On March 12, I moved the home of the mailing lists (behind the
scenes) and messed up one of the steps, so mail in past few days to the
amanda lists ended up being silently blackholed. I've corrected this
and adjusted my procedures so it won't happen again and it this or other
problems would be cau
I apologize for the wasted bandwidth, but it seems the obvious must be
restated. YOU CANNOT UNSUBSCRIBE FROM A LIST BY SENDING MAIL TO THAT LIST.
>From the AMANDA website:
>Amanda is completely unsupported and made available as-is. Unfortunately,
we don't usually have the time to answer all
>us
Ryan Williams wrote:
>
> > Perhaps it would help the two of you. Perhaps you can explain why
> > the rest of us should be inconvenienced because you can't spare the
> > time to learn to use the right tool for the right job? 200 m/day might
> > be a burden for you. For many of us that's a light
>I'm new to this mailing list (as of yesterday) ...
Welcome!
If I may make a short comment. This discussion about E-mail and Subject
lines is not at all typical of this mailing list. I've already seen
more heat about this than the last 1000 other postings. So please don't
judge it just based
At 12:00 PM 2/9/01 -0500, Ryan Williams wrote:
> > Perhaps it would help the two of you. Perhaps you can explain why
> > the rest of us should be inconvenienced because you can't spare the
> > time to learn to use the right tool for the right job? 200 m/day might
> > be a burden for you. For ma
> I can see where it would help if you didn't have some way to filter mail,
but
> mostly the Sender: header is correct.
I'm running Outlook (don't go there) to read E-mail
and have been completely unable to get the filtering to
work. Something in the subject is easy for Outlook
but it barfs on
On Fri, 09 Feb 2001, Ryan Williams wrote:
> > Perhaps it would help the two of you. Perhaps you can explain why
> > the rest of us should be inconvenienced because you can't spare the
> > time to learn to use the right tool for the right job? 200 m/day might
> > be a burden for you. For many o
> Perhaps it would help the two of you. Perhaps you can explain why
> the rest of us should be inconvenienced because you can't spare the
> time to learn to use the right tool for the right job? 200 m/day might
> be a burden for you. For many of us that's a light day. The list
> messages are a
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Joseph Del Corso wrote:
> There is NO inconvience is having an
> [AMU] appended to the front/end of a message subject;
This is an opinion stated as a fact. My opinion is different. Those
6 chars at the beginning force 6 chars of actual information out of
the right end of t
I'm new to this mailing list (as of yesterday) but I already agree
with what Ryan wrote. There is NO inconvience is having an
[AMU] appended to the front/end of a message subject; and frankly being
on a couple dozen different mailing lists and recieving on the order of
200 emails a day, things l
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 09:17:35PM -0500, Ryan Williams wrote:
> Just a little pet peeve I would like to ask about.
>
> Would it be possable to put an [amanda-users] in the subject of everything
> sent to the mailing list? I know that mailman is capable of this but I am
> not shure of the capabil
The alternative is to do what my local LUG does would be to add:
* X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/4749
(naturally amand-users wouldn't claim to be linuxsa :-P)
And filter on that...every now and then someone will send you something
directly and it will end up in the wrong b
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Ryan Williams wrote:
> Just a little pet peeve I would like to ask about.
And this request happens to be a pet peeve of mine.
> Would it be possable to put an [amanda-users] in the subject of everything
> sent to the mailing list? I know that mailman is capable of this bu
Just a little pet peeve I would like to ask about.
Would it be possable to put an [amanda-users] in the subject of everything
sent to the mailing list? I know that mailman is capable of this but I am
not shure of the capabilitys of majordomo.
Regards,
Ryan Williams
14 matches
Mail list logo
