Suman Malla wrote:
>
> While using dd with ufsrestore i.e.
>
> dd if=/dev/nst0 bs=32k skip=1 | gzip -d | /usr/sbin/ufsrestore -ivh -
/dev/nst0 sounds like Linux but ufsrestore sounds like Solaris. Are you
trying to read from the right device?
Suman Malla wrote:
>
> While using dd with ufsrestore i.e.
>
> dd if=/dev/nst0 bs=32k skip=1 | gzip -d | /usr/sbin/ufsrestore -ivh -
>
> I get -
>
> st0: Incorrect block size
> dd: /dev/nst0: Input/Output error
> 0+0 records in
> 0+0 records out
Use "mt -f /dev/nst0 setblk 32768"
Hi all,
I've been scratching my head for a long time, and haven't managed to work
out what is changing the permissions on this file, and so ask for some
pointers!
amcheck returns:
ERROR: /etc/amanda/CORBETT/tapelist is not writable
and sure enough, if I check out the permissions:
-rw---
Thanks for the tip. For those interested, I am now using:
columnspec
"HostName=0:10,Disk=1:18,OrigKB=1:8,OutKB=1:8,DumpRate=0:7,TapeRate=0:7"
which works quite well on some of our longer hostnames and bigger disk
sizes.
g.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL
While using dd with ufsrestore i.e.
dd if=/dev/nst0 bs=32k skip=1 | gzip -d | /usr/sbin/ufsrestore -ivh -
I get -
st0: Incorrect block size
dd: /dev/nst0: Input/Output error
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
Any idea?
--
Suman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
"Ben Hyatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Ben Hyatt wrote:
>> How can I restore files without Amanda? Thanks for your time.
>
>
> use dd along with ufsrestore.
>
> There's good online docs on this.
> http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda-24.html
I've had a problem using dd with skip=1, though. For some reason, dd on
my system (Debi
> How can I restore files without Amanda? Thanks for your time.
use dd along with ufsrestore.
There's good online docs on this.
http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda-24.html
-Ben
> Regards,
> SMalla
jrj wrote:
Is this 2.4.2? If so, I think you're not the only one who's mentioned
this. Sigh.
Yes, it is. Interestingly, I think this is the first partition of mine to
receive a level 3 dump.
Ben
>That's interesting, considering `mars' is the tape server.
I'm just telling you what it means :-). Now you'll have to start
gathering more data to find out why.
Is this 2.4.2? If so, I think you're not the only one who's mentioned
this. Sigh.
>Ben
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specia
>How can I restore files without Amanda? Thanks for your time.
Have you read docs/RESTORE? What about:
http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda.html
Both cover this topic.
>SMalla
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
How can I restore files without Amanda? Thanks for your time.
Regards,
SMalla
__
FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place.
Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com
>FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> mars sda7 lev 3 FAILED [data timeout]
It means dumper on your server stopped getting data for 30 minutes (or
whatever you set dtimeout to in amanda.conf).
That's interesting, considering `mars' is the tape server.
Ben
>Can anyone help me diagnose what this error message precisely means?
>
>FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> mars sda7 lev 3 FAILED [data timeout]
It means dumper on your server stopped getting data for 30 minutes
(or whatever you set dtimeout to in amanda.conf).
That, in turn, could be cau
Hello, I've been getting weird errors on my nightly amanda job and saw
that there was a problem.
I currently use an EXABYTE EZ 17 Autoloader drive and had used the
TAPETYPE value given from this email group. After a few weird errors and
thinking that I had fixed them, I finally fell short when
I just ran the tapetype program on mine and got very intersting errors,
which I will email to this group, however, the tapetype of the EZ17 has
been mentioned before and if you look into the December archives of
egroups you'll see them. If you can't find it I will send you the numbers.
Second, th
Can anyone help me diagnose what this error message precisely means?
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
mars sda7 lev 3 FAILED [data timeout]
Thanks, B.
How does one configure the blocksize?
What about the blocksize used on the tape? perhaps that can be tuned, too...
g.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc W. Mengel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 30 January 2001 3:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Grant Beattie; [EMAIL PROT
* Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 03:45:03PM
-0500)
> It will require to much work to the sendbackup process. It
> will be possible to do it with the DUMPER-API, is you have time, you
> should work on the DUMPER-API.
Time,
yeah, heard about that ..
seems to be ver
On a recent backup report, we received the following message:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
amanda sd0e lev 1 FAILED [nak error:unexpected ack packet]
amanda is the name of the backup server. I dump'ed the partition by hand,
and saw no problems. Anyone know what went wrong?
Thanks!
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:05:21PM +0100, Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
> * Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:59:16PM -0200)
> > On Jan 29, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> doing a tar cvf .. should give you a full list of everything being ba
I've been running Amanda 2.4.2 for several months now. I have a client,
client.foo.com that has stopped responding and here's what I get from the
Amanda report:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY
client.foo. /disk1 lev 0 FAILED [Request to client.foo.com timed out.]
client.foo.
Hi,
has anybody done a tapetype for a Mammoth2 drive? Would be fine to know
because I am just starting a Exabyte EZ17 changer with a Mammoth2 drive.
Thx
Michael
BTW: Does anybody know about this error I get with gmake/gcc when building
tapetype?
tape-src/tapetype.c:244: `O_RDWR' undeclared (
* Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:59:16PM -0200)
> On Jan 29, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> doing a tar cvf .. should give you a full list of everything being backed
>> up ?
> The problem is that you wouldn't be able to tell error messages
On Jan 29, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> doing a tar cvf .. should give you a full list of everything being backed
> up ?
The problem is that you wouldn't be able to tell error messages from
the actual file list. So we do throw a `tar tf' in the pipeline.
--
Alexand
sidenote:
since egroups went yahoo, I haven';t eben able to access the searchable
archives ..
Is this just Konqueror, or is it broken ?
Anyway,
When dumping with ufsdump, amanda pipes through ufsrestore to get an index
.. fair enough
However, when dumping via tar, we dont need this, right ?
do
On Jan 29, 2001, Jonathan Dill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you know how to build binary RPMs optimized for other architecture
> eg. i586 and i686? I think you have to do something to the spec file,
> but I'm not sure what.
I think it's enough to build it with -march=i686 -mcpu=i686. I
beli
>I have decided to upgrade amanada 2.4.1p1 to 2.4.2
Version 2.4.2p1 has been released and you should probably use it.
There is at least one fairly important bug fix.
> Clem Kumah[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist,
>From: "Patrick M. Hausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:49:46 +0100 (CET)
>Doesn't installing Amanda from /usr/ports/misc/amanda24 work for you?
I started with amanda from "ports" back in '98, but it became rather too
awkward to ensure that the Solaris boxen also had amanda con
Hi all!
David Wolfskill wrote:
> >Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:02:38 +
> >From: Clem Kumah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >I have decided to upgrade amanada 2.4.1p1 to 2.4.2
> >When I try to do a make command I get the following error:
>
> >make: don't know how to make amoverview. Stop
> >*** Error
>Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:02:38 +
>From: Clem Kumah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I have decided to upgrade amanada 2.4.1p1 to 2.4.2
>When I try to do a make command I get the following error:
>make: don't know how to make amoverview. Stop
>*** Error code 1
>I seem to recal that it needs gnu make.
I was getting connection refused on amrecover for a while. The
.amandahosts file allowed access to root@localhost, but amrecover would
use root@servername and fail. My solution was to use the server name
explicitly in both .amandahosts and disklist.
Hope this help one of your problems. :)
-
> I am runing it on a freebsd 4.2-Release
On my openbsd box I see gmake in my ports tree here.
(bhyatt)@kawasaki:/usr/ports/devel/gmake:[115]>
HTH
-Ben
> Clem Kumah
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> System Administrator / Teamleader
Hi,
I have decided to upgrade amanada 2.4.1p1 to 2.4.2
When I try to do a make command I get the following error:
make: don't know how to make amoverview. Stop
*** Error code 1
I seem to recal that it needs gnu make. Is this correct, and where can I
get a copy?
I am runing it on a freebsd 4.2
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, John R. Jackson wrote:
>
> But you're comparing apples and oranges. As you've noted, going from
> disk to tape on the same machine gets 3 MBytes/s whether you are using
> ufsdump or Amanda is using taper to copy a holding disk image.
>
> But that's not what happens when A
Mandrake Cooker has RPM and SRPM for tar 1.13.19 and you can get it on
rpmfind.net. I suggest building from the src.rpm unless you're running
Mandrake:
http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/cooker//cooker/SRPMS//tar-1.13.19-4mdk.src.html
I have no idea if this is "stable" but I'm going to test it out.
Hello!
Clem Kuma wrote:
> Where can I find gnu make for Freebsd?
# cd /usr/ports/devel/gmake
# make install clean
will do the trivck on a FreeBSD system with the ports collection installed.
If you prefer to install precompiled binaries try
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/pack
Where can I find gnu make for Freebsd?
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 01:07:57PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > On 26 Oct 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >
> > > On Oct 26, 2000, The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > make: don't know how to make amoverview. Stop
> > > > ***
You can find it here:
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/pub/gnu/tar
Jim
> I saw that tar (gtar?) 1.13.19 is the right version to use. I checked
> both the Free Software Foundations's site as well as rpmfind.net (just
> in case my life would be easy.) and 1.13.17 seemed to be the latest.
>
> Where should I b
I saw that tar (gtar?) 1.13.19 is the right version to use. I checked
both the Free Software Foundations's site as well as rpmfind.net (just
in case my life would be easy.) and 1.13.17 seemed to be the latest.
Where should I be looking?
--
Josh Kuperman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Jean-Louis Martineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:59:30AM
-0500)
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:42:04PM +0100, Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
> > It's not the compression (or at leat not only the compression) that gives
> > the penalty, but more likely the 5 way split ..
> >
> > As
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:42:04PM +0100, Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
> It's not the compression (or at leat not only the compression) that gives
> the penalty, but more likely the 5 way split ..
>
> As long as Im doing incrementals it isn't too bad, since those dump to
> disk, and from disk to
* John R. Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 08:20:30PM -0500)
>>I have always wondered .. why does amanda pipe ufsdump output to ufsrestore
>>before sending it to the tape device?
> It's collecting the index data.
> The dump (or tar) output pipeline is rather complicated. The im
* Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 11:07:59AM -0200)
>> Ehm,
>> docs INSTALL sais, use 1.12 w/ patches.
>> I assumed (incorrectly) that 1.13 would work as well.
> It's fixed in 2.4.2p1.
So I noticed ;)
Will 1.13.17 work ?
>>> Yep, but there's a (rare?) bug in 1.13
On Jan 29, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As in docs/INSTALL?
> Ehm,
> docs INSTALL sais, use 1.12 w/ patches.
> I assumed (incorrectly) that 1.13 would work as well.
It's fixed in 2.4.2p1.
>>> Will 1.13.17 work ?
>> Yep, but there's a (rare?) bug in 1.13.17 that may
* Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:07:01AM -0200)
> On Jan 29, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure enough, GNU tar 1.13. Will version 1.11.8, or 1.12 work?
>>>
>>> I don't think 1.11.* will work. 1.12 will work if you apply the pa
On Jan 29, 2001, Gerhard den Hollander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * John R. Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 01:05:47PM -0500)
>> > Sure enough, GNU tar 1.13. Will version 1.11.8, or 1.12 work?
>>
>> I don't think 1.11.* will work. 1.12 will work if you apply the patc
* John R. Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 01:05:47PM -0500)
> > Sure enough, GNU tar 1.13. Will version 1.11.8, or 1.12 work?
>
> I don't think 1.11.* will work. 1.12 will work if you apply the patches
> from www.amanda.org. 1.13.19 is reported to work.
Could this be
47 matches
Mail list logo
