Re: more with ADIC-1200 + SunOS 5.8 'sgen' driver and mtx problems

2001-04-09 Thread Craig Dewick
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Thomas Hepper wrote: Well, I've tried the 'sst' driver and it works only slightly better than the 'sgen' driver. With the 'sst' driver I can send as many 'mtx inquiry' commands as I like and they all work. What about "mtx -f /dev/rsst5 status"? No dice:

AW: Need help on recover

2001-04-09 Thread christian . weiss
Hi, I've got the same problem with my OnStream ADR50i (SCSI-Controller: AHA-2940U2W). /var/log/messages reports "sens key errors" and "timeouts". My data: Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 02 Lun: 00 Vendor: OnStream Model: ADR50 Drive Rev: 2.33 Type: Sequential-AccessANSI

Re: AW: AW: Need help on recover

2001-04-09 Thread Radu Filip
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I don't solve the problem, yet. - I slow down the Bus-Speed in the Controller-BIOS for the LVD-Connector from 40 to 20MB/sec. - With this change, the write-process (backup) now works - but restoring fails... Oh, I see. For me there was no

Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-09 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 9, 2001, Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 12:22:36PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Apr 9, 2001, Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's a patch that fixes the bug. Obviously, the last hunk is enough to fix the bug, but I'm

config failure with gcc

2001-04-09 Thread svr4
While installing on a linux system I got the following error: ... checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. The permissions look OK. # which gcc /usr/bin/gcc # ls

Re: amandaidx Linux other OS problem

2001-04-09 Thread John R. Jackson
Now the problem is for amrecover: from every work stations it is OK, but from linux do not work. I have upgraded Linux with amanda Version 2.4.2p1: no change but one problem more; ... I think both problems are fixed in 2.4.2p2. Paolo Patruno John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist,

Re: Error while running amdump or amcheck

2001-04-09 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 9, 2001, Yuri Desyatnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "/usr/local/etc/amanda/imediation_unix/amanda.conf", line 210: tape type parameter expected "/usr/local/etc/amanda/imediation_unix/amanda.conf", line 211: tape type parameter expected So, what do those lines contain? -- Alexandre

Re: config failure with gcc

2001-04-09 Thread John R. Jackson
While installing on a linux system I got the following error: ... checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot cre ate executables. Look in config.log. There will be more detail there about

Announcing Amanda 2.4.2, patch level 2

2001-04-09 Thread John R. Jackson
[ I sent this to amanda-announce last Friday, but there appears to be something wrong with that list. Apologies if you get duplicates. --JJ ] The Amanda core development team is pleased to announce the availability of patch level 2 of Amanda version 2.4.2 (amanda-2.4.2p2). It may be obtained

Re: amdump shows not enough diskspace

2001-04-09 Thread John R. Jackson
i am a newbie in amanda ... Welcome! and have installed amanda 2.4.2p2 sometime back ... U, I'm not sure how you did that since I just released 2.4.2p2 a few minutes ago. What version does (e.g.) amcheck say it is? After compilation and configuration , the amdump always complain

Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-09 Thread John R. Jackson
Could you try this patch on Tru64. This is probably a silly question, but did you try the patch on Linux? I was playing with this too and my version (functionally the same as yours, I think) put Linux back to trying to use /dev/root. Here's what I think is happening. Amanda is trying to

Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-09 Thread walterz
Hang on guys, I'm getting directions from a number of people here. Woe Nelly! The patch described below and the previous simple patch have not yet been applied to any of my systems. I have only done a basic make of getfsent and sent the un modified (or P2 distribution) results of getfsent

Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-09 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 07:32:43PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote: Could you try this patch on Tru64. This is probably a silly question, but did you try the patch on Linux? I was playing with this too and my version (functionally the same as yours, I think) put Linux back to trying to use

Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-09 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 11:00:06PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Apr 6, 2001, John R. Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The entry in the fstab looks good and looks like this on both machines: root_domain#root / advfs rw 1 0 That would seem to be reasonable. This was working

Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-09 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 9, 2001, Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's a patch that fixes the bug. Obviously, the last hunk is enough to fix the bug, but I'm posting exactly what I'm about to check in: 2.4.2 branch and mainline. But your patch break / for linux :-( You sure? It appears to

Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-09 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:03:00PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: Looks like we need an additional argument in search_fstab, say check_dev, and get amname_to_devname to call search_fstab first with check_dev == 1, so as to reject any entries whose device names don't exist, then, if none are