[AMaViS-user] Spam Scoring

2009-03-20 Thread Carlos Williams
I have Amavisd-new installed and configured however I am trying to understand how it works. It appears to be scoring my incoming messages like SpamAssassin would however it appears I have SA installed but not running: This is fine however when I get a message, I do see in the headers that someone

Re: [AMaViS-user] Spam Scoring

2009-03-20 Thread Michael Scheidell
$sa_spam_subject_tag = '***SPAM*** '; $sa_tag_level_deflt = 2.0; # add spam info headers if at, or above that level $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 6.31; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level $sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.31; # triggers spam evasive actions $sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 10; # spam

Re: [AMaViS-user] Spam Scoring

2009-03-20 Thread Carlos Williams
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Michael Scheidell scheid...@secnap.net wrote: Final destination set for pass? This does not make sense to me. Can you be more specific? Am I missing this parameter in the config file I am looking at? Does that go somewhere else in the /etc/amavis/conf.d file?

Re: [AMaViS-user] Spam Scoring

2009-03-20 Thread Carlos Williams
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Alexander Wirt formo...@formorer.de wrote: See 20-debian_defaults $final_virus_destiny      = D_DISCARD;  # (data not lost, see virus quarantine) $final_banned_destiny     = D_BOUNCE;   # D_REJECT when front-end MTA $final_spam_destiny       = D_BOUNCE;

Re: [AMaViS-user] Spam Scoring

2009-03-20 Thread Alexander Wirt
Carlos Williams schrieb am Friday, den 20. March 2009: On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Michael Scheidell scheid...@secnap.net wrote: Final destination set for pass? This does not make sense to me. Can you be more specific? Am I missing this parameter in the config file I am looking at?

Re: [AMaViS-user] AMBOOST, autolearn ham, shortcircuit rule

2009-03-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Michael, wondering if the AMBOOST value is used when deciding if SA will autolearn as ham: x-Spam-Score: -100.484 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AM:BOOST=-97.611, AWL=0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, DCC_REPUT_13_19=-0.5,

Re: [AMaViS-user] spamassassin AWL or penpals

2009-03-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Stan, What is better : AWL in spamassassin or penpals in amavis or both? What is your opininion? These are quite different mechanisms, it's hard to compare their merits. AWL is just an averaging mechanism, penpals can rescue a mail (a reply) in an ongoing conversation. Besides, the SQL log

Re: [AMaViS-user] rw_loop: leaving rw loop, no progress

2009-03-20 Thread Doskochynskyi Ivan
Hello Mark, For insight into what is happening, a tcpdump of the failing session would be interesting (tcpdump -i lo0 -s 0 -w c.log 'tcp port 10025'), and/or a log at level 5, especially all the 'rw_loop' log entries and a few events before that, along with timestamps. Seeing that packet

Re: [AMaViS-user] rw_loop: leaving rw loop, no progress

2009-03-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Ivan, This is log in attached files Thanks, interesting and strange. I'll CC this to the Postfix mailing list, in case someone can provide an explanation. I have problem with amavisd-new. My system: FreeBSD 5.4, postfix-2.3.14, amavisd-new-2.6.2_2, p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.5 For each

[AMaViS-user] pen pal feature: LOCAL or not LOCAL

2009-03-20 Thread Thomas Mueller
Hi i'm trying to activate the pen pals / bounce killer feature. i'm using amavisd-new 2.6.2 on debian lenny. i configured storage_sql_dsn for logging. lookup is done in ldap. Full configuration here: http://pastebin.com/m45149835 i've configured a policybank SMTP and Submission. Postfix will

Re: [AMaViS-user] pen pal feature: LOCAL or not LOCAL

2009-03-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Thomas, i'm trying to activate the pen pals / bounce killer feature. i'm using amavisd-new 2.6.2 on debian lenny. i configured storage_sql_dsn for logging. lookup is done in ldap. Full configuration here: http://pastebin.com/m45149835 i've configured a policybank SMTP and Submission.

Re: [AMaViS-user] Spam Scoring

2009-03-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Carlos, how do I reject messages that have a high score of something like '5'? X-Spam-Score: 11.543 $sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.31; $final_spam_destiny = D_BOUNCE; Yes, that should suffice. To block a message, $final_spam_destiny must not be D_PASS, score must be above kill level, and

[AMaViS-user] not seeing stars in

2009-03-20 Thread Goodman, William
Hi all, Has any body have the configuration setting to show the stars in the X-Spam-Level:, is the setting in spamassassin or postfix. I running postfix, ClamAV and Spamassassin all current versions. see snippet below: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jcvi.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score:

Re: [AMaViS-user] not seeing stars in

2009-03-20 Thread Gary V
On 3/20/09, Goodman, William wgood...@jcvi.org wrote: Hi all, Has any body have the configuration setting to show the stars in the X-Spam-Level:, is the setting in spamassassin or postfix. I running postfix, ClamAV and Spamassassin  all current versions. see snippet below: X-Virus-Scanned:

Re: [AMaViS-user] pen pal feature: LOCAL or not LOCAL

2009-03-20 Thread Mark Martinec
Thomas, i'm trying to activate the pen pals / bounce killer feature. P.S., with amavisd-new-2.6.2 please apply the patch: http://marc.info/?l=amavis-userm=123249133113408 when implementing SQL logging / pen pals, otherwise referencing by Message-ID gives incorrect results. (unless a

Re: [AMaViS-user] rw_loop: leaving rw loop, no progress

2009-03-20 Thread Gary V
smtp inet n - n - 5 smtpd smtp-amavis unix - - n - 5 smtp -o smtp_data_done_timeout=1200 -o smtp_send_xforward_command=yes -o disable_dns_lookups=yes -o max_use=20 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n -