Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I keep seeing spam messages with negative scores, like this:
No, score=-0.317 tagged_above=-1.99 required=4.01
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.708,
HTML_30_40=0.374, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.001,
Gary V wrote:
It's sad, but we are at war with the spammers and the virus writers
and the adware companies and the hackers and the spyware writers.
Their tactics change on a daily basis, and so must ours. War often
requires effort, sorry.
I know that. Which is why I keep pointing out that
Matthias Andree wrote:
Take this with a grain of salt, I'm biased (being the bogofilter
co-maintainer):
IMHO the SpamAssassin Bayes stuff should be disabled -- for various reasons:
1. is that it causes a major performance issue, even on lightly loaded
Pentium D and Xeon 2.8 equipped
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 09:58:49AM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
Matthias Andree wrote:
Take this with a grain of salt, I'm biased (being the bogofilter
co-maintainer):
IMHO the SpamAssassin Bayes stuff should be disabled -- for various reasons:
1. is that it causes a major performance
Jo wrote:
Gary V wrote:
It's sad, but we are at war with the spammers and the virus writers
and the adware companies and the hackers and the spyware writers.
Their tactics change on a daily basis, and so must ours. War often
requires effort, sorry.
I know that. Which is why I keep
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Gerald Dachs wrote:
Hello,
..snip.
Received: from [192.168.99.27] (unknown [192.168.99.27])
by server.dachsweb.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1F3C480F0
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 6 Oct 2006 10:42:08 +0200 (CEST)
...
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.648
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Andrea Bencini wrote:
I install postfix and amavisd-new-2.4.1-2
I would like to put in amavisd.conf this policy_bank
$policy_bank{'FET'} = {
warnvirusrecip = 1,
final_virus_destiny = D_BOUNCE,
};
but in my log I receive this message:
amavis[4224]: (!) loading
I was troubleshooting SQL based AWL and was about to clear it out and
start over, and did a 'select * from awl\g' and found several addresses
with the 'username' of GLOBAL.
(411)
And 158521 with username 'vscan' (the name of the process I run
amavisd-new user as)
Where did the 411 'GLOBAL' names
