Re: stream 0 accept failed: bad SECURITY line: ''

2013-04-18 Thread Brian Cuttler
I've been scratching my head over this, FW on the client looks ok to me. [root@www-stage ~]# /sbin/iptables -L | grep curie ACCEPT udp -- curieb.wadsworth.org anywhereudp spts:932:948 dpt:amanda ACCEPT tcp -- curieb.wadsworth.org anywheretcp

stream 0 accept failed: bad SECURITY line: ''

2013-04-12 Thread Brian Cuttler
3.146: received ACK pkt: amandad: time 33.146: stream_accept: timeout after 30 seconds amandad: time 33.146: stream 0 accept failed: bad SECURITY line: '' amandad: time 63.146: stream_accept: timeout after 30 seconds amandad: time 63.146: stream 1 accept failed: bad SECURITY line: '' amandad

Re: stream 0 accept failed: bad SECURITY line: ''

2013-04-12 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On 04/12/2013 11:52 AM, Brian Cuttler wrote: amandad: try_socksize: send buffer size is 65536 amandad: try_socksize: receive buffer size is 65536 amandad: time 3.128: bind_portrange2: trying port=831 amandad: time 3.129: stream_server: waiting for connection: 0.0.0.0.36507 amandad:

Re: stream 0 accept failed: bad SECURITY line: ''

2013-04-12 Thread Brian Cuttler
Jean-Louis, Yes, the ability to hit the socket makes sense, especially as amcheck is ok and amdump, which uses many more network resources, does not. I'm not seeing the failures I'd expect to see, which may simply mean I don't actually know what I'm looking for. The failure bad security is