> I agree users con be confused by the different dists, but if we label it
> andromda-src-3.0-RC1-light.zip or something it should be easy to
> understand (most open source projects that do this simply append 'LE'
> (light edition))
>
> [CB] What's the purpose though? Didn't you just say in the p
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wouter Zoons
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 11:16 AM
To: 'Chad Brandon'
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Andromda-devel] andromda distribution
Well .. I think 33MB really i
ists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Andromda-devel] andromda distribution
>
> I donât think we need a light distribution, whatâs wrong with downloading
> 33 MB? I think it would just complicate the build (more to maintain) and
> make it more difficult for users to know what distributi
isnât much
anyway).
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wouter Zoons
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 12:46 AM
To: 'Chad Brandon'
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [Andromda-devel] andromda distribution
T
ECTED]On Behalf Of Wouter
ZoonsSent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 8:46 AMTo: 'Chad
Brandon'Cc: [email protected]:
[Andromda-devel] andromda distribution
The current build weighs in at
around 33MB, wouls it make sense to create a ‘light edition’ which t
The current build weighs in at around 33MB, wouls it make
sense to create a ‘light edition’ which takes up less space ?
we could leave out these things:
/lib
/samples
/docs.zip
The download would be around only 2 MB in that case
I think it would be interesting, I mean, wh
