Re: [amanda@gorn.americom.com: AmeriCom AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9, 2002]

2002-04-10 Thread rwk
Thanks for your reply... However, the Ecrix V17 tapesize is set to 35000 mbytes and... Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on solo.americom.com:/ is: /dev/sda3 7.9G 6.9G 632M 92% / gorn.americom.com:/ is: /dev/sda4 5.1G 4.3G 547M 89% / The other

Re: [amanda@gorn.americom.com: AmeriCom AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9, 2002]

2002-04-10 Thread rwk
OK, I did: grep [/_]idebigger amdump.1 setting up estimates for solo.americom.com:/idebigger solo.americom.com:/idebigger overdue 11782 days for level 0 setup_estimate: solo.americom.com:/idebigger: command 0, options: got result for host solo.americom.com disk /idebigger: 0 - 8004440K, 2 -

SOS! problems with amrecover

2002-04-10 Thread Nünighoff, Leonie, NUE
Hello mailinglist, I have a strange problem with amrecover. This afternoon I have a presentation about amanda backup service and nothing works (murphy's task...) When I start amrecover as root, the following error occurs: shakira:/ # amrecover -C rtec -s shakira.r-tec.int -t shakira.r-tec.int

Re: Problems getting client to work.

2002-04-10 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ John R. Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07.04.02 20:24]: Of course... I've tried 2.4.2p2 too, with no luck. So I updated to the bleeding-edge version. OK. Just wanted to make sure you understood what you were running. I've downgraded to 2.4.2p2 again, since the beta did not work either.

Re: [amanda@gorn.americom.com: AmeriCom AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 9, 2002]

2002-04-10 Thread Uncle George
i guess your next step would be the more detailed logs. How about reviewing the 'amdump.[0-9]' files in the 'logdir' directory defined in amanda.conf ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for your reply... However, the Ecrix V17 tapesize is set to 35000 mbytes and...

Re: how to set blocksize in amanda?

2002-04-10 Thread klavs klavsen
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 19:38, John R. Jackson wrote: I was wondering how I set the blocksize in amanda? Version 2.4.3 (now in beta test) has this ability. See amanda(8). Cool :-) So the point is, do a **lot** of testing first before deciding to go down this path. The simplest thing is

FAQ - wrong data

2002-04-10 Thread klavs klavsen
Hi guys, I found the DLT I have.. it's a Tandberg DLT1 (that's why it states 40/80gb on tape type IV). found this under that drive: from FAQ-o-matic Quantum DLT7000 391B Tandberg DLT1 data from tapetype length 38398 mbytes filemark 40 kbytes speed 1494 kps On FreeBSD 4.4RC5 PIII 1GH 512MB

Re: Problem with 2.4.3b3 on FreeBSD

2002-04-10 Thread Holger Schemel
Hi, If you want to continue using 2.4.3b3, apply the following patch: There's one problem with your patch. The fclose() call should either be protected inside the if (exclude != NULL) test, or it should be changed to afclose(), which will test for NULL. Oops -- right! Seems that Solaris

Re: SOS! problems with amrecover

2002-04-10 Thread Alisa K. Manning
Looks like you didn't specify index yes in your dumptype definition (near the end of the amanda.conf file). I ran into this yesterday when I was trying to run amrecover from a client. Maybe you could do what I did-- - redefine the dumptype (add 'index yes') - use amadmin to force a level 0

holding disk vs straight to tape

2002-04-10 Thread David Flood
What are the advantages/disadvantages of using the holding disk? What are the advantages/disadvantages of dumping stuff straight to tape? We have a tapeserver which is our fileserver and as such is just backing itself up. When we upgraded from 2.4.1p1 to 2.4.2p2 the backups suddenly started

Spanning multiple tapes

2002-04-10 Thread Gardiner Leverett
I looked around in the archive and didn't find this answered (directly), so here is a similar issue: We're using the Amanda version 2.3.0.4 on Solaris. We have been having the problem (recenlty) where the backups have been failing due to reaching the end of the tape. Problem is, the backups

amrecover - permission denied

2002-04-10 Thread shopereira
Hi folks, I'm using amanda-2.4.2p2 on Redhat 7.2 ... all backups seems to be ok but now I need to recovery some files and when I try to use amrecover I'm getting the follow error: ---xxx--- amidxtaped: debug 1 pid 28508 ruid 501 euid 501 start time Wed Apr 10 12:24:36 2002 amidxtaped: version

advfs dislist entry

2002-04-10 Thread Eric Zylstra
Should be a simple one... What is the proper way to enter an advfs partition into the disklist? I looked into the /etc/fdmns/partition domain/ directory, saw which partition was involved and put that into the disklist. The report comes back: FAIL planner mymachine involved partition 0 [disk

Re: multiple amdump per day overwrites level0

2002-04-10 Thread Stephen Carville
On 10 Apr 2002, Frederic Saincy wrote: - Hi all, - - in my amanda.conf - ### - dumpcycle 1 weeks - runspercycle 5 - tapecycle 6 tapes - ### - - i ran 7 amdumps today (testing). The first amdump does a level0, and - the last overwrite this unique level0 with a level1. - - This is a bug, a

dump fails for what reason??

2002-04-10 Thread Axel Haenssen
node16 sda7 20020410 11775 0 1970:1:1:0:0:0 20375963 679198 1 1970:1:1:0:0:0 20375963 679198 driver: adding holding disk 0 dir /home/amanda size 2097152 reserving 629145 out of 2097152 for degraded-mode dumps driver: start time 110.101 inparallel 1 bandwidth 2600 diskspace 2097152 dir OBSOLETE

Re: Not writing tape label...

2002-04-10 Thread Marc W. Mengel
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, James Kelty wrote: When I run the amlabel utility (% amlabel Daily Daily123), I get this error: rewinding, reading label, not an amanda tape rewinding, writing label Daily123, checking label amlabel: no label found, are you sure /dev/st0 is non-rewinding? It is

Re: Two tape drives

2002-04-10 Thread Marc W. Mengel
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Eric Trager wrote: On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, C. Chan wrote: Is there currently a way to back up to two or more tape drives simultaneously using the same Amanda config? Apparently not. In 2.4.3 (currently in beta) you can stripe a backup accross two tapes with the RAIT

Re: Two tape drives

2002-04-10 Thread Marc W. Mengel
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, David Flood wrote: I want to split my backups over two DLT drives. Is this possible and if so how is it best done? Can amanda be configured to do this somehow or do/can I run two instances of amanda at the same time? Running two amdumps with different configs at the same

Re: need help on how to config root partition in disklist

2002-04-10 Thread Marc W. Mengel
You can certainly put / in your disklist as the drive name. Probably /dev/hda6 isn't working because that is not how the drive is mounted in /etc/fstab, rather it is mounted by LABEL=/ or some other such thing. On Mon, 1 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am a relatively new amanda

Re: Problem sending mail

2002-04-10 Thread Marc W. Mengel
Sounds like the configure script couldn't find a mail program and set it to NONE. You should have gotten an error message like: *** WARNING: Amanda cannot send mail reports without these programs. Set MAILER to some program that accepts -s subject user message_file. when you ran configure.

Re: files disappearing?

2002-04-10 Thread Marc W. Mengel
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Tom Van de Wiele wrote: hi I was just wondering. We have a big fileserver here, which is backup'ed every day. On two occassions, 2 dirs have disappeared. I'm just making sure, amanda doesn't write to the disk its backup'ing, right? If it doesn't, then some (l)user

Re: disklist and hw compression

2002-04-10 Thread Marc W. Mengel
When you are using hardware compression on the tape drive, the backup image cached on disk is of course not yet compressed. If it thinks the dump won't fit on the tape, did you pick a different tapetype for the compressed device? On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Matthew Boeckman wrote: I have two

Re: without tapes

2002-04-10 Thread Marc W. Mengel
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Juanjo wrote: Hi, Is it possible to run amanda without-tapes so it dumps only to holding disk? But what I mean is not to take off the tapes physically but disabling tape writing. I want to accumulate incrementals worth a week and flush them on friday to a tape... How

Re: GFS-rotation scheme with amanda

2002-04-10 Thread Marc W. Mengel
Amanda is not so picky about tape rotations. As long as the scheme you use doesn't try to overwrite any backups which you've said you should still keep of a given partition, and the tape labels match the regexp in your amanda.conf, you can rotate the tapes any way you like. On Mon, 8 Apr 2002,

Re: without tapes

2002-04-10 Thread Frank Smith
--On Wednesday, April 10, 2002 13:56:02 -0500 Marc W. Mengel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Juanjo wrote: Hi, Is it possible to run amanda without-tapes so it dumps only to holding disk? But what I mean is not to take off the tapes physically but disabling tape writing. I

Re: Two tape drives

2002-04-10 Thread C. Chan
Also Sprach Marc W. Mengel: On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, C. Chan wrote: Is there currently a way to back up to two or more tape drives simultaneously using the same Amanda config? In 2.4.3 (currently in beta) you can stripe a backup accross two tapes with the RAIT code, but to do so you

Re: vmlinux in boot does not restore

2002-04-10 Thread Anthony A. D. Talltree
http://lwn.net/2001/0503/a/lt-dump.php3 for what Linus has to say about it. Which as always is handwaving to cover the fact that he's too lazy to fix it.

Re: holding disk vs straight to tape

2002-04-10 Thread Marc W. Mengel
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, David Flood wrote: What are the advantages/disadvantages of using the holding disk? What are the advantages/disadvantages of dumping stuff straight to tape? Advantages of holding disk: * Better tape throughput, better tape reliability because you can stream your

Re: amrecover - permission denied

2002-04-10 Thread Marc W. Mengel
Sounds like your /dev/nst0 device is not readable by your amanda user. What does an 'ls -l /dev/nst0' look like? On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, I'm using amanda-2.4.2p2 on Redhat 7.2 ... all backups seems to be ok but now I need to recovery some files and when I

error [/bin/tar got signal 13]

2002-04-10 Thread Michael Robbert
I am trying to get AMANDA working for the first time and am stuck getting amdump to complete with all my partitions. I have tracked the problem down to this error at the end of the sendbackup.debug file on the client: error [/bin/tar got signal 13] The error changes slightly if I change the

Re: SOS! problems with amrecover

2002-04-10 Thread Marc W. Mengel
Misspelled amanda config? That would keep it from finding the right index directory in that config's amanda.conf... On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Nünighoff, Leonie, NUE wrote: Hello mailinglist, I have a strange problem with amrecover. This afternoon I have a presentation about amanda backup

Re: vmlinux in boot does not restore

2002-04-10 Thread C. Chan
Also Sprach Anthony A. D. Talltree: http://lwn.net/2001/0503/a/lt-dump.php3 for what Linus has to say about it. Which as always is handwaving to cover the fact that he's too lazy to fix it. I'm still confused about this. Is it because the kernel buffer vs page cache architecture is

Re: Newbie question: amncheck - unary operator expected

2002-04-10 Thread Frank Smith
--On Wednesday, April 10, 2002 14:26:34 -0500 Greg Wardawy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The current problem is that I'm getting the WARNING: tapedev is /dev/null, dumps will be thrown away but I have no tapedev /dev/null in my amanda.conf file. Here goes the beginning part of amanda.conf:

amanda or a commercial solution?

2002-04-10 Thread Christophe Kalt
Hi all, i just joined a new startup and am setting up everything. So of course, i'm looking around for a backup software and while there are some good expensive commercial solutions, there's also amanda. In my previous job, we had a very customized amanda setup which worked fine but i was

Re: holding disk vs straight to tape

2002-04-10 Thread Jay Lessert
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:26:40PM -0500, Marc W. Mengel wrote: I never used amanda with negative chunksizes, so I can't help you here. The chunksize doesn't have anything to do with whether something is put on disk, it just says what the biggest chunk of a backup image will be put in one

[amanda@gorn.americom.com: AmeriCom AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 10, 2002]

2002-04-10 Thread rwk
Sorry I have to keep posting this but I cannot find the problem... I do not understand what is causing the error RESULTS MISSING. Is this an error anyone understands or has experienced? I implemented a couple of patches a few weeks ago for other problems I was encountering (based on

Single tape?

2002-04-10 Thread Davide
Hi, I'm new to Amanda and I want to use it because I have multiple platforms (Sun, SGI, Linux and PCs) that I need to back up. Only the server will be backup daily while users data will be backup weekly (or something other than daily). Anyway, my question is, Is there a way to 'force' amanda

Re: multiple amdump per day overwrites level0 [long]

2002-04-10 Thread Frederic Saincy
file origK compK secs 0 20020410 DailySet1-041 492800 182109 278 Current info for orion.progiweb.home /home: Stats: dump rates (kps), Full: 1006.0, 1003.0, -1.0 Incremental: 115.0, -1.0, -1.0 compressed size, Full: 61.6%, 61.6

Re: multiple amdump per day overwrites level0 [long]

2002-04-10 Thread Frank Smith
, Full: 37.0%, 37.0%,-100.0% Incremental: 6.4%, 6.4%, 6.4% Dumps: lev datestmp tape file origK compK secs 0 20020410 DailySet1-041 492800 182109 278 Current info for orion.progiweb.home /home: Stats: dump rates (kps), Full

Re: Two tape drives

2002-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
This is the closest method Amanda has to spanning one partition or filesystem over multiple tapes, correct? ... At the moment, yes. ... If so, how do I configure to toss the parity away if I only have two tape drives? If it's similar to RAID 3 then I can just specify the third drive as

Re: without tapes

2002-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
Put /dev/null in for your tape device when running the amdumps, then set it to a real tape and do an amflush. Wasn't there a comment on this list before about using something non- existent (like /dev/nosuchdevice) instead of /dev/null because amanda was somehow 'aware' of /dev/null and would

Re: Spanning multiple tapes

2002-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
We're using the Amanda version 2.3.0.4 on Solaris. Good grief! :-) We have been having the problem (recenlty) where the backups have been failing due to reaching the end of the tape. ... There are two ways you could be hitting end of tape. It might be that the total cumulative size of all

Re: Should I upgrade to 2.4.3b3?

2002-04-10 Thread Bernhard R. Erdmann
Even when 2.4.3 proper comes out, there's really no compelling reason to upgrade *unless* you need any of the new features. If it ain't broke... If it's not broken, it hasn't got enough features yet. ;-)

Re: SOS! problems with amrecover

2002-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
I have a strange problem with amrecover. ... As Alisa said, the most likely cause is that you don't have indexing turned on. A quick way to check this is: amadmin rtec disklist shakira.r-tec.int Look for index YES. If I try to set the disk default by using setdisk /backup/client1

partition has negative byte count

2002-04-10 Thread Jennifer Peterson
Hi everyone, I've got three partitions on IRIX 6.5 (efs and xfs) that return total bytes written as a negative number. Ex. Total bytes written: -594548736 I'm using gnutar, and needless to say there's no size line match in above gnutar output. Any idea what's going on? Thanks, Jenn

Re: how to set blocksize in amanda?

2002-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
Tapetype reported speed at 2811kb/s and the vendor supplied data is 3mb/s)(= 3072 kb/s). Close enough. You never want to believe what vendors tell you. They take the rotational speed of the tape and the density and claim that's how fast it can run, when back here in the real world we all know

Re: Newbie question: amncheck - unary operator expected

2002-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
The current problem is that I'm getting the WARNING: tapedev is /dev/null, dumps will be thrown away but I have no tapedev /dev/null in my amanda.conf file. Frank is right. You need to set tapedev to /dev/nst0. I'm not sure about my changer config file ... It would help if you posted it.

Re: error [/bin/tar got signal 13]

2002-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
I am trying to get AMANDA working for the first time and am stuck getting amdump to complete with all my partitions. I have tracked the problem down to this error at the end of the sendbackup.debug file on the client: error [/bin/tar got signal 13] Signal 13 is broken pipe, which is rarely the

Re: holding disk vs straight to tape

2002-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
So I'm thinking about testing the backups on that server without using the holding disk. How is this done, is there a way of specifying it in the amanda.conf for all dumptypes as well as somehow specifying it for individual dumptypes? Put: holdingdisk no in whichever dumptypes you want.

Re: dump fails for what reason??

2002-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
I think it has to do with the amanda demon. I send parts of my amdump.1 logfile with it. Anybody any Idea Ummm, yes. It's pretty obvious: dumper: stream_client: gethostbyname(localhost) failed Amanda can't do a host name lookup on localhost. You've got something wrong with the DNS or

Re: partition has negative byte count

2002-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
Ex. Total bytes written: -594548736 I'm using gnutar ... What version (gnutar --version)? You **must** use 1.13.19 (or later) or else 1.12 plus the patches at www.amanda.org. Jenn John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: advfs dislist entry

2002-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
What is the proper way to enter an advfs partition into the disklist? Regardless of file system or OS type, you should be able to enter either the mount point (e.g. /home) or a full device name (/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0) or a device shorthand (c0t0d0s0). I don't know how the latter two relate to

Re: multiple amdump per day overwrites level0

2002-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
I agree it should warn you about the over-write, but if I remember your original posting correctly your config had a tapecycle of about a week and runspercycle was around 6 or so, yet you ran amdump 8 times in one day. The planner logic might not be set up to handle this extreme case. I took a

Re: amanda overwrites level0 without warning

2002-04-10 Thread Frederic Saincy
Hi, Frank Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The planner logic might not be set up to handle this extreme case. I don't know very well amanda's internal and this is the occasion for me to look at the sources. If the planner can't, amdump must wonder: If i do this, can admin restore the system

Guidelines for using a tape library?

2002-04-10 Thread David Trusty
Hi, I have a Qualstar tape library, which has 20 tapes. The library can be configured to look like one massive tape drive, with the 20 physical tapes hidden from the host application. I can cause the unit to eject the current physical tape and load a new one by using the mt offl command. My

Re: amanda overwrites level0 without warning

2002-04-10 Thread Frank Smith
--On Thursday, April 11, 2002 03:37:15 +0200 Frederic Saincy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Frank Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The planner logic might not be set up to handle this extreme case. I don't know very well amanda's internal and this is the occasion for me to look at the

Re: Guidelines for using a tape library?

2002-04-10 Thread Frank Smith
--On Thursday, April 11, 2002 03:26:08 + David Trusty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a Qualstar tape library, which has 20 tapes. The library can be configured to look like one massive tape drive, with the 20 physical tapes hidden from the host application. I can cause the

Re: Guidelines for using a tape library?

2002-04-10 Thread David Trusty
Frank, Thanks! Here is some more info. I am using the Qualstar under HPUX. I haven't found a way to address the tapes individually. I see only two SCSI devices, whether I use the RANDOM or SEQUENTIAL modes on the Qualstar. Is that how yours works too? Does Amanda have some way of accessing

Re: Guidelines for using a tape library?

2002-04-10 Thread Frank Smith
--On Thursday, April 11, 2002 04:21:10 + David Trusty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am using the Qualstar under HPUX. Mine's on a Linux box. I haven't found a way to address the tapes individually. I see only two SCSI devices, whether I use the RANDOM or SEQUENTIAL modes on the Qualstar.