On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:15:06 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
If I may... I think the solution suggested by Nathan does not lean
toward the excludes.
Yes, that's correct. The thread only mentions excludes as a workaround
for situations where program=GNUTAR dumptypes are still being using,
On Wednesday 30 July 2014 09:29:45 Nathan Stratton Treadway did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:15:06 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
If I may... I think the solution suggested by Nathan does not lean
toward the excludes.
Yes, that's correct. The thread only mentions
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:26:11 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Ergo, a string ./lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs isn't valid because it references 2
more subdirs. And I have tried just ./rpc_pipefs, which, while it
should be valid, did not work. And a simple ./lib make it skip about 50
megs worth of stuff
On Wednesday 30 July 2014 12:44:37 Nathan Stratton Treadway did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:26:11 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Ergo, a string ./lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs isn't valid because it
references 2 more subdirs. And I have tried just ./rpc_pipefs,
which, while it
On Tuesday 29 July 2014 01:15:06 Olivier Nicole did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene,
So in a roundabout way, tar's mouthyness coaxed me into buying a
better printer. And if the excludes work tonight, I'm happy, camping
or...
If I may... I think the solution suggested by Nathan does not
On Jul 29, 2014, at 5:53 AM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
This points toward the use
of more than one excludes file, location defined in the dumptype. That
would work, but demands a dumptype stanza per DLE in the worst case.
My exclude lists are added in the dumptypes rather
On Sunday 27 July 2014 17:29:49 Alan Hodgson did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Friday, July 25, 2014 06:00:35 PM you wrote:
No, at the end of the day, we are on the same page Deb. Its a matter
of scale of course and that cannot be helped. I just want my
softlinks to actually be backed up,
On Monday 28 July 2014 04:53:47 r.vick...@rhul.ac.uk did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
However, in one failure path it quoted, there are no softlinks. It
simply did not like /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs, which actually goes 2
or 3 levels deeper, encountering
...@amanda.org [mailto:owner-amanda-us...@amanda.org] On
Behalf Of Gene Heskett
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 4:09 AM
To: r.vick...@rhul.ac.uk
Cc: amanda-users@amanda.org; bug-...@gnu.org
Subject: [BULK] Re: Question on the one-filesystem option
On Monday 28 July 2014 04:53:47 r.vick...@rhul.ac.uk
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 04:15:43PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Friday 25 July 2014 15:26:00 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
I just create two DLEs
mynode / backuptype
mynode /boot backuptype
Then amdump myconfig ( or amdump myconfig
4:09 AM
To: r.vick...@rhul.ac.uk
Cc: amanda-users@amanda.org; bug-...@gnu.org
Subject: [BULK] Re: Question on the one-filesystem option
On Monday 28 July 2014 04:53:47 r.vick...@rhul.ac.uk did opine And Gene
did reply:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
However, in one failure path
...@wdtv.com]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 12:29 PM
To: Joi L. Ellis
Cc: r.vick...@rhul.ac.uk; amanda-users@amanda.org; bug-...@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [BULK] Re: Question on the one-filesystem option
On Monday 28 July 2014 11:00:25 Joi L. Ellis did opine And Gene did reply:
I've been doing some googling
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 18:00:35 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
created them for me. It did not because they were not in the backup, they
were skipped due to the perceived by tar, different filesystem error.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 13:29:19 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
I can do that, but how
On Monday 28 July 2014 18:48:55 Nathan Stratton Treadway did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 18:00:35 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
created them for me. It did not because they were not in the backup,
they were skipped due to the perceived by tar, different filesystem
error.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:38:32 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
So I'm still standing here on my stump and proclaiming that tars --one-
file-system implementation is broken. And has been since somewhere post
1.22.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 05:08:38 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Crazy. There is no
On Monday 28 July 2014 22:29:19 Nathan Stratton Treadway did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:38:32 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
So I'm still standing here on my stump and proclaiming that tars
--one- file-system implementation is broken. And has been since
somewhere post
Gene,
So in a roundabout way, tar's mouthyness coaxed me into buying a better
printer. And if the excludes work tonight, I'm happy, camping or...
If I may... I think the solution suggested by Nathan does not lean
toward the excludes.
Solving your problem by using a crafted exclude list that
On Friday 25 July 2014 18:00:35 Gene Heskett did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Friday 25 July 2014 16:49:02 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Jul 25, 2014, at 3:15 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Friday 25 July 2014 15:26:00 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And
On Friday, July 25, 2014 06:00:35 PM you wrote:
No, at the end of the day, we are on the same page Deb. Its a matter of
scale of course and that cannot be helped. I just want my softlinks to
actually be backed up, without any dereference, and its not even with tar
1.27.1 happening.
You
Greetings;
It turns out some of my backups for this machine will not be usable,
particularly for a bare metal recovery on a new drive, due to a miss-
understanding of the --one-filesystem option by tar-1.27, and 1.27.1 does
not fix it.
The problem is that this system is currently installed
I just create two DLEs
mynode / backuptype
mynode /boot backuptype
Then amdump myconfig ( or amdump myconfig mynode )
will get both of them.Is this not an option for you?
Deb Baddorf
Fermilab
On Jul 25, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 02:45:50PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
It turns out some of my backups for this machine will not be usable,
particularly for a bare metal recovery on a new drive, due to a miss-
understanding of the --one-filesystem option by tar-1.27, and 1.27.1 does
not
In my previous answer I forgot one other combination.
If the symbolic link target is a directory on another
file system:
Without the --dereference option the symbolic link is archived.
With --dereference, but without --one-file-system, the directory and
its contents are archived.
With
On Friday 25 July 2014 15:26:00 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
I just create two DLEs
mynode / backuptype
mynode /boot backuptype
Then amdump myconfig ( or amdump myconfig mynode )
will get both of them.Is this not an option for you?
That
On Friday 25 July 2014 15:59:37 Jon LaBadie did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 02:45:50PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
It turns out some of my backups for this machine will not be usable,
particularly for a bare metal recovery on a new drive, due to a miss-
On Jul 25, 2014, at 3:15 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Friday 25 July 2014 15:26:00 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
I just create two DLEs
mynode / backuptype
mynode /boot backuptype
Then amdump myconfig ( or amdump myconfig
On Friday 25 July 2014 16:49:02 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
On Jul 25, 2014, at 3:15 PM, Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Friday 25 July 2014 15:26:00 Debra S Baddorf did opine
And Gene did reply:
I just create two DLEs
mynode / backuptype
mynode
27 matches
Mail list logo
