas is something funny just to remember DOS graphics!
9- ...
So obviously a serious request remained for more than 20 years 
without suitable answer!

Why?


Younes



__
See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now: 
http://au.movies.yahoo.com/session-times/


+
+ To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geost...@jrc.ec.europa.eu
+ To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.ec.europa.eu with no 
subject and unsubscribe ai-geostats in the message body. DO NOT 
SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
+ As a general service to list users, please remember to post a 
summary of any useful responses to your questions.

+ Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/



+
+ To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geost...@jrc.ec.europa.eu
+ To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.ec.europa.eu with no subject and 
unsubscribe ai-geostats in the message body. DO NOT SEND 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
+ As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary of any 
useful responses to your questions.
+ Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/


Re: AI-GEOSTATS: (1) Geostatistics in pain

2010-01-07 Thread Paul Hiemstra

Younes Fadakar wrote:

Hi there,

This is my first message as a test message checking the usage of the service, 
working with ai-geostats mailing list. I have many questions to ask you too.
To start:
The world of Geostatistics seriously needs a tool to present well to novices and professionals. Current availabilities have many of disadvantages. Some are too old, others not user-friendly and the rest more expensive. 
1- GsLib seems powerful but too old (DOS-command line in 2010!)

2- WinGsLib is completely confusing despite of logging and automating! no 
direct input and output!!
3- Variowin is too weak in terms of GUI!
4- mGstat as a Matlab toolbox written too complex not handy program!
5- GeoR as an extention for R makes you to work with R such a command-line 
environment! what a development rather than GsLib!!
  

Hi Younes,

Being an R user myself (gstat, automap) I would like to comment a little 
on your problem with command line tools. I think what is most important 
is that each application has its own best tool to use. When a novice 
user wants to quickly make some maps, a GUI would probably be the 
preferred tool. But if you, as in my case, want to interpolate thousands 
of maps, put them on a webservice and allow user to get those maps from 
the web, a GUI tool such as ArcGIS is probably not the best option. R is 
great for these kinds of large analysis. In addition, I'm a Linux user 
and would not trade my command line for any GUI :). Therefore I believe 
a GUI is not per definition better than command line. It's just that 
people are used to GUI nowadays, making command line seem old.


I agree that it takes quite some time to learn R and that it is not a 
tool suitable for the casual user. A great combo would be a tool that 
has the flexibility and power of R and the ease of use of e.g. ArcGIS.


Hope you find a solution that suits your particular needs.

cheers,
Paul

6- Isatis is more expensive; for what?!
7- Gs+ is in pain with weak performance of GUI!
8- Geoeas is something funny just to remember DOS graphics!
9- ...
So obviously a serious request remained for more than 20 years without suitable 
answer!
Why?
 


Younes


  
__
See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now: 
http://au.movies.yahoo.com/session-times/

+
+ To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geost...@jrc.ec.europa.eu
+ To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.ec.europa.eu with no subject and 
unsubscribe ai-geostats in the message body. DO NOT SEND 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
+ As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary of any 
useful responses to your questions.
+ Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/
  



--
Drs. Paul Hiemstra
Department of Physical Geography
Faculty of Geosciences
University of Utrecht
Heidelberglaan 2
P.O. Box 80.115
3508 TC Utrecht
Phone:  +3130 274 3113 Mon-Tue
Phone:  +3130 253 5773 Wed-Fri
http://intamap.geo.uu.nl/~paul

+
+ To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geost...@jrc.ec.europa.eu
+ To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.ec.europa.eu with no subject and 
unsubscribe ai-geostats in the message body. DO NOT SEND 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
+ As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary of any 
useful responses to your questions.
+ Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/


Re: AI-GEOSTATS: (1) Geostatistics in pain

2010-01-06 Thread Edzer Pebesma

Younes, thanks for the provocative message.

I believe you are looking for this free or cheap, all-capable package 
with a complete, friendly and robust graphical user interface with 
dynamic graphics. A problem is that such a thing is hard and expensive 
to develop, and unlikely to be arise as a side product of a research 
project. Look at the worlds of GIS or image analysis -- there's a lot of 
high quality things out there for free, but the thing you're looking for 
is very expensive.


In your list I missed at least:
9. ArcGIS + geostatistical analyst
10. SGEMS, the new Stanford software after GSLIB
11. other packages in R, such as gstat, randomFields, rsaga, and so on.
12. ... (I hope others will finish this list!)

I'm one of the many people active in the r-sig-geo community, and am 
constantly astonished about the growth of the activity around R; you can 
see some statistics on this in a paper in the latest issue of the R 
journal, e.g. fig 4 in

http://journal.r-project.org/archive/2009-2/RJournal_2009-2_Fox.pdf

The special-interest-group on spatial data with R, r-sig-geo, undergoes 
a similar growth; it has now some 1400 subscribers and the development 
of mailing list activity is plotted in 
http://ifgi.uni-muenster.de/~epebe_01/r-sig-geo.png . A major part of 
this activity focuses around geostatistics.


Looking at these graphs, I have the impression that I'm not alone when 
thinking that although graphical, interactive exploratory data analysis 
is a very nice thing to have, a solid data analysis should start from 
the principle of reproducability, and therefore as little as possible 
/depend/ on the reproduction of long sequences of mouse clicks.


Are users of this list aware of other communities and/or mailing lists 
where considerable activity around geostatistics and/or geostatistical 
software takes place?


Younes, could you be more precise about exactly which serious request 
[...] remained more than 20 years?


I hope your email gets many responses,
--
Edzer

Younes Fadakar wrote:

Hi there,

This is my first message as a test message checking the usage of the service, 
working with ai-geostats mailing list. I have many questions to ask you too.
To start:
The world of Geostatistics seriously needs a tool to present well to novices and professionals. Current availabilities have many of disadvantages. Some are too old, others not user-friendly and the rest more expensive. 
1- GsLib seems powerful but too old (DOS-command line in 2010!)

2- WinGsLib is completely confusing despite of logging and automating! no 
direct input and output!!
3- Variowin is too weak in terms of GUI!
4- mGstat as a Matlab toolbox written too complex not handy program!
5- GeoR as an extention for R makes you to work with R such a command-line 
environment! what a development rather than GsLib!!
6- Isatis is more expensive; for what?!
7- Gs+ is in pain with weak performance of GUI!
8- Geoeas is something funny just to remember DOS graphics!
9- ...
So obviously a serious request remained for more than 20 years without suitable 
answer!
Why?
 


Younes


  
__
See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now: 
http://au.movies.yahoo.com/session-times/

+
+ To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geost...@jrc.ec.europa.eu
+ To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.ec.europa.eu with no subject and 
unsubscribe ai-geostats in the message body. DO NOT SEND 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
+ As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary of any 
useful responses to your questions.
+ Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/
  


--
Edzer Pebesma
Institute for Geoinformatics (ifgi), University of Münster 
Weseler Straße 253, 48151 Münster, Germany. Phone: +49 251 
8333081, Fax: +49 251 8339763  http://ifgi.uni-muenster.de 
http://www.52north.org/geostatistics  e.pebe...@wwu.de




RE: AI-GEOSTATS: (1) Geostatistics in pain

2010-01-06 Thread Seth J Myers
I'm wondering what geostatistical software is best for handling very large data 
sets.  With the advent of GIS and remote sensing, having too much data is a 
problem.  Sampling of course is useful, but only to a point if a large study 
area is used.  I've read other places that among the commercial stat packages, 
SAS is best at handling large data sets.  Is this true?  Also, I've produced my 
own little routine in IDRISI that can create 'random' samples that are 
clustered by inverse distance, so that short lags are preferred.  Are there any 
software packages that can create a random sample of points that show a 
pre-specified clustering pattern in space? Thanks -Seth


From: owner-ai-geost...@jrc.ec.europa.eu [owner-ai-geost...@jrc.ec.europa.eu] 
on behalf of Edzer Pebesma [edzer.pebe...@uni-muenster.de]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 2:52 PM
To: Younes Fadakar
Cc: ai-geostats@jrc.it
Subject: Re: AI-GEOSTATS: (1) Geostatistics in pain

Younes, thanks for the provocative message.

I believe you are looking for this free or cheap, all-capable package with a 
complete, friendly and robust graphical user interface with dynamic graphics. A 
problem is that such a thing is hard and expensive to develop, and unlikely to 
be arise as a side product of a research project. Look at the worlds of GIS or 
image analysis -- there's a lot of high quality things out there for free, but 
the thing you're looking for is very expensive.

In your list I missed at least:
9. ArcGIS + geostatistical analyst
10. SGEMS, the new Stanford software after GSLIB
11. other packages in R, such as gstat, randomFields, rsaga, and so on.
12. ... (I hope others will finish this list!)

I'm one of the many people active in the r-sig-geo community, and am constantly 
astonished about the growth of the activity around R; you can see some 
statistics on this in a paper in the latest issue of the R journal, e.g. fig 4 
in
http://journal.r-project.org/archive/2009-2/RJournal_2009-2_Fox.pdf

The special-interest-group on spatial data with R, r-sig-geo, undergoes a 
similar growth; it has now some 1400 subscribers and the development of mailing 
list activity is plotted in http://ifgi.uni-muenster.de/~epebe_01/r-sig-geo.png 
. A major part of this activity focuses around geostatistics.

Looking at these graphs, I have the impression that I'm not alone when thinking 
that although graphical, interactive exploratory data analysis is a very nice 
thing to have, a solid data analysis should start from the principle of 
reproducability, and therefore as little as possible depend on the reproduction 
of long sequences of mouse clicks.

Are users of this list aware of other communities and/or mailing lists where 
considerable activity around geostatistics and/or geostatistical software takes 
place?

Younes, could you be more precise about exactly which serious request [...] 
remained more than 20 years?

I hope your email gets many responses,
--
Edzer

Younes Fadakar wrote:

Hi there,

This is my first message as a test message checking the usage of the service, 
working with ai-geostats mailing list. I have many questions to ask you too.
To start:
The world of Geostatistics seriously needs a tool to present well to novices 
and professionals. Current availabilities have many of disadvantages. Some are 
too old, others not user-friendly and the rest more expensive.
1- GsLib seems powerful but too old (DOS-command line in 2010!)
2- WinGsLib is completely confusing despite of logging and automating! no 
direct input and output!!
3- Variowin is too weak in terms of GUI!
4- mGstat as a Matlab toolbox written too complex not handy program!
5- GeoR as an extention for R makes you to work with R such a command-line 
environment! what a development rather than GsLib!!
6- Isatis is more expensive; for what?!
7- Gs+ is in pain with weak performance of GUI!
8- Geoeas is something funny just to remember DOS graphics!
9- ...
So obviously a serious request remained for more than 20 years without suitable 
answer!
Why?


Younes


  
__
See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now: 
http://au.movies.yahoo.com/session-times/

+
+ To post a message to the list, send it to 
ai-geost...@jrc.ec.europa.eumailto:ai-geost...@jrc.ec.europa.eu
+ To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.ec.europa.eu with no subject and 
unsubscribe ai-geostats in the message body. DO NOT SEND 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
+ As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary of any 
useful responses to your questions.
+ Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/



--
Edzer Pebesma
Institute for Geoinformatics (ifgi), University of Münster
Weseler Straße 253, 48151 Münster, Germany. Phone: +49 251
8333081, Fax: +49 251 8339763  http://ifgi.uni-muenster.de
http://www.52north.org/geostatistics  
e.pebe

Re: AI-GEOSTATS: (1) Geostatistics in pain

2010-01-06 Thread Pierre Goovaerts
Hello,

Your list is far from complete. I would recommened you take a look
at the following paper
Goovaerts, P. 2009. Geostatistical software. In M.M. Fischer and A. Getis,
editors, *Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis: Software Tools, Methods and
Applications.* Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, in
press.http://home.comcast.net/%7Epgoovaerts/A7-June.pdf
that is available at
http://sites.google.com/site/goovaertspierre/pierregoovaertswebsite/publications/book-chapters
that provides an overview and comparison of functionalities in a series of
geostat software, most of them listed on ai-geostat website.

Cheers,

Pierre

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Younes Fadakar yfa.st...@ymail.com wrote:

 Hi there,

 This is my first message as a test message checking the usage of the
 service, working with ai-geostats mailing list. I have many questions to ask
 you too.
 To start:
 The world of Geostatistics seriously needs a tool to present well to
 novices and professionals. Current availabilities have many of
 disadvantages. Some are too old, others not user-friendly and the rest more
 expensive.
 1- GsLib seems powerful but too old (DOS-command line in 2010!)
 2- WinGsLib is completely confusing despite of logging and automating! no
 direct input and output!!
 3- Variowin is too weak in terms of GUI!
 4- mGstat as a Matlab toolbox written too complex not handy program!
 5- GeoR as an extention for R makes you to work with R such a command-line
 environment! what a development rather than GsLib!!
 6- Isatis is more expensive; for what?!
 7- Gs+ is in pain with weak performance of GUI!
 8- Geoeas is something funny just to remember DOS graphics!
 9- ...
 So obviously a serious request remained for more than 20 years without
 suitable answer!
 Why?


 Younes



  
 __
 See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now:
 http://au.movies.yahoo.com/session-times/

 +
 + To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geost...@jrc.ec.europa.eu
 + To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.ec.europa.eu with no
 subject and unsubscribe ai-geostats in the message body. DO NOT SEND
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
 + As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary of
 any useful responses to your questions.
 + Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/




-- 
Pierre Goovaerts

Chief Scientist at BioMedware Inc.
3526 W Liberty, Suite 100
Ann Arbor, MI  48103
Voice: (734) 913-1098 (ext. 202)
Fax: (734) 913-2201

Courtesy Associate Professor, University of Florida
Associate Editor, Mathematical Geosciences
Geostatistician, Computer Sciences Corporation
President, PGeostat LLC
710 Ridgemont Lane
Ann Arbor, MI 48103
Voice: (734) 668-9900
Fax: (734) 668-7788

http://goovaerts.pierre.googlepages.com/