Thanks. I've downloaded the source and will attempt to make
the changes to include the Query String in a PageView determiniation.
Any suggestions on which module I might find the related logic?
If not, don't worry about it, I'll search.
Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen T
>
> I believe my problem is perhaps not understanding if the PAGEINCLUDE
> command is syntatically correct for including Query Strings. I've done it
> the way the documention implies, I believe. (Granted, I don't believe I
> seen any documentation stating the appending of Query String to Reques
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Scott Spence wrote:
>
> So I am back to the beginning - does anyone know how to make browser names
> case INsensitive? (CASE INSENSITIVE does not work :-()
>
Browser names _are_ case sensitive, and analog properly recognises them as
such.
However, if you want a case sensiti
On Mon, 6 May 2002, melinda Yuan wrote:
> Hi Stephen:
>
> Thank you for your advise.
> I did add "BRowser on #Browser Summary" in the analog.cfg, and run the
> analog again. But it's still not working. Do I miss something here?
>
What was the error message?
--
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK
I've read that page dozens of times.
Here is my LOGFORMAT (MS-Extended, btw)
LOGFORMAT (%Y-%m-%d %h:%n:%j %s %j %r %q %c %j %j %b %T HTTP/%j %B %j %f)
(you see the %r for the Request and %q is for the Query String)
LOGFILE d:\temp\efx1\ex020419.log
OUTFILE d:\temp\efx1\report.html
PAGEEXCLUDE
voytek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2002 14:20:19 +0100, Aengus wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a few of these in such a format:
>>> E:\analog]dir \users\sbt.net.au\logs\access*
>>>
>>> ...
>>> 29/09/97 18:37394 0 access.sep2997.gz
>>> 1/10/98 0:08 12326 0
On Tue, 7 May 2002 14:20:19 +0100, Aengus wrote:
>Yes. A scheduled batch file runs with the permissions of the scheduler,
>which doesn't necessarily have the same rights to access the log file as
>you do when you run the batchfile yourself.
it's not permissions or rights issue, I've checked
>
>>
Gilman, Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: Aengus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>> Gilman, Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> is there any way to run analog with the files as they are?
>>>
>>> if not--what is the standard date format that analog reads? i was
>>> thinking about creating a
voytek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2002 10:14:31 +0100, Aengus wrote:
>
>> "Failed to open logfile" means that Analog couldn't find the file,
>> or it didn't have permission to open it. I presume you are
>> generating this output manually, and not running Analog from a
>> scheduled
thanks for this. after i've added the date will i need to create a unique
LOGFORMAT for analog to read the report properly? thanks for your help. the
perl script is working well.
-Original Message-
From: Aengus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
with Analog 3.x and 4, I have used these in the cfg:
...
LOGFILE \users\sbt.net.au\logs\access*
LOGFILE \users\sbt.net.au\logs\www*
...
that worked purrfectly, processing a bunch of access* logs, as well as, a bundle of
www* logs
now that I tried to run Analog 5.22, it doesn't seem to accept m
On Tue, 7 May 2002 10:14:31 +0100, Aengus wrote:
>"Failed to open logfile" means that Analog couldn't find the file, or it
>didn't have permission to open it. I presume you are generating this
>output manually, and not running Analog from a scheduled batch file?
well both. is there a differe
Voytek Eymont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [K:\analog]analog +gsbt.net.au.cfg
> analog: analog version 5.22/OS2
> analog: Warning F: Failed to open logfile
> k:\users\sbt.net.au\logs\access*: ignoring it
> (For help on all errors and warnings, see docs/errors.html)
>
> using these
>
> LOGFILE
13 matches
Mail list logo
