02, 2002 02:38:25 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi :-)
I am trying to install Amanda 2.4.2 on my SuSE 7.2 Linux with kernel 2.4.18
but got stopped right away when running ./configure --with-user=amanda
--with-group=disk.
It tells me:
Checking in readline in -lreadline--- (cached
On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 13:07, Moritz Both wrote:
Hi,
actually yes. I have. I did restore some backups a while ago, but it
_could_ be that the Tape drive was connected to a Sym53c875. I
experience exactly the same problem that you describe at the moment (on
an Adaptec UW controller). I currently
Henning,
have you ever been able to actually *restore* files from amanda tapes
using this device? Which is the firmware verison it has?
See also my email on the list from half an hour ago.
Greetings,
Moritz
I'm having trouble compiling Amanda on HPUX 11. I've
tried the hints in the archive and installed gcc,
binutils, flex, readline, etc. but I'm still getting
the following compile error:
Making all in common-src
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../config
-I./../regex-src
On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 00:35, I wrote:
I will verify this theory tonight with an acid test: An Amanda run
(amdump/amverify) on a freshly erased (and labeled) tape _should_
succeed. I'll tell you in the morning. :-)
Hi,
here are my results. Unfortunately, they're not too good:
amverify adr
On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 13:07, Moritz Both wrote:
Hi,
actually yes. I have. I did restore some backups a while ago, but it
_could_ be that the Tape drive was connected to a Sym53c875. I
experience exactly the same problem that you describe at the moment (on
an Adaptec UW controller). I currently
On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 13:07, Moritz Both wrote:
Henning,
have you ever been able to actually *restore* files from amanda tapes
using this device? Which is the firmware verison it has?
Hi,
[ There is a remotely Amanda specific reference much further below. But
as some Amanda people seem
Hi,
I run backups with Amanda and anq Onstream ADR 50e tape (external
version, SCSI LVD) since about a year without any visible problems.
I know about the mt -f /dev/nst0 stoptions scsi2log trick for this
drive and while I wasn't able to find any explanation what this
command actually does, I
Dear Amanda Team,
#
define dumptype ordix-full {
global
program GNUTAR
comment Komplettsicherung Obelix
comprate 0.50, 0.50
index yes
strategy noinc
}
##
After we made several backups, I ran a test recovery
Dear Amanda Team,
#
define dumptype ordix-full {
global
program GNUTAR
comment Komplettsicherung Obelix
comprate 0.50, 0.50
index yes
strategy noinc
}
##
After we made several backups, I ran a test recovery
[ I sent this to amanda-announce last Friday, but there appears to be
something wrong with that list. Apologies if you get duplicates. --JJ ]
The Amanda core development team is pleased to announce the availability
of patch level 2 of Amanda version 2.4.2 (amanda-2.4.2p2). It may be
obtained
Tue Jan 30 0:04:03 2001: enter: getTapeParams
Tue Jan 30 0:04:03 2001: running: /bin/chio -f /dev/null params
I don't know much about chio, but passing /dev/null to it seems like a
bad idea. That comes from "changerdev" in amanda.conf. Are you sure
that parameter didn't get dinged in the
Hi,
I have decided to upgrade amanada 2.4.1p1 to 2.4.2
When I try to do a make command I get the following error:
make: don't know how to make amoverview. Stop
*** Error code 1
I seem to recal that it needs gnu make. Is this correct, and where can I
get a copy?
I am runing it on a freebsd
I am runing it on a freebsd 4.2-Release
On my openbsd box I see gmake in my ports tree here.
(bhyatt)@kawasaki:/usr/ports/devel/gmake:[115]
HTH
-Ben
Clem Kumah
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Administrator / Teamleader
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:02:38 +
From: Clem Kumah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have decided to upgrade amanada 2.4.1p1 to 2.4.2
When I try to do a make command I get the following error:
make: don't know how to make amoverview. Stop
*** Error code 1
I seem to recal that it needs gnu make. Is this
From: "Patrick M. Hausen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:49:46 +0100 (CET)
Doesn't installing Amanda from /usr/ports/misc/amanda24 work for you?
I started with amanda from "ports" back in '98, but it became rather too
awkward to ensure that the Solaris boxen also had amanda
I have decided to upgrade amanada 2.4.1p1 to 2.4.2
Version 2.4.2p1 has been released and you should probably use it.
There is at least one fairly important bug fix.
Clem Kumah[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist,
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, John R. Jackson wrote:
I've had a problem writing tapes on my amanda tape server. While I have
a work-around, I thought I'd mention it here to see if anyone has any
ideas how to solve it.
U, why are you telling us about a kernel problem (and I agree that's
what it
2. To see if I can get any suggestions why the FIRST file header is
different from the rest of the file headers ...
There isn't any difference that I know of. Here's the sequence of events
(in taper), unless I goofed following the code path:
* open O_RDONLY
* rewind
* read 32 KBytes
On Dec 6, 2000, "Terry Rossi" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did `make all' create common-src/libamanda.la?
Yes it did.
And how about common-src/.libs/libamanda.lai?
Yes it did.
On Dec 6, 2000, "Terry Rossi" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 6, 2000, "Terry Rossi" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did `make all' create common-src/libamanda.la?
Yes it did.
And how about common-src/.libs/libamanda.lai?
Yes it did.
And then `make install' complained about its
I see from the readme file that amanda was not tested on HP-UX 11.00.
That file probably has not been updated for ages. Don't take the lack
of a reference to mean it hasn't been done.
Has anyone ever gotten this to work under 11.00 or should I give up?
Do I take it from this you're having
Error exit code 1
Stop.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John R. Jackson
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 3:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Amanda 2.4.2 and HP-UX 11.00
I see from the readme file t
On Dec 5, 2000, "Terry Rossi" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John and the list, sorry for the HTML. The current problem I
am having is with the "make install" as follows:
Did `make all' create common-src/libamanda.la?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Yes it did. Permissions are wide open, the make was done as root.
Did `make all' create common-src/libamanda.la?
etter", and then recompiling.
Thanks,
Dylan
- Original Message -
From: "John R. Jackson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Dylan Casey" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: missing result in amanda 2.4.2
... So, I downloaded 2.
Hi,
Thanks for the help. I removed 2.4.1p1 and installed 2.4.2 again. I had to
do a couple of tries on the configuring, but eventually got it to work.
The last problem was finding out that I had to put in the amandates file.
Once I did that, everthing worked just fine with gnu tar (dump still
Once I did that, everthing worked just fine with gnu tar ...
Glad to hear it.
(dump still doesn't work with the big disk).
What do you mean?
If you're using Linux, make sure you get the latest version of dump
from SourceForge. It's maintanence was nil for a long time and it had
serious
I am running Linux. I have a dump 0.4b9-1 ...
As I recall, that's **way** too old.
... Before I go to the work of installing it, are
there good reasons to prefer dump to gnu-tar or vice versa?
Oh, no. Here we go on this subject again :-).
Yes, there are reasons. But for every one side A
--- "John R. Jackson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running Linux. I have a dump 0.4b9-1 ...
As I recall, that's **way** too old.
... Before I go to the work of installing it, are
there good reasons to prefer dump to gnu-tar or vice versa?
Oh, no. Here we go on this subject again
On Nov 29, 2000, Randolph Cordell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Tar --atime-preserve" But I do remember this keeps tar from
changing the last-access time of files as it backs them up.
Which forces it to change the inode update time, that makes each file
seem out-of-date on the next run.
This
The Amanda core team is pleased to announce the release of Amanda
2.4.2. It fixe a many bugs and have many new feature since
amanda-2.4.1p1.
Excellent!
Question: If I update the host, do I also have to update the rest of them?
I ask, because I have several OSs working together here
On Nov 27, 2000, Eric Wadsworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question: If I update the host, do I also have to update the rest of them?
Nope. The Amanda protocol has remained unchanged since release 2.4.0.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC
Question: If I update the host, do I also have to update the rest of them?
No (I don't think so). As far as I recall, everything past 2.4.0b4 is
compatible between client and server. I think I even had a couple of
clients I forgot to update for several weeks when I went to 2.4.2 and
they were
Hi,
We've been using Amanda (2.4.1p1) for our backups for about a year now,
with great success. Last week, I replaced the user disk containing the
home areas with a new 36 Gig disk. All the mount points are the same,
it's just the disk that's different. On the very next backup run, the
backup
... So, I downloaded 2.4.2, and after some
stuggling with the configure command, got it setup. amcheck runs fine,
but now _none_ of the disks get backed up! Here are the errors:
...
What's in /tmp/amanda/sendsize*debug and amandad*debug on ettin?
Dylan Casey
John R. Jackson, Technical Software
The Amanda core team is pleased to announce the release of Amanda
2.4.2. It fixe a many bugs and have many new feature since
amanda-2.4.1p1.
It can be dowloaded from http://www.amanda.org/
Here's a list of the changes for release 2.4.2 (from the NEWS file):
Look at the ChangeLog file for more
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
The Amanda core team is pleased to announce the release of Amanda
2.4.2. It fixe a many bugs and have many new feature since
amanda-2.4.1p1.
Just when I upgraded to the 2.4.2 beta on the site :^)
* --with-samba-user is deprecated
Can someone help
I have install amanda-2.4.2-19991216-beta1 on Freebsd 4.1-RELEASE
when I rum amcheck I get the following error:
access as backup not allowed from [EMAIL PROTECTED]] amandahostsauth
failed
I have gone through the faq and have not come across anyt mistake. I
already have
I have install amanda-2.4.2-19991216-beta1 on Freebsd 4.1-RELEASE
I would have grabbed the latest CVS sources. I know there have been
some fixes since that snapshot. See the FAQ for instructions if you're
not familiar with how to do this.
when I rum amcheck I get the following error:
access
that seems to be it ... compiled through cleanly thsi time, thanks :)
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 01:07:57PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
On 26 Oct 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Oct 26, 2000, The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
41 matches
Mail list logo
