no, that was a PLUGIN, and it uses a dbus-whatever command line utility to
listen to dbus... I'm talking about writing a C extension to add
new commands to the Tcl interpreter... it's not the same.. we'll need jonne to
answer us, but I do think he started working on that..
KKRT
On Fri, Aug 18,
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:11:38PM -0400, Philippe Khalaf wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:37:45 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Youness Alaoui) wrote:
AFAIK there are some tools that automatically generate C code for binding
any function from a C library, this can be
used in order to quickly
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:48:06AM +0200, Ole Andr? Vadla Ravn?s wrote:
On 8/19/06, Philippe Khalaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:21:15 +0200
Harry Vennik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Finally I found some time to document some of my ideas in more detail.
The
Hi all,
I read the thread, and I already see that it is not particularly going in the
right direction. Why? Python vs. TCL is not the thing to be discussed here.
Of course Python has a lot of very very useful bindings, and TCL is missing
some, but, what about the knowledge in the team? And,
Hi,
I will try to reply to all mails in one... But Youness already did many
replies.
First when you proposed Python, I was sure that Youness won't be agree with
that :p (By the way, you should maybe try Python once because I think it's a
really good language). But it's clear I think it will be
Sorry, accidental send. it's not quite complete...
Op zaterdag 19 augustus 2006 13:07, schreef Harry Vennik:
Hi all,
I read the thread, and I already see that it is not particularly going in
the right direction. Why? Python vs. TCL is not the thing to be discussed
here. Of course Python has
Op zaterdag 19 augustus 2006 13:09, schreef Philippe Valembois - Phil:
Hi,
I will try to reply to all mails in one... But Youness already did many
replies.
First when you proposed Python, I was sure that Youness won't be agree with
that :p (By the way, you should maybe try Python once because
I just got up just to see a big thread so I can't say I read
everything carefully, but IIRC (before I switched kde's language to
English) I couldn't get wxWidgets to display utf-8 characters. Does
anyone have any experience on that? IIRC audacity uses wxWidgets
(yeah, looks ugly to me), so please:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:50:37 -0400
Philippe Khalaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
still work on aMSN1. Added avantage is easy porting to another toolkit.
If someone decides he wants a GTK+ aMSN2, he can fork the Python core
and write his own UI.
s/GTK+/QT
Regards,
Philippe
Regards,
Philippe
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:37:45 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Youness Alaoui) wrote:
AFAIK there are some tools that automatically generate C code for binding any
function from a C library, this can be
used in order to quickly generate the bindings...
What tools? They will generate bindings for TCL
Hi Youness, thanks for your help, but the regexp is not the problem,
but the different window managers reporting different and strange
geometrys. The thing is, I used some code in wiki.tcl.tk to get the
windows decoration size (title bar and decorations). To find out this
size, you need to find
On 8/19/06, Youness Alaoui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:48:06AM +0200, Ole Andr? Vadla Ravn?s wrote: On 8/19/06, Philippe Khalaf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:21:15 +0200 Harry Vennik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Finally I found some time to
Op zaterdag 19 augustus 2006 16:38, schreef Ole André Vadla Ravnås:
that already happened and you can read the thread if you want... but as you
said, pros and cons for everything, but I think in our situation Tcl has a
far greater pros/cons ratio than any other language (I'm talking about the
On 8/19/06, Harry Vennik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op zaterdag 19 augustus 2006 16:38, schreef Ole André Vadla Ravnås: that already happened and you can read the thread if you want... but as you said, pros and cons for everything, but I think in our situation Tcl has a
far greater pros/cons ratio
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:59:12PM +0200, Harry Vennik wrote:
Op zaterdag 19 augustus 2006 13:09, schreef Philippe Valembois - Phil:
Hi,
I will try to reply to all mails in one... But Youness already did many
replies.
First when you proposed Python, I was sure that Youness won't be agree
This looks like a flame war between python and tcl... and I don't want to start
the debate again.
You looked offended by my mail, I have no idea why, but in that case, sorry.
I'll stop the discussion there as none of us can be convinced of who is right,
and noone really knows who is right...
Le Saturday 19 August 2006 21:47, Youness Alaoui a écrit :
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:59:12PM +0200, Harry Vennik wrote:
Op zaterdag 19 augustus 2006 13:09, schreef Philippe Valembois - Phil:
Hi,
I will try to reply to all mails in one... But Youness already did many
replies.
First
And here we get exactly to where I was in my other mail when I
accidentally pressed the send button. We need to get that GUI thing
set. It has been discussed a thousand of times now, so it's time to get
it in some direction. To put it in a few questions:
- What is our goal?
Le Saturday 19 August 2006 23:24, Harry Vennik a écrit :
And here we get exactly to where I was in my other mail when I
accidentally pressed the send button. We need to get that GUI thing
set. It has been discussed a thousand of times now, so it's time to
get it in some direction.
On 8/19/06, Youness Alaoui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks like a flame war between python and tcl... and I don't want to start the debate again.You looked offended by my mail, I have no idea why, but in that case, sorry.I'll stop the discussion there as none of us can be convinced of who is
Op zaterdag 19 augustus 2006 23:34, schreef Philippe Valembois - Phil:
But anway, I think you are wrong in saying 'This way, if you want to
create a new window, no need to upgrade GUI modules.' They will need to
be updated to include a command to show the new window, as well as to
handle
You get the principle but I would like to do something better than using
callbacks for events... Or at least use an event layer between GUI and proc
that do the things...
I think XML2GUI should be a relatively simple thing to do isn't it ?
The hard work is to begin the spec for the XML and after
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:51:44 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Youness Alaoui) wrote:
This looks like a flame war between python and tcl... and I don't want to
start the debate again.
You looked offended by my mail, I have no idea why, but in that case, sorry.
I'll stop the discussion there as none
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:51:44 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Youness Alaoui) wrote:
This looks like a flame war between python and tcl... and I don't want to
start the debate again.
You looked offended by my mail, I have no idea why, but in that case, sorry.
I'll stop the discussion there as none
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:20:22 +0200
Philippe Valembois - Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You get the principle but I would like to do something better than using
callbacks for events... Or at least use an event layer between GUI and proc
that do the things...
I think XML2GUI should be a
You mean python cons where you say TCL cons at one point.
Having learned python, you get used to the indentation very fast. I
wouldn't list it as a big con. You get very readable code as a result
as well. Its debatable.
Another Pro is I can do more than sit on the sidelines and listen to
this
26 matches
Mail list logo
