ly and in the same order, then I
> > believe that you would get the same results. But we consider this an
> > implementation detail rather than a guarantee that Lucene should have.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 7:03 PM Marc Davenport
> > wrote:
> >
> > > H
Hello,
I've been working on this personalization project using KNN queries and I
have a couple questions but one is more pressing for me than the others.
1) Inconsistency between index instances:
All of the same documents are loaded into different indexes. They may be
loaded in different order, bu
ty efficient and a cache wouldn't
> likely win you very much and just lead to trouble,
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 12:08 PM Marc Davenport
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > Right now our implementation retrieves our UID for our records from the
> > topdocs by calling Inde
Hello,
Right now our implementation retrieves our UID for our records from the
topdocs by calling IndexSearcher.doc(docid, fieldToLoad) (Deprecated) with
the UID as the only field. I'm looking to replace this with the
appropriate call to IndexSearcher.storedFields(). This feels a little
inefficie
Hello,
I'm exploring some personalization to our sort orders. If I have an
original query q which is mostly just a set of term filters, and I want to
sort those by distance between some float vector on the document and a
supplied user vector. I only see one way to do this. I would create a new
bool
ems like you can use your own cache implementation,
> similar
> > to what you can see in tests - TestDirectoryTaxonomyWriter.java
> > or TestConcurrentFacetedIndexing.java. This would
> > allow you to plug in the previous implementation (or something even more
> > fine-tun
items and match the previous behavior.
Marc
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 4:39 PM Marc Davenport
wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks for the leads. I haven't yet gone as far as doing a git bisect, but
> I have found that the big jump in time is in the call to
> facetsConfig.build(taxonomyWriter
. It'll take some time to build but it's a
> logarithmic bisection and you'd know for sure where the problem is.
>
> D.
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:16 PM Marc Davenport
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Adrien et al,
> > I've been doing some investigation today and it
se for this 2x regression. It would
> be interesting to look at a profile.
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 9:32 PM Marc Davenport
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I'm finally migrating Lucene from 8.11.2 to 9.10.0 as our overall build
> can
> > now support Java 1
Hello,
I'm finally migrating Lucene from 8.11.2 to 9.10.0 as our overall build can
now support Java 11. The quick first step of renaming packages and
importing the new libraries has gone well. I'm even seeing a nice
performance bump in our average query time. I am however seeing a dramatic
increas
returned?
Thank you,
Marc Davenport
On 10/9/20 11:49 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 09/10/2020 16:38, marc.davenp...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to upgrade from 9.0.35 to 9.0.38. I know that explicit
module definitions were added between .37 & .38. I'm just trying to
shake out the changes needed on our end to use it. I
Hello all,
I'm trying to upgrade from 9.0.35 to 9.0.38. I know that explicit
module definitions were added between .37 & .38. I'm just trying to
shake out the changes needed on our end to use it. It's my tentative
grasp on proper use of modules, but I could use some help. Now when we
are st
On 10/7/20 2:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/10/2020 19:47, marc.davenp...@oracle.com wrote:
On 10/7/20 1:51 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/10/2020 18:29, marc.davenp...@oracle.com wrote:
I'm doing a simple upgrade from 9.0.35 to 9.0.38 embed. I notice some
significant changes that I don't see l
On 10/7/20 1:51 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/10/2020 18:29, marc.davenp...@oracle.com wrote:
I'm doing a simple upgrade from 9.0.35 to 9.0.38 embed. I notice some
significant changes that I don't see listed in the changelog.
There are covered by the entry for bug 64540.
Ah, thank you for t
I'm doing a simple upgrade from 9.0.35 to 9.0.38 embed. I notice some
significant changes that I don't see listed in the changelog.
Until 9.0.37 tomcat-embed-core.jar did not have a module-info. Now in
9.0.38 it does. This changes the modules I need to require when using
it. This may be the r
Thanks Robert. I didn't see anything that indicated I could do this in the
code, but I was also open to the idea that I was reading the wrong part of the
model parsing. I think the person put things in WEB-INF because they were jars
that were not OSGI bundles. I have seen people wrapping jars o
Hello all,
In our previous application based on Sling6 we used a maven assembly to build
our application war. In the assembly we placed some classes into WEB-INF/lib
and made felix provide these. I'm trying to shift us to use the sling start
plugin so we can keep our features held together be
Julian,
Thanks for even the wildest of speculation. I can use all the help I can
get right now. It looks like the slingevent namespace we don't even
need. I inherited this project as a kind of mess. It looks like whoever
was migrating this from Sling 6 to Sling 10 had just included the
provi
Robert,
Thanks for thinking about this issue with me.
You asked: do you have any custom code that plugs into the repository
initialisation?
I can not find any custom classes that are implementing RepositoryInitilizer.
We have a custom class which provides the SlingRepository service and a serv
Hello Robert et all,
Thank you for your reply. I have not been able to pair down to a sample
project that isolates this issue. I'm currently deploying my application
over and over until I hit the failure mode. I haven't identified the
code that would have created the missing primary types. I
Angela et all,
Thank you for your reply. I still figured out how to consistently
reproduce this problem. I'm currently deploying my application over and
over until I hit the failure mode. I haven't identified the code that
creates the index to see why it might be failing. I could use some idea
g? I'm currently on
1.6.8. I could not find any JIRA tickets that would address this, but
then again my JIRA-foo isn't the best.
Much appreciated,
Marc Davenport
Hello,
We are in the process of migrating from Sling6 to Sling10 (Sling11 came
out after we started the initiative). One of the upgrades is moving from
Jackrabbit 2 to Jackrabbit Oak. We've modeled ourselves after the
Sling10 starter war. The starter war uses Oak 1.6.8 so we started with
tha
Hello all,
I previously wrote about an encryption issue which could be resolved by
moving from Oak 1.6.8 to 1.10.0. I was surprisingly able to convince my
team to make this move now. I've been moderately successful. However,
about 1/2 the time, our application will fail to deploy. I can not p
t does not reflect any
service ranking, so the OOTB UAF is always returned first.
Is there another configuration I should be doing? I'm currently on
1.6.8. I could not find any JIRA tickets that would address this, but
then again my JIRA-foo isn't the best.
Much appreciated,
Marc Davenport
Thanks for the response Angela, it looks like I am running into OAK-. The
extractAlgorithm() was updated to handle algorithms that start with PBKDF2 in
that version. I'm not sure I can convince my team to make the jump right now
considering that core was broke into modules. I wonder if I c
Hello all,
We are migrating an application that was built on Sling 6 & Jackrabbit
to Sling 10 & Oak. We are using Oak 1.6.8 which is the version used in
the example sling 10 application. We had previously built our own
authenticators & login plugins to use CryptedSimpleCredentials and keep
p
#x27;m assuming that you are trying the same file for all
people, but if not then the one person that can upload might just be
uploading a smaller file than the rest. Just a thought.
You may want to use is_uploaded_file() and move_uploaded_file() if you are
using PHP 4.0.2 or greater.
hope t
an be
found? or have a regular expression that can do this?
cheers,
Marc Davenport
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
inding the site entirely.
Has anyone ever seen this?
Help would be much
Marc Davenport
31 matches
Mail list logo
