[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread lucleblanc6
On 11 Nov 2013 at 0:14, George Henry wrote: Actually, after more than 10 years on the market, D-STAR has only about 28,000 registered users worldwide. There are fewer than 2000 active users, worldwide, daily. Many people are wondering why Icom keeps pouring money into something which is

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread Steve May
The unique feature of D-STAR for amateur use is that if a user doesn't like the price, or doesn't like the fact that ICOM is using an AMBE chip, or doesn't like ICOM because they capitalize every letter in their name, or because they think that the gubment is going to break down their door because

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread Rob
It would benefit the amateur community more to get support behind NON-PROPRIETARY OPEN PROTOCOLS and SYSTEMS like FreeDV, Speex and Codec2. Why subject yourself to the AMBE TAX ??? de ka2pbt On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Steve May steve.w5...@gmail.com wrote: The unique feature of D-STAR

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread Gordon JC Pearce
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:34:58AM +, Rob wrote: It would benefit the amateur community more to get support behind NON-PROPRIETARY OPEN PROTOCOLS and SYSTEMS like FreeDV, Speex and Codec2. Why subject yourself to the AMBE TAX ??? Furthermore, if I want to use digital voice to talk to

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread Paul Stoetzer
An interesting idea would be trying a FreeDV QSO via satellite. I've made a few QSOs with it on HF and it's an interesting mode. Obviously it's full duty-cycle, so any attempts should be limited to just a few tests, but I'm sure it would work. 73, Paul, N8HM On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:52 AM,

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread Dominic Hawken
On 11 Nov 2013, at 11:52, Gordon JC Pearce gordon...@gjcp.net wrote: On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:34:58AM +, Rob wrote: It would benefit the amateur community more to get support behind NON-PROPRIETARY OPEN PROTOCOLS and SYSTEMS like FreeDV, Speex and Codec2. Why subject yourself to the

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread damon runion
Well back in the days of AM and when SSB came out it was the same thinking then BUT what has happened to AM . Same thing with DSTAR it is growing and will grow . Thats what makes ham radio so much fun, there is something for everyone 73,s Damon On 11/11/13, George Henry ka3...@att.net wrote:

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread Joe
d star may be all ok on paths where it is a perfect signal, but nywhere that there is QSB or QRM or QRN it is dead in the water and is useless. And 90% of Amateur radio has those issues to deal with. Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread K2AK - Jeff
Great point! Hi Angelo, Jeff - K2AK (X-K7WIN) -Original Message- From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Angelo Glorioso Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 8:57 AM To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: D STAR When GO32 was running, we

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread n0jy
I use D-STAR Digital Data on 1.2 GHz for my Winlink RMS Packet CMS connection, 24/7. The Pactor 3 mode that I use for Winlink HF forwarding is proprietary. But nobody else has come up with anything near as good (yet). So a lot of hams use it because it does the job well. We use D-STAR DD 1.2

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread Stefan Wagener
Yes, It could work as long as software for doppler control (eg SatPc32) can invoke the smaller frequency changes which it actually can (see my other note on the IC-9100). So you would use the built-in DSTAR module for uplink or downlink and the 9600 packet mode with a GMSK node adapter for the

[amsat-bb] FUNcube-1 Interview on BBC Radio

2013-11-11 Thread M5AKA
I believe the BBC recording should be available worldwide, let me know if it isn't. See http://amsat-uk.org/2013/11/11/funcube-1-on-bbc-radio/ 73 Trevor M5AKA AMSAT-UK website http://amsat-uk.org/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/pages/AMSAT-UK/208113275898396 Twitter

[amsat-bb] FUNcube-1 Project Update

2013-11-11 Thread Graham Shirville
Hi All, Our software team is working feverishly to complete the FUNcube Dashboard software that we will be using to decode and display the telemetry that will be transmitted from the spacecraft on 145.935 MHz. Whilst they finish their work here are some provisional pre-launch keps. We may

[amsat-bb] ISS and the TS 2000

2013-11-11 Thread Rich/wa4bue
Hi all, The K4AMG CLUB is using the TS 2000 and SATPC32. In SAT mode the program or the transceiver gives an uplink and down link frequency. The ISS is simplex. Is it possible to work a simplex mode to the ISS with this configuration? God Bless R W4BUE

[amsat-bb] Re: ISS and the TS 2000

2013-11-11 Thread Jeff Moore
ISS voice contacts are NOT simplex. They are just not cross-band. You have a different uplink and downlink frequency but within the same band similar to a conventional repeater. You should be able to set both the software and the radio to the correct frequencies. 7 3 Jeff Moore -- KE7ACY

[amsat-bb] Re: ISS and the TS 2000

2013-11-11 Thread John Fickes
Rich SATPC32ISS should fix you up. Look at SATPC32 in your programs folder, it should be there. I'm not sure about the TS 2000, I use Icom 910 but that shouldn't matter. With SATPC32ISS it should set your radio int split mode with the 2 frequencies that you need for voice. However if you are

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread George Henry
FreeDV would probably work on the transponder birds if your doppler update was fast enough... it has built-in AFC. Your only chance to try it on an FM bird would probably be in the middle of the night... George, KA3HSW - Original Message - From: Paul Stoetzer n...@arrl.net To:

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread Tony Langdon
On 11/11/13 6:44 PM, Gordon JC Pearce wrote: On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:14:26AM -0600, George Henry wrote: There are very good reasons why no other amateur radio manufacturer will touch it. George, KA3HSW What, apart from encryption being illegal on the amateur bands? Without a radical

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread Tony Langdon
On 12/11/13 12:17 AM, Paul Stoetzer wrote: An interesting idea would be trying a FreeDV QSO via satellite. I've made a few QSOs with it on HF and it's an interesting mode. Obviously it's full duty-cycle, so any attempts should be limited to just a few tests, but I'm sure it would work. I

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR

2013-11-11 Thread Tony Langdon
On 12/11/13 3:25 AM, Stefan Wagener wrote: Yes, It could work as long as software for doppler control (eg SatPc32) can invoke the smaller frequency changes which it actually can (see my other note on the IC-9100). So you would use the built-in DSTAR module for uplink or downlink and the 9600

[amsat-bb] FreeDV (was: D STAR)

2013-11-11 Thread Tony Langdon
On 12/11/13 4:10 PM, George Henry wrote: FreeDV would probably work on the transponder birds if your doppler update was fast enough... it has built-in AFC. Your only chance to try it on an FM bird would probably be in the middle of the night... I'd be looking at using FreeDV with the linear

[amsat-bb] Re: D STAR - try freeDV instead

2013-11-11 Thread Ross Whenmouth
Hi, Rather than trying to get a D-Star radio to QSY in less than 5 kHz steps, you could try freeDV with your existing SSB transceivers? D-Star occupies 6.25 kHz bandwidth on the transponder, but freeDV only needs 1.25 kHz (half of a normal SSB voice emission). You can get freeDV