On Fri, May 4, 2007 21:32, Anders Norrbring wrote:
> This is a cause of confusion for me...
> I'm using Amavis-new 2.4.5 and SpamAssassin 3.2.0 with the MySQL backend
> for AWL etc..
dont use it for whitelist, since awl is not really a whitelist but a score
awarager
> What if I want to add domai
On 5/10/07, Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi There, We are running NOD32 on Debian Linux (sarge). We are using
> amavis-new (standard debian sarge package) to do the scanning of mail
> as it comes into our mail-gateway (postfix). We are having a
> configuration issue with amavis-new and nod32.
Hi There, We are running NOD32 on Debian Linux (sarge). We are using
amavis-new (standard debian sarge package) to do the scanning of mail
as it comes into our mail-gateway (postfix). We are having a
configuration issue with amavis-new and nod32. This is the output of
the mail.log file and the amav
On May 9, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
>> I'm sorry for jumping in, but I have a question about this. Is it
>> possible to configure amavis to do *both*...i.e., send caught spam to
>> the local quarantine directory, as well as send a copy of it to a
>> configurable email address?
>
> Pos
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dylan
Bouterse
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 7:43 PM
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] processing times
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary V
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 4:51 PM
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] processing times
Dylan wrote:
> SA check: 223 (43%)
> SA check: 5748 (95%)
OK, so you know it's
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary V
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 4:51 PM
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] processing times
Dylan wrote:
> SA check: 223 (43%)
> SA check: 5748 (95%)
OK, so you know it's
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary V
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 4:51 PM
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] processing times
Dylan wrote:
> SA check: 223 (43%)
> SA check: 5748 (95%)
OK, so you know it's
Dylan Bouterse wrote:
> -Original Message-
> Dylan Bouterse wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> I think you're on to something. I changed my local tests to 1 and my
> times have come down to reasonable values ranging from sub 1000ms to 4
> or 5 which I expect and have on my other non Maia system. My ques
> -Original Message-
> Dylan wrote:
>
> > SA check: 223 (43%)
>
> > SA check: 5748 (95%)
>
> OK, so you know it's spamassassin network tests. Grab a test
> message and feed it to spamassassin in debug mode and pipe it
> through a perl function that Mark mentions:
>
>
> One thing tha
Dylan wrote:
> SA check: 223 (43%)
> SA check: 5748 (95%)
OK, so you know it's spamassassin network tests. Grab a test message
and feed it to spamassassin in debug mode and pipe it through a perl
function that Mark mentions:
su amavis -c 'spamassassin -D < email.txt 2>&1' | timestamp
where tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary V
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 2:52 PM
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] processing times
Dylan wrote:
> Gary,
> Thank you for the reply/suggestions. I had the logging o
Dylan wrote:
> Gary,
> Thank you for the reply/suggestions. I had the logging on 2 and changed
> it to 3 then 4 but could not really see anything that pointed out what
> was taking the most time to process besides looking at the log entry
> time for each. As for mysql traffic, there isn't a WHOLE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy
Laidman
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 10:12 AM
Cc: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] processing times
Dylan Bouterse wrote:
> Where I would usually get sub 1000ms process
> t
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary V
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 9:58 AM
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] processing times
Dylan wrote:
> I have been running postfix/amavisd for some time now and recentl
Jeremy wrote:
> Dylan Bouterse wrote:
>> Where I would usually get sub 1000ms process
>> times, I'm seeing times in excess of 6000ms on a regular basis.
> Smells like a network issue. Try setting $sa_local_tests_only to 1 and see if
> the time drops.
Certainly it will. The question is, was $sa_
Dan,
> I've been poking through the code lately, and looks like most of the
> code is in there to quarantine messages based on size, but it doesn't
> appear to be completely "done". I've got a client specifically asking
> about this and so was curious what it might take to finish this up.
> Ideas
Dylan Bouterse wrote:
> Where I would usually get sub 1000ms process
> times, I'm seeing times in excess of 6000ms on a regular basis.
Smells like a network issue. Try setting $sa_local_tests_only to 1 and see if
the time drops.
--
Dylan wrote:
> I have been running postfix/amavisd for some time now and recently
> switched one of my servers over to the Maia installation. I like the
> setup and most everything seems to be working great, except my amavis
> processing times are much higher than I am used to with a standard
> po
Teodor,
> How can I put in the notify_virus_recips_templ the body of the original
> message?
Use defanging instead of recipient notifications:
$defang_virus = 1;
$final_virus_destiny = D_PASS;
It will push the original infected message to an attachment,
and prepend some warning text.
It is
Teodor,
> I need to modify the notification email send by amavis when a banned file
> name is detected. Specifically, I need to customize the content of the %F
> variable, because is too verbose and confuzing our users :)
>
> A tipically message for banned file graph.zip shows:
> banned name: mult
>> I'm sorry for jumping in, but I have a question about this. Is it
>> possible to configure amavis to do *both*...i.e., send caught spam to
>> the local quarantine directory, as well as send a copy of it to a
>> configurable email address?
>Possible. Do the quarantining as usual (e.g. to a file
Dave,
> I'm sorry for jumping in, but I have a question about this. Is it
> possible to configure amavis to do *both*...i.e., send caught spam to
> the local quarantine directory, as well as send a copy of it to a
> configurable email address?
Possible. Do the quarantining as usual (e.g. to a fi
I have been running postfix/amavisd for some time now and recently
switched one of my servers over to the Maia installation. I like the
setup and most everything seems to be working great, except my amavis
processing times are much higher than I am used to with a standard
postfix/amavisd setup. Whe
Mauro,
> The reasoning goes like this: we do all our alias- and
> list-expansion before calling the spamfilters to handle the
> inabilities of some of our mailfilters (not all are as flexible as
> AMaViS) and particularly to have per-user-filtering even on
> our lists. So when AMaViS gets the mail
Hi list, hi everyone else
I'm playing with the idea to change the way spamassassin is
called by AMaViS and I'm looking for feedback about the idea.
Hopefully it is not too stupid.
The reasoning goes like this: we do all our alias- and
list-expansion before calling the spamfilters to handle the
in
Matthias,
> Is it possilble to change quarantine-settings for "file-naming" of
> quarantined items and where do i have to do this?
> new format:
> /var/lib/amavis/virusmails/spam-zhUP2pIl4N2X.gz
> old format:
> /spam-57db2a646a8cd015efbfbae443b997c6-20060926-200024-32648-02.gz
> I wrote a script
27 matches
Mail list logo
