Al Gore?
Lee, w0vt
- Original Message -
From: "ken"
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service"
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 12:19 AM
Subject: [AMRadio] formerly about Microphones
> "Isn't it time we found something else to talk about?"
>
> Ok, We all know that Buzz
"Isn't it time we found something else to talk about?"
Ok, We all know that Buzz Aldrin was the 2nd man to walk on the
moon
Who was the 2nd voice to be transmitted on AM radio?
73,
Ken W2DTC
__
Our Main Website: http://www.am
> Isn't it time we found something else to talk about? My mailbox is
> clogged with mic recommendations!
>
> Thanks and 73,
>
> John, W4AWM
You need to change over to the Digest Mode. That way you receive a bundle
of messages in one e-mail and your in-box doesn't get clogged up whenever
there
Boy Manual Man, you sure are right - I'm just another of those dummies that
doesn't read every word like you guys that have business that service ham
radio. I just have concern about the true intentions of the folks running the
ARRL after their earlier attempts to change the ham radio world.
I
You obviously either ignored, or didn't read, the actual article and the
section that referred to this activity and just read the summary.
It really said: "The Board approved the "establishment of a Study
Committee to study, research and consider developing a plan to move the
US amateur community
The October 2009 QST magazine, page 64, reports the actions of the 2009 second
meeting of the ARRL Board.
The Board approved the "establishment of a Study Committee to study, research
and consider developing a
PLAN TO MOVE THE US AMATEUR COMMUNITY TO NARROWBAND CHANNEL SPACING." (Emphasis
min
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Rob Atkinson wrote:
> Well at the risk of starting another long blowout, I would like to
> meekly make the point that I find some justification in outboard
> processing for AM if will add a little punch and clarity to the
> sidebands and increase the average power
I think that is a real good idea.
I like to limit the frequency response, no point in being real wide, and
control the modulation.
I hear plenty of guys on the air under and over modulating, as well as
operating 2 or more KHz away from where everyone else is operating.
But I don't think you need
Steve I really enjoy that photo/text page of your transmitter project.
http://www.wd8das.net/gates.html
There's nothing like seeing a Gates on a trailer hitch carrier. I can only
imagine what people thought you were a-totin' going down the road.
That's a nice audio setup you described. Is tha
Well at the risk of starting another long blowout, I would like to
meekly make the point that I find some justification in outboard
processing for AM if will add a little punch and clarity to the
sidebands and increase the average power in them. I think since AM in
the U.S. is limited to about hal
I think you mean it as a resolution of .001 volts. Accuracy is
indicated as ±(1.5% + 2digits), which is still pretty accurate.
Although unlike larger DMM's I doubt it has internal adjustment to
recalibrate, so stability of that accuracy is really undefined. For our
ham work it's a good deal
Code didn't work.
Philip LaMarche
LaMarche Enterprises, Inc.
www.instantgourmetspices.com
www.w9dvm.com
800-395-7795 pin 02
727-944-3226
FAX 727-937-8834
NASFT 30210
K3 #1605
CCA 98 00827
CRA 1701
W9DVM
-Original Message-
From: amradio-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:amr
Ah Ha, thanks, I didn't see the code
73,
Ken W2DTC
> Enter source code 99RC1 at checkout and the sale price is $2.99.
>
>
> K7DFW
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mai
> did you mean $10.49 ?
=
Enter source code 99RC1 at checkout and the sale price is $2.99.
K7DFW
..._._
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www
And since it's digital - its accurate to .001 volts.
Probaly as good as my $350.00 Fluke
- Original Message -
From: "ken"
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service"
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] MCM Electronics digital multimeter for $2
did you mean $10.49 ?
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 4:32 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] MCM Electronics digital multimeter for $2.99
> MCM Electronics has a cute digital multimeter for $2.99
>
> http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/72-7940
>
>
>
MCM Electronics has a cute digital multimeter for $2.99
http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/72-7940
Steve WD8DAS
sbjohns...@aol.com
http://www.wd8das.net/
-
Radio is your best entertainment value.
17 matches
Mail list logo
