amlabel: not an amanda tape ???

2007-08-01 Thread Michael D Schleif
Please, ANY ideas ??? amanda is version 2.5.1p1-2.1 , running on debian: # uname -a Linux erda 2.6.18-4-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 11:36:53 CEST 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux Trying to setup a VXA-2 manual load tape drive with amanda. Same tape that I used earlier today with amtapetype, and

Re: amlabel: not an amanda tape ??? [ SOLVED ]

2007-08-01 Thread Michael D Schleif
. Weichinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007:08:01:14:32:04+0200] scribed: Michael D Schleif schrieb: Please, ANY ideas ??? amanda is version 2.5.1p1-2.1 , running on debian: # uname -a Linux erda 2.6.18-4-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 11:36:53 CEST 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux Trying to setup a VXA-2

amlabel: amlabel: not an amanda tape ???

2007-07-31 Thread Michael D Schleif
amanda is version 2.5.1p1-2.1 , running on debian: # uname -a Linux erda 2.6.18-4-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 11:36:53 CEST 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux Trying to setup a VXA-2 manual load tape drive with amanda. Same tape that I used earlier today with amtapetype, and successfully got a tapetype

Re: Problems using amanda to backup SMB shares

2006-07-13 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006:07:12:17:49:06-0400] scribed: On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 09:31:09AM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote: * Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006:07:12:00:09:07-0400] scribed: snip / When asked to, and if run by root, they record the date and time and level

Re: Problems using amanda to backup SMB shares

2006-07-12 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006:07:12:00:09:07-0400] scribed: snip / When asked to, and if run by root, they record the date and time and level of the dumps in a file /etc/dumpdates. This file then can be used by dump in the future to decide what needs backing up at various dump

Re: Problems using amanda to backup SMB shares

2006-07-11 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006:07:11:11:59:30-0400] scribed: On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Nathan Weston wrote: snip / As for the second problem, I don't see anything in the .debug files that gives me a clue. The permissions for /etc/amandates look like this: -rw-r-

Re: /tmp/amanda needs 64KB, only has -2147483648KB available

2006-06-15 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Rémi Demarthe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006:06:15:15:07:51+0200] scribed: Hello all, When I run amcheck, I've got this result : ERROR: services4.obs-besancon.fr: [dir /tmp/amanda needs 64KB, only has -2147483648KB available.] ERROR: services4.obs-besancon.fr: [dir /var/log/amanda needs 64KB,

Re: missing result ... in ... response ???

2006-05-30 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006:05:29:14:13:00+0200] scribed: snip / Jean-Louis created a patch for 2.5.0, which break at 64K (just as 2.4.x), which fixes your problem. Yes. As I stated earlier, it is better for me to use debian packages; rather than attempting to maintain personal

Re: missing result ... in ... response ???

2006-05-29 Thread Michael D Schleif
* On 2006:05:25:08:25:07-0500 I, Michael D Schleif [EMAIL PROTECTED], scribed: Something has changed in amanda. I have been running amanda on this lan for several years. For the most part, DLE's have been constant for at least six months. I have six linux servers, all running debian

missing result ... in ... response ???

2006-05-25 Thread Michael D Schleif
Something has changed in amanda. I have been running amanda on this lan for several years. For the most part, DLE's have been constant for at least six months. I have six linux servers, all running debian. Regarding amanda-server, my records show that I upgraded amanda to version: 2.4.5

Re: missing result ... in ... response ???

2006-05-25 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006:05:25:10:16:56-0400] scribed: Michael, If the problem is that you have too many DLE for a udp packet, try the attached patch which will double the size of the packet. Thank you, for your participation in this matter. Yes, I can get this

Re: DDS-3 tapetype ???

2005-06-18 Thread Michael D Schleif
OK, here is my solution that allows full tape length for my backups. Notice that I am using amtapetype only as an effective way to illustrate both my problem and the solution. This demonstrates using the OS and mt to turn tape drive hardware compression ON: * Michael D Schleif [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: DDS-3 tapetype ???

2005-06-17 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Paul Bijnens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005:06:17:09:51:48+0200] scribed: Michael D Schleif wrote: Since the tape drive change, I have wondered why I didn't seem to be getting all the data on some tapes. Clearly, with Amanda, some days it just doesn't want to send a full 12GB to tape; but, mostly

DDS-3 tapetype ???

2005-06-16 Thread Michael D Schleif
Earlier this year, my HP DAT tape drive had problems, and I replaced it with a Compaq/Sony SDT-9000. Mostly, I am still using the same DDS-3 tapes that I was using, and retired some and added some. My old records show that I was getting nearly the full 12GB uncompressed tape length. Since the

AS/400 backup ???

2005-02-17 Thread Michael D Schleif
Anybody using Amanda to backup an AS/400? Pointers cheerfully accepted ; TIA -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I

Dump Time Run Time ???

2004-07-23 Thread Michael D Schleif
I am certain that this is a misunderstanding on my part ; How can Dump Time be *GREATER THAN* Run Time? STATISTICS: Total Full Daily Estimate Time (hrs:min)0:17

Re: disklist and whitespaces

2004-07-15 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Andrea Borgia [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004:07:15:18:48:50+0200] scribed: Hello. On one host I would like to backup the Windows Documents and Settings directory from Linux, but it appears Amanda is bitching about those embedded whitespaces. I've tried both escaping them and quoting the

GNUTAR, mount points symbolic links ???

2004-07-12 Thread Michael D Schleif
Does Amanda/GNUTAR _follow_ all mount points and symbolic links in a DLE? Everytime that I setup Amanda clients, I get confused on these issues. If this is covered in the FAQ-O-Matic, then I do not see it. If it has been covered on the mailing list countless times, then my searches are too

Best Practices: small number of tapes ???

2004-07-10 Thread Michael D Schleif
OK, we have a Quantum SuperDLT1 tape drive, and an Overland LXB autoloader, with ten (10) slot magazine and barcode reader. One slot is the cleaning tape, which is controlled by the autoloader, and not by the Amanda changer. Backups are to be performed seven (7) days per week. Amanda is backing

Re: Best Practices: small number of tapes ???

2004-07-10 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004:07:10:17:45:42-0400] scribed: On Saturday 10 July 2004 11:46, Michael D Schleif wrote: snip / With this current setup, nine (9) usable tapes, I wonder how best to configure Amanda? Yes, we can manually swap out magazines as necessary; but, we prefer

crossed signals ???

2004-04-29 Thread Michael D Schleif
Can somebody please explain these errors: [compress got signal 11, /usr/bin/smbclient got signal 13] [compress got signal 11, /bin/tar got signal 13] [index got signal 11, /usr/bin/smbclient got signal 13] One of my Debian clients, running kernel 2.6.2, has recently developed these

superdlt1: out of tape ???

2004-04-28 Thread Michael D Schleif
We are having one bear of a time getting Amanda to work properly in this environment. # uname -a Linux pluto 2.6.2-1-686-smp #1 SMP Thu Feb 19 23:32:17 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux (brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4p2) define tapetype SuperDLT1 { comment

backup DMZ host ???

2004-04-26 Thread Michael D Schleif
My client has a proxy-arp DMZ, on which resides a host that I want to backup to a NAT'ed, private network Amanda server. I keep getting this error: # sudo -u backup amcheck DailySet1 -cltw Amanda Tape Server Host Check . . . ERROR: don.platinumaire.net: [host

Re: backup DMZ host ???

2004-04-26 Thread Michael D Schleif
Stefan = O, I forgot about /tmp/amanda/ on the client ; From the client (don): amandad: time 0.004: sending REP packet: Amanda 2.4 REP HANDLE 000-E08F0608 SEQ 1083000883 ERROR [host bluetrout.PlatinumAire.net: port 62170 not secure] * Stefan G. Weichinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: kernels v2.6.x vs. /dev/nst0 ???

2004-03-08 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004:03:08:08:18:07-0500] scribed: On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 at 11:10pm, Michael D Schleif wrote Amanda 2.4.4p1 Debian Linux I finally took the plunge yesterday, and upgraded my last system to kernel 2.6.3. Unfortunately, this is my amanda

Re: kernels v2.6.x vs. /dev/nst0 ???

2004-03-08 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Michael D Schleif [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004:03:07:23:10:40-0600] scribed: snip / Unfortunately, this is my amanda backup server, and under this kernel it no longer communicates with /dev/nst0: # sudo mt -f /dev/nst0 offline mt: No such device. Cannot open '/dev/nst0'. Everything

Re: kernels v2.6.x vs. /dev/nst0 ???

2004-03-08 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Stefan G. Weichinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004:03:08:16:03:45+0100] scribed: Hi, Michael, on Montag, 08. März 2004 at 15:48 you wrote to amanda-users: MDS I am using the stock Debian kernel: MDSkernel-image-2.6.3-1-686 MDS From config-2.6.3-1-686: MDS# MDS# SCSI device

kernels v2.6.x vs. /dev/nst0 ???

2004-03-07 Thread Michael D Schleif
Amanda 2.4.4p1 Debian Linux I finally took the plunge yesterday, and upgraded my last system to kernel 2.6.3. Unfortunately, this is my amanda backup server, and under this kernel it no longer communicates with /dev/nst0: # sudo mt -f /dev/nst0 offline mt: No such device. Cannot open

Advice for setup large environment?

2004-02-24 Thread Michael D Schleif
I have been successfully using Amanda for nearly a year on several small LAN's. Now, I want to setup Amanda in a larger network in a phased approach. First, notice that I will be using backup hardware such as I have setup and configured for Arcserve and BackupExec; but, not yet with Amanda. [1]

Can't open exclude file ???

2004-01-28 Thread Michael D Schleif
This does *not* appear to be Gene's problem of several days ago. Yesterday, I reconfigured some disk, and reconfigured amanda to work with the disk changes. For nearly one year, I have used the following as a top level dumptype, from which all others inherit: define dumptype global {

Re: Can't open exclude file ???

2004-01-28 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004:01:28:10:28:28-0500] scribed: On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:07:34AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote: snip / Now, since this addition, I get this: # sudo -u backup amcheck DailySet1 -cltw Amanda Tape Server Host Check

Re: Can't open exclude file ???

2004-01-28 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004:01:28:11:08:19-0500] scribed: On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:52:41AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote: snip / Ironically, I do _not_ need any exclude file for this DLE. Initially, I did not have any exclude file, and amcheck issued the _same_ error. Then, I

howto determine tape position ???

2004-01-13 Thread Michael D Schleif
At the end of an amanda dump, what is the optimal way to determine the location/position on that tape where the dump completed? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we

Re: howto determine tape position ???

2004-01-13 Thread Michael D Schleif
* Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004:01:13:12:30:56-0500] scribed: On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:17:18AM -0600, Michael D Schleif wrote: At the end of an amanda dump, what is the optimal way to determine the location/position on that tape where the dump completed? Not certain what your

Re: Who is radicalmedia.com ???

2003-09-06 Thread Michael D Schleif
Jon LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003:09:05:12:19:59-0400] scribed: On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 09:58:50AM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote: Michael D Schleif [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003:09:01:22:12:01-0500] scribed: And, why are they re-sending post-spamassassin'd spam, that they received from

Re: Who is radicalmedia.com ???

2003-09-05 Thread Michael D Schleif
Michael D Schleif [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003:09:01:22:12:01-0500] scribed: And, why are they re-sending post-spamassassin'd spam, that they received from amanda mailing list, *BACK* through amanda mailing list? Who can stop this? Please . . . Here is an example header: Received: from

Who is radicalmedia.com ???

2003-09-02 Thread Michael D Schleif
And, why are they re-sending post-spamassassin'd spam, that they received from amanda mailing list, *BACK* through amanda mailing list? Who can stop this? Please . . . -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding

Re: Not again !!!

2003-08-14 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach Jon LaBadie (Wed 06 Aug 02003 at 04:59:41PM -0400): On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:39:17PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote: Yes, agreed; but, are the plethora of insipid and specious virus-found alarms really necessary (read: on-topic) on this -- or any -- mailing list? Yes

Re: su amanda doesn't have permissions

2003-08-09 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach S. Keel (Fri 08 Aug 02003 at 03:09:49PM -0700): Hopefully someone here can help...I've been working through the Frankenlinux setup instructions along with the Using Amanda Chapter at Backupcentral to setup my site, but have run into a problem when I try to run... su amanda -c

Re: Disaster recovery.

2003-08-09 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach Gene Heskett (Fri 08 Aug 02003 at 02:16:17PM -0400): On Friday 08 August 2003 14:00, Ean Kingston wrote: I've been starting to work on a DRP plan here and I've run into a bit of a catch-22. If the amanda index (and tape in my case) server is lost and all I have left is the

Re: Not again !!!

2003-08-06 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach Rebecca Pakish Crum (Wed 06 Aug 02003 at 02:23:30PM -0500): snip / It amazes me how often these two running arguments are repeatedly debated...using localhost and spam to the amanda list. For the love of pete...how many sys admins does it take to beat the dead horse? (I suppose

tape usage ???

2003-08-03 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Does amanda keep track of how many times a tape has been used? If not, how difficult would it be to increment a counter in the amanda tape header? Clearly, at 32kB, there is plenty of room in the header for this simple matter . . . What do you think? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource

which tape is which ???

2003-07-15 Thread Michael D. Schleif
I have been using amanda for several weeks. Initially, I tested various configurations; but, now I am supposed to be ``in production'' ; Somehow, I find myself with two (2) identically labeled tapes: backup.005 ; amcheck finds both to be valid. tapelist shows one (1) entry for backup.005. How

Re: which tape is which ???

2003-07-15 Thread Michael D. Schleif
. Michael D. Schleif said: I have been using amanda for several weeks. Initially, I tested various configurations; but, now I am supposed to be ``in production'' ; Somehow, I find myself with two (2) identically labeled tapes: backup.005 ; amcheck finds both to be valid. tapelist

Re: which tape is which ???

2003-07-15 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach Kurt Yoder (Tue 15 Jul 02003 at 11:31:21AM -0400): Michael D. Schleif said: snipped That's my problem: if I knew which of these tapes is the ``most recently-written one'', then I would know which is in the current cycle ; So, how do I determine that? Ah. Put one

Re: to compress or not to compress ???

2003-07-04 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach Paul Bijnens (Fri 04 Jul 02003 at 10:51:47AM +0200): snip / In docs/RESTORE, you can find all the commands you need to use an amanda tape without amanda software. That is an excellent document! I'm sorry that I bothered the list before finding and reading it . . . -- Best

to compress or not to compress ???

2003-07-03 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Yes, I am learning -- at the expense of many questions ; First, a brief overview: I have five (5) Linux servers, totaling ~50 Gb used diskspace, divided roughly even across all five. I have several DAT tape drives, the largest of which is an HP DDS-3. I have twelve (12) DDS-3 tapes, and twenty

Re: to compress or not to compress ???

2003-07-03 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach Gene Heskett (Thu 03 Jul 02003 at 02:51:39PM -0400): On Thursday 03 July 2003 11:42, Michael D. Schleif wrote: Yes, I am learning -- at the expense of many questions ; First, a brief overview: I have five (5) Linux servers, totaling ~50 Gb used diskspace, divided roughly even

Re: to compress or not to compress ???

2003-07-03 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach George Kelbley (Thu 03 Jul 02003 at 02:41:12PM -0600): restoring w/o amrestore can be done with dd, gzip, tar, and so on, way messy compared to amrecover (or amrestore) but its possible. That's one of the plus's to amanda. Kurt Yoder wrote: Assuming you're running Linux,

Re: server will not backup itself ?!?!

2003-07-02 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach Paul Bijnens (Wed 02 Jul 02003 at 09:38:37AM +0200): Michael D. Schleif wrote: # grep amanda /etc/inetd.conf amanda dgram udp wait backup /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/lib/amanda/amandad amandaidx stream tcp nowait backup /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/lib/amanda/amindexd amidxtape stream tcp nowait

Re: server will not backup itself ?!?!

2003-07-02 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach Jay Lessert (Wed 02 Jul 02003 at 08:38:45AM -0700): On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 09:59:16PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote: # bragi.private.network sda1 comp-root # bragi.private.network sda4 comp-user 192.168.123.150 sda1 comp-root 192.168.123.150 sda4 comp-user

Re: server will not backup itself ?!?!

2003-07-02 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach Paul Bijnens (Wed 02 Jul 02003 at 07:35:07PM +0200): Michael D. Schleif wrote: # sudo -u backup amcheck -c DailySet1 Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check WARNING: Bragi.private.network: selfcheck request timed out. Host down? Client check: 1 host

EXT2 directory corrupted while converting directory #195556 ???

2003-07-02 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Now that I have amanda doing something useful, I have run into another problem. The first full backup that I did was successful, including backing up /dev/sda1. Subsequently, in order to test various functionality of amanda, I did this: # sudo -u backup amadmin DailySet1 force

Re: EXT2 directory corrupted while converting directory #195556 ???

2003-07-02 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach Paul Bijnens (Wed 02 Jul 02003 at 11:23:10PM +0200): Michael D. Schleif wrote: ... | DUMP: dumping (Pass III) [directories] ? /dev/sda1: EXT2 directory corrupted while converting directory #195556 ? | DUMP: Broken pipe I do not find anything of this sort in the amanda

howto decide full vs. incremental ???

2003-07-02 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Thank you, all of you, for your help -- I have a working amanda! Now, I am trying to understand amanda's built-in backup strategy. How can I know when `disk' will be backed up full or incremental? I do not have a changer, and I have more data across all disks than single tape capacity.

server will not backup itself ?!?!

2003-07-01 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Hi! I installed amanda on a Debian Woody system, and everything appears to be configured properly. amcheck -lstw runs without incident. However, I am victim to what appears to be the most common problem: selfcheck request timed out. Host down? I have scoured the Faq-O-Matic, and I

Re: server will not backup itself ?!?!

2003-07-01 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach Jay Lessert (Tue 01 Jul 02003 at 05:09:21PM -0700): On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 06:36:34PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote: What do you think? ### ### # grep -v '^\([# ]\|$\)' /etc/amanda/DailySet1/disklist

Re: server will not backup itself ?!?!

2003-07-01 Thread Michael D. Schleif
particular solution ; What do you think? On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at 07:36 PM, Michael D. Schleif wrote: Hi! I installed amanda on a Debian Woody system, and everything appears to be configured properly. amcheck -lstw runs without incident. However, I am victim to what appears

Re: server will not backup itself ?!?!

2003-07-01 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach Joshua Baker-LePain (Tue 01 Jul 02003 at 10:29:38PM -0400): On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 at 6:36pm, Michael D. Schleif wrote # grep amanda /etc/inetd.conf amanda dgram udp wait backup /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/lib/amanda/amandad amandaidx stream tcp nowait backup /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/lib

Re: server will not backup itself ?!?!

2003-07-01 Thread Michael D. Schleif
Also sprach Jay Lessert (Tue 01 Jul 02003 at 07:45:50PM -0700): On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 09:08:33PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote: Of course, I have tried every combination of hostname and address in disklist, and also made certain that that name there is the _same_ as that used