Re: EXB-10i and Solaris 8

2002-10-14 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:33:25PM -0700, Jerry wrote: > in sgen.conf uncomment the changer line, remove the > (type 08) or whatever is in ( ), uncomment all the lun > lines, modload sgen, devfsadm -i sgen and look in > /dev/scsi/changer I think... I just went through this, > let me know if it doe

Re: EXB-10i and Solaris 8

2002-10-14 Thread Jerry
in sgen.conf uncomment the changer line, remove the (type 08) or whatever is in ( ), uncomment all the lun lines, modload sgen, devfsadm -i sgen and look in /dev/scsi/changer I think... I just went through this, let me know if it doesn't work. JErry --- Marc Mengel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > O

3 KASIM VE BÝZ

2002-10-14 Thread biz363

Re: EXB-10i and Solaris 8

2002-10-14 Thread Marc Mengel
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 16:00, Galen Johnson wrote: > Paul T. Root wrote: > > > Hi, > > I've just moved my Exabyte 10i changer from > > a Solaris 2.6 box to Solaris 8. Is there a device > > driver available? I've been searching Exabyte and > > I can even find the chs stuff I had before. In Sol

Re: Amanda Backup Client Host Check

2002-10-14 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 14 October 2002 11:38, Anthony Valentine wrote: >Would it look in /home/backup if Amanda were compiled with > 'backup' as the amanda user? It sure would, but thats not how we are instructed to build amanda. Amanda should be configured and built as user amanda, and amanda (the user) sho

Re: EXB-10i and Solaris 8

2002-10-14 Thread Galen Johnson
Paul T. Root wrote: > Hi, > I've just moved my Exabyte 10i changer from > a Solaris 2.6 box to Solaris 8. Is there a device > driver available? I've been searching Exabyte and > I can even find the chs stuff I had before. > > Thanks, > Paul. > check out mtx at mtx.badtux.net. Just be sure a

Re: chg-mtx, mtx, amanda, and Redhat v8.0

2002-10-14 Thread Peter Smith
Oops. I just checked on chg-zd-mtx, it looks like I should be using that instead. Sorry! Duhh. Peter Smith Peter Smith wrote: > I had some problems getting chg-mtx, mtx, and amanda under Redhat v8.0 > working correctly. RPM versions (from Redhat v8.0) are as follows. > > amanda-server-2.4.2p

chg-mtx, mtx, amanda, and Redhat v8.0

2002-10-14 Thread Peter Smith
I had some problems getting chg-mtx, mtx, and amanda under Redhat v8.0 working correctly. RPM versions (from Redhat v8.0) are as follows. amanda-server-2.4.2p2-9 amanda-client-2.4.2p2-9 amanda-2.4.2p2-9 mtx-1.2.16-5 Basically I had to modify /usr/lib/amanda/chg-mtx for it to work with the mtx

EXB-10i and Solaris 8

2002-10-14 Thread Paul T. Root
Hi, I've just moved my Exabyte 10i changer from a Solaris 2.6 box to Solaris 8. Is there a device driver available? I've been searching Exabyte and I can even find the chs stuff I had before. Thanks, Paul. -- Paul T. RootCCSA, CCSE, CCNA Qwest Communications

Re: Business Proposal

2002-10-14 Thread Dan Wilder
Heh. Amanda gets whacked by the Nigerian spam too. At SSC we've been struggling with this sort of thing, and while we have not succeeded entirely in eliminating spam from our mailing lists, we're pretty close. Of course most of our lists are members-only post, which so far screens out a lot of

Business Proposal

2002-10-14 Thread Dr.Dan Musa
FROM THE DESK OF THE ACCOUNT MANAGER,CITIBANK N.A.NIGERIA #82 ALLEN AVENUE,IKEJA, LAGOS-NIGERIA. TEL/FAX: 234-9-2721383 Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URGENT BUSINESS PROPOSAL{STRICTELY CONFIDENTIAL} REQUEST FOR CO-OPERATION ON A PRIVATE DEAL.

Re: reply-to in mailing list

2002-10-14 Thread Caitlyn M. Martin
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 17:56, Chris Noon wrote: > > o A stronger community results when individuals respond to > > individuals as opposed to responding to all members of the the list... > > > > I don't doubt that you are right about that, but I do read threads that have > nothing to do with me.

Re: Amanda Backup Client Host Check

2002-10-14 Thread Christoph Scheeder
Hi Larry Dunham schrieb: > Ozone wrote: > >>>...ERROR: moon: [access as backup not alloweb from >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]] open of /home/backup/.amandahost failed >>> >>>Why ? >> > > > Gene wrote: > >>Because .amandahosts doesn't exist? And why is it looking in >>/home/backup for .amandahosts? I

Re: Fwd: help for compiling amanda to support xfsdump in RH 7.3

2002-10-14 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 at 10:26am, Zhen Liu wrote > So, the output of ./configure is below: *snip* > checking for gawk... (cached) gawk > checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... (cached) yes This isn't the first time you've run configure (see all the cached entries). > checking for ufsdump... (cac

Re: Anyone compiled 2.4.3 on AIX?

2002-10-14 Thread bukys
My guess is that your configure cache is full of bogus results because the first time you ran configure, it tried to run gcc with the flags -q32 -D_LARGE_FILES -qlonglong and it decided that NOTHING works. If you have a Makefile, try a "make distclean", setenv CC cc, and ./configure. If you don

Re: Anyone compiled 2.4.3 on AIX?

2002-10-14 Thread Anthony Valentine
I tried all of that, but I still get the same results. Just for grins, I also did a ./configure in 2.4.3b4 and got the same results. I even downloaded a fresh copy from the amanda.org website to make sure I didn't get a corrupt copy. No dice on that either. I take it that you did NOT get this

Re: Anyone compiled 2.4.3 on AIX?

2002-10-14 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 09:14:37AM -0700, Jerry wrote: > Failed on 4.3.3 with: > /usr/include/sys/socket.h:76: warning: empty > declaration > alloc.c: In function `debug_caller_loc': > alloc.c:79: warning: assignment makes pointer from > integer without a cast > alloc.c: In function `safe_env': >

Re: Anyone compiled 2.4.3 on AIX?

2002-10-14 Thread Anthony Valentine
I don't even get as far as compiling. My error comes up during the configure script. Here is what I get: checking for shmget... (cached) no configure: WARNING: *** Neither shmget() nor mmap() found! configure: WARNING: *** This system will not support the Amanda server. While a configure of 2

Re: New amanda version

2002-10-14 Thread Yura Pismerov
Why don't you upgrade server side first ? It is safe to do. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hehe well it's just a matter of upgrading all the clients and server with > the time but during the client/server upgrade there will be multiple > versions running so I just wanted to make sure this will no

RE: Amanda Backup Client Host Check

2002-10-14 Thread Larry Dunham
Ozone wrote: > >...ERROR: moon: [access as backup not alloweb from > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] open of /home/backup/.amandahost failed > > > >Why ? > Gene wrote: > Because .amandahosts doesn't exist? And why is it looking in > /home/backup for .amandahosts? It should be looking for > /home/amanda/.

Re: Anyone compiled 2.4.3 on AIX?

2002-10-14 Thread bukys
I'm exactly where you are with my amanda-2.4.3 compile on AIX 5.1. Here's what I did to get dislodged: "setenv CC cc" before I run ./configure because "/bin/getconf XBS5_ILP32_OFFBIG_CFLAGS" returns "-q32 -D_LARGE_FILES -qlonglong" but gcc won't accept that. "touc

Re: Anyone compiled 2.4.3 on AIX?

2002-10-14 Thread Jerry
Failed on 4.3.3 with: /usr/include/sys/socket.h:76: warning: empty declaration alloc.c: In function `debug_caller_loc': alloc.c:79: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast alloc.c: In function `safe_env': alloc.c:463: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a c

Re: Anyone compiled 2.4.3 on AIX?

2002-10-14 Thread Jerry
What version of AIX. I have AIX 4.3.3 and AIX 5L available to me so I can give it a try if you want on one of those. Jerry --- Anthony Valentine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everyone! > > Has anyone gotten 2.4.3 to compile on AIX? I am > having problems getting > the configure script to

Anyone compiled 2.4.3 on AIX?

2002-10-14 Thread Anthony Valentine
Hello everyone! Has anyone gotten 2.4.3 to compile on AIX? I am having problems getting the configure script to work and I have a few questions. Anthony -- UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things.

Re: Amanda Backup Client Host Check

2002-10-14 Thread Anthony Valentine
Would it look in /home/backup if Amanda were compiled with 'backup' as the amanda user? On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 07:16, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 14 October 2002 10:57, O-Zone wrote: > >Hi All, > >i've just solved any problems with conf but i have a new > > worry...when i'm running amcheck it

Re: Amanda Backup Client Host Check

2002-10-14 Thread Galen Johnson
O-Zone wrote: >Hi All, >i've just solved any problems with conf but i have a new worry...when i'm >running amcheck it say to me: > >ERROR: moon: [access as backup not alloweb from [EMAIL PROTECTED]] open >of /home/backup/.amandahost failed > >Why ? > > I would guess one of 2 reasons. 1) it do

Re: Amanda Backup Client Host Check

2002-10-14 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 14 October 2002 10:57, O-Zone wrote: >Hi All, >i've just solved any problems with conf but i have a new > worry...when i'm running amcheck it say to me: > >ERROR: moon: [access as backup not alloweb from > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] open of /home/backup/.amandahost failed > >Why ? Because .aman

Re: Amanda Backup Client Host Check

2002-10-14 Thread Frank Smith
--On Monday, October 14, 2002 16:57:56 +0200 O-Zone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > i've just solved any problems with conf but i have a new worry...when i'm > running amcheck it say to me: > > ERROR: moon: [access as backup not alloweb from [EMAIL PROTECTED]] open > of /home/backup/.amand

Re: questions about proposed amanda hardware solution

2002-10-14 Thread Frank Smith
--On Monday, October 14, 2002 08:13:20 -0500 Mike Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks -- > > I want to thank everybody for all the feedback. Diskwise, it's nice > to know that IDE solutions are workable, and I'm going to look into > them. Politically (isn't it always about the politics?

Amanda Backup Client Host Check

2002-10-14 Thread O-Zone
Hi All, i've just solved any problems with conf but i have a new worry...when i'm running amcheck it say to me: ERROR: moon: [access as backup not alloweb from [EMAIL PROTECTED]] open of /home/backup/.amandahost failed Why ? -- O-Zone 2001 ! WEB @ www.zerozone.it Key fingerprint = BF36 D825

Re: xinetd and amanda

2002-10-14 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 14 October 2002 09:45, Hery Zo RAKOTONDRAMANANA wrote: >Gene Heskett wrote: >>On Monday 14 October 2002 04:43, Hery Zo RAKOTONDRAMANANA wrote: >>>Hi all, >>> >>>I'm using amanda-2.4.2p2-4 on a debian woody system with xinetd. >>>I used to backup my amanda server via "localhost". Since my

Re: questions about proposed amanda hardware solution

2002-10-14 Thread jens persson
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 08:13:20AM -0500, Mike Simpson wrote: > > I'm still curious about hooking up an AIT3 tape library to Linux, and > whether or not the mtx or scsi-changer drivers can actually control > something like a QualStar or Overland tape library. Is anyone out > there using AIT3

Re: xinetd and amanda

2002-10-14 Thread Hery Zo RAKOTONDRAMANANA
Jerry wrote: >Paste your xinetd.d conf section for amanda here. >Also, see if /var/adm/messages reports anything when > > my xinetd.conf looks like this: >running amcheck. > service amanda { socket_type = dgram protocol= udp wait= yes use

Re: questions about proposed amanda hardware solution

2002-10-14 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 14 October 2002 09:13, Mike Simpson wrote: >Folks -- > >I want to thank everybody for all the feedback. Diskwise, it's > nice to know that IDE solutions are workable, and I'm going to > look into them. Politically (isn't it always about the > politics?) I'm in all likelihood going to b

Re: New amanda version

2002-10-14 Thread marc . bigler
Hehe well it's just a matter of upgrading all the clients and server with the time but during the client/server upgrade there will be multiple versions running so I just wanted to make sure this will not create problems... Regards Marc

ufsdump solaris occasional error

2002-10-14 Thread Jerry
Occasionally, I see: FAILED (dumper) [/usr/sbin/ufsdump returned 3] It's a solaris 8 box... no mirroring or anything complex. It happens to be the tape server as well. If doesn't appear to happen all the time, and on the next run it's usually cleared up. Is there any common problems known to

Re: New amanda version

2002-10-14 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 14 October 2002 08:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hi there, > >I saw that there is a new stable version of AMANDA out. Now is it > possible to run the old version as AMANDA as a server (2.4.2p2) > and use the newewst version as client ? Will that work ? > >Regards >Marc Its compatible.

Re: xinetd and amanda

2002-10-14 Thread Jerry
Paste your xinetd.d conf section for amanda here. Also, see if /var/adm/messages reports anything when running amcheck. Jerry --- Hery Zo RAKOTONDRAMANANA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using amanda-2.4.2p2-4 on a debian woody system > with xinetd. > I used to backup my amanda ser

Re: win2k remote shutdown from linux?

2002-10-14 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 14 October 2002 05:01, jordivi wrote: >Hi > > I want to be able to do evening backups on windows shares >and shutdown them after dumps is done. I found an utility > (psshutdown) which can be scheduled in a windows box to shutdown > the others. I want to do this from the amanda serv

Re: xinetd and amanda

2002-10-14 Thread Hery Zo RAKOTONDRAMANANA
Gene Heskett wrote: >On Monday 14 October 2002 04:43, Hery Zo RAKOTONDRAMANANA wrote: > > >>Hi all, >> >>I'm using amanda-2.4.2p2-4 on a debian woody system with xinetd. >>I used to backup my amanda server via "localhost". Since my amanda >>server has multiple interfaces, I want to limit amanda

Re: What tapecycle value to use?

2002-10-14 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 14 October 2002 04:56, Toralf Lund wrote: [...] >Yes, that's what I'm doing. The problem with this is that > something easily gets left out as new directories are created. > >How about > >1. Allowing wildcards in the disklist file >2. Having some kind of "auto expansion" mode, where a di

Re: xinetd and amanda

2002-10-14 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 14 October 2002 04:43, Hery Zo RAKOTONDRAMANANA wrote: >Hi all, > >I'm using amanda-2.4.2p2-4 on a debian woody system with xinetd. >I used to backup my amanda server via "localhost". Since my amanda >server has multiple interfaces, I want to limit amanda to > listening to 192.168.11.1 (

Re: Question about hw compression and tapetype def.

2002-10-14 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 14 October 2002 04:20, jordivi wrote: >Hi > > My backups fails using soft compression on large disks, using >tar or dump + gzip I get things like: >-- >- FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: > server1 /disk1 lev 0

Re: Question about hw compression and tapetype def.

2002-10-14 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 14 October 2002 04:20, jordivi wrote: >Hi > > My backups fails using soft compression on large disks, using >tar or dump + gzip I get things like: >-- >- FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: > server1 /disk1 lev 0

Re: questions about proposed amanda hardware solution

2002-10-14 Thread Mike Simpson
Folks -- I want to thank everybody for all the feedback. Diskwise, it's nice to know that IDE solutions are workable, and I'm going to look into them. Politically (isn't it always about the politics?) I'm in all likelihood going to be forced into using Dell hardware, and as far as I can tel

New amanda version

2002-10-14 Thread marc . bigler
Hi there, I saw that there is a new stable version of AMANDA out. Now is it possible to run the old version as AMANDA as a server (2.4.2p2) and use the newewst version as client ? Will that work ? Regards Marc

Re: Question about hw compression and tapetype def.

2002-10-14 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:20:18AM +0200, jordivi wrote: > Hi > > My backups fails using soft compression on large disks, using > tar or dump + gzip I get things like: > --- > FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: > server1

win2k remote shutdown from linux?

2002-10-14 Thread jordivi
Hi I want to be able to do evening backups on windows shares and shutdown them after dumps is done. I found an utility (psshutdown) which can be scheduled in a windows box to shutdown the others. I want to do this from the amanda server. Do you know how? Is there an utility for linux to d

Re: What tapecycle value to use?

2002-10-14 Thread Toralf Lund
> On Monday 14 October 2002 03:36, Toralf Lund wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:15:34AM +0200, Toralf Lund wrote: > >> > >On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 01:38:18PM +0200, Toralf Lund wrote: > >> > >> Forgot to mention this earlier: I'm not using incrementals > >> > >> at all. > >> > > > >> > >Tapes

xinetd and amanda

2002-10-14 Thread Hery Zo RAKOTONDRAMANANA
Hi all, I'm using amanda-2.4.2p2-4 on a debian woody system with xinetd. I used to backup my amanda server via "localhost". Since my amanda server has multiple interfaces, I want to limit amanda to listening to 192.168.11.1 (eth1) interface only. This can be done through the "bind" directive o

Question about hw compression and tapetype def.

2002-10-14 Thread jordivi
Hi My backups fails using soft compression on large disks, using tar or dump + gzip I get things like: --- FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: server1 /disk1 lev 0 FAILED [input: Can't read data: : Connection timed out]

Re: What tapecycle value to use?

2002-10-14 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 14 October 2002 03:36, Toralf Lund wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:15:34AM +0200, Toralf Lund wrote: >> > >On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 01:38:18PM +0200, Toralf Lund wrote: >> > >> Forgot to mention this earlier: I'm not using incrementals >> > >> at all. >> > > >> > >Tapes >> > > >> > >

Re: What tapecycle value to use?

2002-10-14 Thread Toralf Lund
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 09:15:34AM +0200, Toralf Lund wrote: > > >On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 01:38:18PM +0200, Toralf Lund wrote: > > >> Forgot to mention this earlier: I'm not using incrementals at all. > > >Tapes > > >> from the same week will contain full backups of different > directories, > >