Hi Tim and all,
On Sat, 29 May 2004 16:34:49 +0200 (CEST)
Tim Goetze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Remi Bernhard]
I tried with kernel 2.4.25 + lowlatency patch.
I have the same xruns :-/
Any other idea ?
checklist:
* running jackd as root? with -R option?
Tried - failed.
* tried
On Sun, 2004-05-30 at 04:09, Remi Bernhard wrote:
Hi Tim and all,
On Sat, 29 May 2004 16:34:49 +0200 (CEST)
Tim Goetze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Remi Bernhard]
I tried with kernel 2.4.25 + lowlatency patch.
I have the same xruns :-/
Any other idea ?
checklist:
*
Hello,
I read a lot a great thing about the audiophile 24/96 on the net, and i
decided to buy it to get better latency than my old sblive! I just
received the audiophile 24/96 and unfortunatly, i have a lot of XRuns
with when i run jackd.
I already tried the following :
- i changed irq (several
[Remi Bernhard]
I read a lot a great thing about the audiophile 24/96 on the net, and i
decided to buy it to get better latency than my old sblive! I just
received the audiophile 24/96 and unfortunatly, i have a lot of XRuns
with when i run jackd.
my old system had various 2.4.x-ll kernels, asus
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 06:16, Remi Bernhard wrote:
So i have 2.6.5 kernel, and not 2.4.x. Do you think i should install
2.4.25 instead ?
(i gather that 2.4 is still the better choice for low-latency
operations.)
I read the alsa-* archives, and i saw a thread with two people who
[Remi Bernhard]
So i have 2.6.5 kernel, and not 2.4.x. Do you think i should install
2.4.25 instead ?
i do think so because i never saw any hard facts about latency posted
for the 2.6 series, while 2.4.x-ll is well documented and proven to
work quite well here and elsewhere.
it _could_ also be
Hi,
As far as minimizing buffer size is concerned - if
you are doing live audio or you want to monitor recording with inboard
effects turned on you need to have a small buffer size. With the
envy24 chipset cards you can use hardware monitoring so you can set
the buffer size to 2048 and
[Remi Bernhard]
To be more sharp, i need to reduce latency because i use softsynth
(zynaddsubfx, fluidsynth, etc.) that needs a low latency when playing
from midi keyboard, and if not, there is a lag time, that man can
hear, between the time when you hit the key, and the time it is played.
I
On Sat, 29 May 2004 13:44:40 +0200 (CEST)
Tim Goetze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Remi Bernhard]
So i have 2.6.5 kernel, and not 2.4.x. Do you think i should install
2.4.25 instead ?
i do think so because i never saw any hard facts about latency posted
for the 2.6 series, while 2.4.x-ll is
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 07:13, Tim Goetze wrote:
[Remi Bernhard]
To be more sharp, i need to reduce latency because i use softsynth
(zynaddsubfx, fluidsynth, etc.) that needs a low latency when playing
from midi keyboard, and if not, there is a lag time, that man can
hear, between the time when
[Jan Depner]
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 07:13, Tim Goetze wrote:
[Remi Bernhard]
To be more sharp, i need to reduce latency because i use softsynth
(zynaddsubfx, fluidsynth, etc.) that needs a low latency when playing
from midi keyboard, and if not, there is a lag time, that man can
hear, between
[Remi Bernhard]
I tried with kernel 2.4.25 + lowlatency patch.
I have the same xruns :-/
Any other idea ?
checklist:
* running jackd as root? with -R option?
* tried running jackd without any clients?
* IDE-DMA enabled?
* ll-sysctl interface chosen at kernel build time? turned it on?
* X
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 09:31, Tim Goetze wrote:
depends on what 'system' we're talking about, which isn't really clear
in the first place (nor is it too important, but here goes anyway ...
:)
you can see the whole setup as the system, then latency is the time
from keypress to voltage change
[Jan Depner]
Agreed. But the problem that keeps popping up on the lists is that
people who are not doing live sound, have cards that do hardware
monitoring, and don't need to use a tiny buffer size waste their time
trying to get the minimum buffer size because they think they need to
get
14 matches
Mail list logo
