Re: Problem getting overland changer running

2001-07-06 Thread Peter Druck
John, first of all, amanda seems to be running. I can make amdump and amrestore but I need further testing. Nevertheless here are the answers: ... In my installation it is Data Transfer Element: Full (Unknown Storage Element Loaded) What version of mtx are you using? I looked at the

Specifig backup plan - HELP!

2001-07-06 Thread Mariusz Brylant
After looking around for a good OpenSourse backup solution, I decided to make use of Amanda. Now I'am facing a problem configuring this software the way it fits my company backup policy. Thus I am asking you, those who are surely more familiar with this topic. Here are requirements I

Re: Symbolic Link and Next Tape Prediction ?

2001-07-06 Thread Olivier Nicole
One simple way would be to do this a few hours before the real amdump run: amadmin config tape | Mail -s Amanda tapes needed whoever I choose to do that using amcheck instead I see several advantages: it emails automatically, check the tape status, check the clients... I taught my guys to

unsubscribe

2001-07-06 Thread GWilliam
unsubscribe

Re: Specifig backup plan - HELP!

2001-07-06 Thread Olivier Nicole
After looking around for a good OpenSourse backup solution, I decided to make use of Amanda. Now I'am facing a problem configuring this software the way it fits my company backup policy. Thus I am asking you, those who are surely more familiar with this topic. Here are requirements I need

RE: chg-scsi

2001-07-06 Thread Rob Earl
Hi Gene, Here's what I did. I went to the sourceforge site to the following link: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/amanda/amanda-2/changer-src/ I then downloaded each file and replaced the changer-src directory on my machine with what I downloaded. I ran ./configure from the

FW: chg-scsi

2001-07-06 Thread Rob Earl
Gene, Here are the linking errors: ld: Unresolved: ScanBus SCSI_OpenDevice SCSI_CloseDevice Tape_Status DumpSense Sense2Action SCSI_ExecuteCommand Tape_Ioctl make: *** [chg-scsi] Error 1 Thanks, Rob -Original Message- From: Rob Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 06,

FW: chg-scsi

2001-07-06 Thread Rob Earl
Gene, Sorry for this chain of e-mails, but different thoughts keep popping into my head. One thing I should mention to you in case you didn't see it in other e-mails is that I'm using a Compaq TL891 Tape Library, not a Seagate product. Do you think the chg-scsi interface is what I should be

changer problems

2001-07-06 Thread Sandra Panesso
Hi : Still I have problems with amanda 2.4.2p2 and my changer. I got the error amcheck-server: could not get changer info: badly formed result from changer: /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx: [: -eq: unary operator expected Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check

Re: help: problems building Amanda 2.4.2p2 on HP-UX v10.20

2001-07-06 Thread Stephen Walton
Here's the configure command I've used to build Amanda 2.4.2p2 on two HP-UX 10.20 machines (an aging 735/99 and a newer K460) with no trouble: ./configure --with-user=amanda --prefix=/opt/amanda-2.4.2p2 \ --localstatedir=/var/opt --with-configdir=/etc/opt/amanda \ --with-amandahosts

Re: FW: chg-scsi

2001-07-06 Thread Todd Pfaff
I've just been through this (ie. using the newer, supported chg-scsi from the 2.5.0 cvs development source with an amanda-2.4.2p2 server) so the procedure is fresh in my mind. Here's what you do. - build and install your 2.4.2p2 server - get the 2.5.0 source via cvs - first, login to cvs server

Re: Symbolic Link and Next Tape Prediction ?

2001-07-06 Thread John R. Jackson
I choose to do that using amcheck instead ... I agree amcheck is the better tool, however ... I taught my guys to change the tape in the morning when the previous back-up is over (new tape name is at top of amdump report). The problem is that Edward said They will not receive amanda email to

compiling on aix 4.3.3

2001-07-06 Thread John Jolet
I've been trying all day to compile the latest stable release of amanda on aix 4.3.3. Everything seems fine, except when it hits the client-src directory, it fails thusly: Making all in client-src /usr/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../config

Re: changer problems

2001-07-06 Thread John R. Jackson
Still I have problems with amanda 2.4.2p2 and my changer. I got the error amcheck-server: could not get changer info: badly formed result from changer: /usr/local/libexec/chg-zd-mtx: [: -eq: unary operator expected What version of mtx are you using? What does mtx -f /dev/sga status have to

Re: starttime weirdness

2001-07-06 Thread peanut butter
Hi and thanks for the help. --From John R. Jackson-- I'm not sure that's what's going on. Note the following: driver-idle: no-diskspace As far as I can tell from the code, Amanda will run everything it can before those with a delay (but see below). The problem is, the best client

Cannot execute runtar after upgrade: Redhat 6.2 -- 7.1

2001-07-06 Thread Michael Hannon
Greetings. We recently upgraded one of our Amanda servers to Redhat 7.1 (from Redhat 6.2), and we experienced some difficulties with the backup after that. In particular, Amanda was suddenly unable to execute runtar on the server itself!. (I.e., it isn't a question of root access to

Re: starttime weirdness

2001-07-06 Thread John R. Jackson
Well, I only ever want to write to tape when running this config and so have not specified a holding disk at all. Oh. Well that explains a few things :-). Given this, how would you think Amanda would then behave? As I said, I'm just guessing based on a quick read of the code, but I think if

Solaris 8 s28_38shwp2 SPARC

2001-07-06 Thread Denise Ives
All, Just this past week out of the blue amanda on sunny1 (tapeserver) is returning access denied. I inquired to the group of admins here if anything had changed on this box or if any outages occured but they have responded with 'no'. I've checked host IP entries in /etc/host amanda entires in

Re: Cannot execute runtar after upgrade: Redhat 6.2 -- 7.1

2001-07-06 Thread John R. Jackson
... We recently upgraded one of our Amanda servers to Redhat 7.1 (from Redhat 6.2), and we experienced some difficulties with the backup after that. ... In the process, did you switch to running amandad from xinetd (instead of inetd)? Did you fix the xinetd config file (the RPM's have it

Re: inetd on crack

2001-07-06 Thread xavier
John R. Jackson wrote: ... inetd on the client machine starts to eat more and more cpu ressources up to 98% ... If it's inetd chewing up the resources, then you need to talk to your OS vendor. It's unlikely Amanda can cause that. John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL

Re: [Fwd: amdump taking over a day to complete]

2001-07-06 Thread Erick Bodine
John, I tried running dump by itself and it turns out that dump on the tape server was the problem. I upgraded to the latest version (dump-0.4b19-5.6x.i386.rpm) and everything is working fine now. Once again, a problem not with amanda but with something else. Many thanks for your

Re: Cannot execute runtar after upgrade: Redhat 6.2 -- 7.1

2001-07-06 Thread Michael Hannon
At 03:16 PM 7/6/2001 -0500, John R. Jackson wrote: ... We recently upgraded one of our Amanda servers to Redhat 7.1 (from Redhat 6.2), and we experienced some difficulties with the backup after that. ... In the process, did you switch to running amandad from xinetd (instead of inetd)? Did

Re: Solaris 8 s28_38shwp2 SPARC

2001-07-06 Thread John R. Jackson
... I inquired to the group of admins here if anything had changed on this box or if any outages occured but they have responded with 'no'. And you believed them??? :-) ERROR: sunny1.neptune.com: [access as amanda not allowed from [EMAIL PROTECTED]] The problem is with your

Re: Solaris 8 s28_38shwp2 SPARC

2001-07-06 Thread Olivier Nicole
On synnu1, check /tmp/amanda/* And don't take a no for an answer :) Olivier

Re: DLT vs. AME autoloaders.

2001-07-06 Thread Olivier Nicole
The next part of my question is about DLT vs. AME technologies themselves. It seems like everyone uses DLT for its reliability but AME (including Mammoth and AIT) boast faster transfer rates and greater capacity. I was wondering if anyone had any horror stories or personal experiences to help

Re: DLT vs. AME autoloaders.

2001-07-06 Thread C. Chan
Also Sprach Olivier Nicole: The next part of my question is about DLT vs. AME technologies themselves. It seems like everyone uses DLT for its reliability but AME (including Mammoth and AIT) boast faster transfer rates and greater capacity. I was wondering if anyone had any horror stories