On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:22 PM Kai Uwe Broulik
wrote:
> Hi,
>
HI Kai,
>
> (only posting to plasma-devel only below is about Plasma)
>
> > i'd also like to schedule removing CI support for [...] Plasma/5.27
>
> Plasma 5.27 is our LTS release and we’ve just had Kubuntu 24.04 ship
> with it.
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 10:03 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
>
> Bad news: 1 repository is still failing and 3 new ones started
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 7:19 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
> Bad news: 9 repositories have started failing and 1 is still
On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 10:50 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
> Good news: 1 repo was fixed
>
> Bad news: 2 repo started failing
>
On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 8:37 AM wrote:
> On 2024-05-04 21:56, Akseli Lahtinen wrote:
> > On Saturday 4 May 2024 14:47:35 GMT+3 christ...@cullmann.io wrote:
> >> My proposal: we enforce Breeze as icon set and style everywhere. And
> >> we
> >> provide still a way to overwrite that for the user,
On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 8:37 AM wrote:
> On 2024-05-04 21:56, Akseli Lahtinen wrote:
> > On Saturday 4 May 2024 14:47:35 GMT+3 christ...@cullmann.io wrote:
> >> My proposal: we enforce Breeze as icon set and style everywhere. And
> >> we
> >> provide still a way to overwrite that for the user,
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 12:57 PM Nicolas Fella wrote:
> On 01.05.24 01:54, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs
> on
> > their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> > reasons.
> >
> >
> > Good
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 9:23 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
> Bad news: 1 repo started failing
>
> kconfig:
> *
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481077
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481077
--- Comment #4 from Ben Cooksley ---
Please don't hijack others closed reports.
I'll process this removal shortly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485961
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INTENTIONAL
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485960
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Signing in to the Akademy |Trying to sign
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485961
--- Comment #2 from Ben Cooksley ---
Subversion is by-and-large deprecated and no longer in use except for
translations.
As translations don't use code review tools not sure what the harm of this is?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Hi all,
It has been brought to Sysadmin's attention that a number of subscribers to
the konsole-devel mailing list were automatically unsubscribed from the
list in the past few days.
This was an action taken correctly by the system, albeit in error due to a
number of badly formed emails that
Hi all,
I have just flipped the switch that has moved the CI system over to using
Qt 6.7 for Linux builds on our SUSE images.
Should you see any issues with builds failing as a result of packages being
missing in the registry then please submit a merge request to
sysadmin/ci-management to ensure
Hi all,
I have just flipped the switch that has moved the CI system over to using
Qt 6.7 for Linux builds on our SUSE images.
Should you see any issues with builds failing as a result of packages being
missing in the registry then please submit a merge request to
sysadmin/ci-management to ensure
Hi all,
I have just flipped the switch that has moved the CI system over to using
Qt 6.7 for Linux builds on our SUSE images.
Should you see any issues with builds failing as a result of packages being
missing in the registry then please submit a merge request to
sysadmin/ci-management to ensure
Hi all,
I have just flipped the switch that has moved the CI system over to using
Qt 6.7 for Linux builds on our SUSE images.
Should you see any issues with builds failing as a result of packages being
missing in the registry then please submit a merge request to
sysadmin/ci-management to ensure
Hi all,
I have just flipped the switch that has moved the CI system over to using
Qt 6.7 for Linux builds on our SUSE images.
Should you see any issues with builds failing as a result of packages being
missing in the registry then please submit a merge request to
sysadmin/ci-management to ensure
Hi all,
As part of routine maintenance on Invent (Gitlab) i've been reviewing the
total amount of space currently being consumed by repositories.
At this time, the top 100 largest repositories on Invent (we have 14,000 or
so for context) are consuming around 21% of the total space. It would
Hi all,
As part of routine maintenance on Invent (Gitlab) i've been reviewing the
total amount of space currently being consumed by repositories.
At this time, the top 100 largest repositories on Invent (we have 14,000 or
so for context) are consuming around 21% of the total space. It would
Hi all,
As part of routine maintenance on Invent (Gitlab) i've been reviewing the
total amount of space currently being consumed by repositories.
At this time, the top 100 largest repositories on Invent (we have 14,000 or
so for context) are consuming around 21% of the total space. It would
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 1:51 AM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Saturday 20 April 2024 15:12:48 CEST Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Freitag, 19. April 2024 22:40:38 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 4:39 AM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > > &g
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 5:07 AM Ashark wrote:
> Hello.
>
Hey Andrew,
>
> I have seen a bug that kdewebkit is failing to build (406342). I was
> looking
> why the person was building that module in the first place.
>
> Afaict, this module is not used in any project. Searching in repo-metadata
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 4:39 AM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi all,
>
> Unsurprisingly I'll be pretty much aligned with Luigi, Sune and Volker
> here I
> think. I'll try to add a couple of extra aspects to feed the thinking on
> this
> topic.
> On Friday 19 April 2024 11:04:33 CEST Carl
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 4:39 AM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi all,
>
> Unsurprisingly I'll be pretty much aligned with Luigi, Sune and Volker
> here I
> think. I'll try to add a couple of extra aspects to feed the thinking on
> this
> topic.
> On Friday 19 April 2024 11:04:33 CEST Carl
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459128
--- Comment #28 from Ben Cooksley ---
(In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #26)
> (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #22)
> > (In reply to Ben Cooksley from comment #17)
> >
> > > For Windows, that installation issue i
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459128
--- Comment #28 from Ben Cooksley ---
(In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #26)
> (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #22)
> > (In reply to Ben Cooksley from comment #17)
> >
> > > For Windows, that installation issue i
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485522
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 1:15 AM Ralf Habacker
wrote:
> Am 10.04.24 um 10:51 schrieb Ben Cooksley:
> > umbrello - 3rd week
> > * https://invent.kde.org/sdk/umbrello/-/pipelines/657665
> > <https://invent.kde.org/sdk/umbrello/-/pipelines/657665>
> >*
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 4:33 AM Volker Krause wrote:
> On Sonntag, 7. April 2024 23:02:06 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs
> on
> > their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> > reasons.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 9:33 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
> Good news: 1 repository was fixed
>
> Bad news: 2 repositories are
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 9:26 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
> Good news: 3 repositories got fixed
>
> Bad news: 2 repositories
Git commit 9b33873bf75e362f24d6b03a2c7873fb5fa16668 by Ben Cooksley.
Committed on 10/04/2024 at 08:42.
Pushed by bcooksley into branch 'master'.
Ensure we include QtKeychain in our Windows images for Qt 5.15 and Qt 6.6.
This dependency on QtKeychain was added by PIM developers to KLDAP
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 9:51 AM Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Dienstag, 9. April 2024 23:26:32 CEST Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > ktrip - NEW
> > * https://invent.kde.org/utilities/ktrip/-/pipelines/657661
> > * craft_android builds fail
>
> *sigh* Why does kirigami master depend on the not yet
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 1:55 AM Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> On Saturday, 6 April 2024 18:22:22 CEST Sven Brauch wrote:
> > This is basically a discussion about whether it is less risky to trust
> > the individual developers, or the people with access to the CI signing
> > key. You are trading
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 9:03 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
> Bad news: 1 repositories is still failing and 1 has started failing
On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 4:23 AM Johannes Zarl-Zierl
wrote:
> Am Freitag, 5. April 2024, 13:45:35 CEST schrieb Carl Schwan:
> > On Friday, April 5, 2024 12:04:28 PM CEST Albert Vaca Cintora wrote:
> > > - Tarballs should only be generated in a reproducible manner using
> > > scripts. Ideally by
On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 1:43 AM Heiko Becker wrote:
> On Friday, 5 April 2024 12:04:28 CEST, Albert Vaca Cintora wrote:
> > It seems a lot of people feel conservative in favor of tarballs, so
> > maybe I aimed too far. At least I think the discussion brought some
> > interesting points that we
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 10:48 PM Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2024-04-03, Albert Vaca Cintora wrote:
> > What's the advantage of providing tarballs?
>
> I do think there is an advantage in being able to verify that the soure
> tarball is the same across distributions. Using a checksum on the
>
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 11:41 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
> Good news: 1 repository was fixed
>
> Bad news: 2 repositories are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484759
--- Comment #1 from Ben Cooksley ---
The content of attachment 167943 has been deleted for the following reason:
Removing confidential information
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484759
--- Comment #1 from Ben Cooksley ---
The content of attachment 167943 has been deleted for the following reason:
Removing confidential information
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464394
--- Comment #5 from Ben Cooksley ---
That MR is incorrect as the artifact in question will only be around as long as
that particular build is around. That means that the next time breeze-icons is
rebuilt, once the CI artifact cleanup job is run
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464394
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bcooks...@kde.org
--- Comment #3 from Ben
Hi all,
Due to recent updates in SUSE around signond, i've just had to remove
signond-libs-devel from our SUSE Qt 5.15 images.
This is due to signond now being built with Qt 6 - and therefore being
incompatible with Qt 5.
Looking in signon-kwallet-extension though I see it is still Qt 5 code
Hi all,
Due to recent updates in SUSE around signond, i've just had to remove
signond-libs-devel from our SUSE Qt 5.15 images.
This is due to signond now being built with Qt 6 - and therefore being
incompatible with Qt 5.
Looking in signon-kwallet-extension though I see it is still Qt 5 code
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 5:40 AM Volker Krause wrote:
> On Dienstag, 26. März 2024 08:59:29 CET Heiko Becker wrote:
> > On Monday, 25 March 2024 23:23:01 CET, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > El dissabte, 23 de març de 2024, a les 21:06:46 (CET), Julius Künzel va
> > >
> > > escriure:
> > >>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 5:55 AM Volker Krause wrote:
> On Dienstag, 26. März 2024 00:42:53 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El dilluns, 25 de març de 2024, a les 18:03:27 (CET), Volker Krause va
> >
> > escriure:
> > > On Sonntag, 24. März 2024 23:14:12 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > >
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481455
--- Comment #4 from Ben Cooksley ---
Building master versions of software with Craft is generally not supported -
which is why it fails.
The patch will be removed when the next Frameworks release takes place and the
Craft cache is rebuilt.
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481455
--- Comment #4 from Ben Cooksley ---
Building master versions of software with Craft is generally not supported -
which is why it fails.
The patch will be removed when the next Frameworks release takes place and the
Craft cache is rebuilt.
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483228
--- Comment #8 from Ben Cooksley ---
This is an issue that has also struck Kdenlive and Krita.
I've now rewound the repository and have applied a safety measure that should
hopefully prevent it from recurring.
--
You are receiving this mail because
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:12 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
> Good news: 6 repositories got fixed
>
> Bad news: 2 repository
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:34 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
>
> VERY BAD NEWS:
> * Cantor made it to its 4th week with FreeBSD
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459128
--- Comment #17 from Ben Cooksley ---
Given that both KIO and Curl are working fine, i'd suggest that something isn't
quite right with how your test is utilising WebEngine - especially given it
fails on both FreeBSD and Linux.
For Windows
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459128
--- Comment #17 from Ben Cooksley ---
Given that both KIO and Curl are working fine, i'd suggest that something isn't
quite right with how your test is utilising WebEngine - especially given it
fails on both FreeBSD and Linux.
For Windows
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:46 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
> Bad news: 1 repository is still failing and 1 new has started
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459128
--- Comment #15 from Ben Cooksley ---
Not sure why we're trying to launch WebEngine here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459128
--- Comment #15 from Ben Cooksley ---
Not sure why we're trying to launch WebEngine here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483228
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459128
--- Comment #12 from Ben Cooksley ---
Running curl against that URL works fine in a CI container, your test must be
doing something else to trigger the failure (either IPv4/IPv6 related, or
otherwise cannot handle the high bandwidth connection
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459128
--- Comment #12 from Ben Cooksley ---
Running curl against that URL works fine in a CI container, your test must be
doing something else to trigger the failure (either IPv4/IPv6 related, or
otherwise cannot handle the high bandwidth connection
Hi all,
For those that have been experimenting with the Craft Continuous Delivery
jobs on Gitlab, one of the many questions we've been receiving is how to
best link to those from your websites.
I'm happy to advise that going forward build results will now be published
for release branches on
Hi all,
For those that have been experimenting with the Craft Continuous Delivery
jobs on Gitlab, one of the many questions we've been receiving is how to
best link to those from your websites.
I'm happy to advise that going forward build results will now be published
for release branches on
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 1:22 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
> Good News: 7 failing repositories from previous report got fixed
>
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 10:07 PM David Redondo wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 3. März 2024, 13:27:56 CET schrieb Carl Schwan:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The blogs.kde.org which was powered by Drupal previously was switched
> to Hugo
> > this week. This is mostly relevant to the people using or interested to
> use
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 1:12 PM Michael Reeves wrote:
> Does anyone have insight as to why this is happeing:
>
>
> /Resources/qml/org/kde/i18n/localeData/libki18nlocaledataqmlplugin.dylib']
> succeeded with exit code 0
> Library dependency
>
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 9:45 PM Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2024-02-28, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > konversation - 1st week
> > * https://invent.kde.org/network/konversation/-/pipelines/616933
> > * cmake fails to find dbus on Linux CI
>
> This seems like intentional sillyness from the
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:18 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
> Good news: 1 repository has been fixed
>
> Bad news: 3 NEW
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 11:35 PM Konstantin Kharlamov
wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 23:07 +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 10:27 PM Konstantin Kharlamov
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 22:16 +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 24, 20
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 11:35 PM Konstantin Kharlamov
wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 23:07 +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 10:27 PM Konstantin Kharlamov
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 22:16 +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 24, 20
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 10:27 PM Konstantin Kharlamov
wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 22:16 +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 8:37 PM Konstantin Kharlamov
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 16:31 +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 10:27 PM Konstantin Kharlamov
wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 22:16 +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 8:37 PM Konstantin Kharlamov
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 16:31 +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 9:21 PM Volker Krause wrote:
> On Saturday, 24 February 2024 04:31:49 CET Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:12 PM Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > > On 2024-02-22, Nate Graham wrote:
> > > > I've started pondering post-megarelease p
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 9:21 PM Volker Krause wrote:
> On Saturday, 24 February 2024 04:31:49 CET Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:12 PM Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > > On 2024-02-22, Nate Graham wrote:
> > > > I've started pondering post-megarelease p
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 8:37 PM Konstantin Kharlamov
wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 16:31 +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:12 PM Sune Vuorela wrote:
>
> On 2024-02-22, Nate Graham wrote:
> > I've started pondering post-megarelease projects
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 8:37 PM Konstantin Kharlamov
wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 16:31 +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:12 PM Sune Vuorela wrote:
>
> On 2024-02-22, Nate Graham wrote:
> > I've started pondering post-megarelease projects
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:12 PM Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2024-02-22, Nate Graham wrote:
> > I've started pondering post-megarelease projects. We've spent so long on
> > porting and bugfixing that I think it might be useful to shift gears to
> > feature work, and I'd like to brainstorm
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 11:12 PM Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2024-02-22, Nate Graham wrote:
> > I've started pondering post-megarelease projects. We've spent so long on
> > porting and bugfixing that I think it might be useful to shift gears to
> > feature work, and I'd like to brainstorm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481732
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481732
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481483
--- Comment #4 from Ben Cooksley ---
The bug has now been cleansed of the sensitive information.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 12:01 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
> VERY BAD NEWS:
> * Cantor made it to its 4th week with FreeBSD
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 11:06 AM Heiko Becker wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 February 2024 22:30:56 CET, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs
> on
> > their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing
> > for multiple
> >
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 1:22 PM Harald Sitter wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 10:23 AM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 2:58 PM Loren Burkholder <
> computersemiexp...@outlook.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Saturday, February
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 12:36 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El divendres, 16 de febrer de 2024, a les 21:40:33 (CET), Heiko Becker va
> escriure:
> > On Tuesday, 30 January 2024 23:39:43 CET, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > El dijous, 21 de desembre de 2023, a les 19:49:42 (CET), Heiko Becker
>
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 2:58 PM Loren Burkholder <
computersemiexp...@outlook.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, February 17, 2024 8:35:48 PM EST Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 10:26 AM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >
> > The Binary Factory, alongside it's two bui
On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 10:26 AM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For some time now we have been steadily working on getting our ability to
> build everything that was previously built on the Binary Factory being
> built on Gitlab.
>
> I'm now very happy to advise th
On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 10:26 AM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For some time now we have been steadily working on getting our ability to
> build everything that was previously built on the Binary Factory being
> built on Gitlab.
>
> I'm now very happy to advise th
On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 10:26 AM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For some time now we have been steadily working on getting our ability to
> build everything that was previously built on the Binary Factory being
> built on Gitlab.
>
> I'm now very happy to advise th
On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 10:26 AM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For some time now we have been steadily working on getting our ability to
> build everything that was previously built on the Binary Factory being
> built on Gitlab.
>
> I'm now very happy to advise th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481425
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|bugs.kde.org|plasma-browser-integration
Component
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 9:50 AM Paul Brown wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14 February 2024 19:44:55 CET Johnny Jazeix wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the Community Working Group (https://community.kde.org/CWG) handles
> these
> > kind of topics, you should discuss the subject with them.
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree with
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481320
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
CC
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 1:13 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple reasons.
>
> Good news: 1 repository was fixed
>
> Bad news: 2 repositories are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481077
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481077
Ben Cooksley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 7:17 AM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2024, 11:48:57 CET schrieb Ben Cooksley:
> > All of the Games Flatpak failures are caused by
> >
> https://invent.kde.org/games/libkdegames/-/commit/023d1a7b173f9d28453a0268e9
> >
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 10:24 AM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs on
> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
> multiple
> reasons.
>
> Good News: 7 failing repositories from previous report got fixed
>
On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 4:28 AM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ((cc:kde-frameworks-devel for heads-up, replies please only to
> kde-core-deve))
>
> I hit the problem that when working on a repo which would like to use
> latest
> KF development state to integrate some new KF API just
1 - 100 of 5164 matches
Mail list logo
