Re: LTO Ultrium

2003-01-27 Thread Gerhard den Hollander
* Martin Oehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 05:11:39PM +0100) Hi! Am Fre, 2003-01-24 um 16.22 schrieb Gene Heskett: On Friday 24 January 2003 08:53, Martin Oehler wrote: Why is the length the same? Seems like switching the compression modes with mt is not working. It

Re: Make amanda unload tape drive?

2003-01-27 Thread Simon Young
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 12:34:47PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote: Can amanda send a signal to my DLT IV to unload the tape after backups are finished, so whoever goes back to swap tapes can just do it without waiting to manually unload? The standard trick is to call either amtape CONFIG eject

Re: LTO Ultrium

2003-01-27 Thread Martin Oehler
Am Mon, 2003-01-27 um 09.54 schrieb Gerhard den Hollander: * Martin Oehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 05:11:39PM +0100) I'm sorry, I made a mistake. The hardware compression was off all the time. :( That's exactly what it looked like ;) Hehe, do you know what's funny? I made

amresore problems, Doesn't know which restore to use.

2003-01-27 Thread stan
I;m having problems getting a backup restored. Here's the scenario. Tape server machine Debian GNU link testing, running Amanda 2.4.3b4 Client machine HP-UX 10.20 running Amanda 2.4.2p1, and with VXFS filesystems (I think this is important). I'm running amrecover on the client, and all is

Re: question

2003-01-27 Thread Riccardo Parola
I went trough the same yesterday... turned out I didn't have amanda-client installed on the client AT ALL none the less!!! Obviously make sure you have amanda and amanda-client installed on the client, make sure you have an entry for your server in ~amanda/.amandahosts (or ~/operator...

Crazy settings for my SONY SDT-7000

2003-01-27 Thread Jeff Borders
I ran amtapetype -e 8192 (which should have been half of this) -f /dev/nst0 -t SONY_SDT-7000 It took two days to run. Here are the results: define tapetype SONY_SDT-7000 { comment hardware compression off length 114668 mbytes filemark 910304 kbytes speed 24 kps }

Re: amresore problems, Doesn't know which restore to use.

2003-01-27 Thread stan
Replying to my own messgae is bad form, I know, but I left out the fact that when I run amverify on the tape(s0 in question, they recognize that the dumps were created by vxfdump. On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 09:59:13AM -0500, stan wrote: I;m having problems getting a backup restored. Here's the

Re: features: append, span tapes, compress?

2003-01-27 Thread Brian Cuttler
John, This is exactly what we are thinking of doing at my site. We are looking at a trival method of dividing up the amanda disks - group 1) local to server, group 2) remote clients. With lots of local disk, fiber channel... this sort of makes sense and will allow us to utilize both of our

Basic amrestore usage question

2003-01-27 Thread stan
Since I'm having trouble with my tool of choice (amrecover) today (see my previous mails on this(, I'm trying to simply get a backup set off of a Amanda tape using amrestore (which I have never used before). I see the set I want going by in amverify, and amrestore. In amrestore it's listed as

Overland XB tape stacker

2003-01-27 Thread Nigel Barker
Hi Apologies for the level of this question, I'm sure the answer is around on the web, but I can't find it! (Is there a Idiots Guide to setting up your first Amanda install?) Anyway, got a 10 tape Overland XB tape stacker, with a dlt 7000 drive, and I'm looking to find a suitable chg-multi.conf

Re: amrestore: could not stat /dev/rmt0.1

2003-01-27 Thread David Hayes
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, John R. Jackson wrote: Sorry it took so long to get back to you. I was able to reproduce (and even fix :-) the problem. Give the following patch a try. Hi John. This patch works great. Thanks for your time/efforts. --david

Re: features: append, span tapes, compress?

2003-01-27 Thread John R. Jackson
We are looking at a trival method of dividing up the amanda disks - group 1) local to server, group 2) remote clients. That will work very easily. No special (source code) work required. Since one amanda will never actually touch the ethernet interface is there another method or work-around we

Re: Basic amrestore usage question

2003-01-27 Thread John R. Jackson
... I'm trying to simply get a backup set off of a Amanda tape using amrestore (which I have never used before). You have used it (via amrecover), you just didn't know it :-). I see the set I want going by in amverify, and amrestore. In amrestore it's listed as set 35

RE:Oracle backup via AMANDA

2003-01-27 Thread Keith Higgs
I run a cron script that runs the Oracle export utility and tar/gzips the dmp and log files using a date named file. You can then use AMANDA to backup the output. The alternative is to purchase a third party interface for each Oracle installation you wish to backup. Unfortunately, such warez

Just starting out

2003-01-27 Thread Jozwiak, Paul
I was just curious if there was some information anyone could pass on to see Amanda is right for my environment. I have Sun E150 with a 40 slot, 4 drive Spectralogic 1 AIT Tape array. Will Amanda work with this equipment? Anybody have some last minute do's and don'ts that I should follow?

Re: amresore problems, Doesn't know which restore to use.

2003-01-27 Thread stan
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 09:59:13AM -0500, stan wrote: I;m having problems getting a backup restored. Here's the scenario. Tape server machine Debian GNU link testing, running Amanda 2.4.3b4 Client machine HP-UX 10.20 running Amanda 2.4.2p1, and with VXFS filesystems (I think this is

Re: amresore problems, Doesn't know which restore to use.

2003-01-27 Thread John R. Jackson
So, when I look in the amrecover debug file on the client, I find it's trying to execute /sbin/restore. This is wrong, it should be trying to execute /usr/sbin/vxrestore. Here is the relevant part of the code in recover-src/extract_list.c: #if defined(VXDUMP) if

Recycling a Tape

2003-01-27 Thread Michael Kopach
Hi Guys! I have the odd tape that fills up from AMANDA. Since I have a limited number of tapes on hand, how does one safely clean out the contents of that tape and reuse it under AMANDA? Thanks ... Mike

Re: Recycling a Tape

2003-01-27 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 at 1:53pm, Michael Kopach wrote I have the odd tape that fills up from AMANDA. Since I have a limited number of tapes on hand, how does one safely clean out the contents of that tape and reuse it under AMANDA? Err, I'm not quite sure what any of this means. By default,

Re: Recycling a Tape

2003-01-27 Thread Michael Kopach
Opps, my mistake! Maybe I didn't clarify. AMANDA was running out of tape at the end of a few runs. I think I will let it run *as is* and see if it happens again. If so, I'll just run amflush and see if it fits on the next tape. Thanks ... Mike Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/27/03

Re: Recycling a Tape

2003-01-27 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 27 January 2003 16:42, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 at 1:53pm, Michael Kopach wrote I have the odd tape that fills up from AMANDA. Since I have a limited number of tapes on hand, how does one safely clean out the contents of that tape and reuse it under AMANDA?

Re: RAIT in 2.4.3b4

2003-01-27 Thread Scott Mcdermott
John R. Jackson on Sun 26/01 17:40 -0500: You describe RAID4, probably the least commonly used RAID, since it means only one write request can be satisfied at once, as there is a only single drive doing parity writes. Much better is to rotate the parity from one drive to the next with

amanda, os-x, hfspax ?

2003-01-27 Thread wr
Hi all Has anyone tried backing up os-x boxes using Amanda and hfspax? I'd be happy to hack at it (in the most amateurish way) if someone would kindly point out the pertinent points-of-interest, areas to poke at... :-) WR

Re: RAIT in 2.4.3b4

2003-01-27 Thread John R. Jackson
- it doesn't have any parallelism at all, so it gains no concurrency advantages; it simply loops among the data set members, does one write, blocks, does the other, etc then write the parity tape. Correct. To do parallelism at user level would require something like a shared memory

NO_AMANDA (was Re: RAIT in 2.4.3b4)

2003-01-27 Thread Scott Mcdermott
John R. Jackson on Mon 27/01 21:37 -0500: - the #ifdef NO_AMANDA stuff is pretty much exact duplication. Anyone consider just moving this out into a library instead of duplicating whole routines in rait-*.c ? Yes, but Marc Mengel really (really :-) wanted to keep the code