unsubscribe

2000-12-12 Thread Philippe Dogliani
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Auto-eject tapes

2000-12-12 Thread Erik van der Meulen
This is not of great importance, but I would like to see my tapes ejcet after a Amanda run. I use a simple DAT system /dev/nst0 and it takes about 20 secs between pushing the button and seeing the tape. In practice this appears to be just enough to loose my attention and forget about the thing

RE: Auto-eject tapes

2000-12-12 Thread Christopher P. Mills
Easy. Set the cron line to include a tape eject command after running amdump. In my configuration, the line looks something like: 30 03 * * * /usr/local/amanda/sbin/amdump default; mt -f /dev/nst0 rewoffl Check out the manpage for "mt" most unixes have either this command or something

Re: Auto-eject tapes

2000-12-12 Thread Christoph Scheeder
Hi, that's all ok, but i use the "" sing in place of the ";", which has the nice effect of an error-detection: if the amdump faild for any reason, the tape does not get ejected, and i get reminded to check what went wrong... Christoph "Christopher P. Mills" schrieb: Easy. Set the cron line

Re: problem with dumping from host

2000-12-12 Thread Matt McManus
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, John R. Jackson wrote: ... I have have been using amstatus to monitor the dump, and it seems that the dump gets to about 140%, then goes back to 0%. I notice it's well over 2 (or 4) GBytes in size. It's my understanding Linux does not support files 2 GBytes. What

Re: format of amandahosts file

2000-12-12 Thread David Lloyd
Hmm! Of course, a DNS server would "simplify" things. But besides the theoretical point of "Occam's razor" (what is simple?), we have all these security announcements for bind, that make the blood chill, even with the most nuclearly hardened packet filter... Without being too laconic, your

Exclude file

2000-12-12 Thread ROD
Hi, Can anyone tell me if 'excludes' with the Amanda smbclient. I've unsuccessfully being trying to exclude recycler files on an NT box. best regards Rod

Re: Auto-eject tapes

2000-12-12 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:36:58 GMT "Christopher P. Mills" said: Easy. Set the cron line to include a tape eject command after running amdump. In my configuration, the line looks something like: 30 03 * * * /usr/local/amanda/sbin/amdump default; mt -f /dev/nst0 rewoffl I think

curious about error

2000-12-12 Thread Eric A. Sproul
Hi, Every time I look at Amanda's debug output I learn something new... Can anyone tell me what the last message means in this sendsize.debug excerpt? DUMP: Date of this level 2 dump: Tue Dec 12 01:53:14 2000 DUMP: Date of last level 1 dump: Wed Dec 6 02:25:22 2000 DUMP: Dumping

tape changer confusion

2000-12-12 Thread Andrew Bacchi
I am trying to set up Amanda for my remote systems. I use an ATL L500 14 bay changer/library with an DLT 7000 tape drive. I am currently doing simple tar directly to the DLT tape using /dev/st0(or /dev/nst0) from a RH Linux 6.2 system. After reading much documentation, I find no /dev/ch0 and

amlabel hangs up

2000-12-12 Thread Olaf Seidel
Hi, I have problems with amlabel. Sometimes, when I label a tape, there are no problems and the process takes a minute or so. And sometimes (2 out of 6 tapes), Amanda says, that it is writing the label to the tape and when the checking label process is going on, amanda hangs up. Only a

Re: Auto-eject tapes

2000-12-12 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:44:29 CST Bill Carlson said: On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Paul Lussier wrote: I think you could also do something like: amdump default amtape default eject Does amdump exit with a nonzero status on some errors now? I seem to remember that it always

Re: curious about error

2000-12-12 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Dec 12, 2000, "Eric A. Sproul" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DUMP: slave couldn't reopen disk: Interrupted system call Looks like some problem in DUMP. I'd ask around in a DUMP-specific mailing list. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC

Re: Exclude file

2000-12-12 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Dec 12, 2000, "ROD" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone tell me if 'excludes' with the Amanda smbclient. There's partial support for excludes of Samba backups in Amanda 2.4.2 final. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer

Re: Auto-eject tapes

2000-12-12 Thread Christoph Scheeder
Hi, on my linux-server it exits with non zero staus on errors, even if the holdingdiskspace is to low. Christoph Bill Carlson schrieb: On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Paul Lussier wrote: I think you could also do something like: amdump default amtape default eject Does amdump exit

Re: Auto-eject tapes

2000-12-12 Thread John R. Jackson
Does amdump exit with a nonzero status on some errors now? ... A simple "tail amdump" shows it always exits with a zero. Only very serious ones (e.g. a totally corrupt amanda.conf) would cause a non-zero exit. It does not exit non-zero for backup errors, e.g. client down, out of tape, etc.

Re: amlabel hangs up

2000-12-12 Thread John R. Jackson
... So what would be the reason, because sometimes I don't have any problems? Are the tapes crap? I wonder about it, because for that money you should get good tapes and not a failure rate of 33%. Thanks in advance. BTW, these are OnStream ADR50 tapes... This is almost certainly a hardware

Re: Auto-eject tapes

2000-12-12 Thread Bill Carlson
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, John R. Jackson wrote: Does amdump exit with a nonzero status on some errors now? ... A simple "tail amdump" shows it always exits with a zero. Only very Shame on me. "Use the Source, Luke!". To be specific, amdump is a shell script and:

Re: backing up subdirs in a partition using xfsdump on IRIX

2000-12-12 Thread John R. Jackson
... I assume this means that xfsdump only wants to dump full partitions, is there any way around this? ... In general, *dump programs only want to work with the entire file system. If you want finer control than that, you'll have to switch to GNU tar. I suppose an alternative is to backup

Tapetype for Exabyte Mammoth2?

2000-12-12 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
Does anyone have a tapetype for an Exabyte Mammoth2 drive (with 225m tapes)? There doesn't seem to be one in the FAQ-O-Matic. Thanks, - J

amanda is working like normal again

2000-12-12 Thread Denise Ives
There were no problems with amdump's level 0 run last night. sda10 backed-up along with the rest of my partitions. There was no power outage on any of the systems when sda10 failed to dump last weekend. I checked syslogs - etc. and found nothing. Thanks both to Chris and John for constant

Re: Reading a file on the holding disk

2000-12-12 Thread David Lloyd
Chris! Why does if=some device work and if=some file does not? Is this because I have an ext2 filesystem on the disk and copied the file with cp? If it's a file on an ext2 system, just use tar directly: tar -xzvf the_file OR tar --extract --gzip --verbose --file=the_file DL -- The new

Re: Reading a file on the holding disk

2000-12-12 Thread John R. Jackson
How do I read a file on the holding disk? Amrestore knows how to read from the holding disk directly. But when I copy the file to a MO-disk (2048 bytes per sector) ... Huh? Did you copy it with the Amanda header or not? Why does if=some device work and if=some file does not? Is this because

Re: Reading a file on the holding disk

2000-12-12 Thread Chris Karakas
"John R. Jackson" wrote: How do I read a file on the holding disk? Amrestore knows how to read from the holding disk directly. I have tried amrestore -h -p /scsi/DynaMo/linux/20001212/bacchus._usr_share.1 | dd bs=32k skip=1 of=test.6 but test.6 seems to be neither a tar

Re: Reading a file on the holding disk

2000-12-12 Thread Chris Karakas
has the 32k header at the start. What I am trying is dd if=/scsi/DynaMo/linux/20001212/bacchus._usr_src.1 bs=32k skip=1 | zcat | tar -tf - but I get tar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Skipping to next header -- Regards Chris Karakas Dont waste your cpu time - crack rc5: http

Re: amdump inconsistancy.

2000-12-12 Thread Hien Viet Lieu
Thanks John, I think you are absolutely right to question the dump program. The inconsistancy may be due to the dump command, but it's more likely that the processes it depends on are the main cause, and I don't know how to find out what these processes are. Anytime a filesystem failed to

about setting up the disklist.conf

2000-12-12 Thread richard
Dear all, In my disklist.conf, I have set up the following: localhost /etc comp-root-tarlocalhost /home comp-root-tar202.85.165.88 /home comp-root-tar In the 202.85.165.88 /home directory, I have set up different users who only themselves can read their directories. So, I have put the

Re: amdump inconsistancy.

2000-12-12 Thread John R. Jackson
Thanks John, I think you are absolutely right to question the dump program. ... It's 0.4b19 version ... Well, I'd be a lot happier if it was ancient so I could blame it :-). You're right that that seems pretty recent, so it may not be the culprit. The inconsistancy may be due to the dump

Re: about setting up the disklist.conf

2000-12-12 Thread John R. Jackson
In my disklist.conf, I have set up the following: localhost /etc comp-root-tar localhost /home comp-root-tar 202.85.165.88 /home comp-root-tar=20 I recommend you put a real host name in there instead of "localhost". If you ever need to move to a new server, that name will be wrong. In the

Re: What is the meaning of the /usr/local/etc/amanda/changer* files

2000-12-12 Thread John R. Jackson
Hi. My /usr file system overflowed and so amanda was unable to write to /usr/local/etc/amanda/changer*. Technically, that's a bug in amcheck (it ought to detect if those files are writable) but skip that for now. It's not really an amcheck bug. Those files are "writable" even if the file

Re: What is the meaning of the /usr/local/etc/amanda/changer* files

2000-12-12 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 19:49:11 -0800 From: Jeff Silverman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi. My /usr file system overflowed and so amanda was unable to write to /usr/local/etc/amanda/changer*. Technically, that's a bug in amcheck (it ought to detect if those files are writable) but skip that for now. What

Re: What is the meaning of the /usr/local/etc/amanda/changer* files

2000-12-12 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
Amcheck could (and should -- I'll add it to the TODO list) test the amount of free space, but that would only be good at the time amcheck was run and the file system could fill up after that. If you're going to be mucking with amcheck, could you also fix the bug where it assumes that

Re: What is the meaning of the /usr/local/etc/amanda/changer* files

2000-12-12 Thread John R. Jackson
If you're going to be mucking with amcheck, could you also fix the bug where it assumes that /usr/local/amanda/etc has to be writable ... I think that's what David Wolfskill just brought up today (in amanda-hackers) and offered to fix. I vote for him doing it :-). -Mitch John R. Jackson,

Re: What is the meaning of the /usr/local/etc/amanda/changer* files

2000-12-12 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Dec 13, 2000, "John R. Jackson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you're going to be mucking with amcheck, could you also fix the bug where it assumes that /usr/local/amanda/etc has to be writable ... I think that's what David Wolfskill just brought up today (in amanda-hackers) and offered to

Re: What is the meaning of the /usr/local/etc/amanda/changer* files

2000-12-12 Thread Mitch Collinsworth
If you're going to be mucking with amcheck, could you also fix the bug where it assumes that /usr/local/amanda/etc has to be writable ... I think that's what David Wolfskill just brought up today (in amanda-hackers) and offered to fix. Hadn't seen David's message yet, but yes he described

RE: Auto-eject tapes

2000-12-12 Thread Christopher P. Mills
But surely that just makes amdump run in the background does it not, or am I missing some nice functionality with cron that I did not know about? -Original Message- From: Christoph Scheeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 December 2000 10:17 To: Christopher P. Mills Cc: 'Erik van der

RE: does any one know the setting of HP DDS-3 SureStore DAT24i Internal DAT drvie in amanda.conf?

2000-12-12 Thread Mike O'Shaughnessy
I have these drives - here is the tapetype define tapetype HP-DAT24 { comment "HP SureStore DAT24, no compression" comment "DDS-3 125 meter tape" comment "produced by tapetype program" length 11703 mbytes # 12 GB filemark 0 kbytes speed 1000 kbytes }