Re: [all-audio] accessible portable HD Radio

2020-08-24 Thread Gary Schindler
The Marc 3 and the Sangean HDr14 and the HDR-16 radios can be found on 
amazon.com. The radios are battery opporated and come with power adapters too! 
The Marc 3 costs about $50.00, and the Sangean radios are around $100.00 or so!


Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Merv Keck
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 12:48 PM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: [all-audio] accessible portable HD Radio

Hi,
I thought everyone in the United States at least had pretty much moved to 
Online radio but someone I need to buy a gift for has her heart set on an HD or 
super duper whammer jammer radio of some sort. As long as it is portable as in 
battery operated and gets A M and FM and maybe has a few other bells and 
whistles like HD or I don't care what else as long as it is accessible for a 
totally blind individual.  I also don't mind paying for quality which is why 
I'm asking on this list as usually good quality items are only discussed on 
this group.
Thanks in advance.
Merv






-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3541): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/3541
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76389361/21656
Group Owner: all-audio+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/all-audio/leave/1074140/405281159/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually Impaired

2019-08-17 Thread Gary Schindler

It isn't a bad radio. The sensitivity is quite good.


I have a Marc 3 which is half the price of the Hd-R16 and it has an edge 
on FM sensitivity and it fits in your over sized pants pocket.



On 8/17/2019 5:16 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:

No, I don’t have a HDR16 but I do know someone who does and he has demonstrated 
it often enough to me both via FaceTime and with recordings captured directly 
from it.
No point me getting a HDR16 as we don’t have HD radio in Australia but Tom 
would be the first to agree with you that the AM of the HDR16 could b e 
improved.
The AM of the PR-d17 is improved of that of the HDR16 however the PDR-17 
doesn’t have facilities to receive HD AM or FM.



On 18 Aug 2019, at 6:39 am, Gary Schindler  wrote:

You have the Hd-R16 like I do! The AM could be improved..

On 8/17/2019 2:08 PM, Tom Kaufman wrote:

Dane:  I understand what you're saying in regard to how what you hear over
the air is different than what you hear over the internet!  Not all stations
are this way; WSM (in Nashville, Tennessee U.S.A.) as much as I've been able
to determine, is exactly the same on the internet as it is if you listen to
AM 650!  But yes...there is something kind of special (and I can't explain
it) but if you can get a far-off station to come in good on a bonified radio
that is kind of unique!  Having said that, I do enjoy being able to listen
to a station that is out of my area without having to contend with the
station fading out!  I still can remember how it used to be, trying to
listen to the Grand Ole Opry back in the day; a song would be playing
and...just at the part where maybe a good instrumental solo was coming up,
WSM would start fading away to the point where you couldn't really hear it!
Of course nowadays, every now and again, you do get a situation where (if
you're listening on your computer or smart speaker) the connection drops;
this is also a pain! Fortunately (at least in my case) this doesn't happen
all that often!  In regard to this San Gian radio: I might be tempted to
check it out further if it had the capability to get HD!  I bought a San
Gian radio a couple of years ago (don't remember the exact model number) is
a nice radio and does get HD, but isn't quite as good as I thought it was
going to be!  While it has wonderful selectivity, to me it tends to be a
little noisy on AM!  On FM, if a station isn't really that close, sometimes
the stations will sound fuzzy or sort of like it is "miss tuned!"
Tom Kaufman

-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io [mailto:all-audio@groups.io] On Behalf Of Dane
Trethowan
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 1:31 PM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually
Impaired

A couple of things here.
Often these days - particularly it seems with broadcasters from the US - the
Internet Streams and free-to-air broadcasting are two completely different
things.
Listen to say KNX or WINS and what you get over the Internet is quite
different than what you'll hear from the Medium-Wave transmitter.
Next - as a DX Listener - I find Internet radio to be rather an insult.
That is anyone can listen to Internet streams and that's convenient without
a doubt.
But their can be no doubt that the fun and the challenge from a DXer's point
of view is to be able to listen to that far off station and furthermore be
able to report the fact - in both written detail and literal sound - to the
station itself.
I have managed to listen to KNX in the US from Australia a number of times
on the radio long before Internet was even thought of for this sort of
thing.


-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io  On Behalf Of -
Sent: Sunday, 18 August 2019 2:57 AM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually
Impaired

I have few to none problems listening to radio worldwide on my smartspeaker.
It is also a fraction of the cost of an intrnet or standard radio.

On Sat, 17 Aug 2019, Dane Trethowan wrote:


That's the theory about Smart Speakers yes however they don't always
do what you tell them to do.


-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io  On Behalf Of -
Sent: Friday, 16 August 2019 11:07 PM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually
Impaired


Even internet radios have been passed by.  Smart speakers will stream
all internet radio sources, including those worldwide, all by voice

command.

And they have many other sources of audio info including thousands of
podcasts and the cable and other news sources.

On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Gary Schindler wrote:


That is why Sangean should concentrate on designing an internet
radio with

talking menus.

Once you have used a Sangean radio you get familiar with the
nomenclature and how to operate them and to me there isn't much
advantage

to having one of these!

It is commendable that Sangean does for now build something with

accessibility in mind.

On 8

Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually Impaired

2019-08-17 Thread Gary Schindler
That is when AM radio is the best! There is always lots of leakage from 
the power grid.



On 8/17/2019 5:13 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:

Point taken.
I have just returned to the land of the living if you like after deliberately 
turning my power off for almost an hour to DX before the sun rises and even 
then the noise from other sources was still noticeablenoticible I must be the 
only person the world over who wishes for a neighbourhood power blackout for a 
few hours from time-to-time.



On 18 Aug 2019, at 6:34 am, Gary Schindler  wrote:

Amazon has it too!


With all the cell towers and computer noise in general you can't DX any more 
like you used to in the states.


On 8/17/2019 1:37 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:

If anyone would like to buy in the US then you will find it at Universal Radio
https://www.universal-radio.com/catalog/spcialty/0417.html


-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io  On Behalf Of Casey
Sent: Sunday, 18 August 2019 3:25 AM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually Impaired

  Hi does anyone have this radio yet?

If so how is the sound on A.M and is the F.M reception as good as the say it is 
and what about on A.M also can you set the alarm so that you could wake up to 
the radio as well?



On 8/17/2019 11:57 AM, - wrote:

I have few to none problems listening to radio worldwide on my smartspeaker.  
It is also a fraction of the cost of an intrnet or standard radio.

On Sat, 17 Aug 2019, Dane Trethowan wrote:


That's the theory about Smart Speakers yes however they don't always
do what you tell them to do.


-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io  On Behalf Of -
Sent: Friday, 16 August 2019 11:07 PM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually
Impaired


Even internet radios have been passed by.  Smart speakers will stream
all internet radio sources, including those worldwide, all by voice command.

And they have many other sources of audio info including thousands of
podcasts and the cable and other news sources.

On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Gary Schindler wrote:


That is why Sangean should concentrate on designing an internet
radio with

talking menus.

Once you have used a Sangean radio you get familiar with the
nomenclature and how to operate them and to me there isn't much
advantage

to having one of these!

It is commendable that Sangean does for now build something with

accessibility in mind.

On 8/15/2019 2:46 PM, Anders Holmberg wrote:

Hi! Actually not want to disrespect people here but i don???t get
the Am/fm radio thing anymore. I have a harman/kardon receiver here
but i very very seldom use the radio in that receiver. Maybe i am
boring or stupid or something but why not just listen via internet.
/A


13 aug. 2019 kl. 22:54 skrev Dane Trethowan :

Now this radio may be well worthwhile grabbing.

https://radiojayallen.com/sangean-pr-d7-am-fm-radio-for-the-visual
l
y-impaire d/







-- XB









--
Gary G. Schindler








--
Gary G. Schindler

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#2741): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/2741
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32857178/21656
Group Owner: all-audio+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/all-audio/leave/1074140/405281159/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually Impaired

2019-08-17 Thread Gary Schindler

You have the Hd-R16 like I do! The AM could be improved..

On 8/17/2019 2:08 PM, Tom Kaufman wrote:

Dane:  I understand what you're saying in regard to how what you hear over
the air is different than what you hear over the internet!  Not all stations
are this way; WSM (in Nashville, Tennessee U.S.A.) as much as I've been able
to determine, is exactly the same on the internet as it is if you listen to
AM 650!  But yes...there is something kind of special (and I can't explain
it) but if you can get a far-off station to come in good on a bonified radio
that is kind of unique!  Having said that, I do enjoy being able to listen
to a station that is out of my area without having to contend with the
station fading out!  I still can remember how it used to be, trying to
listen to the Grand Ole Opry back in the day; a song would be playing
and...just at the part where maybe a good instrumental solo was coming up,
WSM would start fading away to the point where you couldn't really hear it!
Of course nowadays, every now and again, you do get a situation where (if
you're listening on your computer or smart speaker) the connection drops;
this is also a pain! Fortunately (at least in my case) this doesn't happen
all that often!  In regard to this San Gian radio: I might be tempted to
check it out further if it had the capability to get HD!  I bought a San
Gian radio a couple of years ago (don't remember the exact model number) is
a nice radio and does get HD, but isn't quite as good as I thought it was
going to be!  While it has wonderful selectivity, to me it tends to be a
little noisy on AM!  On FM, if a station isn't really that close, sometimes
the stations will sound fuzzy or sort of like it is "miss tuned!"
Tom Kaufman

-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io [mailto:all-audio@groups.io] On Behalf Of Dane
Trethowan
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 1:31 PM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually
Impaired

A couple of things here.
Often these days - particularly it seems with broadcasters from the US - the
Internet Streams and free-to-air broadcasting are two completely different
things.
Listen to say KNX or WINS and what you get over the Internet is quite
different than what you'll hear from the Medium-Wave transmitter.
Next - as a DX Listener - I find Internet radio to be rather an insult.
That is anyone can listen to Internet streams and that's convenient without
a doubt.
But their can be no doubt that the fun and the challenge from a DXer's point
of view is to be able to listen to that far off station and furthermore be
able to report the fact - in both written detail and literal sound - to the
station itself.
I have managed to listen to KNX in the US from Australia a number of times
on the radio long before Internet was even thought of for this sort of
thing.


-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io  On Behalf Of -
Sent: Sunday, 18 August 2019 2:57 AM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually
Impaired

I have few to none problems listening to radio worldwide on my smartspeaker.
It is also a fraction of the cost of an intrnet or standard radio.

On Sat, 17 Aug 2019, Dane Trethowan wrote:


That's the theory about Smart Speakers yes however they don't always
do what you tell them to do.


-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io  On Behalf Of -
Sent: Friday, 16 August 2019 11:07 PM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually
Impaired


Even internet radios have been passed by.  Smart speakers will stream
all internet radio sources, including those worldwide, all by voice

command.

And they have many other sources of audio info including thousands of
podcasts and the cable and other news sources.

On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Gary Schindler wrote:


That is why Sangean should concentrate on designing an internet
radio with

talking menus.


Once you have used a Sangean radio you get familiar with the
nomenclature and how to operate them and to me there isn't much
advantage

to having one of these!


It is commendable that Sangean does for now build something with

accessibility in mind.


On 8/15/2019 2:46 PM, Anders Holmberg wrote:

Hi! Actually not want to disrespect people here but i don???t get
the Am/fm radio thing anymore. I have a harman/kardon receiver
here but i very very seldom use the radio in that receiver. Maybe
i am boring or stupid or something but why not just listen via

internet.

/A


13 aug. 2019 kl. 22:54 skrev Dane Trethowan

:

Now this radio may be well worthwhile grabbing.

https://radiojayallen.com/sangean-pr-d7-am-fm-radio-for-the-visua
ll
y-impaire d/










-- XB









--
XB












--
Gary G. Schindler

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#2738): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/2738
Mute This Topic: https:/

Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually Impaired

2019-08-17 Thread Gary Schindler

Amazon has it too!


With all the cell towers and computer noise in general you can't DX any 
more like you used to in the states.



On 8/17/2019 1:37 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:

If anyone would like to buy in the US then you will find it at Universal Radio
https://www.universal-radio.com/catalog/spcialty/0417.html


-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io  On Behalf Of Casey
Sent: Sunday, 18 August 2019 3:25 AM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually Impaired

  Hi does anyone have this radio yet?

If so how is the sound on A.M and is the F.M reception as good as the say it is 
and what about on A.M also can you set the alarm so that you could wake up to 
the radio as well?



On 8/17/2019 11:57 AM, - wrote:

I have few to none problems listening to radio worldwide on my smartspeaker.  
It is also a fraction of the cost of an intrnet or standard radio.

On Sat, 17 Aug 2019, Dane Trethowan wrote:


That's the theory about Smart Speakers yes however they don't always
do what you tell them to do.


-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io  On Behalf Of -
Sent: Friday, 16 August 2019 11:07 PM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually
Impaired


Even internet radios have been passed by.  Smart speakers will stream
all internet radio sources, including those worldwide, all by voice command.

And they have many other sources of audio info including thousands of
podcasts and the cable and other news sources.

On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Gary Schindler wrote:


That is why Sangean should concentrate on designing an internet
radio with

talking menus.

Once you have used a Sangean radio you get familiar with the
nomenclature and how to operate them and to me there isn't much
advantage

to having one of these!

It is commendable that Sangean does for now build something with

accessibility in mind.

On 8/15/2019 2:46 PM, Anders Holmberg wrote:

Hi! Actually not want to disrespect people here but i don???t get
the Am/fm radio thing anymore. I have a harman/kardon receiver here
but i very very seldom use the radio in that receiver. Maybe i am
boring or stupid or something but why not just listen via internet.
/A


13 aug. 2019 kl. 22:54 skrev Dane Trethowan :

Now this radio may be well worthwhile grabbing.

https://radiojayallen.com/sangean-pr-d7-am-fm-radio-for-the-visual
l
y-impaire d/









-- XB









--
Gary G. Schindler

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#2737): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/2737
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32857178/21656
Group Owner: all-audio+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/all-audio/leave/1074140/405281159/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually Impaired

2019-08-15 Thread Gary Schindler
I think the smart speakers on the market cut into the internet radio 
market, maybe even crippled it altogether. The only internet radios seem 
to be needing to be set up with remote controls, knobs and buttont on 
the radio itself with know audio feedback! Grace and C. Crane seem to be 
the only manufacturers making anything these days.



I do know Dane if there were anything worth the while you would be one 
to let us know what would be available and how accessible it would be!



On 8/15/2019 4:00 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:

That’s a most interesting point and I’ll give you my opinions from my 
perspective given I’ve owned quite a few Internet radio devices.
Portable self-contained Internet radio sets have not taken off in the market 
which perhaps isn’t surprising given the popularity of Smart Phone devices so 
really there’s no need for such a device.
I have had a number of Sangean Internet radio sets that have provided me with 
accessibility but that accessibility to the radio was provided by an App on a 
Smart Phone but still the radio talked and we come back to the same question, 
what was the point when my Smart Phone could do all that? The only point was 
that I now had access to the display text of DAB+ and FM broadcasts.
So I guess technology when it all is boiled down is as useful as you yourself 
want it to be or make it.
Other Internet radio sets I’ve used with great success include the Logitech 
U.E. Smart Radio or Squeezebox range which are still available if you know 
where to look and still supported.
These radios are accessed either by an App on your Smart Phone or directly via 
a HTML web page.
You can set alarms on these devices, set up one touch presets, add extra radio 
services such as Sky FM or whatever it calls itself these days etc.



On 16 Aug 2019, at 5:15 am, Gary Schindler  wrote:

That is why Sangean should concentrate on designing an internet radio with 
talking menus.


Once you have used a Sangean radio you get familiar with the nomenclature and 
how to operate them and to me there isn't much advantage to having one of these!


It is commendable that Sangean does for now build something with accessibility 
in mind.


On 8/15/2019 2:46 PM, Anders Holmberg wrote:

Hi!
Actually not want to disrespect people here but i don’t get the Am/fm radio 
thing anymore.
I have a harman/kardon receiver here but i very very seldom use the radio in 
that receiver.
Maybe i am boring or stupid or something but why not just listen via internet.
/A


13 aug. 2019 kl. 22:54 skrev Dane Trethowan :

Now this radio may be well worthwhile grabbing.

https://radiojayallen.com/sangean-pr-d7-am-fm-radio-for-the-visually-impaire
d/









--
Gary G. Schindler








--
Gary G. Schindler

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#2710): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/2710
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32857178/21656
Group Owner: all-audio+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/all-audio/leave/1074140/405281159/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [all-audio] Sangean PR-D17 AM/FM Radio for the Visually Impaired

2019-08-15 Thread Gary Schindler
That is why Sangean should concentrate on designing an internet radio 
with talking menus.



Once you have used a Sangean radio you get familiar with the 
nomenclature and how to operate them and to me there isn't much 
advantage to having one of these!



It is commendable that Sangean does for now build something with 
accessibility in mind.



On 8/15/2019 2:46 PM, Anders Holmberg wrote:

Hi!
Actually not want to disrespect people here but i don’t get the Am/fm radio 
thing anymore.
I have a harman/kardon receiver here but i very very seldom use the radio in 
that receiver.
Maybe i am boring or stupid or something but why not just listen via internet.
/A


13 aug. 2019 kl. 22:54 skrev Dane Trethowan :

Now this radio may be well worthwhile grabbing.

https://radiojayallen.com/sangean-pr-d7-am-fm-radio-for-the-visually-impaire
d/











--
Gary G. Schindler

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#2703): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/2703
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32857178/21656
Group Owner: all-audio+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/all-audio/leave/1074140/405281159/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [all-audio] accessible internet radio recording software?

2019-07-31 Thread Gary Schindler
How would you record something like a football game with those recording 
apps? you would have to know the stream address, and hope the game is 
consistently being broadcast on the same station every week? How could 
Tunein be used if you had Tunein Live?



On 7/31/2019 2:26 PM, Aidan wrote:

Keep in mind though, that total recorder don't support commin radio
formats such as aac plus streams. That is a huge problem as many
stations don't have mp3 streams anymore.

On 7/28/19, Dave Marthouse  wrote:

I suggest Total recorder.  I think it will meet your requirements.


http://www.totalrecorder.com




Dave Marthouse

dmartho...@gmail.com



On 7/28/2019 2:19 AM, goshawk on horseback wrote:

hello all,
does anyone know of any good internet radio station recording software,
that is fully accessible with either window-eyes or nvda?
I need it to be able to do timed recordings/start and stop with out me
needing to be there to actually do it, also the recordings it makes should
be as high quality as possible, as the stations I will primarily be using
it for very often play recordings that are a long way from being anything
like good quality.
if possible, it should be able to record 2 or 3 streams/stations, and have
an easy way to find the streams, rather than me having to scratch around
finding long url links.

Simon





--









--
Gary G. Schindler

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#2659): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/2659
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32629891/21656
Group Owner: all-audio+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/all-audio/leave/1074140/405281159/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [all-audio] Optical Cables and Right-Angle Adaptors

2019-07-23 Thread Gary Schindler

That has me stumped then.


On 7/23/2019 2:09 PM, Darran Ross via Groups.Io wrote:
No Gary, its the straight-forward connections, not the mini optical 
version.



- Original Message - From: "Gary Schindler" 


To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Optical Cables and Right-Angle Adaptors


Darran, Are you using the mini optical adapters that look like a 3.5 
jack on the end? maybe they have to be snugged up tighter. this is 
just a guess! I never used the right angle adapters my self.



On 7/23/2019 11:24 AM, Darran Ross via Groups.Io wrote:

Hi Gary.

There were caps on the adaptor to begin with, but they have been 
removed.


Darran

- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Schindler" 


To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [all-audio] Optical Cables and Right-Angle Adaptors


Is there a cap of some kind on the ends of the adapters? That is 
the only thing I can think of because the optical signal should be 
able to go around corners.


On 7/23/2019 7:49 AM, Darran Ross via Groups.Io wrote:

Hi List.

I've got an optical cable plugged into my desktop machine, and in 
an attempt to relieve the obvious stress being placed on the cable 
by its positioning I bought a right-angle adaptor. However, its 
not working and I was wondering if anyone could offer some advice.


I have actually bought two different adaptors as the first one 
didn't work either and I thought it might be faulty, but I now 
find that the second one from a different maker is also not 
working and I'm a little perplexed to say the least. After all, 
its such a straight-forward bit of kit that you wonder where you 
could be going wrong, but I'm hoping someone may be able to shed 
some light on this for me.


To sum up, the optical cable works as expected until the adaptors 
are connected, then silence.


Anyone any ideas?

Darran



--
Gary G. Schindler




__ ESET Internet Security __

This email was scanned, no threats were found.



Detection engine version: 19733 (20190723)

http://www.eset.com








--
Gary G. Schindler




__ ESET Internet Security __

This email was scanned, no threats were found.



Detection engine version: 19734 (20190723)

http://www.eset.com









--
Gary G. Schindler

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#2598): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/2598
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32571640/21656
Group Owner: all-audio+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/all-audio/leave/1074140/405281159/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [all-audio] Another tv, OR add speakers or sound bar?

2019-02-28 Thread Gary Schindler
A bigger TV doesn't always mean that the sound will be better! The TV's 
are flat, and the enclosures are cramped and small.


A good sound bar with a sub woofer would be a nice addition for your 
set. It would help if you were able to turn off the internal speakers on 
the TV. If possible, use a toslink or SPDIF cable to hook up the sound 
bar. sometimes just hooking up a good set of computer or amplified 
speakers to the TV will go a long way to better sound.


If you do get a bigger TV, wall mounting can help with the acoustics of 
the set, but again the cabinet has to be thicker on the TV too.


On 2/28/2019 2:17 PM, Gerardo Corripio wrote:

‘Ve a 22-inch Samsung flat screen, whose sound is terrible! I don’t know why I 
bothered to buy it back in July of 2013, before seeing if I could test out the 
sound before. Anyway I’m wanting to better the sound of it, thus I’d like your 
advice if get a bigger TV (possibly a 32-inch with etter sound),or buy myself a 
SoundBar? For now, I plug in my earbuds for me to be able to enjoy tv WITH MY 
HEARING AIDS.

Gera
Enviado desde mi iPhone SE de Telcel




--
Gary G. Schindler

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#2066): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/2066
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/30166939/21656
Group Owner: all-audio+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/all-audio/leave/1074140/405281159/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [all-audio] CC EP Pro Radio continued

2018-10-11 Thread Gary Schindler
I have gotten used to internet radio, you have more choices of the same 
junk to listen to. You don't have to put up with the noise.



One night a Thunder storm blew out the electricity in the area and it 
was like heaven as far as DXING again for a while.




On 10/11/2018 8:49 AM, Adrian Spratt wrote:

I agree with this summary in general, but New York City, where I live, is a 
qualified exception. HD channels do work here, and they provide a little 
variety. There are probably other cities around the U.S. where the situation is 
also moderately better. Separately, shortwave is useless here and I gave up on 
it a long time ago. Enter Tapin to fill the void.

-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io  On Behalf Of Gary Schindler
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 1:22 AM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] CC EP Pro Radio continued

Mary and Howard are correct. You have five companies that own most of the radio 
stations in the states. Most of the talk stations are conservative.


They also didn't mention that cellular towers, noisy power lines and 
transformers from an ageing power grid, computers everywhere, and, leaking 
cable systems  adjacent interference from stations using the frequencies to the 
left and right of the main station for HD radio makes it almost impossible to 
DX any more. IF you do pull in a station at night that is an HD station because 
of the reduced power, it sounds terrible anyway because of the sky wave 
conditions. Because of these things it isn't worth buying a good radio no 
matter how sensitive or selective it is if you can't enjoy a good listening 
experience.



On 10/11/2018 12:02 AM, Mary Otten wrote:

Howard,
I have to agree with you. As somebody who grew up loving to DX on the medium 
wave band and then later got a ham license, I love radio. But radio in the 
United States these days is useless. I wouldn’t spend 10 bucks on a radio. 
There’s nothing to listen to. Unless you come to the states, Dane, you simply 
can’t understand what we’re talking about. If it’s better for you in Australia, 
great. But here, everything is owned by big corporations and who really gives a 
damn? There’s no local color nothing. It’s worthless.
Mary

On Oct 10, 2018, at 8:58 PM, Howard Traxler  
wrote:

Dane, you are generalizing.  Some ham radio guys know the stuff and some don't. 
 Whichever I am is no concern to anyone but me.  All I am saying is:

(only an opinion); broadcast radio and TV, these days, is nothing but a vast 
waste land and not worth the price of any type of receiving device.

- Original Message - From: "Dane Trethowan"

To: 
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [all-audio] CC EP Pro Radio continued


I think you're missing the point.
This radio is a very reasonably priced and good sounding set so no matter what 
your radio listening habits - long distance or local - then it’s a set worth 
getting.
And please forgive me again but those who use Ham radio sets I've found 
wouldn't know a a good sensitive long distance receiver if they fell over one.
Yep I know that Kenwood are recognised for transceivers as are Uniden and a 
whole heap of other companies but they're not known for long distance reception 
of the type I'm talking about, you need nice antennas to be strung up, nothing 
wrong with that at all but I like to move around.


-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io  On Behalf Of Howard
Traxler
Sent: Thursday, 11 October 2018 2:10 PM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] CC EP Pro Radio continued

Don't know what kind of broadcasting is done in Australia, but here in the 
states there isn't much that I'd turn on the radio for--no matter how good the 
radio be.

Being a radeo ham, I have a Kenwood TS-590S.  The receiver on this one tunes continuous 
from the "long wave" bandup through 54 (or so) megahertz; very nicely covering 
the US broadcast band.  With external amplification, this one can have pretty good sound. 
 Not to take anything away from the CC radios or even the super radios; there has to be 
something out there that one desires to hear; or what good is it?

- Original Message -
From: "Dane Trethowan" 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [all-audio] CC EP Pro Radio continued


Shame you feel that way as there’s plenty to recommend a radio such
as this if you’re thinking from a content perspective.
Actually one could argue that its probably better to be able to
listen to long-distance radio given the rubbish some local city
stations broadcast and then you’ll never know unless you try
receiving these stations so therefore you’ll need something good to receive 
them on in the first place.
So enter the CC EP Pro as a very good starting point for a most
reasonable price.
There aren’t too many radios that come near the CC EP Pro as far as
performance these days and I’ve had my view confirmed when scanning
about the band an

Re: [all-audio] CC EP Pro Radio continued

2018-10-10 Thread Gary Schindler
Mary and Howard are correct. You have five companies that own most of 
the radio stations in the states. Most of the talk stations are  
conservative.



They also didn't mention that cellular towers, noisy power lines and 
transformers from an ageing power grid, computers everywhere, and, 
leaking cable systems  adjacent interference from stations using the 
frequencies to the left and right of the main station for HD radio makes 
it almost impossible to DX any more. IF you do pull in a station at 
night that is an HD station because of the reduced power, it sounds 
terrible anyway because of the sky wave conditions. Because of these 
things it isn't worth buying a good radio no matter how sensitive or 
selective it is if you can't enjoy a good listening experience.




On 10/11/2018 12:02 AM, Mary Otten wrote:

Howard,
I have to agree with you. As somebody who grew up loving to DX on the medium 
wave band and then later got a ham license, I love radio. But radio in the 
United States these days is useless. I wouldn’t spend 10 bucks on a radio. 
There’s nothing to listen to. Unless you come to the states, Dane, you simply 
can’t understand what we’re talking about. If it’s better for you in Australia, 
great. But here, everything is owned by big corporations and who really gives a 
damn? There’s no local color nothing. It’s worthless.
Mary

On Oct 10, 2018, at 8:58 PM, Howard Traxler  
wrote:

Dane, you are generalizing.  Some ham radio guys know the stuff and some don't. 
 Whichever I am is no concern to anyone but me.  All I am saying is:

(only an opinion); broadcast radio and TV, these days, is nothing but a vast 
waste land and not worth the price of any type of receiving device.

- Original Message - From: "Dane Trethowan" 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [all-audio] CC EP Pro Radio continued


I think you're missing the point.
This radio is a very reasonably priced and good sounding set so no matter what 
your radio listening habits - long distance or local - then it’s a set worth 
getting.
And please forgive me again but those who use Ham radio sets I've found 
wouldn't know a a good sensitive long distance receiver if they fell over one.
Yep I know that Kenwood are recognised for transceivers as are Uniden and a 
whole heap of other companies but they're not known for long distance reception 
of the type I'm talking about, you need nice antennas to be strung up, nothing 
wrong with that at all but I like to move around.


-Original Message-
From: all-audio@groups.io  On Behalf Of Howard Traxler
Sent: Thursday, 11 October 2018 2:10 PM
To: all-audio@groups.io
Subject: Re: [all-audio] CC EP Pro Radio continued

Don't know what kind of broadcasting is done in Australia, but here in the 
states there isn't much that I'd turn on the radio for--no matter how good the 
radio be.

Being a radeo ham, I have a Kenwood TS-590S.  The receiver on this one tunes continuous 
from the "long wave" bandup through 54 (or so) megahertz; very nicely covering 
the US broadcast band.  With external amplification, this one can have pretty good sound. 
 Not to take anything away from the CC radios or even the super radios; there has to be 
something out there that one desires to hear; or what good is it?

- Original Message -
From: "Dane Trethowan" 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [all-audio] CC EP Pro Radio continued


Shame you feel that way as there’s plenty to recommend a radio such as this
if you’re thinking from a content perspective.
Actually one could argue that its probably better to be able to listen to
long-distance radio given the rubbish some local city stations broadcast and
then you’ll never know unless you try receiving these stations so therefore
you’ll need something good to receive them on in the first place.
So enter the CC EP Pro as a very good starting point for a most reasonable
price.
There aren’t too many radios that come near the CC EP Pro as far as
performance these days and I’ve had my view confirmed when scanning about
the band and listening to the set earlier this morning.
Yes, you can go for all those vintage sets if you like as I myself have done
but its really not worth the bother doing that unless you know someone in
the repairs business.
Let’s take the classic GE Super Radio version II, I got one in 1990 and I
gave it away.
Now suppose I was offered one of those sets today the question then arises,
should I buy or should I settle for something else like a CC EP Pro? To me
the answer is obvious, forget about the GE Super Radio and take the CC EP
Pro.
The GE Super Radio would most likely require an alignment and finding
someone to do that may take some time.
The CC EP Pro is as good as - if not a little better in some ways - as the
GE Super radio was.
The CC EP Pro is far quieter whereas the GE Super Radio was quite noisy in
comparison.
The CC EP Pro in my view has a definite performance edge when it comes to

Re: [all-audio] There's finally a microwave you can control with Alexa, and it just got its first discount

2018-08-31 Thread Gary Schindler
I am glad you clarified these points for me. I am considering getting 
one of these myself!





On 8/31/2018 9:07 AM, Rick Alfaro wrote:
This is definitely a valid point. I had my sighted wife read the code 
on the back of the door but I also could have used be my eyes or 
similar service to accomplish that. Perhaps even knfb reader might 
have done the trick but I took the easy way out.



Also, you do not have to press the start button to start the cooking. 
Alexa does that.



On 8/30/2018 12:50 PM, Gary Schindler wrote:
How did you deal with the password issue that folks talked about when 
setting it up?



Frankly I think that's all a microwave oven is good for anyway is to 
reheat something.




On 8/30/2018 10:56 AM, Rick Alfaro wrote:
Hi. I have this oven and it's perfectly adequate for simple every 
day type of things like heating up a cup of coffee or making a quick 
hot pocket. I wouldn't recommend it for anyone that does any kind of 
serious microwave cooking however. I think the power is adequate for 
the size of .9 cubic feet.



On 8/29/2018 7:51 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
No, not the type of oven I’d buy either but at least its another 
choice for people.



On 30 Aug 2018, at 5:16 am, Dane Trethowan 
 wrote:


Wow! I hope this comes to Australia.

https://bgr.com/2018/08/02/smart-microwave-with-alexa-voice-commands/














--
Gary G. Schindler

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#1240): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/1240
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/25076811/21656
Group Owner: all-audio+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/all-audio/leave/1074140/405281159/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [all-audio] There's finally a microwave you can control with Alexa, and it just got its first discount

2018-08-30 Thread Gary Schindler
How did you deal with the password issue that folks talked about when 
setting it up?



Frankly I think that's all a microwave oven is good for anyway is to 
reheat something.




On 8/30/2018 10:56 AM, Rick Alfaro wrote:
Hi. I have this oven and it's perfectly adequate for simple every day 
type of things like heating up a cup of coffee or making a quick hot 
pocket. I wouldn't recommend it for anyone that does any kind of 
serious microwave cooking however. I think the power is adequate for 
the size of .9 cubic feet.



On 8/29/2018 7:51 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
No, not the type of oven I’d buy either but at least its another 
choice for people.



On 30 Aug 2018, at 5:16 am, Dane Trethowan 
 wrote:


Wow! I hope this comes to Australia.

https://bgr.com/2018/08/02/smart-microwave-with-alexa-voice-commands/












--
Gary G. Schindler

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#1235): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/1235
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/25076811/21656
Group Owner: all-audio+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/all-audio/leave/1074140/405281159/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Re: [all-audio] There's finally a microwave you can control with Alexa, and it just got its first discount

2018-08-30 Thread Gary Schindler
The reviews haven't been all glowing about this microwave either. You 
have to enter a password that is printed on the microwave door 
somewhere, and the data base for frozen products seems to be limited.



From what I am able to ascertain, once you get the oven on the network, 
you have to wake up the thing every time you want to use it to connect 
it to your network by opening the oven door! As I think about that, I 
guess they want to make sure you have food in the cavity so you don't 
start an empty oven and burn it up.



I am to understand too, that you have to still press the start button 
for the scan to function to start the oven and cook your food.



Somebody will by it and answer all of our questions.


I was hoping that it would fit over my shelf over the stove so I could 
junk my worn out Hamilton Beech oven that has seen better days!




On 8/29/2018 4:29 PM, Steve Matzura wrote:

Disappointingly small and underpowered. .9 cubic fee, 900 watts.


On 8/29/2018 3:16 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:

Wow! I hope this comes to Australia.

https://bgr.com/2018/08/02/smart-microwave-with-alexa-voice-commands/











--
Gary G. Schindler

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#1234): https://groups.io/g/all-audio/message/1234
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/25076811/21656
Group Owner: all-audio+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/all-audio/leave/1074140/405281159/xyzzy  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-