Re: [AMaViS-user] dkim softfail on maillist postings

2010-12-09 Thread Mark Martinec
Benny, > i was reading opendkim readme's, where i found that it could limit how > much of body that it signs dkim l=.. (bodylenght) > > just unsure if thats supported in Mail::DKIM, else i just hope that > maillist dont change my body or remove dkim header so it atleast not > make dkim softfails

Re: [AMaViS-user] dkim softfail on maillist postings

2010-12-08 Thread Benny Pedersen
On man 06 dec 2010 14:58:06 CET, Mark Martinec wrote > mailing lists may still benefit from validating your message > on their input side, like when they run their antispam filters. i was reading opendkim readme's, where i found that it could limit how much of body that it signs dkim l=.. (body

Re: [AMaViS-user] dkim softfail on maillist postings

2010-12-06 Thread Mark Martinec
Benny, > ofthen i see this in postings from me on maillists > > localhost.junc.org (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, body has been > altered) header...@junc.org > > can i tell amavisd-new not to sign body to maillists that modify body ? No, you can't easily tell amavisd not to sign based on a

[AMaViS-user] dkim softfail on maillist postings

2010-12-04 Thread Benny Pedersen
ofthen i see this in postings from me on maillists localhost.junc.org (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, body has been altered) header...@junc.org can i tell amavisd-new not to sign body to maillists that modify body ? -- xpoint