[ubuntu/saucy-proposed] bind9 1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-3 (Accepted)

2013-08-28 Thread LaMont Jones
bind9 (1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-3) unstable; urgency=low [Michael Stapelberg] * add systemd service file. Closes: #718212 [LaMont Jones] * deliver more dnssec-* tools in bind9utils. Closes: #713026 * support parallel=N DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS, fix -j build. Closes: #713025 * deliver rrl.h and

Accepted postfix 2.10.1-2 (all i386 source)

2013-08-28 Thread LaMont Jones
: low Maintainer: LaMont Jones Changed-By: LaMont Jones Closes: 721150 Description: postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment for Postfix postfix-doc - Documentation for Postfix postfix- High-performance mail transport agent postfix

Accepted postfix 2.10.1-1 (all i386 source)

2013-08-27 Thread LaMont Jones
: low Maintainer: LaMont Jones Changed-By: LaMont Jones Closes: 703776 703871 703887 703929 704016 709107 Description: postfix- High-performance mail transport agent postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment for Postfix postfix-doc

Accepted bind9 1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-3 (all i386 source)

2013-08-27 Thread LaMont Jones
:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: LaMont Jones Changed-By: LaMont Jones Closes: 692483 713025 713026 718212 720813 Description: bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X bind9 - Internet Domain N

Accepted bind9 1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-2 (all i386 source)

2013-08-18 Thread LaMont Jones
:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: LaMont Jones Changed-By: LaMont Jones Description: bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X bind9utils - Utilities for BIND

Accepted bind9 1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-1 (all amd64 i386 source)

2013-08-18 Thread LaMont Jones
: 1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: LaMont Jones Changed-By: LaMont Jones Closes: 696661 Description: bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server bind9utils - Uti

Bug#719719: ITP: bind10 -- ISC's Internet Domain Name Server

2013-08-14 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:47:14AM -0430, Ernesto Hernández-Novich wrote: > * Package name: bind10 > Version : 1.1.0 > Upstream Author : ISC Software Distribution > * URL : http://bind10.isc.org > * License : BSD > Programming Lang: C++, Python > Description

Bug#719719: ITP: bind10 -- ISC's Internet Domain Name Server

2013-08-14 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:47:14AM -0430, Ernesto Hernández-Novich wrote: > * Package name: bind10 > Version : 1.1.0 > Upstream Author : ISC Software Distribution > * URL : http://bind10.isc.org > * License : BSD > Programming Lang: C++, Python > Description

Bug#717069: bind9: Please allow alternative dnsutils and host packages

2013-07-16 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:26:59PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > the Knot DNS 1.3.0 introduced knot-dnsutils and knot-host package(s), > so it would be nice if the two can coexist nicely in the system. > knot-dnsutils and knot-host provide kdig, knsupdate and khost binaries > that aim to be 1:1 compa

Bug#246680: ldap-support for bind9

2013-06-17 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 07:21:39PM +0200, InuSasha wrote: > i want to reopen the wish-entry. > the bind 9.8.4 supports the ldap back-end out of the box. > > only "--with-dlz-ldap=yes" have to add to configure. I believe that doing that forces ldap to be installed on every machine that has bind9 i

[Bug 1187177] Re: iptables calls setsockopt(2) incorrectly, fails when it should not

2013-06-03 Thread LaMont Jones
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #710997 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710997 ** Also affects: iptables (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710997 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1187177] [NEW] iptables calls setsockopt(2) incorrectly, fails when it should not

2013-06-03 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: Since time immemorial, iptables has called setsockopt() and treated any -1 return value as fatal. Any system call can return EAGAIN or EINPROGRESS (depending on the origins of the API), and good coding

Bug#710997: iptables calls setsockopt incorrectly

2013-06-03 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: iptables Version: 1.4.18-1 Tags: patch -- Since time immemorial, iptables has called setsockopt() and treated any -1 return value as fatal. Any system call can return EAGAIN or EINPROGRESS (depending on the origins of the API), and good coding practice requires checking for that and retr

Bug#705762: Uploaded new upstream version

2013-05-30 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:28:31AM +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote: > I have just uploaded nmap 6.25-0.1 to DELAYED/5: Please go ahead and upload it to non-delayed. I'll get the source tree caught up with the archive in the next week or 3. lamont > nmap (6.25-0.1) unstable; urgency=low > > * Non-m

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1171992] PulseList.txt

2013-04-30 Thread LaMont Jones
apport information ** Attachment added: "PulseList.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660325/+files/PulseList.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1171992] BootDmesg.txt

2013-04-30 Thread LaMont Jones
apport information ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660322/+files/BootDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1171992] HookError_cloud_archive.txt

2013-04-30 Thread LaMont Jones
apport information ** Attachment added: "HookError_cloud_archive.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660324/+files/HookError_cloud_archive.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubunt

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1171992] CurrentDmesg.txt

2013-04-30 Thread LaMont Jones
apport information ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660323/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 1171992] BootDmesg.txt

2013-04-30 Thread LaMont Jones
apport information ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660322/+files/BootDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992 Titl

[Bug 1171992] Re: raring install does not detect builtin speakers

2013-04-30 Thread LaMont Jones
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: lspci -v output: 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High Definition Audio (rev 06) Subsystem: Dell Device 0447 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 48

[Bug 1171992] CurrentDmesg.txt

2013-04-30 Thread LaMont Jones
apport information ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660323/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992

[Bug 1171992] PulseList.txt

2013-04-30 Thread LaMont Jones
apport information ** Attachment added: "PulseList.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660325/+files/PulseList.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992 Titl

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1171992] Re: raring install does not detect builtin speakers

2013-04-30 Thread LaMont Jones
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: lspci -v output: 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High Definition Audio (rev 06) Subsystem: Dell Device 0447 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 48

[Bug 1171992] HookError_cloud_archive.txt

2013-04-30 Thread LaMont Jones
apport information ** Attachment added: "HookError_cloud_archive.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171992/+attachment/3660324/+files/HookError_cloud_archive.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 1169044] Re: can't install/upgrade postfix non interactively through apt

2013-04-24 Thread LaMont Jones
This is specifically caused by having non-default smtp_recipient_restrictions, which changed behavior in 2.10, and postfix needs to know how you want to proceed. The answer to the question can be preseeded if you so desire. There is no bug here. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1169044] Re: can't install/upgrade postfix non interactively through apt

2013-04-24 Thread LaMont Jones
This is specifically caused by having non-default smtp_recipient_restrictions, which changed behavior in 2.10, and postfix needs to know how you want to proceed. The answer to the question can be preseeded if you so desire. There is no bug here. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1171992] [NEW] raring install does not detect builtin speakers

2013-04-23 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: lspci -v output: 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High Definition Audio (rev 06) Subsystem: Dell Device 0447 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 48 Memory at fbd0 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1171992] [NEW] raring install does not detect builtin speakers

2013-04-23 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: lspci -v output: 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset High Definition Audio (rev 06) Subsystem: Dell Device 0447 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 48 Memory at fbd0 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]

[Bug 1170887] Re: OOPS generated during boot loading drivers

2013-04-19 Thread LaMont Jones
This seems to have been introduced in 3.8.0-18-generic. Currently running a quantal kernel so that the machine will stay up. I'm happy to run whatever tests you need around this, up to and including shipping the stupid board to someone. (tell me what to get to replace it that will work halfway d

[Bug 1170887] [NEW] OOPS generated during boot loading drivers

2013-04-19 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: During boot, there is an OOPS. Here is the dmesg output from the boot, through the OOPS. After booting, ps seems to hang. Maybe that's related. Linux soko 3.8.0-19-generic #29-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 17 18:16:28 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu

[Bug 1167512] [NEW] nova-network fails to start if bindir is not set

2013-04-10 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: The setup: - grizzly rc2 upgraded to grizzly (1:2013.1-0ubuntu1~cloud0), running on precise. - fresh install configured based on what appears to be a folsom howto Starting nova-network results in the following in the nova-network log: ... 2013-04-10 08:59:18.788 WARNING nov

[Bug 1167512] [NEW] nova-network fails to start if bindir is not set

2013-04-10 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: The setup: - grizzly rc2 upgraded to grizzly (1:2013.1-0ubuntu1~cloud0), running on precise. - fresh install configured based on what appears to be a folsom howto Starting nova-network results in the following in the nova-network log: ... 2013-04-10 08:59:18.788 WARNING nov

[Bug 1166455] Re: nova flavor-list only shows 1000 flavors

2013-04-08 Thread LaMont Jones
** Tags added: prodstack -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166455 Title: nova flavor-list only shows 1000 flavors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 1166455] Re: nova flavor-list only shows 1000 flavors

2013-04-08 Thread LaMont Jones
** Tags added: prodstack -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166455 Title: nova flavor-list only shows 1000 flavors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://b

[Bug 1166455] [NEW] nova flavor-list only shows 1000 flavors

2013-04-08 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: After I created a thousand new flavors (to enable some automation), with IDs 1000-1999, nova flavor-list now displays flavor 1, followed by 1000-1998, and then stops. Flavors 1999 and 2-6 are still valid and usable, just absent from the output of flavor-list (flavor-show is h

[Bug 1166455] [NEW] nova flavor-list only shows 1000 flavors

2013-04-08 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: After I created a thousand new flavors (to enable some automation), with IDs 1000-1999, nova flavor-list now displays flavor 1, followed by 1000-1998, and then stops. Flavors 1999 and 2-6 are still valid and usable, just absent from the output of flavor-list (flavor-show is h

Bug#703805: postfix: insserv cannot enable postfix if dnsmasq is disabled

2013-03-23 Thread LaMont Jones
found 2.4.6-4 -- On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:40:51PM +0100, Dominik George wrote: > Package: postfix > Version: 2.10.0-3 > Severity: normal > > The postinst script cannot successfully run update-rc.d when dnsmasq is > installed but disabled at boot time. This was introduced in the original insserv

Accepted postfix 2.10.0-3 (all amd64 source)

2013-03-22 Thread LaMont Jones
Urgency: low Maintainer: LaMont Jones Changed-By: LaMont Jones Closes: 703168 703225 703316 703397 703449 703471 703537 703590 Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed: 1156223 Description: postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment for Postfix postfix-doc

[Bug 1157853] Re: package unity-asset-pool 0.8.24daily12.12.05-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/google.png', which is also in package accoun

2013-03-20 Thread LaMont Jones
Adding this here since it's the same problem, just a different file. Preparing to replace unity-asset-pool 0.8.24daily12.12.05-0ubuntu1 (using .../unity-asset-pool_0.8.24daily13.03.20-0ubuntu1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement unity-asset-pool ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/

[Bug 1157687] [NEW] Upgrade to raring fails in prerm

2013-03-20 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: During an upgrade to raring (from quantal), the prerm script tries to use things that are not defined. There are broken Dependencies in the package. Preparing to replace python-novaclient 1:2.9.0-0ubuntu1 (using .../python-novaclient_1%3a2.11.1-0ubuntu1_all.deb) ... T

[Bug 1157687] [NEW] Upgrade to raring fails in prerm

2013-03-20 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: During an upgrade to raring (from quantal), the prerm script tries to use things that are not defined. There are broken Dependencies in the package. Preparing to replace python-novaclient 1:2.9.0-0ubuntu1 (using .../python-novaclient_1%3a2.11.1-0ubuntu1_all.deb) ... T

[Bug 1089342] Re: Postfix uses temporary IPv6 address for outbound connections

2013-03-19 Thread LaMont Jones
This is actually a bug in the ubuntu server settings. Servers should not have ipv6 privacy on by default, and postfix should honor what the admin has set. I'll revisit this and either close it with a reference to the other bug, or reassign it, as appropriate. -- You received this bug notificati

[Bug 1089342] Re: Postfix uses temporary IPv6 address for outbound connections

2013-03-19 Thread LaMont Jones
This is actually a bug in the ubuntu server settings. Servers should not have ipv6 privacy on by default, and postfix should honor what the admin has set. I'll revisit this and either close it with a reference to the other bug, or reassign it, as appropriate. -- You received this bug notificati

[Bug 1156223] Re: package postfix 2.10.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2013-03-19 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in 2.10.0-3 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix => Fix

[Bug 1156223] Re: package postfix 2.10.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2013-03-19 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in 2.10.0-3 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix => Fix

postfix 2.10.0-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2013-03-17 Thread LaMont Jones
to me, or submit it as a wishlist bug against postfix. The deadline for receiving the updated translation is Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:58:00 -0600. Thanks in advance, # # Catalan translation for postfix package. # Copyright (C) 2012 LaMont Jones. # This file is distributed under the same license as t

postfix 2.10.0-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2013-03-17 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 2.10.0-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2013-03-17 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 2.10.0-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2013-03-17 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 2.10.0-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2013-03-17 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 2.10.0-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2013-03-17 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 2.10.0-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2013-03-17 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 2.10.0-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2013-03-17 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 2.10.0-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2013-03-17 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 2.10.0-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2013-03-17 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

postfix 2.10.0-2: Please update debconf PO translation for the package postfix

2013-03-17 Thread LaMont Jones
Hi, You are noted as the last translator of the debconf translation for postfix. The English template has been changed, and now some messages are marked "fuzzy" in your translation or are missing. I would be grateful if you could take the time and update it. Please send the updated file to me, or

[Bug 1155730] Re: postfix 2.10 for raring

2013-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
Fred - was that on a fresh install, or what version were you upgrading from? thanks, lamont -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155730 Title: postfix 2.10 for raring To manage notificat

[Bug 1155730] Re: postfix 2.10 for raring

2013-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
Fred - was that on a fresh install, or what version were you upgrading from? thanks, lamont -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155730 Title: postfix 2.10 for raring T

[Bug 1155730] Re: postfix 2.10 for raring

2013-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
If approved, please sync 2.10.0-2 from debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155730 Title: postfix 2.10 for raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: h

[Bug 1155730] [NEW] postfix 2.10 for raring

2013-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: Postfix 2.10 provides improved controls for reducing the risk of open relays. Also, we want to continue to offer the latest postfix to LTS users via backports and we need to get it into raring to do this. Attached is the upstream diff of the HISTORY file. ** Affects: postfi

[Bug 1155730] Re: postfix 2.10 for raring

2013-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
If approved, please sync 2.10.0-2 from debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155730 Title: postfix 2.10 for raring To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launch

[Bug 1155730] [NEW] postfix 2.10 for raring

2013-03-15 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: Postfix 2.10 provides improved controls for reducing the risk of open relays. Also, we want to continue to offer the latest postfix to LTS users via backports and we need to get it into raring to do this. Attached is the upstream diff of the HISTORY file. ** Affects: postfi

Accepted postfix 2.10.0-2 (all amd64 source)

2013-03-14 Thread LaMont Jones
Urgency: low Maintainer: LaMont Jones Changed-By: LaMont Jones Closes: 702374 Description: postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment for Postfix postfix-doc - Documentation for Postfix postfix- High-performance mail transport agent postfix

[Bug 1154667] [NEW] When tftpd was converted to upstart, xinetd support was dropped

2013-03-13 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: I need to run tftpd from xinetd, and that support was dropped when the init script was converted to upstart. Please restore the ability to run tftpd from xinetd. ** Affects: tftp-hpa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notifica

[Bug 1154667] [NEW] When tftpd was converted to upstart, xinetd support was dropped

2013-03-13 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: I need to run tftpd from xinetd, and that support was dropped when the init script was converted to upstart. Please restore the ability to run tftpd from xinetd. ** Affects: tftp-hpa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notifica

Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix

2013-03-11 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:59:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > A debdiff against the current wheezy package (possibly minus the .po > changes and some of the repetitive documentation updates) would probably > have been more useful, fwiw. Noted for the future. > > The source and amd64 binaries

Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix

2013-03-11 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:59:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > A debdiff against the current wheezy package (possibly minus the .po > changes and some of the repetitive documentation updates) would probably > have been more useful, fwiw. Noted for the future. > > The source and amd64 binaries

Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix

2013-03-08 Thread LaMont Jones
diff -u postfix-2.9.6/debian/control postfix-2.9.6/debian/control --- postfix-2.9.6/debian/control +++ postfix-2.9.6/debian/control @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@ Source: postfix Section: mail Priority: extra -Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers -XSBC-Original-Maintainer: LaMont Jones +Maintainer: LaMont Jones

Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix

2013-03-08 Thread LaMont Jones
diff -u postfix-2.9.6/debian/control postfix-2.9.6/debian/control --- postfix-2.9.6/debian/control +++ postfix-2.9.6/debian/control @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@ Source: postfix Section: mail Priority: extra -Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers -XSBC-Original-Maintainer: LaMont Jones +Maintainer: LaMont Jones

Bug#702374: postfix: get message Relay Access Denied, when using SASL

2013-03-06 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:19:49PM +0100, Jean-Jacques Doti wrote: > I've been able to solve the problem by adding this line to the conf > (main.cf) : > smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated, > permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination > but I'm not sure there will be no side

Bug#702374: postfix: get message Relay Access Denied, when using SASL

2013-03-06 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:19:49PM +0100, Jean-Jacques Doti wrote: > I've been able to solve the problem by adding this line to the conf > (main.cf) : > smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_sasl_authenticated, > permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination > but I'm not sure there will be no side

Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix

2013-03-06 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to > fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message > in the bug log for details. wheezy has 2.9.3-2.1, sid has 2.10.0-1. Given

Bug#702412: pre-approval unblock: postfix

2013-03-06 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > I've been looking into Postfix RC bug #700719. In short, my proposal is to > fix the maintainer field and then unblock the package. Please see my message > in the bug log for details. wheezy has 2.9.3-2.1, sid has 2.10.0-1. Given

Accepted postfix 2.10.0-1 (all amd64 source)

2013-03-04 Thread LaMont Jones
Urgency: low Maintainer: LaMont Jones Changed-By: LaMont Jones Closes: 699877 Description: postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment for Postfix postfix-doc - Documentation for Postfix postfix- High-performance mail transport agent postfix

Accepted bind9 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6 (all amd64 source)

2013-03-04 Thread LaMont Jones
:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: LaMont Jones Changed-By: LaMont Jones Closes: 696661 Description: bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server bind9utils - Utilitie

[Bug 1139159] Re: Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL

2013-03-02 Thread LaMont Jones
Finally saw what was meant there. Confirmed, doing the mkdir "${dest_dir}.NEW" will be unconditional (inside that box) as of 2.10.0-1 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lam

[Bug 1139159] Re: Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL

2013-03-02 Thread LaMont Jones
Finally saw what was meant there. Confirmed, doing the mkdir "${dest_dir}.NEW" will be unconditional (inside that box) as of 2.10.0-1 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lam

[Bug 1139159] Re: Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL

2013-03-02 Thread LaMont Jones
What is the value for smtp_tls_CApath in your configuration? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1139159 Title: Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL To manage notifications ab

[Bug 1139159] Re: Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL

2013-03-02 Thread LaMont Jones
What is the value for smtp_tls_CApath in your configuration? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1139159 Title: Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL To manag

Bug#699145: bind9: CVE-2012-5689

2013-02-25 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:53:01AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:37:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Given these, I am not convinced that this should be RC for wheezy. > How about a NEWS item drawing attention to the issue and workaround, > and a downgrade to

Bug#699145: bind9: CVE-2012-5689

2013-02-25 Thread LaMont Jones
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:53:01AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:37:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Given these, I am not convinced that this should be RC for wheezy. > How about a NEWS item drawing attention to the issue and workaround, > and a downgrade to

Bug#698658: bind9 with fix for 698641

2013-02-14 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 08:44:55PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Debian admin has deployed the patch at [2] to the bind running the > debian.org nameservers - else debian.org's nameservers would not have > any resources left to answer legitimate queries. > > We think it important that the bind v

Bug#698658: bind9 with fix for 698641

2013-02-14 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 08:44:55PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Debian admin has deployed the patch at [2] to the bind running the > debian.org nameservers - else debian.org's nameservers would not have > any resources left to answer legitimate queries. > > We think it important that the bind v

Bug#699934: bind9: on upgrading bind, it never tells me that a "new" /etc/default/bind9 is going to be installed

2013-02-07 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:50:22AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > I have a modified /etc/default/bind9. > Everytime bind packages are upgraded, I end up having a > /etc/default/bind9.dpkg-dist, which by itself is fine, but dpkg never > queries me with the usual dialog on whether I want to

Re: LaMont Jones, WTH are you doing?

2013-02-06 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 06:11:03PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > please compare > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2013/02/msg00141.html > with, for example, > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2013/02/msg00140.html > and tell me whether you’re seeing what I am seeing: > •

Re: LaMont Jones, WTH are you doing?

2013-02-06 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 11:33:39AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote: > mergechanges is responsible for the differences you're seeing: > dpkg-source is run (yes, on an ubuntu system), and then binaries are built > on a system that is running sid, both amd64 and i386 binaries, since at > l

Accepted postfix 2.9.6-1 (all amd64 i386 source)

2013-02-05 Thread LaMont Jones
Urgency: low Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers Changed-By: LaMont Jones Closes: 683687 690936 Description: postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix postfix-dev - Loadable modules development environment for Postfix postfix-doc - Documentation for Postfix postfix- High-performance mail

Accepted bind9 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-5 (all amd64 i386 source)

2013-01-30 Thread LaMont Jones
: 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: LaMont Jones Changed-By: LaMont Jones Closes: 698641 Description: bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server bind9utils - Uti

Bug#698641: Please apply the rate limiting patches

2013-01-21 Thread LaMont Jones
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 06:08:58PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > With the grown deployment of DNSSEC and more information being put into > the domain name system, DNS servers have become and are becoming a > useful tool for denial of service attacks by providing amplification: > a single UDP pack

Accepted bind9 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-4 (all amd64 i386 source)

2013-01-21 Thread LaMont Jones
: 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: LaMont Jones Changed-By: LaMont Jones Closes: 697681 Description: bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled with BIND 9.X bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server bind9utils - Uti

[Bug 1100449] [NEW] postinst outputs errors if dpkg-dev is not installed

2013-01-16 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: If dpkg-dev is not installed, then errors are produced, despite the script running successfully. redirecting stderr should fix it: if (type dpkg-vendor >/dev/null); then echo y;fi bash: type: dpkg-vendor: not found ** Affects: sks (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Ocaml-maint] [Bug 1100449] [NEW] postinst outputs errors if dpkg-dev is not installed

2013-01-16 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: If dpkg-dev is not installed, then errors are produced, despite the script running successfully. redirecting stderr should fix it: if (type dpkg-vendor >/dev/null); then echo y;fi bash: type: dpkg-vendor: not found ** Affects: sks (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

Bug#692416: Wheezy with dlopen enabled

2013-01-15 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 03:11:42PM +0100, Peter Beck wrote: > Having the same issue on a wheezy machine with Samba4. > I'm also curious if this will be fixed for wheezy too. The current plan is to have 1:9.8.4.dfsg.P1-3 migrate to wheezy. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-req

Bug#690361: dpkg: postfix doesn't get the correct SE Linux labels

2013-01-14 Thread LaMont Jones
tag 690361 + moreinfo -- It is not clear what exactly the change should be here, nor do I have a machine to test it on. If someone would like to propose a patch, I'd be happy to include it. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-bugs-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubsc

Bug#690361: dpkg: postfix doesn't get the correct SE Linux labels

2013-01-14 Thread LaMont Jones
tag 690361 + moreinfo -- It is not clear what exactly the change should be here, nor do I have a machine to test it on. If someone would like to propose a patch, I'd be happy to include it. lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubsc

Accepted bind9 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze9 (all amd64 i386 source)

2013-01-12 Thread LaMont Jones
: 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze9 Distribution: squeeze-proposed-updates Urgency: low Maintainer: LaMont Jones Changed-By: LaMont Jones Closes: 697352 Description: bind9 - Internet Domain Name Server bind9-doc - Documentation for BIND bind9-host - Version of 'host' bundled wit

[Bug 1096116] Re: New version 1.1.4 available

2013-01-11 Thread LaMont Jones
This will also solve https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sks/+bug/1098704 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1096116 Title: New version 1.1.4 available To manage notifications abou

[Ocaml-maint] [Bug 1096116] Re: New version 1.1.4 available

2013-01-11 Thread LaMont Jones
This will also solve https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sks/+bug/1098704 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Debian OCaml Maintainers, which is subscribed to sks in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1096116 Title: New version 1.1.4 available Status i

[Bug 1098704] [NEW] 1.1.3 fails to load the current keydata

2013-01-11 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: 1.1.3-1ubuntu3, 1.1.3-1, and 1.1.3 (running on precise) fail to load the current keydump data from http://ftp.prato.linux.it/pub/keyring/dump- latest/ At some point after loading the first 45 keys, it gets into a futex lock wait that never finishes. 1.1.4 does not experi

[Ocaml-maint] [Bug 1098704] [NEW] 1.1.3 fails to load the current keydata

2013-01-11 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: 1.1.3-1ubuntu3, 1.1.3-1, and 1.1.3 (running on precise) fail to load the current keydump data from http://ftp.prato.linux.it/pub/keyring/dump- latest/ At some point after loading the first 45 keys, it gets into a futex lock wait that never finishes. 1.1.4 does not experi

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >