Hi Jensen,
Thanks for following up.
The Title says the document is about OAM for ALTO protocol, but the
Abstract says "operations and management". I prefer the Abstract's
choice of words.
Thanks for raising this issue. I double-checked RFC6291
Hi Adrian,
Really thank you for your "sanity review"! It is very helpful for us at
this moment. Let me separate my response into two parts to answer your
comments.
The following response applies to your comments until Sec 3. I'll send
another email to respond to your remaining comments soon.
Hi authors,
Thanks for starting this work on a YANG model for ALTO servers. I believe this
will be a useful component to support the operational features of ALTO in real
deployments.
I have done a "sanity review" rather than a detailed technical review.
In summary, this looks like a
