I have Amavisd-new installed and configured however I am trying to
understand how it works. It appears to be scoring my incoming messages
like SpamAssassin would however it appears I have SA installed but not
running:
This is fine however when I get a message, I do see in the headers
that someone
$sa_spam_subject_tag = '***SPAM*** ';
$sa_tag_level_deflt = 2.0; # add spam info headers if at, or above that
level
$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 6.31; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level
$sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.31; # triggers spam evasive actions
$sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 10; # spam
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Michael Scheidell scheid...@secnap.net wrote:
Final destination set for pass?
This does not make sense to me. Can you be more specific? Am I missing
this parameter in the config file I am looking at? Does that go
somewhere else in
the /etc/amavis/conf.d file?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Alexander Wirt formo...@formorer.de wrote:
See 20-debian_defaults
$final_virus_destiny = D_DISCARD; # (data not lost, see virus
quarantine)
$final_banned_destiny = D_BOUNCE; # D_REJECT when front-end MTA
$final_spam_destiny = D_BOUNCE;
Carlos Williams schrieb am Friday, den 20. March 2009:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Michael Scheidell scheid...@secnap.net
wrote:
Final destination set for pass?
This does not make sense to me. Can you be more specific? Am I missing
this parameter in the config file I am looking at?
Michael,
wondering if the AMBOOST value is used when deciding if SA will
autolearn as ham:
x-Spam-Score: -100.484
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[AM:BOOST=-97.611, AWL=0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599,
DCC_REPUT_13_19=-0.5,
Stan,
What is better : AWL in spamassassin or penpals in amavis or both?
What is your opininion?
These are quite different mechanisms, it's hard to compare their merits.
AWL is just an averaging mechanism, penpals can rescue a mail (a reply)
in an ongoing conversation. Besides, the SQL log
Hello Mark,
For insight into what is happening, a tcpdump of the failing session would
be interesting (tcpdump -i lo0 -s 0 -w c.log 'tcp port 10025'), and/or
a log at level 5, especially all the 'rw_loop' log entries and a few
events before that, along with timestamps.
Seeing that packet
Ivan,
This is log in attached files
Thanks, interesting and strange.
I'll CC this to the Postfix mailing list,
in case someone can provide an explanation.
I have problem with amavisd-new.
My system: FreeBSD 5.4, postfix-2.3.14, amavisd-new-2.6.2_2,
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.5
For each
Hi
i'm trying to activate the pen pals / bounce killer feature.
i'm using amavisd-new 2.6.2 on debian lenny. i configured storage_sql_dsn
for logging. lookup is done in ldap. Full configuration here:
http://pastebin.com/m45149835
i've configured a policybank SMTP and Submission. Postfix will
Thomas,
i'm trying to activate the pen pals / bounce killer feature.
i'm using amavisd-new 2.6.2 on debian lenny. i configured storage_sql_dsn
for logging. lookup is done in ldap. Full configuration here:
http://pastebin.com/m45149835
i've configured a policybank SMTP and Submission.
Carlos,
how do I reject messages that have a high score of something like '5'?
X-Spam-Score: 11.543
$sa_kill_level_deflt = 6.31;
$final_spam_destiny = D_BOUNCE;
Yes, that should suffice. To block a message, $final_spam_destiny must
not be D_PASS, score must be above kill level, and
Hi all,
Has any body have the configuration setting to show the stars in the
X-Spam-Level:, is the setting in spamassassin
or postfix. I running postfix, ClamAV and Spamassassin all current
versions. see snippet below:
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jcvi.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score:
On 3/20/09, Goodman, William wgood...@jcvi.org wrote:
Hi all,
Has any body have the configuration setting to show the stars in the
X-Spam-Level:, is the setting in spamassassin
or postfix. I running postfix, ClamAV and Spamassassin all current
versions. see snippet below:
X-Virus-Scanned:
Thomas,
i'm trying to activate the pen pals / bounce killer feature.
P.S.,
with amavisd-new-2.6.2 please apply the patch:
http://marc.info/?l=amavis-userm=123249133113408
when implementing SQL logging / pen pals, otherwise referencing
by Message-ID gives incorrect results.
(unless a
smtp inet n - n - 5 smtpd
smtp-amavis unix - - n - 5 smtp
-o smtp_data_done_timeout=1200
-o smtp_send_xforward_command=yes
-o disable_dns_lookups=yes
-o max_use=20
127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n -
16 matches
Mail list logo