bind9 (1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-3) unstable; urgency=low
[Michael Stapelberg]
* add systemd service file. Closes: #718212
[LaMont Jones]
* deliver more dnssec-* tools in bind9utils. Closes: #713026
* support parallel=N DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS, fix -j build. Closes: #713025
* deliver rrl.h and
: low
Maintainer: LaMont Jones
Changed-By: LaMont Jones
Closes: 721150
Description:
postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix
postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment for Postfix
postfix-doc - Documentation for Postfix
postfix- High-performance mail transport agent
postfix
: low
Maintainer: LaMont Jones
Changed-By: LaMont Jones
Closes: 703776 703871 703887 703929 704016 709107
Description:
postfix- High-performance mail transport agent
postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix
postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment for Postfix
postfix-doc
:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LaMont Jones
Changed-By: LaMont Jones
Closes: 692483 713025 713026 718212 720813
Description:
bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND
bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X
bind9 - Internet Domain N
:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LaMont Jones
Changed-By: LaMont Jones
Description:
bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server
bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND
bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X
bind9utils - Utilities for BIND
: 1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LaMont Jones
Changed-By: LaMont Jones
Closes: 696661
Description:
bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND
bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X
bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server
bind9utils - Uti
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:47:14AM -0430, Ernesto Hernández-Novich wrote:
> * Package name: bind10
> Version : 1.1.0
> Upstream Author : ISC Software Distribution
> * URL : http://bind10.isc.org
> * License : BSD
> Programming Lang: C++, Python
> Description
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:47:14AM -0430, Ernesto Hernández-Novich wrote:
> * Package name: bind10
> Version : 1.1.0
> Upstream Author : ISC Software Distribution
> * URL : http://bind10.isc.org
> * License : BSD
> Programming Lang: C++, Python
> Description
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:26:59PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> the Knot DNS 1.3.0 introduced knot-dnsutils and knot-host package(s),
> so it would be nice if the two can coexist nicely in the system.
> knot-dnsutils and knot-host provide kdig, knsupdate and khost binaries
> that aim to be 1:1 compa
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 07:21:39PM +0200, InuSasha wrote:
> i want to reopen the wish-entry.
> the bind 9.8.4 supports the ldap back-end out of the box.
>
> only "--with-dlz-ldap=yes" have to add to configure.
I believe that doing that forces ldap to be installed on every machine
that has bind9 i
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #710997
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710997
** Also affects: iptables (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710997
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
Public bug reported:
Since time immemorial, iptables has called setsockopt() and treated any
-1 return value as fatal. Any system call can return EAGAIN or
EINPROGRESS (depending on the origins of the API), and good coding
Package: iptables
Version: 1.4.18-1
Tags: patch
--
Since time immemorial, iptables has called setsockopt() and treated any
-1 return value as fatal. Any system call can return EAGAIN or
EINPROGRESS (depending on the origins of the API), and good coding
practice requires checking for that and retr
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:28:31AM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> I have just uploaded nmap 6.25-0.1 to DELAYED/5:
Please go ahead and upload it to non-delayed. I'll get the source tree
caught up with the archive in the next week or 3.
lamont
> nmap (6.25-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Non-m
apport information
** Attachment added: "PulseList.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660325/+files/PulseList.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
apport information
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660322/+files/BootDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
apport information
** Attachment added: "HookError_cloud_archive.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660324/+files/HookError_cloud_archive.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubunt
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660323/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
apport information
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660322/+files/BootDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992
Titl
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
lspci -v output:
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High
Definition Audio (rev 06)
Subsystem: Dell Device 0447
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 48
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660323/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992
apport information
** Attachment added: "PulseList.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660325/+files/PulseList.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992
Titl
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
lspci -v output:
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High
Definition Audio (rev 06)
Subsystem: Dell Device 0447
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 48
apport information
** Attachment added: "HookError_cloud_archive.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660324/+files/HookError_cloud_archive.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
This is specifically caused by having non-default
smtp_recipient_restrictions, which changed behavior in 2.10, and postfix
needs to know how you want to proceed. The answer to the question can
be preseeded if you so desire. There is no bug here.
--
You received this bug notification because you
This is specifically caused by having non-default
smtp_recipient_restrictions, which changed behavior in 2.10, and postfix
needs to know how you want to proceed. The answer to the question can
be preseeded if you so desire. There is no bug here.
--
You received this bug notification because you
Public bug reported:
lspci -v output:
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High
Definition Audio (rev 06)
Subsystem: Dell Device 0447
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 48
Memory at fbd0 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
Public bug reported:
lspci -v output:
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High
Definition Audio (rev 06)
Subsystem: Dell Device 0447
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 48
Memory at fbd0 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
This seems to have been introduced in 3.8.0-18-generic. Currently
running a quantal kernel so that the machine will stay up.
I'm happy to run whatever tests you need around this, up to and
including shipping the stupid board to someone. (tell me what to get to
replace it that will work halfway d
Public bug reported:
During boot, there is an OOPS. Here is the dmesg output from the boot,
through the OOPS.
After booting, ps seems to hang. Maybe that's related.
Linux soko 3.8.0-19-generic #29-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 17 18:16:28 UTC 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
The setup:
- grizzly rc2 upgraded to grizzly (1:2013.1-0ubuntu1~cloud0), running on
precise.
- fresh install configured based on what appears to be a folsom howto
Starting nova-network results in the following in the nova-network log:
...
2013-04-10 08:59:18.788 WARNING nov
Public bug reported:
The setup:
- grizzly rc2 upgraded to grizzly (1:2013.1-0ubuntu1~cloud0), running on
precise.
- fresh install configured based on what appears to be a folsom howto
Starting nova-network results in the following in the nova-network log:
...
2013-04-10 08:59:18.788 WARNING nov
** Tags added: prodstack
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166455
Title:
nova flavor-list only shows 1000 flavors
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.n
** Tags added: prodstack
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166455
Title:
nova flavor-list only shows 1000 flavors
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://b
Public bug reported:
After I created a thousand new flavors (to enable some automation), with
IDs 1000-1999, nova flavor-list now displays flavor 1, followed by
1000-1998, and then stops.
Flavors 1999 and 2-6 are still valid and usable, just absent from the
output of flavor-list (flavor-show is h
Public bug reported:
After I created a thousand new flavors (to enable some automation), with
IDs 1000-1999, nova flavor-list now displays flavor 1, followed by
1000-1998, and then stops.
Flavors 1999 and 2-6 are still valid and usable, just absent from the
output of flavor-list (flavor-show is h
found 2.4.6-4
--
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:40:51PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> Package: postfix
> Version: 2.10.0-3
> Severity: normal
>
> The postinst script cannot successfully run update-rc.d when dnsmasq is
> installed but disabled at boot time.
This was introduced in the original insserv
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LaMont Jones
Changed-By: LaMont Jones
Closes: 703168 703225 703316 703397 703449 703471 703537 703590
Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed: 1156223
Description:
postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix
postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment for Postfix
postfix-doc
Adding this here since it's the same problem, just a different file.
Preparing to replace unity-asset-pool 0.8.24daily12.12.05-0ubuntu1 (using
.../unity-asset-pool_0.8.24daily13.03.20-0ubuntu1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement unity-asset-pool ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/
Public bug reported:
During an upgrade to raring (from quantal), the prerm script tries to
use things that are not defined. There are broken Dependencies in the
package.
Preparing to replace python-novaclient 1:2.9.0-0ubuntu1 (using
.../python-novaclient_1%3a2.11.1-0ubuntu1_all.deb) ...
T
Public bug reported:
During an upgrade to raring (from quantal), the prerm script tries to
use things that are not defined. There are broken Dependencies in the
package.
Preparing to replace python-novaclient 1:2.9.0-0ubuntu1 (using
.../python-novaclient_1%3a2.11.1-0ubuntu1_all.deb) ...
T
This is actually a bug in the ubuntu server settings. Servers should
not have ipv6 privacy on by default, and postfix should honor what the
admin has set.
I'll revisit this and either close it with a reference to the other bug,
or reassign it, as appropriate.
--
You received this bug notificati
This is actually a bug in the ubuntu server settings. Servers should
not have ipv6 privacy on by default, and postfix should honor what the
admin has set.
I'll revisit this and either close it with a reference to the other bug,
or reassign it, as appropriate.
--
You received this bug notificati
Fixed in 2.10.0-3
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Fix
Fixed in 2.10.0-3
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Fix
to me, or submit it as a wishlist bug
against postfix.
The deadline for receiving the updated translation is
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:58:00 -0600.
Thanks in advance,
#
# Catalan translation for postfix package.
# Copyright (C) 2012 LaMont Jones.
# This file is distributed under the same license as t
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing.
I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it.
Please send the updated file to me, or
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing.
I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it.
Please send the updated file to me, or
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing.
I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it.
Please send the updated file to me, or
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing.
I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it.
Please send the updated file to me, or
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing.
I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it.
Please send the updated file to me, or
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing.
I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it.
Please send the updated file to me, or
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing.
I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it.
Please send the updated file to me, or
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing.
I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it.
Please send the updated file to me, or
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing.
I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it.
Please send the updated file to me, or
Hi,
You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for
postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages
are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing.
I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it.
Please send the updated file to me, or
Fred - was that on a fresh install, or what version were you upgrading
from?
thanks,
lamont
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155730
Title:
postfix 2.10 for raring
To manage notificat
Fred - was that on a fresh install, or what version were you upgrading
from?
thanks,
lamont
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155730
Title:
postfix 2.10 for raring
T
If approved, please sync 2.10.0-2 from debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155730
Title:
postfix 2.10 for raring
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
Public bug reported:
Postfix 2.10 provides improved controls for reducing the risk of open relays.
Also, we want to continue to offer the latest postfix to LTS users via
backports and we need to get it into raring to do this.
Attached is the upstream diff of the HISTORY file.
** Affects: postfi
If approved, please sync 2.10.0-2 from debian.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155730
Title:
postfix 2.10 for raring
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launch
Public bug reported:
Postfix 2.10 provides improved controls for reducing the risk of open relays.
Also, we want to continue to offer the latest postfix to LTS users via
backports and we need to get it into raring to do this.
Attached is the upstream diff of the HISTORY file.
** Affects: postfi
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LaMont Jones
Changed-By: LaMont Jones
Closes: 702374
Description:
postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix
postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment for Postfix
postfix-doc - Documentation for Postfix
postfix- High-performance mail transport agent
postfix
Public bug reported:
I need to run tftpd from xinetd, and that support was dropped when the
init script was converted to upstart.
Please restore the ability to run tftpd from xinetd.
** Affects: tftp-hpa (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notifica
Public bug reported:
I need to run tftpd from xinetd, and that support was dropped when the
init script was converted to upstart.
Please restore the ability to run tftpd from xinetd.
** Affects: tftp-hpa (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notifica
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:59:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> A debdiff against the current wheezy package (possibly minus the .po
> changes and some of the repetitive documentation updates) would probably
> have been more useful, fwiw.
Noted for the future.
> > The source and amd64 binaries
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:59:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> A debdiff against the current wheezy package (possibly minus the .po
> changes and some of the repetitive documentation updates) would probably
> have been more useful, fwiw.
Noted for the future.
> > The source and amd64 binaries
diff -u postfix-2.9.6/debian/control postfix-2.9.6/debian/control
--- postfix-2.9.6/debian/control
+++ postfix-2.9.6/debian/control
@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
Source: postfix
Section: mail
Priority: extra
-Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers
-XSBC-Original-Maintainer: LaMont Jones
+Maintainer: LaMont Jones
diff -u postfix-2.9.6/debian/control postfix-2.9.6/debian/control
--- postfix-2.9.6/debian/control
+++ postfix-2.9.6/debian/control
@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
Source: postfix
Section: mail
Priority: extra
-Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers
-XSBC-Original-Maintainer: LaMont Jones
+Maintainer: LaMont Jones
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:19:49PM +0100, Jean-Jacques Doti wrote:
> I've been able to solve the problem by adding this line to the conf
> (main.cf) :
> smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated,
> permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination
> but I'm not sure there will be no side
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:19:49PM +0100, Jean-Jacques Doti wrote:
> I've been able to solve the problem by adding this line to the conf
> (main.cf) :
> smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated,
> permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination
> but I'm not sure there will be no side
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to
> fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message
> in the bug log for details.
wheezy has 2.9.3-2.1, sid has 2.10.0-1. Given
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to
> fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message
> in the bug log for details.
wheezy has 2.9.3-2.1, sid has 2.10.0-1. Given
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LaMont Jones
Changed-By: LaMont Jones
Closes: 699877
Description:
postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix
postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment for Postfix
postfix-doc - Documentation for Postfix
postfix- High-performance mail transport agent
postfix
:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LaMont Jones
Changed-By: LaMont Jones
Closes: 696661
Description:
bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND
bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X
bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server
bind9utils - Utilitie
Finally saw what was meant there. Confirmed, doing the mkdir
"${dest_dir}.NEW" will be unconditional (inside that box) as of 2.10.0-1
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lam
Finally saw what was meant there. Confirmed, doing the mkdir
"${dest_dir}.NEW" will be unconditional (inside that box) as of 2.10.0-1
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lam
What is the value for smtp_tls_CApath in your configuration?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1139159
Title:
Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL
To manage notifications ab
What is the value for smtp_tls_CApath in your configuration?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1139159
Title:
Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL
To manag
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:53:01AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:37:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Given these, I am not convinced that this should be RC for wheezy.
> How about a NEWS item drawing attention to the issue and workaround,
> and a downgrade to
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:53:01AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:37:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Given these, I am not convinced that this should be RC for wheezy.
> How about a NEWS item drawing attention to the issue and workaround,
> and a downgrade to
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 08:44:55PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Debian admin has deployed the patch at [2] to the bind running the
> debian.org nameservers - else debian.org's nameservers would not have
> any resources left to answer legitimate queries.
>
> We think it important that the bind v
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 08:44:55PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Debian admin has deployed the patch at [2] to the bind running the
> debian.org nameservers - else debian.org's nameservers would not have
> any resources left to answer legitimate queries.
>
> We think it important that the bind v
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:50:22AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> I have a modified /etc/default/bind9.
> Everytime bind packages are upgraded, I end up having a
> /etc/default/bind9.dpkg-dist, which by itself is fine, but dpkg never
> queries me with the usual dialog on whether I want to
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 06:11:03PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> please compare
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2013/02/msg00141.html
> with, for example,
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2013/02/msg00140.html
> and tell me whether you’re seeing what I am seeing:
> •
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 11:33:39AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> mergechanges is responsible for the differences you're seeing:
> dpkg-source is run (yes, on an ubuntu system), and then binaries are built
> on a system that is running sid, both amd64 and i386 binaries, since at
> l
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers
Changed-By: LaMont Jones
Closes: 683687 690936
Description:
postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix
postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment for Postfix
postfix-doc - Documentation for Postfix
postfix- High-performance mail
: 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LaMont Jones
Changed-By: LaMont Jones
Closes: 698641
Description:
bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND
bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X
bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server
bind9utils - Uti
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 06:08:58PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> With the grown deployment of DNSSEC and more information being put into
> the domain name system, DNS servers have become and are becoming a
> useful tool for denial of service attacks by providing amplification:
> a single UDP pack
: 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: LaMont Jones
Changed-By: LaMont Jones
Closes: 697681
Description:
bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND
bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X
bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server
bind9utils - Uti
Public bug reported:
If dpkg-dev is not installed, then errors are produced, despite the
script running successfully.
redirecting stderr should fix it:
if (type dpkg-vendor >/dev/null); then echo y;fi
bash: type: dpkg-vendor: not found
** Affects: sks (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Public bug reported:
If dpkg-dev is not installed, then errors are produced, despite the
script running successfully.
redirecting stderr should fix it:
if (type dpkg-vendor >/dev/null); then echo y;fi
bash: type: dpkg-vendor: not found
** Affects: sks (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 03:11:42PM +0100, Peter Beck wrote:
> Having the same issue on a wheezy machine with Samba4.
> I'm also curious if this will be fixed for wheezy too.
The current plan is to have 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-3 migrate to wheezy.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-req
tag 690361 + moreinfo
--
It is not clear what exactly the change should be here, nor do I have
a machine to test it on.
If someone would like to propose a patch, I'd be happy to include it.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-bugs-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
tag 690361 + moreinfo
--
It is not clear what exactly the change should be here, nor do I have
a machine to test it on.
If someone would like to propose a patch, I'd be happy to include it.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
: 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze9
Distribution: squeeze-proposed-updates
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LaMont Jones
Changed-By: LaMont Jones
Closes: 697352
Description:
bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server
bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND
bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled wit
This will also solve
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sks/+bug/1098704
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1096116
Title:
New version 1.1.4 available
To manage notifications abou
This will also solve
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sks/+bug/1098704
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Debian
OCaml Maintainers, which is subscribed to sks in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1096116
Title:
New version 1.1.4 available
Status i
Public bug reported:
1.1.3-1ubuntu3, 1.1.3-1, and 1.1.3 (running on precise) fail to load the
current keydump data from http://ftp.prato.linux.it/pub/keyring/dump-
latest/
At some point after loading the first 45 keys, it gets into a futex
lock wait that never finishes.
1.1.4 does not experi
Public bug reported:
1.1.3-1ubuntu3, 1.1.3-1, and 1.1.3 (running on precise) fail to load the
current keydump data from http://ftp.prato.linux.it/pub/keyring/dump-
latest/
At some point after loading the first 45 keys, it gets into a futex
lock wait that never finishes.
1.1.4 does not experi
801 - 900 of 3452 matches
Mail list logo