Re: config failure with gcc

2001-04-10 Thread Harri Haataja
On 9 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While installing on a linux system I got the following error: ... checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. The

Re: timed out

2001-04-10 Thread Rob Flory
amandad: debug 1 pid 14470 ruid 50 euid 50 start time Mon Apr 9 19:54:21 2001 amandad: pid 14470 finish time Mon Apr 9 22:07:40 2001 The strange thing is that this client has been working fine for months in the past and is now suddenely failing daily. Suggestions? Thanks, Rob Alexandre

Amanda 2.2.6, not using spool area

2001-04-10 Thread Brian Cuttler
We are seeing a fairly recent problem with some of our amanda installation (we have 11 different amanda jobs each night using from 2.2.6 to 4.2.x). We have some partitions that amanda is running "direct to tape" rather than via the spool area even though we have sufficient spool space.

Newbie's question ...

2001-04-10 Thread Do-Risika RAFIEFERANSTIARONJY
Hello, I tested an amdump run manually, it was too long and I stopped the process, I ran the amcleanup and I had the report below. Can someone tell me what are the problem ? Thanks. Sambot Root wrote: *** THE DUMPS DID NOT FINISH PROPERLY! These dumps were to tape DailySet1001.

Re: timed out

2001-04-10 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 10, 2001, Rob Flory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: amandad: debug 1 pid 14470 ruid 50 euid 50 start time Mon Apr 9 19:54:21 2001 amandad: pid 14470 finish time Mon Apr 9 22:07:40 2001 Bump etimeout to 9000 seconds or so. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see

Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-10 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 9, 2001, Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:03:00PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: Looks like we need an additional argument in search_fstab, say check_dev, and get amname_to_devname to call search_fstab first with check_dev == 1, so as to reject

Re: Amanda 2.2.6, not using spool area

2001-04-10 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 10, 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Cuttler) wrote: Wondering if this isn't a "feature" of 2.2.6 and a must upgrade for performance issue at our site. The smaller problem partition is only 4 gig, the larger in excess of 18, both partitions continue to grow. I'm afraid you'll have to

Re: Amanda 2.2.6, not using spool area

2001-04-10 Thread Brian Cuttler
Paul, Actually both amanda hosts are Solaris 5.6, one machine is its own and only client, the other is its own client but also has both solaris and irix clients. In both cases its a local file system with the problem. In both cases output is to a local DLT drive. Establishing chunksize as a

Re: Amanda 2.2.6, not using spool area

2001-04-10 Thread Brian Cuttler
Thank you. Paul Bort had the same thought. I'd thought we'd exceeded the 2 gig barrier long ago - perhaps that was only on some of the newer version amanda servers. Thank you both - will schedule an upgrade to both amanda systems. Oh - which release do you recommend. We don't need the latest

Re: config failure with gcc

2001-04-10 Thread Dan Wilder
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 10:10:57AM +0300, Harri Haataja wrote: On 9 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While installing on a linux system I got the following error: ... checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no configure: error: installation or

amrecover

2001-04-10 Thread Joseph T. McDonald
can't get amrecover to run... run as amanda says must run as root... run as root says i'm not allowed to access as amanda from root, amandahostauth problem.. maybe someone will know something aboutthis, it kinda has me in a bind cause i need this recover badly Joe

RE: amrecover

2001-04-10 Thread Bort, Paul
Each of your amanda clients has a file which lists the users and servers that can access that client for backups and restores. You need to add the root user. It will be in the home directory of the amanda user. For example, mine is /home/amanda/.amandahosts, and looks like:

Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
The patch works for me, what's your /proc/mounts and /etc/mtab entry? /proc/mounts: /dev/root / ext2 rw 0 0 /etc/mtab: /dev/hda1 / ext2 rw 0 0 /etc/fstab: LABEL=/ / ext2 defaults 1 1 ./getfsent /: device of `/': /dev/root dirname of `/': / fstype of `/': ext2 ./selfcheck:

Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
Hang on guys, I'm getting directions from a number of people here. Woe Nelly! Yeah, this got a little confusing. Sorry 'bout that. My advice is to wait for Alexandre, Jean-Louis and I to stop publicly arguing with each other :-) and come to an agreement on the fix. Then I'll put together a

Re: Amanda 2.2.6, not using spool area

2001-04-10 Thread Brian Cuttler
I'm attempting to build Amanda 2.4.2p2 on Solaris 5.6 and finding the following... [newton] /local/source/etc/amanda/amanda-2.4.2p2 43 ./configure --with-user=bin --with-group=sys which seems to run to completion (we have notes from previous installation that talk about the --disable-libtool

Re: Newbie's question ...

2001-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
I tested an amdump run manually, it was too long and I stopped the process, I ran the amcleanup and I had the report below. Can someone tell me what are the problem ? This problem: 192.168.10 /home/dourix lev 0 FAILED [192.168.10.10: [addr 192.168.10.10: hostname lookup failed] says that

Re: Problem

2001-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
Hi, I'm having trouble with amanda. Recently it started to send me emails dated "BogusMonth" and containing the "RESULTS MISSING" error. That probably says amreport cannot read the log file. What happens when you run amcheck? Looking at the logfile directive in amanda.conf, and then looking at

Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-10 Thread Jean-Louis Martineau
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 01:48:13PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote: I'm not sure why you asked about /etc/mtab. While it has the right value, we don't look at it in Amanda (which might be the real problem). We look at /proc/mounts (which has the wrong /dev value) and MNTTAB, which is

Re: Amanda 2.2.6, not using spool area

2001-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
I'm attempting to build Amanda 2.4.2p2 on Solaris 5.6 and finding the following... output ending with... checking whether lockf locking works... (cached) no checking whether lnlock locking works... (cached) no configure: warning: *** No working file locking capability found! configure: warning:

Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
I have /dev/hda1 in /etc/fstab. Ahh, I see. So you cheated. :-) :-) Try this patch, It look at MOUNTED before MNTTAB. Looks good to me. Alexandre, can you give this a try on Tru64? If it works for you, then I'll put together a single patch for Walter to try, and if that works, Jean-Louis

can't get past amcheck

2001-04-10 Thread Andrew Falanga
Ok, everyone, sorry to bother again. Anyway, I've been working on this for a while (taken a back seat over the last couple of days) anyway, every time I run amcheck I get selfcheck request timed out: host down. However, it's not because it's the tape host or the server. What am I missing?

Re: can't get past amcheck

2001-04-10 Thread John R. Jackson
... every time I run amcheck I get selfcheck request timed out: host down. However, it's not because it's the tape host or the server. What am I missing? This is a very common problem and the FAQ (www.amanda.org) has quite a bit on it. Have you gone through those steps? If it doesn't help,

Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-10 Thread walterz
Hang on guys, I'm getting directions from a number of people here. Woe Nelly! Yeah, this got a little confusing. Sorry 'bout that. My advice is to wait for Alexandre, Jean-Louis and I to stop publicly arguing with each other :-) and come to an agreement on the fix. Then I'll put

Re: LSM - Logical Storage Manager Drives

2001-04-10 Thread walterz
Hang on guys, I'm getting directions from a number of people here. Woe Nelly! Yeah, this got a little confusing. Sorry 'bout that. My advice is to wait for Alexandre, Jean-Louis and I to stop publicly arguing with each other :-) and come to an agreement on the fix. Then