Setting C.UTF-8 would work internally I agree. But what does this mean
for SRUs? Does every affected SRU now have to declare Breaks:
python3-minimal (<< whatever)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaul
Here's the buggy code that assumes UTF-8:
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/tree/debpython/files.py#n54
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
Any suggestions on how to identify SRUs that are affected so that we can
ensure that the necessary Breaks are in there?
(also, do we know that Breaks will work as needed for an issue in the
prerm?)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, wh
I think it's fair to call this Critical since SRU releases generally are
currently blocked by this. Looking at the definition, "Severely affects
applications beyond the package responsible for the root cause" also
applies.
** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu)
Importance: High => Critical
-
LP: #2075337 "py3clean fails when using alternate character set"[1] is a
latent bug that can cause dpkg to exit non-zero due to a maintainer
script failure if they aren't using UTF-8. It gets triggered when
upgrading an affected package.
Releasing an SRU of such a package may therefore cause the d
Any suggestions on how to identify SRUs that are affected so that we can
ensure that the necessary Breaks are in there?
(also, do we know that Breaks will work as needed for an issue in the
prerm?)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Setting C.UTF-8 would work internally I agree. But what does this mean
for SRUs? Does every affected SRU now have to declare Breaks:
python3-minimal (<< whatever)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
Here's the buggy code that assumes UTF-8:
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/tree/debpython/files.py#n54
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075337
Title:
py3clean
> I think to even better represent what is going on, we should use the
"block-proposed" tag [1] here.
No, that's not right. That's for the development release only, and
doesn't show on the pending SRU report.
** Tags removed: block-proposed verification-done verification-done-bionic
verification
When a user installs Ubuntu LTS, they expect that the platform and
default apps, together with apps they install from the default
repositories, will follow some principles of quality and stability. For
example, they generally expect that behaviour won’t change in surprising
ways for its 12-year lif
cloud-init SRU release needs to be blocked due to bug 2075337. Sorry!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071762
Title:
sru cloud-init (24.2 update) to focal, jammy and noble
To manage n
I discussed this with Didier, and there's a concern that any SRUs that
trigger this issue may break WSL users due to them possibly using
ISO-8859-1 by default under certain conditions. He will check and get
back to us.
In the meantime, he has asked that we do not release SRUs that may be
affected.
(not strictly for this bug but it doesn't seem worth trying to add
another one that won't be linked SRU-process-wise)
Update: Didier is concerned about potential implications for WSL due to
bug 2075337, so we're waiting on an ack from that side.
For now, I'm going to change the tag back to verifi
On the scope of the issue, I think bug affects users upgrading any
package if the package uses dh_python3, ships a file that has been
diverted, the system is using a non-UTF8 character set and the
translation for "file is diverted" uses non-ASCII characters. cloud-init
and ubuntu-advantage-tools ar
I looked into this with Renan.
We think this is a separate issue and I have filed bug 2075337.
It would seem to affect any package that uses dh_python3 which inserts
py3clean into the package prerm.
For SRU purposes, I would have preferred to hold publication of package
updates that will trigger
Investigating this a bit further, /usr/share/python3/debpython/files.py
is calling "dpkg -L " and when that fails to decode as UTF-8 we
get the error.
I tried that for cloud-init and this in stdout for "dpkg -L cloud-init":
/etc/systemd/system/sshd-keygen@.service.d/disable-sshd-keygen-if-cloud-i
Public bug reported:
We noticed this in bug 2060769 but think it is a separate issue.
dh_python3 is putting a py3clean invocation into package prerm
maintainer scripts. When that runs, it explodes if the system character
set is for example ISO-8859-1.
This appears to affect every package for whi
> - we can't fix it (:
I'm not sure about this.
> But that happens when running prerm scripts for the older version of
the Client...
If this is "old-prerm upgrade" that is returning a non-zero exit status
then we can avoid a dpkg failure by providing "new-prerm failed-
upgrade".
Perhaps I've m
** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074309
Title:
rabbitmq-server upgrade 22.04 -> 24.04 completely broke
** Also affects: auto-package-testing
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Auto Package Testing.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066290
Title:
Attempts to fetch wrong version
This is still affecting Ubuntu infrastructure - at least it was on 23
July. See for example:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/software-
properties/noble/amd64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
** Also affects: auto-package-testing
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066290
Title:
Attempts to fetch wrong version for package
To manage
This is still affecting Ubuntu infrastructure - at least it was on 23
July. See for example:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/software-
properties/noble/amd64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to autopkgtest in Ub
To clarify my opinion, I should add that for LTS purposes, I think it's
important that we have a path to "ratchet up" the minimum ciphersuite
standard, and therefore it's appropriate to do in SRU as a policy.
Theoretically this would be for any release, including past releases,
and future ratchets
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 12:11:05PM -0400, Nick Rosbrook wrote:
> In short, this is not systemd's bug.
I don't think that matters. The idea of the autopkgtest infrastructure
and "always being green" is that we hold back packaging updates if it
would regress behaviour, even if it's the "fault" of a
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 09:06:13AM -0400, Nick Rosbrook wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 8:18 AM Robie Basak wrote:
> > There seems to be a second issue between systemd and lxd which
> > security.nesting=true doesn't seem to fix:
> >
> > https://github.com/canonica
Marking this Triaged/High for Noble as it sounds like a credible report
with clear reproduction steps.
It needs a volunteer to work on it though.
** Also affects: kmail (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: kmail (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Triaged
*
Marking this Triaged/High for Noble as it sounds like a credible report
with clear reproduction steps.
It needs a volunteer to work on it though.
** Also affects: kmail (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: kmail (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Triaged
*
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:34:51AM -0400, Nick Rosbrook wrote:
> tl;dr - If e.g. systemd-resolved (among many other systemd services)
> fails to start in oracular LXD containers, configure your container
> with security.nesting=true (safe for unprivileged containers only).
There seems to be a seco
> by putting this package into noble archive we will remove one of the
blockers for xmutil package (a utility manager for AMD Xilinx boards)
Is this package going to be immediately useful to users without xmutil?
If so, I'd like to see that case being made please as an explanation of
user impact.
The following subscriptions are missing:
isa-support
Missing subscriptions added
--
ubuntu-server mailing list
ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
Somebody appeared on IRC asking for help with this bug but disappeared
again before I could reply.
It's clear that there is an issue, but I don't see enough information
here to isolate it to specific versions of packages that Ubuntu shipped.
People seem to be reporting versions either not publishe
I'm attending a team event tomorrow and so won't be available for my
shift.
--
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
Public bug reported:
Looks like piuparts was moved back to noble-proposed during development
and it never migrated. It does exist in the Oracular release pocket
again.
** Affects: piuparts (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Fix Released
** Affects: piuparts (Ubuntu Noble)
As discussed elsewhere, we need the full hardware enablement to be
completed in Oracular first, and then presented for SRU all together
please. The user impact needs to be presented in a form that an actual
user would recognise, and the test plan needs adjusting to validate that
full story.
--
Yo
The following subscriptions are superfluous:
augeas
convoy
dbconfig-common
ibmasm-utils
ldns
libdumbnet
libesmtp
liblinear
libpam-radius-auth
libparse-yapp-perl
libsdl1.2
lxc
lxcfs
lxd
maas-enlist
mailman
moin
mysql-5.7
netcf
nmap
parsedatetime
php7.2
p
Hello sistemas_grupo-cps, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~16.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by te
Hello sistemas_grupo-cps, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~20.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by tes
Hello sistemas_grupo-cps, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~18.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by te
Hello sistemas_grupo-cps, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~22.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by tes
Hello L, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~16.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pa
Hello L, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~18.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pa
Hello L, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~20.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pac
Hello L, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~22.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pac
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~16.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this ne
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~20.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~18.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this ne
Hello Renan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~16.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this ne
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~22.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Renan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~18.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this ne
Hello Renan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~20.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Renan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~22.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Jeffery, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~16.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Jeffery, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~18.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Jeffery, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~22.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this n
Hello Jeffery, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~20.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this n
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extens
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubu
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extens
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extens
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubu
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubu
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubu
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubu
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubu
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubu
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubu
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubu
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubu
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubu
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubu
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubu
Hello sistemas_grupo-cps, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~24.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by tes
Hello L, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~24.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pac
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~24.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Jeffery, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~24.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this n
Hello Renan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into noble-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~24.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
** Tags added: regression-release
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061128
Title:
`add-apt-repository --pocket` doesn't work on Noble (Deb822?)
To manage notifications about this bug g
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 02:44:31PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Do we have any documentation about Vcs-Git-Commit and Vcs-Git-Ref fields in
> changes files?
I've been working on documentation here:
https://canonical-git-ubuntu.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/
> They are generated by git-
Sorry Steve, I should have been more specific. Assuming there is no
change in Debian's status, do you think it's appropriate for Ubuntu to
create a compat symlink in the meantime, and if so, appropriate for SRU
to 24.04?
Personally I'm inclined to say that it doesn't make sense if the soname
ends
Sure that's fine thanks. I just wanted to make sure that this doesn't
get missed but unfortunately we don't have a mechanism for ensuring it.
Given that Noble has to have the "really" anyway, I would get the
ordering into Oracular resolved as soon as possible to avoid any
accidents - I don't see an
@Georgia is the final fix for Oracular are you planning on a further
upload? Because 4.0.1-ubuntu2 is lower than the emergency fix for Noble
(4.0.1really4.0.0-beta3-0ubuntu0.1), and before Oracular is released we
need the package version to be higher than the one in Noble so as not to
break upgrade
Thanks. When the bwrap profile SRU is attempted again, I'd like the Test
Plan reconsidered please to ensure that we catch the class of regression
that occurred.
On this SRU, before resubmitting it with the bwrap change removed,
please revise the Test Plan to ensure that all necessary steps are
inc
This change was reverted, so I'm reopening the bug task for Noble. See
main tracking bug 2064672 and regression bug 2072811 for details.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046844
Title:
201 - 300 of 1997 matches
Mail list logo
