would be nice
as well, since
it is still stated as a supported feature.
Thanks
Andreas Sundstrom
I'm probably using quite ancient versions of amanda (using Debian, and
due to a kerberos problem I'm still on 2.5.2p1).
Anyway..
I want to use external disks instead of tapes for my backups. I don't
like having the disks connected all the time since it would be possible
for them to be erased when
On 10/21/2012 07:41 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
At Sun, 21 Oct 2012 17:29:30 +0200 Andreas Sundstrom sun...@zappa.cx wrote:
I'm probably using quite ancient versions of amanda (using Debian, and
due to a kerberos problem I'm still on 2.5.2p1).
Anyway..
I want to use external disks instead
Hi.. long time since I posted to this ML now...
Amanda has been working great for me so far.
But I decided to have a look at the krb5 auth support, since I already
use kerberos for a lot of other stuff.
I have finally got it working for both amdump and amrecover.
One question though, when using
Michael Loftis wrote:
--On June 17, 2005 9:51:48 AM +0200 Paul Bijnens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Estimated time to write 2 * 12288 Mbyte: 26880 sec = 7 h 28 min
wrote 298832 32Kb blocks in 76 files in 10632 seconds (short write)
wrote 310628 32Kb blocks in 158 files in 10840
SND wrote:
Hi all,
i want the backed up files from a nightly amdump-run to remain on the
holding disk (after they were successfully written to tape!) at least for
one day. So it would be possible to do faster and more comfortable restores
the next day.
Is there an option to acomplish that? And if
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Mike Delaney wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 06:07:19PM +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
Last time I looked at doing backups of Oracle (Ora 6-7-8), I
approached it as follows: first set each tablespace in hot backup mode
(alter tablespace TS begin backup) then doing a filesystem
Matt Lung wrote:
I have hard disk backups setup using amanda on Fedora Core 3. Everything is
great except when I use amrecover. Trying to restore an old file I will get tar
errors like this:
tar: ./dir/somefile: invalid sparse archive member
tar: Skipping to next header
tar: Archive contains
Kurt Raschke wrote:
On Jan 16, 2005, at 4:25 AM, Paul Bijnens wrote:
For the record:
plain gtar 1.12 needs to be patched to handle large files ( 2GB).
plain gtar 1.13 makes bad index-lists which amrecover cannot handle,
as does the rarely used 1.13.9x, which changed the index-format again
in an
Dan Rich wrote:
I have a DLT IV drive that I cannot get to stream with amanda. With a
little bit of experimentation, I have found that it will stream with tar
if I set the block size to 128KB. However, amanda only seems to support
block sizes of 32kb. The constant rewind/seek motion of the
I might have stumbled on a bug in amtapetype. I believe it's the new
functionality to check for a amanda label that has introduced it.
This explains it quite well I think:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ amtapetype -c -e 35g -f /dev/nst1
amtapetype: /dev/nst1: reading label: Input/output error
[EMAIL
Fernan Aguero wrote:
+[ Matt Hyclak [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13.Oct.2004 11:58):
|
| On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 11:42:33AM -0300, Fernan Aguero enlightened us:
| I did the installation as root, of course. I'm not using the
| amanda sources 'as is', however, but through the added layer
| of the
Joe Konecny wrote:
Gavin Henry wrote:
Amanda is much better than that. It will but the backup in a holding disk
i.e. folder/partition until space runs out or hits the limit you set.
It will not overwrite another tape unless you force it by hand, which
is good.
You don't have to figure out which
tar betas had problems but that change
was reversed (had to do with the ./ that files begin with in
current gnutar versions).
/Andreas Sundstrom
Quoting Stefan G. Weichinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, Andreas,
on Dienstag, 15. Juni 2004 at 09:29 you wrote to amanda-users:
AS Well, now I have created a user named amanda which has default group
membership
AS disk and is also a member of users. Then I recompiled with user=amanda,
AS
Quoting Stefan G. Weichinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, Andreas,
on Dienstag, 15. Juni 2004 at 09:29 you wrote to amanda-users:
AS Well, now I have created a user named amanda which has default group
membership
AS disk and is also a member of users. Then I recompiled with user=amanda,
AS
Owen Williams wrote:
Hi,
I've just upgraded one of my clients to Fedora Core 2,
2.6.6-1.435.2.3smp and want to try ip_conntrack_amanda (if its even
appropriate).
Make sure this patch is in:
http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2004-June/015806.html
I have verified that it fixes
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 at 12:00am, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote
[...]
Kris, I think that you need to some performance testing/optimizing of your
system. What controllers are you using? Have you tested with bonnie++
and/or tiobench? Are there mount parameters to ext3 you
Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Can I allow amanda backup server to talk through firewall for accessing
amanda client host, Is there any way out
The general answer is to recompile amanda with a dedicated portrange
and open those ports in the firewall. See
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Can I allow amanda backup server to talk through firewall for accessing
amanda client host, Is there any way out
The general answer is to recompile amanda with a dedicated portrange
and open those ports in the firewall. See the explanation in
Jay Ted wrote:
Greetings,
I'm having trouble with one of my amanda servers. I have one server running 2.4.4p3
compiled from source on a LFS box with 2.6.7. My other server is 2.4.4p3 compiled
from source on Slack9.1 with 2.6.7. My clients are a handful of RH with rpm'ed
versions of amanda
Iulian Topliceanu wrote:
Hi,
I'm running amanda-2.4.4p2 on a Fedora Core 2 having a Dell PowerVault
120T DLT1 with 6 tapes DLT tapes in it.
When performind amdump I get this error while watching the status with
amstatus:
Using /var/lib/amanda/mail1/amdump.1 from Sun Jun 20 11:41:49 CEST 2004
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Andreas,
on Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2004 at 21:07 you wrote to amanda-users:
AS It appears that a change occured in ip_conntrack_amanda.c between
AS 2.6.5-rc1 and rc2 (this change isn't mentioned in the Changelog or I am
AS unable to find it). I don't know what I was
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Andreas,
on Mittwoch, 16. Juni 2004 at 08:09 you wrote to amanda-users:
A diff against my current .config shows that this seems to be a pretty
fat kernel, many many things compiled into it statically ...
I am no kernel-hacker but I know that having ONE of all those
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Andreas,
on Dienstag, 15. Juni 2004 at 21:56 you wrote to amanda-users:
Where could that one reside? A faulty network-module? Remember that
these things work fine here with each 2.6 ..
AS I'm almost sure it's some kind of kernel bug. That's why I have bothered
AS
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Andreas,
on Mittwoch, 16. Juni 2004 at 08:09 you wrote to amanda-users:
A diff against my current .config shows that this seems to be a pretty
fat kernel, many many things compiled into it statically ...
I am no kernel-hacker but I know that having ONE of all those
Quoting Andreas Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Eric Siegerman wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 10:41:14PM +0200, Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
--with-user=root \
--with-group=root
A stab in the dark here: these settings seem a bit suspicious.
Normally one doesn't run
Quoting Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
All went well and the backup finished successful. Then I switched to my
identically compiled 2.6.6-rc2 kernel and it fails with the same error as
earlier:
These dumps were to tape dflt10.
The next tape Amanda expects
Quoting Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
Also what do you recommend as parameters to tcpdump, it's all running on
the
same host does that mean I can sniff on lo?
This works for me on Linux 2.4.22:
sudo tcpdump -i lo -w trace.lo
I have now made a dump
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Andreas,
on Dienstag, 15. Juni 2004 at 13:32 you wrote to amanda-users:
AS I have now made a dump on the traffic passing through lo during the amdump.
AS I
AS have also recompiled amanda with these two settings (as another friendly
person
AS suggested):
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Paul Bijnens wrote:
It seems ethereal store only the first few bytes of each packet.
There is probably an option to set that size; similar to tcpdump -s
1500.
That means I don't have the full info, but I believe I've seen enough!
Following up on myself.
I've digged into the
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Paul,
on Dienstag, 15. Juni 2004 at 16:49 you wrote to amanda-users:
PB And amanda cleans up the other two connections.
PB Amanda tries again with another set of ports a few times
PB but always trying to connect to 65535 for the index.
PB Then she gives up
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Just for fun: if you disable the indexing, then the backup will run
fine, I believe. (index no in dumptype).
Well, no it doesn't work that way either.
/Andreas
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Very very strange...
Do you have netcat installed?
What is the output of this command on 2.6.6rc2?
nc -v -v -s 127.0.0.1 -p 1234 127.0.0.1 1234
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/amanda$ nc -v -v -s 127.0.0.1 -p 1234 127.0.0.1 1234
localhost [127.0.0.1] 1234 (?) open
/Andreas
if I need to post more info, don't want to write an unnecessary overly
large e-mail.
/Andreas Sundstrom
Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Hi, Andreas,
on Sonntag, 13. Juni 2004 at 15:04 you wrote to amanda-users:
AS I have trouble upgrading from 2.6.5 to 2.6.6, I have narrowed
AS it down by trying the different rc releases. Between 2.6.6-rc1 and
AS 2.6.6-rc2 something happens that make my amanda backups
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Andreas Sundstrom wrote:
I'm sending this now to the amanda-users list, I originally sent it to
the linux-kernel ml but the only person who have answered my mail is
Gene Heskett which also recommended me to try here.
I'm using amanda-2.4.4p2 but I have also tried 2.4.5b1
37 matches
Mail list logo
