On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Thomas Hepper wrote:
Well, I've tried the 'sst' driver and it works only slightly better than
the 'sgen' driver. With the 'sst' driver I can send as many 'mtx inquiry'
commands as I like and they all work.
What about "mtx -f /dev/rsst5 status"?
No dice:
Hi,
I've got the same problem with my OnStream ADR50i (SCSI-Controller:
AHA-2940U2W). /var/log/messages reports "sens key errors" and "timeouts".
My data:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 02 Lun: 00
Vendor: OnStream Model: ADR50 Drive Rev: 2.33
Type: Sequential-AccessANSI
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I don't solve the problem, yet. - I slow down the Bus-Speed in the
Controller-BIOS for the LVD-Connector from 40 to 20MB/sec. - With this
change, the write-process (backup) now works - but restoring fails...
Oh, I see. For me there was no
On Apr 9, 2001, Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 12:22:36PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Apr 9, 2001, Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a patch that fixes the bug. Obviously, the last hunk is enough
to fix the bug, but I'm
While installing on a linux system I got the following error:
...
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create
executables.
The permissions look OK.
# which gcc
/usr/bin/gcc
# ls
Now the problem is for amrecover: from every work stations it is OK, but
from linux do not work.
I have upgraded Linux with amanda Version 2.4.2p1: no change but one
problem more; ...
I think both problems are fixed in 2.4.2p2.
Paolo Patruno
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist,
On Apr 9, 2001, Yuri Desyatnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"/usr/local/etc/amanda/imediation_unix/amanda.conf", line 210: tape type parameter
expected
"/usr/local/etc/amanda/imediation_unix/amanda.conf", line 211: tape type parameter
expected
So, what do those lines contain?
--
Alexandre
While installing on a linux system I got the following error:
...
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot cre
ate executables.
Look in config.log. There will be more detail there about
[ I sent this to amanda-announce last Friday, but there appears to be
something wrong with that list. Apologies if you get duplicates. --JJ ]
The Amanda core development team is pleased to announce the availability
of patch level 2 of Amanda version 2.4.2 (amanda-2.4.2p2). It may be
obtained
i am a newbie in amanda ...
Welcome!
and have installed amanda 2.4.2p2 sometime back ...
U, I'm not sure how you did that since I just released 2.4.2p2 a
few minutes ago. What version does (e.g.) amcheck say it is?
After compilation and configuration , the amdump always complain
Could you try this patch on Tru64.
This is probably a silly question, but did you try the patch on Linux?
I was playing with this too and my version (functionally the same as
yours, I think) put Linux back to trying to use /dev/root.
Here's what I think is happening. Amanda is trying to
Hang on guys,
I'm getting directions from a number of people here. Woe Nelly!
The patch described below and the previous simple patch have not yet been
applied to any of my systems.
I have only done a basic make of getfsent and sent the un modified (or P2
distribution) results of getfsent
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 07:32:43PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote:
Could you try this patch on Tru64.
This is probably a silly question, but did you try the patch on Linux?
I was playing with this too and my version (functionally the same as
yours, I think) put Linux back to trying to use
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 11:00:06PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Apr 6, 2001, John R. Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The entry in the fstab looks good and looks like this on both
machines:
root_domain#root / advfs rw 1 0
That would seem to be reasonable.
This was working
On Apr 9, 2001, Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a patch that fixes the bug. Obviously, the last hunk is enough
to fix the bug, but I'm posting exactly what I'm about to check in:
2.4.2 branch and mainline.
But your patch break / for linux :-(
You sure? It appears to
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:03:00PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Looks like we need an additional argument in search_fstab, say
check_dev, and get amname_to_devname to call search_fstab first with
check_dev == 1, so as to reject any entries whose device names don't
exist, then, if none are
16 matches
Mail list logo