against BDB 5.1. You need to upgrade the BDB database to 5.1, or
rebuild your BDB perl module against 4.8.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
it requires both @sa_username_maps
and @sa_userconf_maps to be set for it to work. I just need to be able to
say to use the additional .cf file for all mail, regardless of user. Is
there a way to do that, or do I need to continue to patch amavisd for that
functionality?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson
};
Basically, I modified it to validate against the quarantine maps for both
cases.
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Saturday, February 19, 2011 10:46 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
On Feb 18, 2011, at 11:34 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de
wrote:
* Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com:
I thought I had noted this to the list a few years ago, but I couldn't
find
($user_config) = c('sa_user_config_file');
amavisd.conf-default:## $sa_user_config_file
So somehow it got lost between pre5 and pre14.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source
--On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 2:22 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
Both sa_userconf_maps and sa_username_maps are mentioned as separate
changes the RELEASE_NOTES, so I don't think that is the case. It looks
like sa_user_config_file itself was completely missed
On Feb 18, 2011, at 11:34 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter p...@state-of-mind.de wrote:
* Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com:
I thought I had noted this to the list a few years ago, but I couldn't find
a record of it. I swear at least one other person said they'd find this
useful. ;)
Quanah
On Feb 18, 2011, at 1:20 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
I've filed a bug with CPAN/RT for this, since I didn't see one filed, and
they just cut a new release that still has this issue present.
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=65888
This is now in the latest
spamassassin happens
to load it in its entirety.
I've filed a bug with CPAN/RT for this, since I didn't see one filed, and
they just cut a new release that still has this issue present.
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=65888
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit
of Net::Server.
According to CPAN, and his own website, the maintainer is Paul Seamons.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical Staff
Zimbra, Inc
A Division of VMware, Inc.
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Tuesday, January 04, 2011 7:23 PM +0100 Christian Roessner
c...@roessner-network-solutions.com wrote:
Hi,
The following patch against Net-Server-0.99 seems to handle it:
Will you be filing a bug against the perl module @ CPAN?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sr. Member of Technical
. In the non working
case, it does not exist in the specified mailbox.
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Thursday, October 07, 2010 8:46 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
I.e.,
The message has been quarantined as: virus-LiJQvMaTPwkW
vs
The message has been quarantined as:
virus-quarantine.e88otn...@qa16.lab.zimbra.com
In the working case, we can find
--On Thursday, October 07, 2010 8:54 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
Also of note, in the working case, the quarantine value is the same as
what is set as $virus_quarantine_to in amavisd.conf.
Oddly, restarting amavis fixed things.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
in amavisd is ready and is in -pre4, the
signing service is in the works and is not included with -pre4.
Mark,
Great news! I look forward to testing with the release that includes it
all. :)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra
readable
to UID under which amavisd is running.
Does this include the ability to have amavis query DKIM signing keys out of
LDAP to provide a scalable solution?
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source
--On Thursday, December 11, 2008 2:46 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
Another thing we want to be able to do is add a disclaimer on a
per-domain basis with altermime, without having to restart amavis all
the time, or to maintain the very large configuration array
...@qa60.lab.zimbra.com
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
If I remove the line:
- Forwarded Message -
it no longer segfaults.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Wednesday, October 14, 2009 4:26 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
Is there any update on this issue? I'm seeing it now as well, although
only on debian5 Ubuntu 8 systems. RHEL, OSX seem unaffected.
Apparently so, I upgraded from 1.3 to 1.32 and it no longer
://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/xml/gsg_xml_txn/cxx/lockingsubsystem.html
Particularly look at the very end of this section:
http://wiki.zimbra.com/index.php?title=OpenLDAP_Performance_Tuning_6.0#Berkeley_DB_DB_CONFIG_tuning
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
--On Thursday, April 30, 2009 2:01 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
I don't see anything immediately in place on this for 2.6.3, at least
announcement wise. Do you have a general timeframe on this (just so I
can update our internal expectations on when this might
for the userprefs bit. Is it possible
to have this in 2.6.5?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
Enter
--On Thursday, December 11, 2008 2:46 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
--On Thursday, December 11, 2008 7:21 PM +0100 Mark Martinec
mark.martinec+ama...@ijs.si wrote:
Would it be practical to store a signing key (in PEM format) in LDAP,
or is it too risky, and storing
@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging
--On Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:23 PM +0100 Mark Martinec
mark.martinec+ama...@ijs.si wrote:
No need to have a static @local_domain_maps prepared from data in LDAP.
Thanks, we've worked out a solution that doesn't involve using
@local_domain_maps.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On February 3, 2009 12:57:46 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
Thanks, although the point I'm trying to get at here, is to avoid doing
things exactly like what you are doing. I.e., Amavis understands and
uses LDAP. Therefore, one should be able to configure
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM
of @local_domain_maps from LDAP instead. So,
is that possible? ;)
Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Monday, February 02, 2009 9:40 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
The question comes from our desire to not put X-SPAM headers on local
domains, usually listed in @local_domains_maps. This becomes a problem,
however, in an environment where you're hosting thousands
--On Wednesday, January 28, 2009 2:22 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
The LDAP.ldif file shipped with amavisd-new in 2.6.2 has:
In fact, for it to work, the following patch needs to be applied:
--- amavisd-new-2.6.2/LDAP.ldif.orig2009-01-28 14:20:45.0 -0800
--On Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:26 AM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
qua...@zimbra.com wrote:
I would like to have amavis query the list of domains from our LDAP
server. However, after reading over README.lookups and README.ldap, I
don't see an obvious way to do this. The amavis schema
The LDAP.ldif file shipped with amavisd-new in 2.6.2 has:
dn: cn=amavisd,cn=schema,cn=config
objectClass: olcSchemaConfig
cn: cn=amavisd
The cn: cn=amavisd line is wrong. It should be:
cn: amavisd
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
considering the best approach.
Ok, I'm happy to help brainstorm on the approach for signing keys. ;) And
having the disclaimer_options_bysender_maps would be great.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source
large configuration array.
Would it be possible to extend amavis to pull this sort of information from
a database such as LDAP or mysql, rather than using the hard coded arrays
it does now?
Thanks,
Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--On Saturday, December 06, 2008 4:59 PM -0800 Quanah Gibson-Mount
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll email one to you on Monday. It's fairly trivial to do with OpenLDAP
(it has a tool that will convert the schema for you).
sent offline.
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
with OpenLDAP
(it has a tool that will convert the schema for you).
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
will be out you'd be stuck with it
for a while :)
Are you going to add the LDAP schema in LDIF form for newer OpenLDAP
installations?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--On Monday, June 23, 2008 9:10 AM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Thursday, June 19, 2008 12:25 PM +0200 Mark Martinec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since debug mode works, it's hard to gather data on why children won't
fork. Any thoughts?
Was the above strace/truss
({
...
background = $daemonize ? 1 : undef,
setsid = $daemonize ? 1 : undef,
but I haven't tried it.
Setting $daemonize = 0; default was one
allows it to run, but I'd really like to understand why it's failing to
fork children happily. :/
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal
-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
-
Check out the new
about discrepancy between
locks requested and locks released in a statistics report) -
For now we are changing $enable_db to 0. I'll revisit this sometime after
we've moved to BDB 4.6.
4.3.29
I would never recommend BDB 4.3 to anyone. ;)
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software
, and it has only hit 2001, how can it
be out of available locker entries?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges
doubtful that BDB is the real culprit. I've see
the Lock table is out of available locker entries be valid in the past, but
in those cases, the data coming back from db_stat -c made sense.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra
, and
gotten no response.
So:
(a) Is it even possible to do what I want
and
(b) Is there any documentation that exists, or can someone provide some
useful examples, if it is possible? :)
Thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
Zimbra
46 matches
Mail list logo