Re: [Anima] Call for agenda ANIMA @ IETF 101, London

Hi, Michael, Even the draft would be with IETF, it is needed to report the changes to WG since the last report. 10 mins is fine, remote report is fine, too. Regards, Sheng -Original Message- From: Anima [mailto:anima-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Michael H. Behringer Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [Anima] Review comments//RE: WGLC on draft-ietf-anima-reference-model-05 - Respond by January 22nd, 2018

Inline... On 28/02/18 15:36, Sheng Jiang wrote: Hi Michael, Thanks for addressing my review comments. Below in lines for my further comments regarding to several points. None of them are major. So, I will start my document shepherd based on the current 06 version. It is up to you to do a

Re: [Anima] Call for agenda ANIMA @ IETF 101, London

Hi Sheng, Not sure we need a slot for the reference model. I guess it should now go to the IESG, right? Up to you. If we have time, I could do a short 10 min update. I won't be in person in London, but can present remotely. Michael On 28/02/18 06:56, Sheng Jiang wrote: Hi, all anima, We

Re: [Anima] Proto 41 [Shepherd review draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-09]

On 07/03/2018 07:27, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> > a) The above "transport-proto /= 41" is technically an update to > >> > GRASP RFC which allows only UDP / TCP. There is some process around > >> > >> really? > >>

Re: [Anima] Proto 41 [Shepherd review draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-09]

Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> > a) The above "transport-proto /= 41" is technically an update to >> > GRASP RFC which allows only UDP / TCP. There is some process around >> >> really? >> QUESTION to Brian. > It's an extension, which seems to