Brian,
Maybe you defined the tape larger than it is?
Are you sure the tape can hold 80M of data?
Are you using hardware compression?
Jean-Louis
On 01/08/2014 09:13 AM, Brian Cuttler wrote:
I'm not sure I understand this tape usage... 18% plus 75% 100%, isn't it?
Amanda 3.3.0
Solaris
Jean-Louis,
Good question, especially as I badly misspoke.
The tape is not DLT IV, it is LTO IV, I used the standard
tape type definition, provided, as I would not have used
such a specific number.
define tapetype LTO4 {
comment Dell LTO4 800Gb - Compression Off
length 802816 mbytes
On 01/08/2014 10:47 AM, Brian Cuttler wrote:
Jean-Louis,
Good question, especially as I badly misspoke.
The tape is not DLT IV, it is LTO IV, I used the standard
tape type definition, provided, as I would not have used
such a specific number.
define tapetype LTO4 {
comment Dell LTO4 800Gb
Jean-Louis,
googled it... I had my numbers wrong, it can supposedly hold
800 Gig, and with HW compression up to 2x that. I should not
have to adjust the tape length and no reason (that I can see)
for dumps to take more than one tape.
Its odd that I'm not seeing an end of media error message...
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:18:46AM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
* Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org [20140108 11:09]:
Jean-Louis,
googled it... I had my numbers wrong, it can supposedly hold
800 Gig, and with HW compression up to 2x that. I should not
have to adjust the tape
* Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org [20140108 11:38]:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:18:46AM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
* Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org [20140108 11:09]:
Jean-Louis,
googled it... I had my numbers wrong, it can supposedly hold
800 Gig, and with HW
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:37:44AM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote:
...
The LTO is advertised as having block level decision making on
compression so that it doesn't expand the data, wonder if that
is not quite true.
My experience is limited to LTO-1, but I found amtapetype gave
'exactly' the
On Wednesday 08 January 2014 14:13:36 Jon LaBadie did opine:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:37:44AM -0500, Brian Cuttler wrote:
...
The LTO is advertised as having block level decision making on
compression so that it doesn't expand the data, wonder if that
is not quite true.
My
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 02:11:15PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 08 January 2014 13:13:43 Brian Cuttler did opine:
...
Also - Isn't there another level of tape header that needs to be
cleared? Isn't re-writing the tape with compression off a little
bit of a trick? If you don't
On Wednesday 08 January 2014 17:47:03 Jon LaBadie did opine:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 02:11:15PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 08 January 2014 13:13:43 Brian Cuttler did opine:
...
Also - Isn't there another level of tape header that needs to be
cleared? Isn't re-writing the
10 matches
Mail list logo
