[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2010-01-08 Thread bklik
I'm having the same issue. I'm behind an authenticated proxy so I can't install the SDK. I've tried everything. On Dec 31 2009, 9:13 am, teryz teryzpl...@gmail.com wrote: I have a problem using AndroidSDKUpdater (revision 4). For the record I'm under win xp 32-bits, jdk 1.6. I set up the

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-31 Thread teryz
I have a problem using Android SDK Updater (revision 4). For the record I'm under win xp 32-bits, jdk 1.6. I set up the Force https://... sources to be fetched using http:// This seemed to work fine but as I am behing a (corporate) proxy I also filled the proxy server and port settings,

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-28 Thread redkrzy
Hi, With this new modular approach of SDK, i would like to move between development platforms like between linux and windows. Is it possible to reduce the download size of the android platforms i.e. 1.6/2.0/2.0.1 etc... I am sure it is quite possible as mostly only the prebuilt (may be

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-13 Thread SangHyunLee
Android has been active in Korea, I wish it soon! However, Korea has not said that ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group,

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-10 Thread arun
Hi, I have Android 1.5 Platform on my machine. I just installed the latest version i.e. 2.0.1 using the android- sdk_r04-windows.zip available online. I am using Eclipse Galileo IDE. I have few questions on this, 1 Can i switch to the new version by just changing the preference in the IDE to

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-10 Thread arun
Hi, I had Android 1.5 installed on windows XP with Eclipse Galileo as IDE. I downloaded the latest Android SDK 2.0.1 from http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html and unzipped to My question is, 1 Can I switch to the new SDK by pointing in Eclipse IDE in the preference to the installed dir

Re: [android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-07 Thread Xavier Ducrohet
actually it's the same. installing 1.6_r2 wipes the 1.6_r1 folder (which is why you get a lock error if it fails to do so. It is completely safe to manually delete the 1.6_r1 folder and then get r2. Xav On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Sekhar sek...@allurefx.com wrote: Right, but my point is:

Re: [android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-07 Thread Xavier Ducrohet
This is because your manifest says minSdkVersion=6 but your droid is still running 2.0 with api 5. Until all droids have received 2.0.1 you should keep minSdkVersion to 5. Xav On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:17 AM, George Scott bud...@gmail.com wrote: My development system: Windows 7 64-bit, 4GB

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-07 Thread Sekhar
Actually, the original error said that r1 was being moved to a temp directory (not removed); but I see now it was probably just to handle errors during r2 install so it can roll back to r1 if necessary. So, all good - I guess deleting the platforms directory is the best way to handle this issue

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-06 Thread adamphillips12
Thanks for this response, I didn't mean to come off as rude but I was more frustrated than anything, I did some long thinking and approached my drawables differently, There are redundancies yes but I suppose no system is going to be perfect stretching over 4 SDKs. I know it might not seem like

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-06 Thread David Müller
I succeeded the update (even with sdk r3) without having to resort to snicklefritz ;-) - Quit eclipse - Killed adb.exe in Task Manager - Started SDK Path\SDK Setup.exe - Ran the update (some eclipse freezes omitted for cleanliness...) - restarted eclipse - everything runs fine! Cheers,

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-06 Thread David Blythman
Yes, I had exactly the same problem last night, with no apparent other running program blocking the folder renaming. In the end I just quit Eclipse and deleted the particular 1.6 r1 folder manually in Explorer (Windows 7 64-bit), after which the update ran without problems. (Before that,

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-06 Thread George Scott
My development system: Windows 7 64-bit, 4GB RAM, 2.1 Dual Core notebook Eclipse development issue: I've updated the needed bits for Android development with Eclipse for Java. However, I do not choose to use the emulator, I prefer testing on my Droid mobile phone. When I try to Run my

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-06 Thread Adrian Romanelli
This is what I did, when I came upon the same problem, and it worked for me (Windows 7 x64). C:\Users\Public\android-sdk-windows\toolsandroid Starting Android SDK and AVD Manager SWT folder 'lib\x86_64' does not exist. Please set ANDROID_SWT to point to the folder containing swt.jar for your

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-06 Thread Sekhar
Right, but my point is: if you delete the 1.6 platforms folder, you're going to lose the r1 - you only get 1.6 r2. I.e., you're basically wiping out 1.6 and just picking up the latest. May be OK if you don't need 1.6 r1, but it's not the same as a regular update. On Dec 5, 1:18 am, blindfold

Re: [android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-05 Thread Mark Murphy
Grrr I have yet another issue of the block on my home XP machine. Using the standalone sdk manager, it keeps telling something is locking the tools dir so it can't install tools r4. But I killed adb, closed Eclipse, all Explorers... still won't work. Process Explorer can't find anything

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-05 Thread blindfold
Quitting Eclipse, manually deleting platforms\android-1.6, and restarting Eclipse to run Android SDK and AVD Manager from its Windows menu brought back platforms\android-1.6 with what I presume is a full replacement of the 1.6 folder with the now updated 1.6 content. This is further proven by the

Re: [android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-05 Thread Dianne Hackborn
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:17 PM, adamphillips12 adamphillip...@gmail.comwrote: It was documented like so The SDK version supported by the device, for example v3. The Android 1.0 SDK is v1, the 1.1 SDK is v2, and the 1.5 SDK is v3., if that was supposed to imply that a device supported its

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-04 Thread blindfold
Just had this renaming block again on another system, here running Windows XP SP3. Quitting Eclipse, manually deleting the platforms \android-1.6 folder, and relaunching Eclipse to run Android SDK and AVD Manager from its Windows menu again fixed the problem. Looks like there is something not

Re: [android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-04 Thread Dianne Hackborn
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:35 PM, adamphillips12 adamphillip...@gmail.comwrote: The framework now correctly selects application resources in project folders that use the API Level qualifier. For example, drawable-v4/ is a folder of drawable resources for API Level 4 (or higher) devices. This

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-04 Thread Sekhar
Yeah, that was the first thing I tried (kill-server), but adb will get started again automatically, so that doesn't help. I'd also tried deleting adb.exe from tools\ in the hope it would'nt get started, but then I can't even bring up the SDK/AVD manager to do the update. Also, blindfold: deleting

Re: [android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-04 Thread Mark Murphy
Yeah, that was the first thing I tried (kill-server), but adb will get started again automatically, so that doesn't help. I'd also tried deleting adb.exe from tools\ in the hope it would'nt get started, but then I can't even bring up the SDK/AVD manager to do the update. Also, blindfold:

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-04 Thread Sekhar
Unfortunately, that won't work since the SDK/AVD manager will refer to the its own stuff (platforms, etc.) regardless of how you start it. I.e., you can't run the manager from one directory and have it refer to the platforms in another directory. Looks like the install process is basically broken

Re: [android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-04 Thread Xavier Ducrohet
adb isn't run from the 1.6 folder so that should have no impact. If you're having problem, I would suggest updating to the tools r4 first (or ADT 0.9.5) and then try 1.6_R2. The new SDK Manager is a better at dealing with this. Also, if you have an anti-virus you should temporarily disable it as

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-04 Thread Sekhar
Well, if I check the file location for the adb.exe program in Task Manager, it's showing as from the 1.6 r1 tools/ directory (I have the SDK set as 1.6 r1 in Eclipse, that's it's launching that - if I change to 1.5, it loads the adb.exe from 1.5 tools/, but that doesn't help). And yes, I do have

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-04 Thread Sekhar
Not working for me. The standalone manager won't connect to the SSL url (https://dl-ssl.google.com/android/repository/repository.xml); and if I make it http, it won't find compatible updates. This is really frustrating, can't believe such a basic install issue managed to slip through the cracks.

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-04 Thread adamphillips12
Sorry Dianne, my reply was intended for public, hit Reply to author by accident: It was documented like so The SDK version supported by the device, for example v3. The Android 1.0 SDK is v1, the 1.1 SDK is v2, and the 1.5 SDK is v3., if that was supposed to imply that a device supported its most

Re: [android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-04 Thread Raphael
Sorry for the frustration. You should get the exact same updates whether you are using the https or the http link. R/ On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Sekhar sek...@allurefx.com wrote: Not working for me. The standalone manager won't connect to the SSL url

Re: [android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-04 Thread Raphael
Grrr I have yet another issue of the block on my home XP machine. Using the standalone sdk manager, it keeps telling something is locking the tools dir so it can't install tools r4. But I killed adb, closed Eclipse, all Explorers... still won't work. Process Explorer can't find anything using that

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-03 Thread adamphillips12
The framework now correctly selects application resources in project folders that use the API Level qualifier. For example, drawable-v4/ is a folder of drawable resources for API Level 4 (or higher) devices. This version matching did not work properly and has been fixed. Did anyone realise this

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-03 Thread Sekhar
I'm not able to update 1.6 r1 to 1.6 r2 in Eclipse on Windows, it's throwing an error A folder failed to be renamed or moved. Looks like adb.exe that's running is preventing a move to temp. Anyone else having this problem? On Dec 3, 3:38 pm, Jason Chen jasonc...@google.com wrote: Hey, folks.

Re: [android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-03 Thread Mark Murphy
I'm not able to update 1.6 r1 to 1.6 r2 in Eclipse on Windows, it's throwing an error A folder failed to be renamed or moved. Looks like adb.exe that's running is preventing a move to temp. Anyone else having this problem? Run adb kill-server, or reboot, and try again. You probably have an

[android-developers] Re: Updates to the Android SDK

2009-12-03 Thread blindfold
Yes, I had exactly the same problem last night, with no apparent other running program blocking the folder renaming. In the end I just quit Eclipse and deleted the particular 1.6 r1 folder manually in Explorer (Windows 7 64-bit), after which the update ran without problems. (Before that, the